The Norris Group Blog

California Real Estate Headline Roundup

Posts Tagged ‘reo’

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 3/9/12

Friday, March 9th, 2012

Sources:
One Georgia Bank Closed Friday; Tally Is Now 12
Foreclosure Sales Outpace Modifications for January
Real Estate Outlook: Pending Home Sales Trend Upward
Consumers shed debt, cut mortgage balances
Repeat foreclosures hit an all-time high in January
Reported Mortgage Fraud Filings Increased in Q3
Home price declines resilient against REO saturation: Clear Capital
Private sector adds 216,000 jobs in February
Initial Unemployment Claims Rise For Third Straight Week
Judicial Watch sues FHFA over MBS disclosures
FHA to Lower Insurance Premiums for Mortgage Refis
FHA to lower refinance premiums
Wells Fargo’s CFO Says Branches May Be Closed, Merged
BofA Makes a Deal on Side

Today’s News Synopsis:

In this week’s video, Aaron Norris gives the news of the week in the world of real estate and other big news of the week.  The pay for the chief executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was cut this week by the FHFA.  227,000 new jobs were added in February, although the unemployment rate remains unchanged at 8.3%.  Freddie mac asked for another $146 million from the Treasury.

In The News:

Housing Wire“Government-held REO halved during robo-signing freeze” (3-9-12)

“The government cut its inventory of foreclosed homes by half in 2011.  Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Department of Housing and Urban Development held roughly 150,700 REO properties as of Dec. 31, down 49% from the 296,000 at the end of 2010, according to an analysis of their collective financial statements.”

Bloomberg“Ghost of Fannie Mae Haunts Canadian Housing as Exposure Worsens: Mortgages” (3-9-12)

“The Canadian housing agency’s vulnerability to mortgage defaults has soared nine-fold in 20 years, approaching levels reached by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the U.S. at the height of the housing boom. Canada Mortgage & Housing Corp. says its finances are secure unless the country plunges into deep recession for several years.”

Realty Times“Fixed-rate Mortgages Remain at or Near All-time Lows” (3-9-12)

“In Freddie Mac’s results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®), fixed-rate mortgages are at or near their 60-year lows helping to drive record high homebuyer affordability. The 15-year fixed, a popular choice among refinance borrowers, averaged a new all-time record low of 3.13 percent.”

DS News - “Payrolls Up 227,000 in February; Unemployment Rate Steady” (3-9-12)

“The nation added 227,000 jobs in February – the seventh straight month of 100,000-plus payroll gains, the longest such string since 2005 – as the unemployment rate held steady at 8.3 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday morning.”

San Francisco Chronicle“Apple growth helps fuel Silicon Valley office boom” (3-9-12)

“Apple is helping fuel the biggest Silicon Valley office-leasing boom since the dot-com era, as the fast-growing company waits for its futuristic new “spaceship” headquarters to land.  Office occupancy in the region rose by 2.7 million square feet last year, the most since 2000, and rents may advance 11 percent to an average $36 a square foot in 2012, according to brokerage Cassidy Turley.”

Housing Wire“FHFA axes executive pay at Fannie and Freddie” (3-9-12)

“The Federal Housing Finance Agency in its role as conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac significantly reduced the amount of pay chief executive officers at the firm will earn in the future.”

DS News“Florida MLS Requires Agents to State If Property Is Bank-Owned” (3-9-12)

“A multiple listing service (MLS) based in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida is requiring real estate agents to disclose if a property they are listing is bank-owned.”

Housing Wire“Freddie Mac to request $146 million from Treasury” (3-9-12)

“Freddie Mac requested another $146 million from the Treasury Department for the three months ended Dec. 31.  The GSE reported $619 million in net income for the fourth quarter, plus an additional $887 million in other income.”

Inman“Mortgage deduction limits: per residence, not per person” (3-9-12)

“Last week brought bad news for wealthy unmarried couples who own homes together. The U.S. Tax Court held that the $1.1 million limit on the mortgage interest deduction must be applied per residence, not per taxpayer, even where the co-owners are unmarried and file separate tax return.”

Los Angeles Times“Bank of America to reduce principal for up to 200,000 homeowners” (3-9-12)

“Home prices and sales remain fragile as foreclosure starts ticked up in January, according to the latest housing scorecard from the Obama administration.”

Hard Money Loan Closed

Victorville, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $48,000 on a 4 bedroom, 2 bathroom home appraised for $81,000.

California Real Estate Investor Events:

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Evening with the Leaders of the Real Estate Industry on March 13, 2012

The Norris Group posted a new event. Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Downey Association of Realtors on March 14, 2012

Looking Back:

Mortgage applications increased 15.5% the previous week, according to the MBA. UCLA economists predicted California’s unemployment rate would remain above 10% until 2013. Freddie Mac’s level of REO properties grew 145.7% over the past two years. Obama threatened to veto bills terminating the Federal Housing Administration’s Short Refi and the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Emergency Homeowner Loan Program.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

268-TNGRadio – Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest 3-10-12

Friday, March 9th, 2012

Shawn Watkins


Shawn Watkins

Investors Workshops

(Full Bio)

Angel Bronsgeest


Angel Bronsgeest

Real Estate Investor

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined once again by Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest. Both own the Investors Workshops in Orange County, and they have supported I Survived Real Estate every year that it has been around as well as have around 200 doors in Ogden, Utah.

Shawn first decided to create his own club when he was going to Nick Manfredi’s club at the Inland Empire Investors Forum. He really enjoyed his club, but he lived in Orange County away from his club and had to keep commuting out to him. Anybody who knows the 91 freeway knows if you do not get on the freeway by 2:00, you are not getting where you need to go very quickly. After doing this for several months, he went up to Nick and told him he wanted to start a club in Orange County. He ended up modeling the Investors workshops off the style of the club that Nick had. He did not pay his speakers, but he did pick them. He started the Investors Workshops in 2003 in Orange County chiefly because he was tired of not coming home until midnight, and he wanted to do things more efficiently. It was a large commitment for a small meeting, and Bruce has felt the same way. You realize it was a one day commitment, a one and a half hour talk, but it took all day. Some of it you just do because you love it, and ultimately these are the people who have great clubs.

In 2003 and 2006-07, there was a lot of interest because there was nothing you could do that would mess up. You had to be quick with any real estate you could touch. You did not have to be too smart; get in, get out, hope that it fell out of escrow at least once, then have a price increase and net more at the end. There was a lot of backslapping and congratulations. It seemed everybody had money, and nobody was afraid to flash it. In that mindset, you are casual about the decision process because you are blinded by the risk. Bruce and a lot of people he knew made some decisions they later regretted. Bruce said he should have read the book that he read once a year for money, and it was just one more lesson he had learned. Sometimes you have too many big chunks, and you realize there are some things you just cannot do.

When you owned a club in 2008 and 2009, there was a very different group sitting there. There was most likely a lot of damage and absence of people. Attendance was flagged, and Shawn began getting several voicemails of people asking if he knew anyone who did a short sale. The last time these words were uttered was in the late 90s. It is like the vocabulary does not exist for a generation, and we had quite a run. From 1998 until about 2007, there were people who did not even know what the REO department was. Short sales were even more remote. You had investors basically trying to figure out how to cut bait. There were multiple properties in multiple cities in multiple states.

Mike Cantu and Shawn Watkins told several stories about being loaded up with sub-divisions and properties, looking at them, and having to make a very hard decision. The stories were so overwhelming. When somebody comes up to you and says they have 30 houses in five different states, and none of them are worth even close to what is owed, then Shawn sees this makes people sick both physically and mentally. It is hard because you do not want to be the person who says it’s over and they need to let it go. Nobody else is wiling to tell them this, and the ones with the real estate clubs must be the only ones who know how to do it right. It is a very valuable experience to sit in this seat once in your life because it gives you perspective that you would not have sitting across from someone else who is there. It is not a permanent position; you will get a chance to own again, but it will not happen again within the next six months. You need to make a decision that takes you off of the pressurized seat you are on because it is not fun receiving certified mail; and you just need to give yourself a break. You were a renter before, and you can be a renter for a while. You just need to give people permission to go back and have that moment where they don’t have to have that stamp showing they owe something, which is kind of a badge of importance.

In order to have face-to-face conversation with someone one-on-one, then you sometimes have to be willing to have an uncomfortable conversation with them. They are going be more apt to tell you the things that are really going on since it is not going to be solely about the houses they own in twenty different states. There are other things going on, and they are more than willing to tell you this. Once you approach this and offer them solutions and conclusions to where you can help them stay afloat, then you create this trust. The people who go to their club who are members are people who know they can trust Shawn and Angel. This is very apparent by the way they have stayed and continued attending their club.

When you have this experience personally, you will sometimes sit across from someone who owns a house who is about to make a wrong decision since they do not want to sell it too low or on terms. The other choices here are leaving your family where they are and going somewhere else such as North Dakota. This way you have some legitimate ammunition and can tell someone if they need to reconsider a deal. You really can get stronger than you ever would because you realize you are really trying to help this person to not compound. We have a tendency to double-up. For instance, when penny stocks were doing badly, Bruce’s first reaction was instead of selling everything to buy more so his cost was less. This is called leveraging down. Leveraging down is lowering your cost on the worst decision you have made in the past. Bruce wondered if it would be smarter to make a new intelligent decision on the best investment in the future. However, you are still stuck with the evidence that you owe a specific stock at too high a price. You then say, “Let’s own twice as much at a lower price.” Sometimes this is what people do in real estate. They really feel they messed up in one area, so they need to fix it in another.

Bruce knows one person who sells bulk homes in Detroit, Michigan twenty at a time for $100 grand. He has mostly California investors buy them, and it has really worked out for him. However, his disclosure is rather hilarious. First, the home may no longer exist, so you are buying them in a pile. There is this spectrum of damage that is going to happen a certain percentage of the time. Second, if it does exist it may have tax liens on it exceeding its value. Nobody goes to see the houses because they are trying to make up for the damage in one area by a super deal that is obviously going to work out at $5 grand a pop. This is when they reconsider their decision. Shawn has seen this over the last few years. He watches people’s business model and looks at what they were buying a little over four years ago. He watched and listened, and for the ones who were gracious enough to ask him why his margin had shrunk so much, their honest answer was there was nothing much else they could do.

Shawn said if he wants a specific deal, he is going to keep buying since the margins are lower. Eventually they will get better again; but the question is what makes people think this is even the case that they will get better. If you buy more now and pay more for it so you can be in the game later, then you should ask yourself if you would consider doing something in real estate a little different. This way, you do not have so much exposure. Bruce does not completely discount the fact that you stay in the game since his company is evidence of one that had to pay higher prices than they thought they would have to originally. However, he also understands that when the shifts happen you sometimes have to control the numbers. He also understands the decisions mentioned prior do not have to be made in a negative fashion.

Shawn will use The Norris Group as an example when he talks to the people at the clubs and will ask them if they think they can outlast The Norris Group. Unless they are better funded and better trained than them, they are not going to outlast them. It is a legitimate statement to say they are a bit player in the game and they cannot withstand a shift down. There are not a lot of groups on par with The Norris Group or who are not as willing to share. Bruce is willing to say when we are willing to take a hit on margin and give their properties away. We will become property managers for a while and go 8 or 10 years in the future. They are comparing their ability to last, and they don’t have it. One little blip, and they’re done.

In the buy/sell business, you can have both alternatives be perfectly acceptable. The scary part was someone would call Craig and say they had a really good deal with a $750 grand house, which is not possible. There is no way you are going to get out of this and no way to cash flow if you don’t. The scariest thing would be if they went to The Norris Group or any other group who had the same standards, Bruce would be intellectually honest enough to tell them his money is not going to follow their deal. What happens is they use their own money, whether it is family money or money from people close to them. They’re standing on a pressure mine; and in their mind if they step off they blow up or take longer to blow up if they stay on it. They can’t move off it, can’t buy anything else, and cannot exit it. In their mind, that’s it.

The alternative is the rental business is not as appealing with $150 houses. Difference is these were not bought with any plan B. Plan A is Plan A. If they step off that Plan A, they lose a limb. Sometimes the answer is to lose one limb rather than lose everything. From 2004-2006, there was almost none of this possible in California. It was just an escalation game, and it was valid to play because everything you touched was going to make $50-$100 grand. It’s when you did not catch the turn that there could be issues.

