The Norris Group Blog

California Real Estate Headline Roundup

Posts Tagged ‘rehabbing’

Important Notice: New EPA Lead-Based Paint Rules

Friday, April 23rd, 2010
Hi %$firstname$%,
I wanted to quickly inform you of new lead-based paint guidelines
released by the EPA and enforceable as of April 22nd.
This will be important for Realtors, contractors, investors, and
property managers. Please spread the word. According to the EPA:
“Beginning April 22, 2010, federal law will require that contractors
performing renovation, repair and painting projects that disturb
more than six square feet of paint in homes, child care facilities,
and schools built before 1978 must be certified and trained to
follow specific work practices to prevent lead contamination.”
http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/leadinfo.htm#remodeling
Removal of lead paint is similar to mold removal. There do not
appear to be any new disclosure forms but there is potential
risk/liability including a large fine if caught violating these
guidelines.
The onus ultimately resides on contractors that are trained and
certified in new mediation practices.  Please take the time to
read the EPA’s website and take a look at the National Association
of Realtors website below and get informed.
National Association of Realtors Videos and Resources on the New
Lead-Based Paint Rules:
http://www.realtor.org/government_affairs/lead_paint_main
EPA Info for Contractors:
http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/renovation.htm#contractors
EPA List of Certified Prfessionals
http://cfpub.epa.gov/flpp/searchrrp_firm.htm
I will also post this on our blog.
Thanks,
Aaron Norris

I wanted to quickly inform you of new lead-based paint guidelines released by the EPA and enforceable as of April 22nd.

This will be important for Realtors, contractors, investors, and property managers. Please spread the word. According to the EPA:

“Beginning April 22, 2010, federal law will require that contractors performing renovation, repair and painting projects that disturb more than six square feet of paint in homes, child care facilities, and schools built before 1978 must be certified and trained to follow specific work practices to prevent lead contamination.”

http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/leadinfo.htm#remodeling

Removal of lead paint is similar to mold removal. There do not appear to be any new disclosure forms but there is potential risk/liability including a large fine if caught violating these guidelines.

The onus ultimately resides on contractors that are trained and certified in new mediation practices.  Please take the time to read the EPA’s website and take a look at the National Association of Realtors website below and get informed.

National Association of Realtors Videos and Resources on the New Lead-Based Paint Rules:

http://www.realtor.org/government_affairs/lead_paint_main

EPA Info for Contractors

http://www.epa.gov/lead/pubs/renovation.htm#contractors

EPA List of Certified Professionals

http://cfpub.epa.gov/flpp/searchrrp_firm.htm

Hope you find this helpful.

171-TNG Radio – Bill Tan 4-24-10

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

Bill Tan

Bill Tan,
President of Bill Tan Investments and The San Diego Creative Real Estate Investors Association

(Full Bio)

stream

itunes

download

rss

This week Bruce is joined by Bill Tan. Bill owns Bill Tan Investments, and he is the creators of the San Diego Creative Investment Association. He is a nationally recognized real estate investor and mortgage exchanger. He speaks now and trains people.

Bill started in the real estate business when some friends of his started doing it. He became really interested in the business when a man came out with a book named Nothing Down. He went to a lot of seminars. He has been investing since the late 1970’s. His mentors are Jon Schobb, Robert Allen, Jimmy Napier, Peter Fortunato, Jack Miller and the Four Horsemen of Florida.

Bill’s company provides several services. Bill acts as a real estate investment counselor, his company makes hard money loans, buying notes, and his company invests in real estate. Getting into the note buying business took some training. Bill got into note buying when he was encouraged to buy real estate in another state. There are a lot of challenges that come with that, such as property management. After a while, he got sick of having to travel to solve these problems, so he chose to sell the property but he had to become the bank in order to do so. Once he did this, he stopped having to deal with the tenants and the check appeared in the mail box every month.  He then went to a real estate training seminar and told other people what he had done. They then started selling their properties and began carrying the notes as well. They also began needing an extra chunk of cash for their deals, so Bill started giving loans. This was when Bill learned all about negotiation. The best note deal he ever made was a $10,000 dollar note buy which he got a $100 dollar cash flow on.