Bruce once met with a guy who was one of the big speakers and was telling everybody to buy all over the world. He had an 8×11 sheet of his 62 properties, and it was his business card. You would look at it and be in awe, except for the fact that you would look at the cash flow that was -$15 grand a month. He had $4 million of worth, $12 million of debt, and $4 million of net worth. These included all the properties in Florida and California. He came to Bruce telling him things were going to change and go down, and it scared him. He was not exposed to this conversation. He looked at his list during lunch and told him he really scared him that night since in Bruce’s opinion the man had 6 months to turn everything he had into what was going to cost him $2 million to sell. He had $2 million in net worth on which he was going to have to pay taxes, and he was going to walk away being a millionaire. If he waited six months, things would go down to 0. If he waited a year, it would be -$4 million. It is very hard to make these decisions, but preventing this damage going forward now is possible because you can choose an area and a type where both the decision to sell or to buy and hold can come in the same property at the same moment. If one thing does not work, you can just keep the other.

Nowadays, The Norris Group does not usually buy a property with the thought of keeping it. If they make a mistake buying and selling, they are just going to eat the mistake. Usually this has to do with the size of the volume. You will have a stinker, which could be one out of every twenty properties, and it would not matter too much. However, if you’re only buying four, then you care a lot more. This happens because things are not always in your control. Sometimes you have some very strange things happen with the appraisal.

In the area where Shawn and Angel are buying, it cash flows mostly because the ownership group that would occupy it is not that excited about owning, so they don’t care about paying more to rent. They like that flexibility. Aaron Norris mentioned the Y generation and how this is how the buyers are built. They do not necessarily need roots of owning a home; they want the flexibility of going to the next job market. Bruce said he really has to look into this as a big shift. The way we used to do real estate was we would camp out on an ownership of a property and stay there. This is where you would usually start. When you get married and go to college, the whole idea is you are going to set aside money and buy a house. However, what if this is new and not going to be replicated? This is where it becomes interesting.

Bruce, Angel, and Shawn went on to discuss the education side of their business. What was really neat was they were taking on subject matter that no one else had. This has been a very big help as they have very experienced people who have had an impact on others learning the field. Angel said this is something that is hard to do even within the education space because working out deals is usually one of the last things investors learn. They begin using their own cash or their family’s cash, all their credit, and eventually they cannot build a career on the extent of what they can do. They have to learn how to buy in a creative way and buy in a way where the seller is participating in a transaction one way or another. This could include a Subject 2 or strictly a seller financed free and clear home. They have to learn how to have those kinds of conversations because they will not grow an empire. They won’t be able to quit their day job on only the extent of what they have. Most people don’t even have a lot to begin with, especially during a time when nobody wants to finance for investors.

One report Bruce recently read by the New York Federal reserve Board showed a chart that meandered its way up from 6-15%, which is the percentage of properties that when the people filled out the loan application they said they were not going to live in it after all. There was another chart that meandered its way up to 50%, which is the percentage of foreclosures caused by people where 50% of them were multiple grant deed owners. What happened was the other 35% did not say they were going to be non-owner occupants on their loan application. Now, they figured out that in California half of all the foreclosures were caused by multiple property owners. The chances of getting financing after this report would be slim. You would not be able to go to Congress and tell them which people were not really responsible for a lot of the damage. This was a speculator doing this, not an investor.

However, it is going to lend a lot of credence to the things Shawn and Angel talked about because it’s going to be about how to own a lot of properties. Unless you are just richer than Midas, you are not going to get financing, no matter who you are. Even with the ten loans that are available to people, you have to have so much backing. The people Angel knows who are getting these are people with high incomes who continue to stake in their jobs to get these ten loans, then have all this financial backing sitting behind every single house.

When Bruce went back to Washington D.C., they met with Fannie Mae and asked them what was not making sense because there was a $15 million portfolio of loans that was perfectly current. It was a 9.9%, and they were worried about a group they were going to loan to at 5%. They came up and said nobody wanted the current model because the loan application almost had to be figured like a commercial loan, which is not part of the factory process. The factory only wants to produce single-family loans that are owner-occupied, while everyone else doesn’t care. If you can’t place the loan, then why originate it? This is what really becomes the problem and the overlay of other lenders where you say Fannie Mae will do one thing, then the lender starts piling on other things. Fortunately, we are in a time where 75% of the mortgages in America are 5% or less interest for the first time in history.

In California, you have a lot of negative equities that are going to keep making their payments and emerge at the break-even point for a long time in the future. This niche of “Can I take this off your hands” is smart for both people. It’s like the hard money loan business right now where you have an investor who buys a house that cash flows, and you have an investor that wants 9% on the trust deed. Smart decisions are on both sides of this table. If you owe $120 grand at 5% and were just transferred to Texas on a job, your choices are to write a $12 grand check to accomplish a closing and make payments while it’s listed. The other option is somebody could come along and say they will take it and enjoy a cash flow, and the lender is a beneficiary of a non-threatening transaction as they are much less likely to have a foreclosure. However, this is somehow not supposed to be allowed.

Educating people on these things is mostly difficult because everything we are talking about is based in 100 years of law. It has happened before people had large banks when they dealt with one another. You might give somebody $10 in valuable consideration in at that time chickens or a horse. We used to do meets and bounds when we used to do legal descriptions. You go back and see that one person may be a geek for title like another may be for stats. That person’s boundary may be the old oak tree and the big rock, which do not exist anymore. You have had to evolve.

When we are talking about educating people on what a trust deed actually is and what a note actually is as well as legal descriptions and how these things work, they think you’re doing some type of voodoo when you’re not. What you are saying is, “Did you actually give money to the seller?” No, you traded documents; which if proper and in order, there is no reason why you cannot do that right now. It is not what the factory puts out. You are fighting this headwind, and we just keep doing it and trying to teach from a base of practical knowledge. We are doing about 7 or 8 a week; and these things are just constantly coming and coming when you are doing this kind of volume. It is not hard to stack a list of examples and say, “Clearly you can do this. We get title insurance, go through all the hoops, and we’re not trying to hide anything.” It might go against the lender policy, but the policy is going to ensure they have more damage than necessary.

Bruce said he had just spoken with a realtor who told him during the 90s, a niche that nobody else wanted was wraps and contract sales. He was so busy because he was the only realtor who fought this one out. He had a legal background and said it was worth the risk.

Bruce wondered how Shawn and Angel were finding their deals or how the deals were finding them. Shawn said what they have did was put the word out to local realtors on the MLS because they looked at stagnant inventory. They would also do mailers to owners of free and clear houses. They bought the list off of Data Trace; and this all took place in California and in Utah. The call rate was phenomenal, and it really all came back to personal referrals. Shawn said the number one source right now is he is getting calls from people, particularly a builder recently who had great prices and offered to lease the house that an owner currently owned if they bought a new one. As soon as he saw this he inserted himself and wondered why someone would do this when it could be sold to them on contract. The builder’s lender, who they own, sat down with them, looked at the documents, gave them the blessing, and now there is a constant stream of people who are trying to build a new one. The sales agent is pointing out different ones for them to buy; so when Shawn shows up to close a deal, it goes fast and he is the buyer’s new best friend. Shawn has been able to turn his deals into multi-transaction deals. Part of the key to being successful is not having to do deals one at a time.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 2/28/12

Tuesday, February 28th, 2012

Today’s News Synopsis:

The recent Case Shiller Home Price Index showed new lows for the year ended 2011 with home prices being at their lowest since 2006.  The FHFA reported mortgage rates increased slightly to 4.25% last month.  Secretary of HUD Shaun Donovan was questioned about the true number of people really hurt by mishandled foreclosures.

In The News:

Housing Wire“January mortgage rates up slightly from December” (2-28-12)

“The Federal Housing Finance Agency said national mortgage rates for January rose to 4.25% from 4.15% the previous month.

DS News“Case Shiller Indexes End 2011 With New Lows” (2-28-12)

“The Case Shiller Home Price Indexes dropped to new index lows at the end of 2011, Standard & Poor’s, which compiles the indices, reported Tuesday morning. Prices are at their lowest level since before the housing crisis began in 2006.”

Los Angeles Times“Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac regulator defends write-down opposition” (2-28-12)

“Under increasing pressure from Democrats to do more to stem foreclosures, the regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on Tuesday strongly defended his opposition to allowing the government-owned housing finance companies to write down mortgage principal for “underwater” homeowners.”

Housing Wire“Galante assures Congress FHA ‘not broke’” (2-28-12)

“Federal Housing Administration Commissioner Carole Galante assured lawmakers again the agency would not need a taxpayer-funded bailout.

Bloomberg“JPMorgan, BofA Strain for Qualified Staff to Clear Foreclosures” (2-28-12)

“JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. told regulators they were straining last year to hire and keep enough qualified people who could clear a backlog of foreclosure complaints.”

DS News“South Carolina Signs Bill to Ban Third Party Fees on Home Sale Contracts” (2-28-12)

“South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley signed a bill to ban Wall Street Home Resale Fees, which require a percentage of the sale of a home to go to a third party.”

Bloomberg“FHA to Increase Cost of Up-Front Mortgage Premiums for New 30-Year Loans” (2-28-12)

“The Federal Housing Administration will increase the cost of up-front mortgage insurance premiums by 75 basis points as part of efforts to rebuild the agency’s insurance fund.”

Housing Wire“Consumer confidence posts sizable increase in February” (2-28-12)

“Consumer confidence rose 9.3 points in February as the outlook for the nation’s economy improved.  The Conference Board said its consumer confidence index rose to 70.8 in February, up from 61.5 in January.”

DS News“HUD Secretary Questioned on Improper Foreclosure Numbers” (2-28-12)

“During a Senate subcommittee hearing, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan was prodded with questions on investigation results regarding how many and what percentage of people actually suffered from wrongful foreclosures.

CNN Money“Housing settlement details due out this week” (2-28-12)

“Final details are due out this week in the $26 billion settlement to help struggling homeowners and settle charges of abusive and negligent foreclosure practices, according to President Obama’s housing chief.”

DS News“Capital Economics Disappointed in Pilot for REO Rental Initiative” (2-28-12)

“While the REO Rental Initiative was supported by Capital Economics when first proposed last year, a report released by the analytics company stated that the news was disappointing upon the discovery that 85 percent of the REO properties to be sold were already occupied by tenants.

Realtor Magazine“FHA Hikes Fees on Mortgages” (2-28-12)

“Home buyers with mortgages backed by the Federal Housing Administration will soon see a rise in fees, the agency announced Monday.”

Hard Money Loan Closed

Carson, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $200,000 on a 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom home appraised for $325,000.

California Real Estate Investor Events:

The Norris Group posted a news event. Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Self Directed Investors Conference on March 8, 2012.

The Norris Group posted a news event. Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Downey Association of Realtors on March 14, 2012.

Looking Back:

MDA DataQuick reported 30.9% of all houses and condos sold in California during January 2011 were bought without a mortgage. The NAR claimed pending home sales fell 2.8% in January 2011.  Approximately 25% of homeowners who sought assistance from Obama’s mortgage assistance program successfully had their payments reduced. A survey from Fannie Mae showed 19% of delinquent borrowers were considering a strategic default.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

266-TNGRadio – Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest 2-25-12

Friday, February 24th, 2012

Shawn Watkins

Shawn Watkins

Investors Workshops

(Full Bio)

Angel Bronzgeest

Angel Bronsgeest

Real Estate Investor

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined once again by Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest. In a reversal this week, Shawn and Angel will in turn be interviewing Bruce Norris on his own radio show. Bruce Norris has interviewed countless people on the topic of real estate investing, not only in Southern California but also worldwide and how they are affecting what we need to look for in the market. You now have to look much wider than you had prior. Bruce, for example, listens to Squawk Box at midnight to find out what is going on with the global policy in Greece and what the GDP chart looks like now. In other words, if a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it affect our real estate market? Can we find other events that do the same thing?