Later on, Bill began taking even more training, so that he could fully understand the business of note buying. He took a set of classes from Carl Aubey,  John Stefenskay, and John Behle. He learned the most from a week long class he took with John Behle.

There are some market circumstances that make seller carry back notes more likely. When lending becomes tight or interest rates rise, sellers have to compete with lenders to get financing for their properties. In these situations, buyers often have difficulty getting financing. There are many people at this time with damaged credit due to foreclosure.

Right now, we have the worst equity position for owners in history. Many people are upside down on their properties. These people are not candidates for the deals that Bill makes. The only protection that people have when they take back a note is the value of the property and the equity position of that home. The equity is usually brought about by a down payment, but right now many properties have negative equity.

At any time, 1/3 of all properties are owned free and clear. A lot of the properties that are free and clear are land, but there are many elderly people who own properties because they have spent their lives paying off their mortgages. Those people are good candidates for carry back notes.

If a senior citizen has a property free and clear which they do not live in, and they want to sell it and carry the note, is their declarable gain the interest they receive or is it the principal they have not received? Bill says there could be two scenarios in this situation. If they have a 100,000 dollar home that they own free and clear, and they take back an IOU on the property for $100,000, and they do not get paid for a while, that is considered an installment sale. If they have an interest only note, then they are only getting rent on their note. In this case, they would not get taxed on their profit, but they would pay tax on the note’s interest. This could go on until they are no longer with us, and then this would cause an estate issue, but they would only have to declare their interest portion. If they were to create an IOU against the property for 30 years, then part of every payment they receive would be interest and that would be taxable. Also, part of every payment they receive would be principal pay down, and that is taxable also.

There is no such thing as a typical seller carry back note. What is nice about notes is that whatever two people agree to can be modified. Sometimes grandparents want their grandchildren to go to college. At certain points over a 4 year span, lump sums will be paid on that note. So in this case, one could just pay a large sum of $10,000 pay down after 4 years. With this specific deal, he bought it as a fully amortized note, but then changed the structure of the note to help his client. Bill’s client was going to put their money into the bank at a 1 percent interest rate, so he gave them the opportunity to earn a higher interest rate through the note. That may be an easy transaction for Bill to do, but it could become very difficult if you deal with a large number of deals. Bill has the opportunity to deal with many creative solutions in a market place where lenders are very tight. If the government had not intervened a short time ago, notes would have likely skyrocketed.

Finding out who owns a note has changed to some extent. When Bill first started buying notes, his business was nearly unknown. Because of the internet and the rumors going around from investment courses, more people are becoming aware. When a person takes back a note, they usually believe they are taking back the note until it is paid off. Most of the contact that Bill has with other note owners shows they are advertising from title companies. Nearly 100 percent of Bill’s notes are referred to him.

Bill has many stories about people who thought they had a legitimate note, but really did not. There is always fraud when money is involved. Fraud is more common when note brokers don’t check on the ownership of their notes. There is more involved in checking the value of a note, because you have to first check the value of the house, and then the person making the payments, and then the value of the note.

If you are creating a note that you want to be sellable, shorter works better than longer, and larger down payments work better than smaller. The longer the term of the note is, the more we have to account for inflation. If somebody were to bring you a fully amortized 30-year note today, and you needed to get a yield on a 10 percent interest note, you could only pay approximately 50 percent of today’s face value of the note in order to get a 10 percent return on the investment at a 6 percent interest rate. This is a hard sell. If you are setting up a note you want to sell, it is important to know that there is a 10 percent market rather than a 6 percent market. If you carried a 30-year, ten percent note, there is a possibility you could get close to earning the full value of the note, but probably not if you were working with Bill. However, there is another opportunity for people who do not need all the money out of their note immediately, because Bill can buy part of the note. For example, there was a note on a property in West Covina. Bill helped structure the note for this property, so that the owner could sell the note after she sold the property. The note’s face value was $100,000. They could not qualify for a new loan, but they had $5,000 dollars down, so they took back the $100,000 dollar note. This note was for 30 years at 7.5 percent interest. She used this money to go to Idaho and buy a condo near her daughter. Bill bought the first 60 payments on that note, and he gave her $30,000 dollars in exchange for them. With this money and the $5,000 dollar down payment, she was able to pay the closing cost of her house and buy a new $20,000 condo. Bill got a good yield from this deal, and at the end of those 60 payments, Bill stopped receiving the payments and she took the payments. At the end of five years, her $100,000 note had amortized to $95,000.