Prior to the show, Shawn and Bruce talked about one-time events. Shawn wondered how these have begun to play in the way that Bruce looks at charts. Bruce said this is one of the themes of the newest report coming out and about the contemplation that California did exceptionally well in real estate, twice as good as the nation. Right in the beginning of the 70s, the California median price was $3 grand higher than the nation. Six years later it was doubled. Bruce asked himself why this happened and if this was a one-time event. He also wondered if this will ever happen again or if we will run out of one-time events. Some of the one-time events are profound. Having come from the baby-boom generation, growing up in this time and going through earning more money, Bruce has seen a lot of changes. This includes the emergence of a two worker family that has started to dominate instead of being the unusual, women getting paid closer and closer to what men are making, and the emergence of legislation saying that you cannot discriminate against minorities. When you play this out for two or three decades, you wonder if this is a new event anymore. The answer is no. It may have peeked out, and there are 35 of these. You have to think about this and ask yourself if this was the driver or if real estate is just a neat thing that people will always want, absent those drivers.

The first chapter in the new report is dealing with the numbers. The title itself is “Numbers are Compelling.” Bruce cannot find any chart that discourages him from buying something and later regretting it. However, he wonders if this can be trumped by legislation changes on how people qualify. This could include having a mandatory 20% down, taking away tax benefits, or changing Prop 13. Romney has taken a lot of heat about the fact that he makes $22 million, files a perfectly legitimate tax return and pays 15% because it is exactly the right income for the tax law. Now they are going to change the tax law; but if they do that it means capital gains are going to shift to a normal rate. However, real estate has its really cool toy called 1031 exchanges, so you might start thinking you might benefit by this. More people will do buy and holds and just hold it, or people will do 1031 exchanges and avoid it. If you think about how we’re going to balance this budget, you could really use a stock boom as this creates a lot of now revenue even more than a real estate boom would. A real estate boom creates equity withdrawal.

When we talk about time versus money, we talk about how it is more important to get out than to know when to get in to the market. You could survive a mistake by getting in a little bit late, but you could get financially and psychologically destroyed by getting out too late. This holds very true for the way real estate investors see the length of their real estate investments. There are quite a few investors out there who do not truly treat real estate as an investment, but more as a speculation. They somehow equate investments with a buy/sell business. Bruce said nothing he has seen would discourage him right now than what he has seen from buying any real estate and going long that made sense monthly.

Shawn wondered why it is taking investors so long to see the benefit of the term of their investment rather than focusing so much on how much they can squeeze out of it in 90 days. Bruce said it is slower, and we are really a society of tweets and everything being fast and instant. We just came off of real estate that taught us this was possible; and now we are wanting that back really bad. The scariest thing for Bruce is having to make up lost ground. This means the investors having a talk with Bruce and then coming up to him and telling him they lost $1 million in the downturn and need to make it back right away. This is a formula to make sure you lose the rest of whatever you have. We’re not used to thinking that way, and we’re not used to having a California that rewards the practice because it does not usually cash flow. It usually goes up, so now we have to adjust our thinking.

Unfortunately, it’s a hard adjustment to thinking if we would want to own something if it was not going to appreciate. It is really trying to prove mathematically and provide a set of proofs that shows what real estate returns if it does not go up in California. Ultimately, you have a balance of 0 at the end of the day. The question is whether you would want to own this. This is a worst case scenario in that you end up owing nothing and wonder if this is still okay. If this is okay, you would have to sign up for a few things because it would probably be different as you do have the demographic side. We probably will have about $50 million people here, but the problem is we do not have $15 million vacant homes. Now you have a cost.

One of the best charts Bruce has seen shows a history of the difference between prices of new homes and existing homes. It is another proof of a peak because the only times those charts have converged to where the existing inventory is above the new is in the “silly” years such as 2006 and 1989 when builders did not meet the demand. All the pricing pressure went to the existing inventory and blew it up. This is a good chart to know if you want to be aware that it is at the peak of exuberance that you say goodbye. Exuberance is now a distant memory, so you now have to look at real estate as a much longer term investment, and people are not as excited.

Shawn said this was his forte in that he took charts Bruce presented in a class where he talked about other markets. He talked about what other places do when California is doing what it is doing currently. Shawn took this information out of state in 2004 and found where the prices converged and where the new inventory was actually less than the existing due to the fact that there was not any inventory. The builders made this a reality by making their products so hot and their lot reservations so desirable that it made the existing inventory to where everybody had to have it and sell it. The builders said if they wanted their house, then they had to sell their current one in 30 days. There was an opportunity here, but it did not last very long because pretty soon you had a lot of new inventory. Then, the air came right out of this balloon. You really saw this happening in the Phoenix market.

Things like what happened here are usually driven by different dynamics in California. In Phoenix you had migration of money, where California is driven by a migration of people. You had equity refugees taking money out of California and trying to dump it anywhere else, and the main focus was there were bus loads of people getting off these in order to make a quick dollar. It became a badge of honor that you wore. People were great to cash the checks, and Shawn said he participated in this just as much as anyone else. However, there is the real estate hangover when you realize you have to spend a lot more money to get into the market. Somehow, we started taking more and more risk thinking that if we just risked a little bit more, we could somehow recreate what we had done in the past, and it just stopped. This is part of human nature and the part when you learn the statistical side and know you are not home yet.

Cal Poly Pomona has put together the statistics and drawn conclusions exactly 180 degrees of mind almost every time. Bruce is on their board now; and the last time the gentleman did the quarterly he said something about the chart, then turned to Bruce and told him he probably saw something totally different. Bruce said this was true because there was an emotional component that was not statistical. This is why the moodometer is a good mathematical model because it does not measure capability, but rather your desire to do something. Almost everyone is capable of owning something, but your desire quotation at 0, meaning you don’t want it. This is why you find no price support and no push of price at 4% interest rate. It is because the people don’t want it.

As a contrarian, you look at this and ask if this is always going to be true. History says no; you are going to want the things as bad as you ever did. It is just going to take time until we are at that low number of affordability. At this point, that ride will have been a lot of fun. You just have to get in at the time when other people are saying they will never touch real estate again. You need the capitulation moment for the bottom to exist. You could be two years from now, and you would probably only miss some small rise. However, you would miss the cash flow if you decided to buy something that worked. As an investor, Bruce has that side where it is not going anywhere; then we have a buy/sell business that is completely different. These two things exist independent of each other. One is personal; one is a business.

However, it is nice to have these two divisions because you can see what is happening in one and draw conclusions for the other business clearly. However, Bruce said a better reason for him is to make no urgent decision because the other world exists. He does not need one dime to exist anew for him to live everything he wants. That makes this group of decisions really sane because he does not have to catch up. You’re talking really about an arms length transaction now because you are not pulling that in by saying if you do not make your bills this month then you are in trouble. Bruce and Shawn had discussed this and talked about how any time you make a decision based on scrambling to pay your bills because it is almost the end of the month, then you are going to make a mistake because you want it more than the person sitting across the table from you. If you are there, then you have to be really good at faking that you’re not. If you really are in that position, to negotiate from that weakness is a poor stance. It is an uphill climb at that point.

The model has changed for Bruce and the Norris Group because they are buying at trustee sales and not dealing with people. However, if he was dealing with people directly, they would probably pick up that he really could care less if he bought the house today. He wants to talk with the people and see what they have, and this is a powerful position to be in. Shawn said there are other buyers who are motivated. One of the things that the Norris Group did one time was they taped an auction where they were auctioning off five new homes. Bruce said this was fun because he was controlling the auction and actually did not know it. His friend Kessler watched Bruce on the video and told him he was in control of the auction, not the auctioneer. He controlled every final bid, every decision, asked a lot of questions, and really messed with the guys unintentionally. On almost every house Bruce asked the auctioneer who had the highest bid and wanted to make sure his bid was still good.

Oddly enough, Bruce became good at attending auctions because he observed them first. He went to the back of an auction many times before he was a bidder, especially early in the 90s when they became prevalent. He observed different companies do it right and wrong, so he really understood when he saw a flawed auction about to happen. All of a sudden he became a little excited when he saw one completely blown, and he realized there was an opportunity there. He looked at all the HUD houses, went to the HUD auction, and was rewarded on the third property. Bruce said he did not need loans until this time, so it is interesting how life changes. He originally was not buying enough to exceed his cash or credit lines, and then all of a sudden he was buying ten HUD houses.

This was actually how he met his loan officer Craig Hill. He had an employee who he told to door knock every employee until they found somebody who wanted his business. This was Craig Hill. When they met, Craig told him his parameters. One house they looked at was in perfect condition; it only needed a hedge mode. It was worth $85,000, and Bruce bought it for $34,000. He asked Craig about the loan program, asked if it was 65% of values, and then asked if he could get his property appraised. It came back at $85, and Bruce asked Craig if it bothered him that he was going to loan Bruce more than he paid for it. Craig told him a simple yes, but that was both the start of their relationship and expansion of their business. Bruce said it was odd at the time because he never thought about being in the hard money loan business. It backed its way into it as you teach people and they become successful. This is when they start asking you if you have any money. This leads to a commonly held belief that the money follows the deal, and people usually do the opposite.

As an investor, Bruce has gotten so many phone calls regarding if Bruce can count on another for support if he should find something. Bruce said it is much better to call him up with a deal where you are nervous because it is so good you don’t want to lose it than them having to find the money. Most people will not make the effort to find the wholesale deal. The fact that the person actually has a deal is good. Bruce one time did something where he had a deal and put it in the L.A. Times in the Sunday paper regarding a property. He had $13 million in phone calls from just one Sunday ad. You realize from this that the people calling you have to have more than $200,000. The amount of money Bruce reached was so ridiculous, and it was because he had a deal. If he had run the ad saying he thought he could find deals, then no one would have called. You have a deal, and all of a sudden you have a club.

Shawn said he is constantly amazed he does not have more people rushing the front; and what this tells him is they are all done before they get there. Deals don’t wait around; you start calling the people you know. For the people who are new to the business or trying to re-enter the business, he gets close to the same amount that Bruce does because of the club of people saying they were tarred and feathered the last couple years but are ready to get back in to the market. The question for them is what they mean by they are ready and what they were doing prior. If they find the deal, the money will follow. For so many of them, the barrier of entry for a lot of them in their minds is they do not have the cash, so they are not going to make the offer. There is some validity to the process of having proof of funds, so they need to fine proof the funds.

When Bruce first started, he did not have the money to be a buyer; he worked for a buyer who had money. He was on commission with the ability to find deals. This worked well enough to make a year’s salary a month, so this is one avenue that people can take. Bruce was at a club meeting one time where someone stood up with a really good deal. Bruce got up to leave, and the man asked him why he was leaving. He then asked to go see his deal, and it was an 11-unit building for $100 grand. He flipped the property by pulling up whoever owned all the other ones and flipped it for $60 grand. This was a really good 1 minute meeting for Bruce.

We have a lot of technology now; and the number one thing Bruce has seen changed the most by technology over the last twenty years is the increase of competition that can become knowledgeable very quickly. A good example is Sean O’Toole’s site ForeclosureRadar.com. He has made trustee sale buying much easier through his website. For information that was difficult to obtain before, you can now go to his website instead of calling all the trustees. For $50 a month, you can be in the trustee sale business. Bruce met Shawn through a club in Northern California. He brought Shawn with him when he was invited to speak in Washington D.C. Both of their careers have been affected by a progression of who they know, the exposure, and branding. This is how it works. It’s knowing who is at the clubs, making friends, and being trusted.

Talking with another whole different source of agents who deal with properties, he saw there was a kind of secret auction going on that he was invited to with another REO agent. Being able to put up equal amounts of dough and qualifying for it at an invitation only event is really cool. But you really have to know somebody. Shawn said with all the advances we have made in technology, the thing he keeps coming back to is you have to have a balance between being willing and able to get out and meet people so they can see the content of your character. They could have the best website, the best app; but the reason you’re going to use, even know about it, or use it to its fullest potential is because you knew the person behind it. Every person Shawn knows who has been successful in REOs comes down to (relationships). You could write 300 offers a day and automate it; but unless that person knows you, you are really not going to get a shot at it. Personal relationships do not stop at talking to a seller directly; it is the REO agent that is repetitive in the short sale.

Tune in next week as Bruce in turn interviews Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

265-TNGRadio – Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest 2-18-12

Friday, February 17th, 2012

Shawn Watkins

Shawn Watkins

Investors Workshops

(Full Bio)

Angel Bronzgeest

Angel Bronsgeest

Real Estate Investor

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined by Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest. In a reversal this week, Shawn and Angel will in turn be interviewing Bruce Norris on his own radio show. An interesting fact is that neither Shawn nor Bruce like to have their questions written down ahead of time as Bruce believes it is important that if you are the interviewer you listen to the answers. A lot of times the second question will have nothing to do with what the person just answered on the first question even if you thought it might naturally go there, it might have actually changed directions and improved the interview. You have to be open to this. This is why Bruce prefers the interviewee to listen to the answers so they can go to whatever naturally flows. For Bruce, he does not really care what the question is as he should already know his material. For Shaawn, the biggest challenge for him is getting beneath the answer. It is easy to have answers ready because we live in a society of sound bytes. What everyone wants is what the biggest thing is they took away from the interview, but if you fall into that trap then you will be asking the same questions that everybody else asked. As soon as you get your answer, you have moved on without going deeper.

It is clear that everyone who knows Bruce knows he is a man who follows statistics. One of the ports of discoveries for Bruce was figuring out how to have access to the past so you can look at trends, and this would paint a likely picture of what was going to happen in the future. Back in the day this did not come easy, but now we have the internet; so it’s like cheating. Prior to this, you had to earn you way to a 25-year chart. Bruce built a successful real estate lending business, but this did not happen in only a couple years. This has happened over the last thirty + years. However, Bruce said they did have success quickly to a certain extent. Sometimes you look at the timeframe you did something in and tell yourself you were fortunate, especially if things were escalating in price or other scenarios. Bruce happened to get into the business in ’81 when interest rates were awful. After ’81, things were tough, so there were builders who could not sell. Bruce and his company started buying the builders out, and they made enough money to where they quickly changed their lifestyle and built a custom home. They had some success, but what they did not know was that there were changes of cycles coming. Bruce was in the middle of all this.

When you’re in the middle of your business, whether it’s doing really well or doing poorly, this is the draw. When it is doing well, we have the tendency to think things are not going to change. We say, “Well, if that worked yesterday, it is going to continue to work today.” Where you find deals when these changes happen and you don’t know the changes are coming, this is when you find your business is over. What Bruce has been able to do better than anyone else in the real estate business is when he started the business; he had watched people in the real estate business and realized he had the ability to find out what the real issues were with others. It was an innate skill he had that had nothing to do with knowing the front end of an escrow from the back end of a HUD. The thing that drove Bruce to find out where the trends were coming from at a time when the information was not easily available was he drove around to different colleges in the UC system and looked at archives and at information that no one else had that dated back years.

How he originally started was he had a painful experience back in 1989 when at the time he thought nothing about trends but rather what things were like at the time. He was stuck here and decided everything was successful, so he decided to build seven custom homes exactly at the peak of the market. Unfortunately, when you are building it takes a while to complete them, so when he finished them everything had changed. Three years later he finally exited the mess by writing checks. When you write a $52 grand check to complete a short sale and it is a personal check, this is a good lesson as you remember it. What is important as an investor is you go through pain sometimes and tell yourself to remember it, or else you might blow it off at a later time.

In 1995 when he bought Aaron a car at a higher price than a house in Riverside, he asked himself what happened from 1989 to 1995. Why did real estate go from you not being able to do anything wrong to no one wanting a house for $13 grand that rents for $550. This led him to think that someone must have figured something out, so he began searching for the guy who had figured this scenario out. He went into the archives and looked up every article written that had “price” in it looking for somebody who said, “Here we are in 1984; by the time we get to 1990 it’s going to go boom!” Unfortunately, he did not find anything as no one had figured it out. Mr. Schumacher, who wrote a book called Buy and Hold Real Estate, said in one of his chapters that it is actually easier to appraise a property a decade out than it is next year. Bruce wondered if this was true for an entire state and if he could literally appraise the state of California out in time. This was really the start of his journey where he said all he really needed was 25 years of charts so he could see what happened, could play and see what was an initial event, and see what kicked things off originally. He said if he could just find that domino that makes everything else happened afterwards, and then he would really have a cheat sheet. He said you really get tired of writing checks that are never coming back.

During his research, as he was looking for the one person who had assembled the vital information, he did not find this person and was building his own archive as he was reading through the articles. He never really charted anything until he realized that no one had ever done it. It was only then he realized he needed to do it himself, so he started at the library and tried to see what they had. Bruce spent a lot of time writing year to year statistics since he could not take some of the books as you had to buy them. What is so amazing is you look back and see that there is no one of this generation who does not have a personal computer. People ten and younger will never know an age without wireless communication. Shawn said when he uses words like encyclopedia and library, they are going the way of the dinosaur because just like any kid, they can have an internet or audio book. Everything is at their fingertips, and it is so fast to access. Bruce was doing his research at a time when it was pen, paper, and you could not take certain materials out of the library. Most of the investors who Shawn has met have a shelf life that goes back about five years depending on when they got in.

It is not exactly the right timeframe when people say real estate goes in 7 year cycles, and it doesn’t. The five years mentioned above is probably enough of a cycle to where it shifts from working to not working. If you don’t know the shift, you are finished. When something is working, as soon as it begins to shift, there is this lag that lasts 6-8 months where the checks stop coming as frequently or you start to write bigger checks. People do not know when to change direction. Shawn has attended every class that Bruce has taught, and he has seen how detailed Bruce is with his charts and his graphs. More than anything else, sometimes people are overwhelmed by the data and are really looking for him to tell them what to do now. Bruce has chosen to go wide-range with his information instead of giving a five-step process for being an excellent California real estate investor today. The reason for this is there is a teacher in him who wants people to leave with a capability of drawing better conclusions themselves. Bruce will show them the blueprint he has found to process the information and come to the best decision he can as an investor, so it scares him when he sees people picking up a cell phone after the first fifteen minutes to find the information quickly. What if by chance he is wrong and the people are looking up the answer based on bad information? This is why he likes to teach the process because he not only thinks it is fun to discover but it is also good to translate to tomorrow. You have to ask yourself what you are going to do tomorrow morning as an investor that is the most efficient activity that is likely to find something that cash flows or is profitable.

Without a blueprint, you listen to late night television; and what seems to be a natural conclusion is usually wrong. Foreclosures are way up, so we need to talk to people directly in California that are in foreclosure. Unfortunately, the great majority of them owe twice as much as what a house is worth. You are going to find yourself very frustrated, and it is expensive. The business model always changes. Right now the Norris Group buys everything at trustee sales that has a certain segment of cost involved, but it is very inexpensive per house. If you are buying REOs or short sales, it is very inexpensive per house because you are talking about relationships. When you start mailing to people in foreclosure, you are going to be out thousands of dollars. If you do that in the wrong cycle and it nets no results, you will not be out in five years but rather in five months and be out $20 grand. Timing to know when the appropriate activity is going to take place makes investing possible and survivable.

Brue and Shawn have also had discussions on conclusions and how during his research, he has not come to the same conclusions that others have come to. Bruce makes up his own mind, so ten people could look at his charts and come to ten different conclusions. The danger is, they assume his conclusions are always right; and they know what he has been doing is exactly what he said. Shawn said when he talks to investors who come out of Bruce Norris’s training, he sees people who know to come to their own conclusions instead of solely copying what Bruce did.

Shawn wondered how much external influence from other investors has an effect on where he is looking next. However, Bruce said this is minimal as it is something where people do look to him. However, Bruce does look outside the world of real estate, a transition that has become necessary. Bruce never thought he would have to pay attention to Squawk Box at midnight to see if Greece pays money or not. The input that the Norris Group receives as far as what is working is the loan business in their own experience as buyers. As far as what they thought would be working, they look at the charts and hit the ground doing a specific activity. In this regard, he is almost always correct because things are pretty easy once you understand the cheat sheet where the deals are going to be. For example, every month they may have $6-$7 million of pending loans; and every one of these loans was predictable as well as the core of where you found them was replicated almost 100% of the time. It is not owner-occupant owners in California, but rather short sales and REOs.

Looking at charts, you look at states that are not so damaged, and they are asking themselves what all the trouble is because they are not doing anything wrong. You have Florida, Phoenix, Nevada, and California falling off the face of the earth, while you have other places wondering what the deal is. It is hard to make a national policy, and this is one of the reasons why it is difficult to make other states pay for what is going on in five states. The reason Bruce has so much humility about the conclusions is because he says he is wrong. He said he just looked at last night, and one of the predictions he made was he thought there would be inflation and higher interest rates. Of all the projections he is looking at 6 ½% interest, and now we are looking at 4%. This is a mistake, and it meant that there was something outside of the world of real estate that trumped what should have happened. Now, you are going as somebody trying to figure it out, and Bruce said he does not have to just read the California budget or the U.S. budget, but rather the IMF Global.

Shawn wondered what the monetary policy is globally. Bruce used the example that if Greece defaults and they have a recession, this will hurt our GDP. Now, Bruce would have to figure out a GDP chart along with price movement in California because he would have to see if something pauses a recession somewhere, do we just not go up because there are no more chips. The basis of what Bruce knows is a big help as he would not want to start from scratch because what he knows allows him to be very efficient with the next pile. He already knows this is not true, and it is so much easier. He has his lie detector on all the time, and he has a baseline where he can already know what a false leader is.

Shawn wondered how much emotion played in his decisions. His mother had been in the title business for a long time, and she remembered being invited to a lunch at the California Escrow Association. Here, she remembered listening to Bruce and a lot of the people not believing him about what he would say would happen with the housing market. Shawn’s mother believed him and knew that he was paying attention to what was going on, but emotionally the people in the room were not prepared to hear what he had to say. So he wondered how this played out, whether positively or negatively, on him when he knows what is going on in the backs of people’s minds. However, Bruce said this does not affect him. One thing about being a contrarian investor is you have to be capable of drawing completely dependent conclusions, and he does not need anyone else to tell him he is probably right.

When you are talking about a positive report in ’97 after a negative event, people were happy he showed up even if they disagreed with him. In 2006, when you come after 8 years of successive, ever-increasing good results, then they do not appreciate you showing up. Getting in at the bottom is not even important because the first two years of a boom do not even feel like you did anything. You are not missing very much except for the fact that the most motivated sellers will exist right then. However, if you do not get out in a timeframe that is sometimes as tight as a quarter, then you are not getting out without a loss. That is when you begin the emotional support of your past decision, and this is when you begin to slide down the hill a lot farther than you thought. Shawn said 90% of the investors that he meets think it is more important to know when to get in, but they do not think about when to get out. With this old adage, people will ride a loser and dump a winner. Too many people say they are going to wait, take their chips, and sit on the sidelines until they know the bottom has come. However, the question is when this will happen.

Bruce said they took some heat in the blogging world for buying things in 2008 because it was obviously not a bottom to other people. Bruce said they were buying one of their typical rentals that would sell for $350,000 at the peak that they bought for $56,000, put $30 grand into, and rents for $1400. Bruce said he will live with this one if he is wrong because it is for a different purpose than if he flipped it. He is going to own something that cost 1/3 of what it cost to build. Most of the time you find the people who are giving you opinions than if you actually asked them how many they it is have done and they say they have not done any or had been hurt doing one prior. The blogosphere is filled with very opinionated amateurs, and Bruce usually likes to stay away from this. Shawn said if his neighbor, who has never done anything sensational or successful in his or her life, is going to give advice on what he is doing, he is going to take advice from someone else.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

264-TNG Radio – Mike Novak-Smith and Ted Boeker 2-11-12

Friday, February 10th, 2012

Mike Novak-Smith

Mike Novak-Smith

REO agent

RE/Max

(Full Bio)

Ted-Boeker

Ted Boeker

Owner and Broker

RE/Max

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined once again by Mike Novak-Smith and Ted Boeker. Mike Novak-Smith is not only one of the largest REO agents in the Inland Empire, but the nation. Mike is in the top 1% of all real estate agents nationwide and is experienced in REO, short sales, bankruptcies, asset management, and negotiating. Mike specializes in REOs in Riverside, Moreno Valley, San Bernardino, Perris, Rialto, Colton, and Corona. Ted Boeker is the owner of the company that Mike is at and has brokered for RE/Max Results in Moreno Valley. Having started the company in 1989, Ted has vast experience in real estate and has been able to train and lead 35 of Southern California’s highest producing real estate brokers and agents to close deals quickly and efficiently for a variety of clients in commercial, residential, multifamily, and office real estate. Nationwide Home Loans Inc. and RE/Max Results escrow division are associated companies. Before that, Ted practiced law.