Bruce has taken Bill’s beginner course. Bill’s technique is very effective, because he makes his students struggle. Bill believes the only way we can learn is by making mistakes, so the more mistakes Bill can help his student s make, the more they will learn. Bill’s more advanced class is the 3-day Creative Financing Technician’s Strategy class, and you do not need a calculator for this class. Bill may be having this class in June.

Bill’s website is www.billtaninvestments.com

115-TNG Radio – Joseph Magdziarz 3-28-09

Friday, March 27th, 2009

Joseph_Magdziarz

Joseph Magdziarz

2009 Vice President, The Appraisal Institute

stream

itunes

download

rss

Bruce Norris is joined again by upcoming 2011 President of the National Appraisal Institute, Joseph Magdziarz.

Bruce asks Joseph why he’s teaching appraisal courses in foreign countries. Joseph says numerous foreign countries are asking for the education so they can find out how to write an appraisal that could be understood globally. This will allow them to participate in the global mortgage market.

Joseph says the ultimate goal of an appraisal is to assign a value of an asset in the now. An acceptable margin of error for an appraisal is 3% but no more than 5%. The definition of market value is a buyer and seller under no undue stimulus coming to an agreement on a price to be paid for an asset. Joseph talks about REOs and short sales and how they should not be factored in to appraisals as they are liquidation prices.

Bruce beings up this appraisal issue which investors are having to deal with when they purchase these types of homes and then repaire them in California. Joseph says the banks should not consider REOs and short sales market value because of the repairs being done and the risk the investor takes in this market. Bruce asks if the new buyer of a fixed home is setting the new market value. Joseph says in the open market, it should but the appraisal might be different because of all glut of REO comps. Often times, appraisers are not being fair and many properties are being undervalued which is a problem.

Bruce brings up the typical scenario of The Norris Group when dealing with appraisals in the current California real estate market. TNG purchases the distressed, “as is” property from auction or from an REO agent and spends time and money upgrading the property. If TNG gets multiple offers, why isn’t it considered market value?

Joseph says competent appraisers will say that that does create market value. Submitting those back up offers could really help force the appraisers make that market adjustment.

Bruce asks if there is no similar inventory, what should investors do? Joseph says hire someone with specific experience with an MAI or SRA designation. Bruce talks about an area in Moreno Valley and the glut of vacant REO and “as is” inventory. When TNG fixes something, the appraiser is typically not getting cooperation because there is no similar substitutions in the market. We’re the only fixed up property.

Bruce talks about the appraisal business in 2004-2005 and how they were feeling pressure to get to a certain high number for refinances. Bruce asks if there is now the opposite pressure from banks wanting to loan less thinking the value will continue to decline.

Joseph says lenders can make loans in a declining market at today’s value and shouldn’t feel like there’s excessive risk if there are the three C’s: collateral, capacity to pay, and credit rating. Joseph says he heard that appraisers were using foreclosure and short sales and these DO NOT make market value so are inappropriate. Liquidation value is a better term for these types of inventory.

Bruce brings up review appraisals and how the original appraisers are worried about coming in too high for fear of being blacklisted from doing work for a certain account if the numbers are adjusted. Bruce asks about the review appraisal process and what authority they have to adjust prices the way they do. Joseph says these review appraisals have to come up with their own opinion but to arbitrarily adjust a number up or down 10% without just cause would be a violation. Many times these reviewers are not following the same license laws the appraisers are required to follow. Appraisers could ask for the review appraiser to send to them the review but most probably won’t. They are entitled to a copy of the review appraisal.

Bruce asks if the review appraiser goes out into the field. Joseph says they often do the review behind a desk using AVM. This is not the same and is just an estimate. Joseph says many lenders might be looking for quick and cheap. Joseph says the lending institution or review company they pay does the review appraisal which is also causing a problem.

Bruce asks how difficult it is for appraisers to work in a market with such wide swings in price, sometimes monthly. Joseph says he doesn’t know how they work in states like California. He says only the best people should be doing these appraisals. People need to use a professional appraisers and not AVMs or BPOs.