With short sales gaining momentum, the process has become simpler and quicker. There is definitely an improvement as the banks have geared up because of either direction from the government or the realization that this is the only way they are going to survive the process. They have shifted a lot of people into the short sale divisions and have shortened the timeframes. There is still a lot of work to do, but there are still a few very good negotiators and asset managers. What is needed is probably ten times this many to be able to handle the number of short sales that are coming. Bruce wondered if Mike and Ted have looked at the losses when they compare a house going the REO route as opposed to the short sale route. Mike said often times a short sale can be more effective, but it depends on the timeframes. One thing with the REOs is the REO seller does control the process of using agents who are very effective and can speed them through the process. Mike has watched short sales where they closed the REO in two months, from start to finish, and fourteen months later they’re still on the market and still in escrow with the short sales. If it is done right, the short sale would be a quicker way to do it, but you have to have control of the process or it will run late. Ted agreed with the exception that the banks are improving their timeframes. In fairness to the banks today and the companies that they are shoving the properties off to are doing a good job of getting up to speed.

Bruce said it has to be pretty detrimental to the agent. For example, a first-time buyer could want to make an offer, but not confirm the offer for another five months. You have to think you are never going to do this a second time even if you hung in there for the five months. You will never make another offer for the second short sale because you have to make the decision to go live somewhere. This is a real issue. Bruce said, being a lender, that if someone asked him if he wanted to take a short sale, it would take about 30 seconds to do the math and say yes. So he wondered why it would take months and what is so involved that the problem cannot be solved more quickly. Ted said with his experience today with short sales, they are doing a lot for one particular company. They have found properties that have seconds that nobody knew about and second loans that have been sold in the secondary market, in some cases days prior. The person selling did not know there was a second, was getting ready to close, and found out about the second after they had already sold the property. Now they have to start all over with the company, and the deal falls through.
Ted said the best one they have so far is first holder made a first. The owner came in, took out a second, and somebody in the process forgot to subordinate the second to the first. There is now a $160,000 second that is now in front of a $150,000 first. The very likelihood is the owner of the home is going to end up with a $60,000 first on his house, and the second will be out with 0. Bruce said a situation like this is not very entertaining when you buy one of these in a trustee sale.

On a side note, when you have 80% of sales going either REO or short sale, the assumption is all of those people become renters. However, Ted said he assumes that about half would become renters, while the rest would move in with someone else, rather their parents or move to Nevada where they can get into something free or inexpensive. So in reality, they become non-households. This is a very big impact when you are talking about potential buyers: they are credit incapable and don’t have the money to live with the extra burden of debt. Not only can they not get a new loan, but they can’t afford a household cost. Therefore, for the time being they are downsizing. This is not going to be okay for either party, both the person who owns the house and are living in the back room or the people in the back room. They would like to emerge some day and be able to leave to live in their own place. If you can pick the timeframe, then you will have excess demand. Theoretically, this should happen two to three years from now assuming credit repair happens in two or three years. Having visited Washington, Bruce said a lot of what is happening is very political rather than common sense. If they wanted common sense suggestions, they would probably find it pretty easy to get. Trying to mix it with political acceptance is a whole different story.

In the ‘90s, there was a niche that emerged that Ted and Mike became very familiar with and that investors did a lot of in the ‘80s. When Bruce became an investor, one of the niches was you would have a 7% mortgage existing on loans prior to 1975, and in 1981 or 1982 interest rates were 17%. If you could move that financing forward to another buyer, you could wrap it as it was allowed. There was something called a simple assumption, which cost Bruce $45, so he would his name and tell people to pick his name instead of the other people. Bruce had new liability, so it was like the loan could only be paid back by the residents, and that was its sole responsibility. They changed this being acceptable, but there were hybrids that emerged in the 90s, something of which Ted and Mike were very familiar. They used a specific vehicle to sell somebody a home who probably would not necessarily qualify for bank financing but to get them to be the owner of a home.

For Ted, he preferred a land sale contractor or land contract. He said many people favor an all-inclusive trust deed; but his whole point about favoring land contract was that it did not create a grant deed, which in those days would tip off a lender that a sale had occurred. The recorded document was a contract between the two parties which memorialized the fact that one party would pay the other party a certain amount of money in five years. In today’s world, Ted does not believe one is necessarily better over the other. A lot of times it is the mood of the lender because the only thing to be concerned about is a due on sale clause being aggressively pursued by a lender. Bruce cannot imagine someone’s desk who decides to foreclose on a current loan because there was a breech on a due on sale clause in 2012. He would be fired quickly.

Mike said he has had many lenders tell him they did an AITD or a land contract who did not care as long as they received their money. Bruce said he once sat across from FHA in a meeting, and he said it would be helpful if they could take over subject to the existing loans, and they said they did not care. With a contract of sale, people would most likely relate to it more if you used it like a car sale. A car sale usually has a lien holder who actually has title. They almost hold the pink slip until the deal is made, whatever the deal is. In a car sense, it is usually paid off; but in a land contract it could be a meeting of certain agreed upon prior demands. It could be a demand for someone to pay them for three years, make every payment on time, and then they receive a grant. Somebody is always in distress, whether it is the seller or the buyer who does not have the credit to get a new loan. In the hard money loan side, there are investors buying properties that cash flow, and they have investors who put money in 9.9% trust deed investments. Smart money is on both sides of this table, and in this particular timeframe you could have smart people on both sides of those decisions. It could even be in a property that is almost a break-even.

Bruce bought a house in Moreno Valley two years ago, so the price really had not damaged; but he just had a job shift. He owed $140 on a $135 house and is $5 grand upside down. If he listed with someone and went through the normal cost, he would have to write a $20 grand check to escape. He had someone on one side, who was renting the same house in Moreno Valley for $1300, and he could make a deal to where he puts up a certain amount of money for a security deposit or pay a commission, and he could walk into a payment that is probably $900 with a chance of owning it. This makes more sense to Bruce, and this is why he believes it has a future pretty quickly. Ted said in this case the interest rate in the loan is becoming more valuable. In the old days, the equity was more valuable; and now the loan is valuable.

When Bruce first got into the business in 1981, he refinanced his house at 17 ½% interest, so to have an interest rate sub 4% is completely ridiculous. Bruce said he could certainly envision an 8% mortgage rate five years from now. Bragging rights would be somebody asking you your interest rate, and you tell them a number that is worth money. Lenders will be very sensitive to this at some point, but he cannot imagine for the next few years this standing in the way of asking if the person wants to foreclose or if they should find a buyer who still makes it current. It also speeds up the healing process in that they want stability from going from owner to vacancy. There are already a lot of damaged people, so when you’re talking about 80% of your business being credit incapable of buying a new home, they are payment capable of owning one in this type of circumstance. Realtors can then make a living not having to count on a group of buyers that won’t emerge for three years. It can absorb the next two or three years of people who are still waiting. Financially, we have two underserved groups: the group that just lost their property and the group of investors that could buy and hold rentals. If we would think this out and think about how we did it in the past, we could solve the problem without a lot of damage. If you had a lot of REOs where it was earmarked for owner-occupants and eventually there is a little pile of them that go to investors, there is five or ten of them at a time, and the mandate is to not sell them for five years, then it would not make sense to give these people financing. This would be game over as you would have more business than you would know what to do.

Ted said investors will save the day eventually, even if they are not allowed to because they are creative. Bruce once sold a property to a lady on Polk Street in Riverside, and it was in a land trust with an AITD on top. She received the property, but then she talked to her team later, and the tax person said when she writes her check she will not be able to deduct the interest as it was not in her name. All of a sudden, the lady called Bruce saying she could not understand that she owned the house, and Bruce could not make her team understand that she owned the house. Finally, he asked her if he could just buy the house back from her, and she said yes. He then asked her if she knew how she was going to have to give him the house. She was going to have to grant deed it to him because she owed him.

Bruce wondered if it was a difficult concept for people to understand the difference between a grant deed and a land contract or even an AITD. He also wondered if it was necessary for an escrow to be experienced with it. Ted answered yes to both questions. People do have a difficulty understanding, and it is a little funny because if you lay it out correctly and simply for a person, they do understand it. It is no different than buying anything else and promising to pay an amount and receive a grant deed or pink slip in return five years from now when the person has made their payments on time. Many real estate offices, certainly in the past, have simply refused to do any creative financing. This could include seller-carried financing, AITDs, or land contracts. One of the things Ted has insisted on is he will not do one of those transactions unless he can control the escrow because he needs to know that the escrow people will know how to do it and can explain it to the people whenever they have questions. Having been an investor for 30 years, Bruce has had experience and said there are some escrows that are worth their weight in gold and others where he is simply stunned by the questions people ask.

Bruce wondered if Ted has talked to people who asked to speak to people experienced with escrow, as this is something that would be valuable. Ted said he has never heard this asked, but he said by the time they finish explaining it they are fairly comfortable with the idea. Bruce said if Ted had worked with land contracts in the early 90s, there was not equity progression for quite some time. Ted said he did about 1300 land contracts, three of which actually went into distress and Ted and his employees were threatened with lawsuits. Out of about 1300, they had three that really did not get resolved and went bad. Ted’s feeling is it is a slam dunk, and the key to it is the people have to understand what they are doing upfront. Ted said he had a number of people who came in three or four years, and in those days the length of time was critical. Three years was too short a time; five years was really better. They had a number of people who came in five years and said they simply could not do it as they had either messed up their credit or had another type of distress. They would resolve the issue through either a reconveyance or a deed back. Everybody walked away relatively happy. As long as people understand what they are doing, they can solve a lot of problems creatively, which is what this market needs.

Bruce wondered if people are gun shy in buying right now, to which Mike said pretty much all the news on housing nowadays is negative. If you go to work and tell your coworkers you bought a house, you get chewed out for it, and then it becomes harder to follow through with it. There is not a lot of support for buying a house today other than the cheap interest rates. Mike said he does not really have the deals fall out once they are in escrow, but for many people today just going out into the market takes a lot of courage. Fear is the biggest factor they are dealing with, and this is why Bruce really spends time looking at his charts as these take him away from emotional decision-making, both on the high side and the ridiculously low side.

If you are in escrow for the first time in your life, you wonder if every situation is the same way. All of a sudden you are not tuning into news you probably heard but really did not hear. Now, all of a sudden, you are questioning every decision, even if you are locking in a 4% 30-year mortgage. Bruce cannot imagine this being replicated in our lifetime. Once we leave this cycle, we are going to see a chart that goes the other way for a considerable period of time. Young buyers today do not have any comparison, so they do not think something is a great deal and are not drawn by the 4%. Mike said there were people who walked when 4 ½% deals went up to 5%. He tried to tell them when he first bought a house it was at 13 ½%, and he was happy to get it. That payment emerges from a discounted price, and it is astonishing.

Bruce wondered what basic changes are going to come about because of this downturn in the future of financing for real estate and down payments. He wondered if there will be permanent changes or if we are only going through the emotions politically to make everybody happy. Mike said he believes there will be permanent changes. The problem today is it has become so hard if you are loaning money to buy a house to enforce your contract and get your collateral back if you make a mistake. If you compare it to car sales, they are way up from three years ago because they can enforce their contracts. If you do not pay for your car, they can come take it. With houses, it is almost impossible to enforce your contract now, so the financing is very tough. It will most likely get easier some day at some point, but it will most likely never again be what it once was. It should not be what it was from 2003 to 2008 because that was crazy, but there will probably be a little bit more of a push for a 5% minimum down payment versus 3% with a Fannie or Freddie type of purchase. As Bruce has pointed out very accurately, the VA program has a very low failure rate, and it is 0% down. There is a way to do it, but it is called underwriting and qualifying somebody. The hard money loan business just puts you in the seat of making common sense decisions. What it boils down to is are we likely to get paid monthly and get paid back? The VA is most likely in this same decision process where the whole world is driven by a FICA score, and yet they can make common sense decisions that look like they are going to be paid back and it makes successful loans.