Bruce asks if there are new rules for appraisals coming down the pike. Joseph say the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC) says any new loans that are purchased has to have an appraisal and any existing can be less than that. A borrower is also required to get a copy of the appraisal. Joseph said the use of management companies is causing a problem because they are keeping part of the fees that should go to the appraisers so they may be spending less time doing a proper job.

Joseph says an appraisal is typically good for six months but in this market, it’s not as relevant. Bruce asks about improvements on homes above and beyond like pools and upgraded hardscaping. In an inactive market, it’s very difficult to assign a value to these extras. An appraisal will have to try and find similar comps. In this type of market, it is possible for these extras to result in little extra value.

Bruce asks about “standard 3.” Joseph says they are 10 sets of rules that govern the appraisal industry. For more information, visit appraisalinstitute.org.

Joseph C. Magdziarz, MAI, SRA is the 2009 vice president of the Appraisal Institute. He will become the president elect in 2010 and president of the Appraisal Institute in 2011.

Magdziarz has been an active member of the Appraisal Institute for 38 years. He has served in a variety of capacities at all levels of the organization.

At the regional level, Magdziarz has served two terms as Regional Vice Chair and two terms as Region III Chair. He has also been a regional representative for many years. On the national level, Magdziarz served two terms on the Appraisal Institute’s National Board of Directors. He has served as Chair of the Education Committee for five years and has also chaired the National Audit Committee, Instructor and Faculty Committees, and Education and Publications Committees. In addition, he has served on a number of project teams. Presently, he is serving on the ADAPT (MAI demonstration report alternative) project team and the International Education and Designation project team.

Magdziarz has been President of Appraisal Research, Inc. in Rockford, Illinois for 38 years. He resides in Rockford, Illinois with his wife Sandra of 41 years and his bulldog Bella.

Magdziarz is an approved Appraisal Institute instructor for 26 courses in the Appraisal Institute’s QE, AE, CE, and USPAP curriculums. He has also had international assignments in Naples, Italy; Istanbul, Turkey; Seoul, South Korea; and Beijing, Tianjin, and Shanghai, China.

Play Now

114-TNG Radio – Joseph Magdziarz 3-21-09

Friday, March 20th, 2009

Joseph_Magdziarz

Joseph Magdziarz

2009 Vice President, The Appraisal Institute

stream

itunes

download

rss

This week Bruce is joined this week by Joseph Magdziarz. He is the current Vice President of the Appraisal Institute and he will become the President Elect in 2010 and President in 2011. He has been associated with the Appraisal Institute for 38 years.

Bruce starts by asking what the MAI designation means. MAI used to stand for “Member of the Appraisal Institute” but now means a member holds the highest professional designation for appraisers. The SRA designation is for residential appraisals and once again gives you the highest designation for that profession. These designations are given by mandated educations and experience.

In 1989, the FIRREA Act was passed. The FIRREA Act was put in place to create barriers to entry for those seeking to become professional appraisers and also to standardize the appraisal process. While it didn’t clean up the appraisal institute completely, it did put in place important systems. In 2008, the Appraisal Foundation brought education and review to a new level. This is still a work in process.

Joseph says on-the-job training is probably the most important aspect of a trainee becoming competent in the world of appraisals. Bruce asks what the stimulus was behind the FIRREA Act. Joseph tells him that at the time there was huge losses going on and lenders were able to hire whoever they wanted and they sometimes had no experience. This lack of experience was seen as a huge part of the problem during the S&L crisis.

Bruce talks about the current markets and asks if appraisers are taking some of the heat for the foreclosure problems. Joseph mentions the Appraisal Institute just got back from a Washington D.C. meeting with Congress and other groups in related industries. The Congressional Research Services gave them a copy of a report that was done on all the causes of the current crises. Out of 26 key areas that are listed as the cause of the real estate and mortgage backed securities issues, the appraiser world is not listed. Joseph says it’s good but it doesn’t mean the organization is perfect yet.

Bruce asks if Joseph sees legislative changes coming regardless of who is at fault for the current real estate crisis. Joseph says the Appraisal Institute’s president, Jim Amorin, is testifying before the Congressional Housing and Finance Committee speaking on the Housing Valuation Code of Conduct.