Bruce wondered if interest rate deductions ever bite the dust, but Mike is not as convinced that this will make as big a difference. Most people’s perceptions of their interest rate deductions are much greater than the actual event. They think they are going to save a lot of taxes, but the truth is it is not really a big deal. At 4%, you have a bit of money to pass whatever the basic deduction is. They will probably have to owe $300 grand or more before it is even relevant, but this is not a real factor. There was another document drawn up where there was two sides of a panel where the Democrats and Republicans both had input about what to do about the budget. To Bruce, real estate seems like a piece of low-hanging fruit. We have had a lot of goodies for a while, and Bruce said if he was on the real estate side, like CAR or NAR, he would find a sacrificial lamb to take something back. One of them would be the $500 grand freebie, which occurs every two years. Bruce said he was surprised the people came up with this even though Bruce happened to own properties that would be affected. You have to wonder what percentage of people nationally could ever take advantage of that. If in fact they are going to take some of our things away, Proposition 13 should not be one of them. Ted said he does not know if he would be willing to give this up as it could be pretty damaging. This would allow taxes to go up 2 or 3 times and affect people who own things free and clear. Bruce said he interviewed a well-known economist who said this is why they have reverse loans.

For more information on their escrow company, American Independent Escrow, Inc., you can contact the company itself.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 2/6/12

Monday, February 6th, 2012

Today’s News Synopsis:

According to the latest report from the U.S. Commerce Department, sales of pending existing homes increased while at the same time sales of new homes decreased all in the month of December.  According to Housing Wire, commercial and multifamily loan origination increased 13% in the fourth quarter of 2011.  NAHB reported the number of housing markets showing improvement has increased to 100.

In The News:

Bloomberg“Foreclosure Deal Deadline Arrives” (2-5-12)

“U.S. states that balked at liability releases in a proposed $25 billion nationwide settlement over bank foreclosure practices must decide today whether its mortgage relief and reforms are worth legal claims they’ll lose.”

Housing Wire“Multifamily mortgage originations jump 13%” (2-6-12)

“Originations of commercial and multifamily loans grew 13% year-over-year in the fourth quarter of 2011, while still declining 7% from the third quarter, an industry trade group said Monday.”

Realty Times“Real Estate Outlook: New Home Sales and Prices Decline” (2-6-12)

“Pending existing-home sales may be up across the nation, but new home sales fell for the first the first time in three months in December. These latest figures come from the U.S. Commerce Department.”

Bloomberg“Bernanke: Fed will protect U.S. economy from Europe” (2-6-12)

“The U.S. foreclosure crisis has risen to new heights.  Atlanta’s 55-story Bank of America Plaza, the tallest tower in the Southeast, is set to be sold at an open outcry auction on the steps of the Fulton County Courthouse tomorrow after landlord BentleyForbes missed mortgage payments.”

Mortgage Bankers Association“MBA Forecasts $230 Billion of Commercial/Multifamily Mortgage Originations in 2012; $2.4 Trillion of Commercial/Multifamily Mortgage Debt Outstanding” (2-6-12)

“In its inaugural forecast of the commercial/multifamily real estate finance markets, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) projects originations of commercial and multifamily mortgages will hit $230 billion in 2012, an increase of 17 percent from 2011 volumes, and continue to rise to $290 billion in 2015.”

NAHB“List of Improving Housing Markets Expands to Nearly 100″ (2-6-12)

“The list of housing markets showing measurable improvement expanded by 29 metros in February to include a total of 98 entries on the National Association of Home Builders/First American Improving Markets Index (IMI), released today. Thirty-six states are now represented by at least one market on the list.”

Los Angeles Times“Lawmakers push Fannie, Freddie to write-down mortgage principle” (2-6-12)

“Rep. Barney Frank and two other House Financial Services Committee Democrats on Monday pressed Edward DeMarco, the regulator of seized housing finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to write-down the principal on mortgages of underwater homes.”

Housing Wire“Capital Economics: REO to rental program possibly ‘best housing fix so far’” (2-6-12)

“In a statement released Monday, Capital Economics called the REO to rental program possibly the “best housing fix so far,” calling it “possibly more significant” than President Obama’s refinancing proposals announced late last month.”

Los Angeles Times“Consumer Confidential: Mortgage deal, Redbox service, Clint rules” (2-6-12)

“Today’s the day for state attorneys general to decide whether they want a piece of a multibillion-dollar mortgage settlement with the nation’s largest banks.”

Inman“Texas regulator issues cease and desist order against flat-fee FSBO site” (2-6-12)

“A Texas real estate regulator is investigating a flat-fee, for-sale-by-owner site for alleged unlicensed brokerage activities in the state and has issued a cease and desist order against the company.”

Hard Money Loan Closed

San Bernardino, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $150,000 on a 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom home appraised for $250,000.

California Real Estate Investor Events:

The Norris Group will be holding their monthly REO Boot Camp, February 14, 2012.

The Norris Group posted a new event. Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the 2012 Kick Off Brunch on February 18, 2012.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

263-TNG Radio – Mike Novak-Smith and Ted Boeker 2-04-12

Friday, February 3rd, 2012

Mike Novak-Smith

Mike Novak-Smith

REO agent

RE/Max

(Full Bio)

Ted-Boeker

Ted Boeker

Owner and Broker

RE/Max

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined by Mike Novak-Smith and Ted Boeker. Mike Novak-Smith is not only one of the largest REO agents in the Inland Empire, but the nation. Mike is in the top 1% of all real estate agents nationwide and is experienced in REO, short sales, bankruptcies, asset management, and negotiating. Mike specializes in REOs in Riverside, Moreno Valley, San Bernardino, Perris, Rialto, Colton, and Corona. Ted Boeker is the owner of the company that Mike is at and has brokered for RE/Max Results in Moreno Valley. Having started the company in 1989, Ted has vast experience in real estate and has been able to train and lead 35 of Southern California’s highest producing real estate brokers and agents to close deals quickly and efficiently for a variety of clients in commercial, residential, multifamily, and office real estate. Nationwide Home Loans Inc. and RE/Max Results escrow division are associated companies. Before that, Ted practiced law.

Ted opened a business in 1989, which was a peak year. Things changed radically after this, and Bruce wondered if this was something that as a part of his business model he saw changing very quickly or if it surprised him. Ted said he would love to say he foresaw a lot of things, but he really did not see much coming. He had come out of commercial real estate, which died after the 1986 Tax Reform Act; and he said there was nothing in commercial to do so he should look at residential. It looked attractive at the time, but he never dreamed they would see the ups and downs that they have. Ted said it was probably good to start when he did because it did steal him through some of the early tough times. The flexibility of a business model all of a sudden became absolute. You could not do farming and be surviving in the ‘90s, and you could not do it after 2006 either.

Bruce went to a meeting at Ted’s company where he talked, and remembered prior to the meeting when they were talking about volume of sales. They were talking about the number of closings that Mike had and the other people who were ahead. Bruce also envisioned a meeting he was not at in 2006 where everybody is doing pretty well, and he wondered how you tell somebody that is doing well that their model is about to radically change and they have to do it before it actually happens. Ted said it is not easy as real estate agents are a wide variety of people, some well educated and others not so much. The biggest example is 3 years ago Ted started harping on short sales, being able to hopefully foresee what was coming. However, agents two years ago said Ted was crazy and they were not going to do what he was talking about. Ted said today about 40% of his sales are short sales. The agents who refused it are probably gone, and the ones who embraced it are doing relatively well to the marketplace. There are not a lot of easy commission checks anywhere.

Mike has been involved in the REO listing side for 21 years. The first REO ever listed was in January 1991. He worked at a Century 21 Office where they could not give away the REO. It basically paid 5% commission instead of 6%. He made a referral, but he was number 9 one the list; so when they finally got to him he knew the economy was declining. The Persian Gulf War had started, and things were tough. He thought if he could do the deal at 2% he could still make the house and car payments and could eat another month. This was why he carried out the deal. Anybody that declined the deal at the time is no longer in the business. Prior to doing the REOs, Mike’s business model was to show up at a Century 21 office and try to live off the floor time and advertise, which he did well. People would just walk in and say they wanted to buy or sell a house and you wrote up the deal. It was easy. Mike also started in 1989 at the very peak year and then quickly transitioned into unknown territory. The 90s was not replicated and it was not the normal downturn. In the ‘80s we had the radical interest rate change, but we did not have a price decline because we were able to borrow the cheap financing and move it forward to other buyers. In the 90s we took a 5% gradual decline every year for a while, and this was news to everyone who owned California real estate.

Bruce wondered how the 2006-2011 downturns differed from what Ted experienced in the 90s as a business owner. Ted said he did not remember the 90s as well because they never really got up to speed. It took them ten years to get up to a critical mass of agents and holding on through the tough times. The early 2000s were good, and then the falloff was a real shock. When they saw the change in 2008, it was the big change for them. In 2008 and 2009 they had a lot of REOs, and then nothing for two years. This is the biggest challenge he has ever had. They have really been able to tighten up and cut out expenses, but that is the key.

As far as the cycles went, Mike said in the 90s he could predict better what was going to happen. He could see the start and the end game. Now it just seems like it is never going to end. It was easier back then to predict your business than compared to now. You get a lot of curve balls today that you did not get then. As far as quantity of listings in this current cycle, Mike said the peak year for him and for everybody in general was 2008. We did not have the government intrusion that we had in the last 3 years, and this is a big frustration.

Bruce wondered what the following years as far as percentages went after 2008 if that year was a 100% year. Mike said in 2008 it went down about 20% for him and 60% in ’10. In ’11, it picked up a little bit but still went down about 50%. Bruce also wondered if anybody on the lender side is saying to either Mike or Ted that they will not be releasing so many or if they are always telling them to step up. What he heard for a long time was to maintain the staff and not cut anybody back, and this was kind of a mistake. He carried too much overhead through a lot of 2010, and he finally decided he was going to have to cut it back. He is okay with not making any money sometimes, but he hates having to feed it. Now he has the right amount of staff, and if they pay attention and operate well, they can make money. When you talk to asset management, the general opinion of people is they do not want to sit there and say they are not going to have a job. They believe it is going to pick up and they are going to have REOs to sell so they will have a job. He believes this is what a lot of it comes down to overall, and he does not believe anybody can predict what is going to happen. They are probably not at the policy decision level. With someone in Mike’s position, one of the nation’s largest, he would probably feel that he has access to somebody inside actually telling him the real scoop. However, this does not happen. Mike said he does know some people way up the food chain from various REO organizations, and even they cannot tell you what is going to happen.

Mike’s REO business peaked in 2008 when we had about a 3.4% delinquency rate, and we went up to 11.2%. Mike’s peak of foreclosures resulted from a 3.2% delinquency, and then we tripled. The amount of REOs he probably should have been handling should have been some gigantic percentage above the peak and its decline. The shadow inventory term is real, but it is not where people think it is. Mike’s opinion of what shadow inventory is the process that is not being finished. There are a lot of defaults going on, but the timeframe between when somebody misses the first payment to the time they foreclose is probably in many cases 18 months to 2 years. He asks a lot of people how long since they made their payment and this is the answer he usually gets. He rarely gets anybody less than a year; but he thinks the whole process has just slowed down, and this is your shadow inventory. It is not like the banks are sitting on millions of houses they own; they just don’t finish the foreclosure. Bruce wondered if there is a valid reason why they don’t do this, and Mike said part of the reason is if they just foreclosed every which way they could, they would not have the capability to handle the property. He hears of agents telling him they are in a really bad situation and don’t even want to foreclose because they do not want the house back. They don’t want to be responsible for the code liens and the taxes.

Bruce said what is interesting to him is somebody always tells him that the lenders are too smart in regards to carrying out foreclosures, but in 2008 they did exactly what they should not have done. They foreclosed on properties aggressively, and we ended up with something like 17 months of inventory and a price decline of about 3 or 4% a month. Once you are there on that low level of price and everybody is upside down; it is much easier to make a decision to walk when you have negative 50% equity. When the civil Code 1169 came into effect in California, you could be fined $1,000 a day if you are the lender owning the property or a trustee sale buyer owning a property. They have someone come out and visit your place, and you have a week or two to fix whatever they are going to see.

When Mike resells REOs, Bruce wondered if there was a big problem with liens that had been placed on the property. Mike said they have a lot of problems with liens. He has a full-time employee whose job is dealing with liens, code violations, and HOA problems. Part of the problem with a lot of the banks is they do not have the internal staff anymore to handle these problems. It used to be they had attorneys on staff that would fix a lot of the code violations and a lot of the liens, and now a lot of that is not done. We do not figure it out until we start marketing the property and they come up. He said he fronts a lot of money to pay code violations and liens because typically the agents expect you to pay them and then be reimbursed. They are on it full-time, checking properties every day as he does not want any code violations and does not want to front the money for it. It is a lot bigger problem than it once was.

Bruce wondered what percentages of his listings were occupied by somebody at the end of the foreclosure process, which Mike said was about 75%. The attitude of the person behind the door is usually bewilderment as they wonder how something like this could happen, and most of these people are tenants of the former borrower. They did not know they were about to be asked to go.

On the topic of Cash for Keys, once this type of thing happens it becomes a street lore and urban legend. You can go ahead and ask for cash for keys, plus with some of the clients they are told how much cash for keys is going to be. A large problem Mike has is a lot of clients are very generous with cash for keys and some are not. Many of them ask why they only receive $1500 when their friend received $8,000. Bruce said if the Learning Annex was still in business, he could be almost certain there was a class held at night. The Cash for Keys is a big deal, but the offers vary a lot, and this can cause some problems. Bruce wondered if it has to do with the size of the loan or just the motivation of the lender, to which Mike said it is the latter. The more well known you are today as a lender, the more you want to pay.

Bruce wondered how big of a problem MERS robo-signing presented to California lenders. Mike said he has not seen much of it where it was a problem. He does believe with a lot of their deals a lot of the loans are in pools and portfolios, and sometimes they get slowed down because someone is going to check the whole portfolio, whether most of the loans are in Chicago or Florida. Sometimes this will slow them down. Something that was originally going to close, for example, in January will not close until March. However, the bigger issue is they are in a mix of properties.

On the myth of bulk sales and bulk REO listings, Bruce said he has only fallen victim to this one time as he went around an looked at 100 houses in two days to get his piece of the dream. However, there have been people who spent a year and ruined themselves by following something that seemed imminent that they were going to cash in on 100 houses. Mike does deal with a lot of REOs, and Bruce wondered if he has dealt with successful bulk deals in California only. He said Fannie Mae and several others do pool sales and advertise for it, but it is usually beyond the capability of the small investors. It does happen, but where he gets the calls is from some person who wants to buy ten houses in bulk, and the problem with that is with many of the lenders there are ten different investors on the deals. It is not the same real seller when you get down to the bottom line. Bruce wondered if he feels there are sufficient properties going that route that it affects the volume that they see, but Mike said this was not the case.

Another topic is bulk note sales, where you have big companies buy thousands of loans at a shot. Bruce wondered if this is significant in its impact in the REO listings. Mike said he is not sure he has seen them, even if it is possible they are going on. You do not see them in California has much as you see them in other places. In Orange County, there is a company in Irvine that buys very large pools, but the majority of the loans are not in California yet. Even if the purchaser received 60% off of the face, it would be hard to say that there would be a lot of room.

Bruce was a moderator of a panel on bulk buying that HousingWire.com had a couple years ago. He was very fascinated with the concept and thought it could really happen to somebody. Of the three, one of the companies that was on the panel was capable of buying 1,000 homes in a very short notice was Williams and Williams Auction Company. Bruce knew Tommy Williams personally, so he talked to him, the person he thought would really know. Having auctioneers all over the country, their infrastructure is such that they literally could get a 1,000 property listing within two or three days, legitimately see every one of them, and come to a number. They had not bought a property in a year, so they had the capacity, but there was not any inventory that was going that route in that kind of volume. Bruce just heard of another scenario yesterday about a bulk sale from one particular lender, so it is such a great theory. However, Ted said somebody actually has to go out and look at the properties to make sure they are even there. Ted said they have had REOs they have gone out to look at that are not even there and had burned down about a year earlier.

It seems one of the things RE/Max would really have a grasp on is how much infrastructure there is as far as capacity to move inventory already in place. They do not have to invent a thing. Bruce wondered how many more listings they could have, if they could have a multiple of 300-400% alone. This is replicated everywhere. Someone could drop a lot of properties into the United States REOs, and it would get absorbed by current staff. Another option is trained staff is added, and this would make more sense more than selling thousands of homes to a hedge fund. There were couple of things in a report Bruce read, and one of the things was doing a big bulk deal. A couple days later he saw a headline for a $650 million pool by one of the well known big companies that they were going to buy REOs and retain them as rentals. This sounds significant until you look at the numbers of how much debt there is in excess. You basically have a $3 trillion problem when you start throwing $50 million at it and see how it is such an insignificant thing. In short of saying they are going to forgive everybody, whoever owes more than their house is worth, we are probably in for a long haul. There is really no end in sight and no end game. Neither is there a change in the aggression of lenders saying they should cut to the chase and take all the REOs back. If a lot of the houses were sold to hedge funds, they would be a lot more aggressive because they would not care about their name being drug through the mud. They do not have a public name or a retail presence, and this is most likely part of the reason why things are slow in some cases.

One of the suggestions in the white report was getting a deed in lieu of foreclosure and giving the people right to buy the property back some years later. Bruce wondered what their thoughts were on the same owner returning as owner at a later time. However, Ted said this is silly. Once a person has given up on the property as we have seen and stopped making payments a year or two earlier, when you go to that person see them start making payments again, that person just laughs at the agents in charge. Bruce does not know how you rationalize this with the person next door making payments on the same loan. You start asking yourself if you can get the deal too. Mike and Ted said one of their clients offered the ability for the occupants to lease the property for a year. Mike and Ted said they have started a few of these, but they have yet to see anybody finish before they failed and ended up being evicted. For them, not paying is a good deal and they want it to continue.

Bruce read another news article where they were talking to a family that had not made a payment in a couple years, and it was a very positive experience for them as far as what it did for them financially. If you think about it, they have an expectation that this is okay, and there is an expectation that it is almost sad when it ends. Of the people who have not made a payment in two years, the ones who have saved all the payments is 0%. There is a statistic that 4,100,000 people that are 90 days late or beyond, including REOs, there is only a 1% chance that they will willingly write a check to make it current. 99% of the pile is going to go the route of a lowered opening bid at a trustee sale, a short sale, or an REO.

In RE/Max’s business model, the short sales have really aggressively gained momentum. Bruce wondered if they are ahead of REOs as far as closings. However, Ted and Mike believe they are even. Last year, roughly, they had about 20% normal sales and about evenly divided between short sales and REOs. Bruce has looked at charts for years, and he said he has not come up with a real meaning with what was just said regarding REOs and short sales until recently. When you close 100 sales, only 20 buyers emerge. This really hit Bruce that in the Inland Empire 80% of the closings are either going to be vacant or bought by someone new migrating here or someone in credit damage or investor for cash. This is not a lot of people. Unfortunately, it is many of the people who walked from their homes three years ago and now have repaired their credit and are able to buy again. There are very few of those, but it is shocking in today’s world that the person who did the wrong thing three years ago seems to be saving the system. Had we foreclosed on somebody instead of waiting, the people who are behind by 2 ½ years have not had one day of new credit.

Tune in next week as Bruce continues his interview with Mike Novak-Smith and Ted Boeker. For more information on RE/Max, visit www.remax-results-ca.com/.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

262-TNGRadio – Robert Kleinhenz 1-28-12

Friday, January 27th, 2012

Robert-Kleinhenz

Robert Kleinhenz

Chief Economist for LAEDC


(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined once again by Robert Kleinhenz. Robert is the Chief Economist of the Kyser Center for Economic Research, which conducts research on regional, state, and national economies. Dr. Kleinhenz has a Bachelor’s Degree from the University of Michigan, a Masters and Doctorate from USC, all in economics. Prior to joining LAEDC, he served as Deputy Chief Economist at the California Association of Realtors and taught economics for over 15 years, most recently at California State University Fullerton.

Bruce said he recently poked around at a refi and quoted a rate that he could barely understand. He said it was something like 3 7/8 for a 30-year mortgage. Bruce said going back 30 years when he became an investor and had refinanced his house at the time to get the money; it was perfect timing back in 1981 when he paid 17 ½ % fixed. Robert said there may have been a couple recessions in between, but what a difference two decades makes. Bruce wonders if when you are 22 and just starting out if you are thinking that it is in any way normal where you are only accustomed to seeing numbers that start with a 5 or a 4, and he wonders how different the future will be with the particular rate going forward. In this case you are comparing what happened back in the early 1980s to the interest rate situation today.

Robert said if he were to place a bet on what was likely to be more normal in the foreseeable future, he would look at the interest rate climate of today and not of the early 1980s. Back in that time we had high rates of inflation, and we had an economy that was in transition and stagnating in several sectors for several reasons. The main thing was we had a lot of inflation, partly driven by high oil prices. This in turn led to high interest rates and at the time the Paul Volcker of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York led efforts to bring the reign of inflation down. One of the ways it did that was by increasing rates by making it very difficult to borrow. This was a much different climate, and hopefully economists have learned a little bit about keeping inflation in check. Hopefully policymakers have listened to the economists who talk about it, and we are most likely going to stay in an environment over the next few years that either has low or moderate inflation and not double-digit inflation.

Bruce read a quote saying, “Experience is something that lets you recognize a mistake when you make it again.” What is interesting about not being concerned about the people that are in charge of policies is their opinion of how benign the housing problem was going to be. This bothered Bruce; and Robert reiterated saying policymakers are humans like us and sometimes don’t get the information right and sometimes still make poor judgments. We definitely have to be concerned about the fact that mistakes are made on the policy side just as mistakes were made on the business side of things. This gave rise to the situation we face today.

Bruce wondered if Robert was concerned about deflation if not inflation. He said it is not that he is not concerned about inflation, but he does not expect to see high levels of inflation over the foreseeable future, and that is predicated on policymakers and their ability to make the right decisions. It hinges on the ability of the Congress to come up with a credible plan to take care of these federal deficits over the long term. Somebody has to be interested in a bond that the risk-level seems appropriate with the return. What is interesting is the one-year T-Bill in Greece is paying 402% as of yesterday, which would probably give you an idea that you should not invest in it as you are not going to get your principle back.

The likelihood that the United States would find itself in the same position that Greece finds itself in is very low, so we should not be too alarmed. There is a very real possibility that we may face a debt situation, but there are several moving parts here. Fortunately, the ace in the hole that we have here in the United States is the fact that the U.S. dollar is the reserve currency, and our Treasuries tend to be the flight to safety for so many investors around the globe when things go awry elsewhere. Bruce did not know how profound an effect this would have because this is exactly what happened when you talk about a ten-year T-Bill. Most of us would have anticipated seeing something under 4% was pretty astonishing, and then it was under 2%. If someone has not already refinanced their house, you definitely need to be sitting up and taking a look at rates today because those rates are fundamentally driven by what is happening with the yield on the ten-year treasury, which nobody would have expected would fall below 3 or 4%, and here it has consistently been under 2% for quite some time. All of this is courtesy of something that is really outside of our borders. Part of this also stems from the Fed’s commitment to maintain low rates over the foreseeable future through the middle of 2013. There was this policy move and effort to insure that long rates stay low partly to help the housing market and to get investors to pay attention to the stock market where it would theoretically be better returns. There are a number of angles behind the Fed’s move, but this has served to also keep rates down.

To insure that something like what was aforementioned is in the Fed’s control, they would have a limited ability to do it. If the market moves in a big way, they may not be able to buck that trend. However, it does accomplish that end by buying or selling securities in such a way as to maintain rates at the levels that they are targeting at this time. We have a 0-fit fund rate and a mortgage rate under 4%. If we were to have an issue where the Euro zone went into a tough recession, Bruce wondered if there would be a domino effect here that could possibly kick us into a another recession. Robert said the cards we are looking at in 2012 include the situation happening in Europe. If their economy is weakened or there is some concern that we have already seen of economies tipping into recession; then that could jeopardize the situation here in the United States. We’re out of the recession and growing and now in the expansionary phase coming out of the recession, so that could tamper the growth or lead to a stall out in the economy here in the United States. This is economic linkage between the European economies and the U.S. economy.

The other linkage is the financial linkage. If the sovereign debt problem in Europe, not just in Greece but also Italy and possibly France, give rise to problems with banks not unlike what we had a few years ago at the height of the financial crisis, then that could stymie activity in the financial world once again. As a result of that, it could have a feedback effect on the real economy and either slow the growth pattern of the U.S. economy or tip it into recession. You have two things coming out of Europe that have the potential to either slow down or derail our current expansion. When the United States had defaults on the mortgages, mortgage-backed securities, and the CDOs, it had quite a direct effect on the people that invested in the banks.

Bruce wondered if the United States has as much of the investment there in Europe, or is it mostly contained inside of their own banking system. Robert answered that it was incestuous in a way in that there are flows capital that go across international boundaries through commercial banks; so if there is a problem that shows up over there, it may also show up on the balance sheets of banks over here. It is through this particular conduit or channel that we would see problems occur. Robert said he would be very surprised if we have something as calamitous as what we saw in 2008. To look at this situation in the financial sector, we have to recognize that so many financial decisions rest on some confidence of what is going to be occurring in the future. If you lack confidence in the future or just don’t know, then you are unlikely to make a decision or make a decision to do nothing. The problem with financial crises that we went through in 2008 is that they have long-lasting effects and wreak havoc on consumer and business confidence. They then leave businesses and households to sit on their hands until they get a sense that the coast is clear. That is one of the reasons this recession was so deep and continues to keep going as long as it has been. There is a real concern about the outlook, and it is reflected in consumer confidence and business confidence that has just not really shown marked improvement over the last couple years.

Bruce wondered if there is real concern about the oil world and if there is fear about aggressive actions such as the closing of the straight. Robert said if we take a step back to 2011 for a moment and think about all of the wild cards that played out in 2011, there are a lot and a number are still playable in 2012. There was earlier discussion on the European debt situation, which is a wild card that has been played several times over the past few years. The Greek debt crisis seems to be the one that is played most frequently. If you take a look at the Arab Spring, that gave rise to disruptions in the flow of oil and gave rise to higher oil prices. There is always the chance that something in the world of energy that triggers an increase in the price of energy, oil or otherwise, there is always the chance that this could slow down economic activity if not derail a growing economy. The other wild card that we have to contend with in 2012 that we also dealt with in 2011 was political. This year the big political wild card is what will happen in November with the election. It does appear as though we are going to continue to be stepping carefully through 2012, hoping that these wild cards do not wreak too much havoc on the economy. If they do, then they have an adverse impact on confidence. If there is an adverse impact on confidence, then the growth we anticipated is just not going to materialize.

In the employment sector, Bruce wondered how important construction is to the improvement of the unemployment. Robert said it is an important segment of the economy but is essentially flat on its back right now in California and elsewhere around the country. If you look at residential activity in the state of California, permits for example, they are just a fraction of what they were in years past. They have been at this very low level for just a fraction of any long-run numbers for the last few years, but it makes sense. If so many foreclosed or distressed properties are available for sale at a fraction of the cost of new construction, it is going to be sometime until after the backlog of distressed properties gets substantially moved before we see construction pick up in a noticeable way. There is a broad market for housing where distressed property values are probably way down on other properties. Things are also the same way with commercial construction. There are a lot of high vacancy rates for office buildings these days; less so for retail and certainly much less so for industrial. Industrial in Southern California is actually outperforming markets around the country. It has less than a 5% vacancy factor, so it is very much a mixed bag. However, construction is going to be recovering slowly, so meanwhile we should take a step back.

In a general sense, the labor market seems to be at a turning point where in order to produce more in 2012, it seems very likely that employers are actually going to have to add people, not just ask their existing labor force to work longer hours. There should be a general upturn in employment in 2012 compared to 2011. It is just a question of how much of an upturn there will be. We need somewhere around 300,000 jobs added per month across the nation in order to bring the unemployment down in a noticeable way in a reasonable amount of time.

The most recent report, the one for December, showed that we added 200,000 jobs, which was a great number based on the recent history. It is just not a high enough level of growth to bring the unemployment rate down. At 200,000 jobs per month, it could take 4 or 5 years for us to get back to a 6% unemployment rate nationally. At 300,000 jobs per month, it would only take a little less than two years, which is a huge difference. At the present time, we should be banking on the 200,000 jobs per month, barring any of these wild cards being played. If that happens for a few months time, then we might actually see the economy gain some ground.

The sector that is in the driver’s seat here is the consumer sector. Consumers are weighed down by uncertainty about their jobs and their economic outlook. The fact that are assets are not worth what they had been worth and the fact that they may have some credit constraints, access to credit may not be what it had been, especially with respect to buying homes. All those things are constraining growth and consumer spending, and that is really the main thing that we need to look for in terms of the driver behind the overall economy. If consumer spending picks up, then we are going to see job gains pick up as well.

In looking at a chart for mortgage equity withdrawal in 2002-2006, it was responsible for a lot of GDP growth. This driver has certainly been diminished if not eliminated from most people’s possibilities. As we go forward, it is certainly going to be the case that the American consumer is still going to have a place for the use of credit. They may not have access to the same amount of credit that was available when they were able to use their home equity in order to finance so many things. This is not a bad thing because it does seem to have created problems, especially problems that have spilled back into the housing sector. We do not want to go back this way, but we do expect to see that some loosening of credit access on the part of consumers would probable enable the consumer sector to get a little bit more steam and give a little bit more push to the overall economy.

Another issue is shadow inventory. Bruce wondered what Robert’s thoughts on what shadow inventory contains are. The definition of shadow inventory has changed over the last couple years, so Bruce wondered what Robert feels is the shadow inventory and what the best resolution for it is. Robert said it is useful for us to get a sense of how long we are going to be dealing with large numbers of distressed properties. If we use that as the definition and ask what things going to be like two years out, then the shadow inventory is the inventory that is on the books, such as MLS inventory for existing homes plus unsold new homes, and the unsold inventory for existing homes in the state of California, which is about 5 months inventory. Five months inventory is enough to actually sustain increases in prices and not decreases in prices because the average is about seven months, so we are at seven months if we are under five. By then we would go through the foreclosure pipeline, and the thing we would pick up would be the number of REO properties that are held by banks in inventory. This is equal to about another 2 ½ months of inventory. Now you are getting over seven months when you take the five mentioned earlier and add 2 ½ months, then there properties that are scheduled for auction and also another 2 ½ months inventory. However, the timeline for that is a much longer timeline.

For the REO properties, the point in time they go into inventory might be about 6 months or so before they are prepped and sold. The relevant shadow inventory number to use for current market conditions and understand what is happening in the current market is probably MLS based inventory plus new homes plus REOs in inventory. If we are asking the question about how long this is going to be with us, then we are going to go further up the foreclosure pipeline and pick up the properties that are in a pre-foreclosure state, such as an NOD or delinquent property. If this is the case, then you are looking at another 2 ½ months inventory. This is simply by taking the number of properties that are in pre-foreclosure state, which is roughly 100,000, and looking at that relative to total annual sales. You also have to look at the timeline. An NOD that is filed in January of 2012 is probably about 18 months away from going into the REO inventory. These numbers are roughly 100,000 in REO inventory and roughly 100,000 NODs plus delinquencies at the present time for the state of California. The timeframe is not anywhere close to normal as the statutory timeframe is about 6 months. Because of different kinds of policies and other factors, this timeline has been stretched out; and a number of lender and servicers have encountered a number of problems along the way.

The bottom line is as we are going further up the ladder and actually including more and more things in this notion of shadow inventory, we also have to figure out how long it is going to take to push all the properties through the foreclosure pipeline and out through the new home market. Therefore, we are looking all the way into 2014 before things get any closer to normal levels of distressed properties. The housing market is going to feel like it has recovered before that period of time, but we are going to have substantial numbers of distressed properties working through the housing market over the next three years. In Riverside, 62% of the sales are either short sales or foreclosures, which means when you sell 1,000 homes, only 380 buyers emerge. Everyone else is credit damage. This is going to take a while to heal.

If you want to learn more about Robert’s company, the Kaiser Foundation, go to LAEDC at www.laedc.org. Here, you can find out about the annual forecast event that will be happening this February 15th in downtown Los Angeles. This is a ticketed event.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 1/19/12

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

Today’s News Synopsis:

Freddie Mac announced 30-year fixed mortgage rates decreased to 3.88, setting a new record low.  Housing starts over 4% decreased last month according to the Commerce Department.  The Lender Processing Services also reported that teh loan-delinquency rate also decreased 7.7% from a year ago, and the rate is now at 8.15%.

In The News:

Los Angeles Times - “California home sales rise in December; median price falls again” (1-18-12)

“Home sales in the Golden State rose slightly in December, boosted by a pickup in the Bay Area and investor activity in Southern California. But with foreclosures and other low-cost homes dominating the market, the median home price for the state ticked down.”

DS News“Firms Launch $450M Program to Convert REOs Into Rentals” (1-18-12)

“Government officials are in the process of reviewing 4,000-plus recommendations for turning repossessed homes into rental properties in order to trim the REO inventory held by federal housing agencies.”

Housing Wire“30-year, fixed-rate mortgage hits new low” (1-19-12)

“The 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage fell to 3.88% this past week, hitting a new low and marking its seventh consecutive week below 4%, Freddie Mac said Thursday.”

San Francisco Chronicle - “BofA Swings to Quarterlly Profit as Lender Builds Capital” (1-19-12)

“Bank of America Corp., the second- largest U.S. lender, swung to a fourth-quarter profit as the company sold assets and built capital faster than expected.”

Inman - “Spy some real estate savings: spyRealty” (1-19-12)

“A new discount-brokerage firm, spyRealty, has launched in New York and Massachusetts, offering homebuyers a 2 percent refund off of the purchase price of a home.”

Housing Wire“Fitch: Principal reductions meaningfully reduce mortgage delinquencies” (1-19-12)

“Principal reductions on mortgage loans meaningfully reduce delinquencies and foreclosures, much more than current proposals, according to Fitch Ratings.”

Bloomberg - “U.S. Housing Starts Drop 4.1%” (1-19-12)

“Builders began work on fewer houses than forecast in December, capping the worst year on record for single-family home construction and signaling recovery in the industry will take time.”

FINS“BofA Plans More Job Cuts Under ‘New BAC’” (1-19-12)

“Bank of America plans to continue cutting jobs after reporting in its year-end earnings  statement that employment fell by 5,874 in the fourth quarter and 3,836 over the year in 2011.”

CNN Money - “CPI: Inflation remains in check” (1-19-12)

“Inflation overall held steady last month, as declining gas prices balanced out higher prices for other items.  The government’s key measure of inflation, the Consumer Price Index, showed prices were virtually unchanged from November to December. It marked the second month in a row CPI has barely moved.”

Housing Wire“U.S. loan delinquency rate down 7.7% from last year” (1-19-12)

“The delinquency rate on U.S. mortgages monitored by Lender Processing Services (LPS: 15.00 +3.52%) fell 7.7% year-over-year in December as the delinquency rate hit 8.15%.”

Mortgage Bankers Association - “CampusMBA Extends Partnership with Insurance Advisors to Offer New Live Online Workshops for Commercial/Multifamily Professionals” (1-19-12)

“CampusMBA, the award-winning education division of the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), today announced it has extended its partnership with Stamford, Connecticut-based Insurance Advisors LLC. Under the agreement CampusMBA, in conjunction with Insurance Advisors, will continue to offer live online workshops addressing a variety of insurance issues for commercial/multifamily real estate loans.”

Hard Money Loan Closed

Riverside, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $105,000 on a 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom home appraised for $168,000.

California Real Estate Investor Events:

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Investors Workshops and will be interviewing Shawn Watkins on January 25, 2012.

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Advanced Investing Skills and Strategies 2.5 on February 4, 2012.

Looking Back:

The Commerce Department reported housing starts decreased in December 2010. However, Fannie Mae expected housing starts to triple by 2013, and the nation’s largest home builders announced plans to increase activity by 10%.  RealtyTrac claimed foreclosure starts in California decreased 33% in 2010.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.