Bruce says in California foreclosures are a huge percentage of the for sale inventory. Often the process starts with a BPO. He asks is appraisers are part of that process. With BPOs, Joseph says there is not accountability and the requirements are different. Joseph says there are different motivations and that appraisers are required to remain unbiased.

Bruce asks how Realtors and appraisers get along and if they typically agree on important issues. Joseph says the two groups differ greatly on the BPO issue and appraisers think Realtors and brokers should be held to the same standards when making real estate evaluations and appraisals. Many states have their own rules and regulations so the National Association of Realtors doesn’t have much control of this issue on a state level. There are 23 states that currently prohibit BPOs for lending purposes. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were unaware of this and called their management companies immediately and halted the practice in those states.

Bruce says a few years ago he was at a Five Star Conference and a lender was on the stage when a broker asked why she had never gotten a listing from the numerous BPO submittals she had put forward. The lender admitted to giving the listing to the highest BPO they received. Joseph says that doesn’t surprise him.

Bruce asks how much of a problem coercion is for appraisers. Joseph says it’s been a real problem lately and especially in states like California. There was recently a lawsuit about an appraiser getting blacklisted because he didn’t give a lender a certain price. The Home Valuation Code of Conduct should address this as a new hotline will be created so appraisals can report this when issues like coercion arise. Joseph says there could be a penalty if an appraiser was caught adjusting numbers or was influenced. The other side is not currently help accountable and that should change.

Bruce says he had read that appraisers may soon have to be bonded and asks how that would change the appraiser business. Joseph says it would be devastating to the business. This would raise an appraiser’s overhead $16,000 and that would be passed on to the customers. The lenders should be the one with the bond since they approve the loan.

Bruce talks about the cramdown in which a current appraisal is necessary. Joseph says it’s excellent for appraisers but it hasn’t passed it yet. Too many people did home valuation models and BPOs and not professionals appraisals. It would have helped. There is a downside to cramdowns so he’s waiting to see what happens.

Bruce asks about valuations models. Joseph says sometimes they are very good and sometimes they are really bad. Areas like San Diego where there are a huge amount of dissimilar properties in a neighborhood make these models less effective. AVM is a type of regression analysis reliant on historical data so it’s not always current. Sometimes these models aren’t updated for sometimes months. Bruce asks if this is the issue with review appraisers. Joseph says this is more of an opinion and not a real estimate. AVM stands for automation evaluation model.

Fannie and Freddie say they test and update their systems often but to not give details. Every time new data gets in the model changes. But once a downward trend starts, it will predict lower and lower numbers much like it did when the market was booming. It works best when markets are flatter.

Bruce asks Joseph what changes he would like to say in the business. Joseph would like to see more education and higher standard of competence for all appraisers.

Listen in next week as the interview continues. To read more on the Appraisal Institute, see appraisalinstitute.org.

Joseph C. Magdziarz, MAI, SRA is the 2009 vice president of the Appraisal Institute. He will become the president elect in 2010 and president of the Appraisal Institute in 2011.

Magdziarz has been an active member of the Appraisal Institute for 38 years. He has served in a variety of capacities at all levels of the organization.

At the regional level, Magdziarz has served two terms as Regional Vice Chair and two terms as Region III Chair. He has also been a regional representative for many years. On the national level, Magdziarz served two terms on the Appraisal Institute’s National Board of Directors. He has served as Chair of the Education Committee for five years and has also chaired the National Audit Committee, Instructor and Faculty Committees, and Education and Publications Committees. In addition, he has served on a number of project teams. Presently, he is serving on the ADAPT (MAI demonstration report alternative) project team and the International Education and Designation project team.

Magdziarz has been President of Appraisal Research, Inc. in Rockford, Illinois for 38 years. He resides in Rockford, Illinois with his wife Sandra of 41 years and his bulldog Bella.

Magdziarz is an approved Appraisal Institute instructor for 26 courses in the Appraisal Institute’s QE, AE, CE, and USPAP curriculums. He has also had international assignments in Naples, Italy; Istanbul, Turkey; Seoul, South Korea; and Beijing, Tianjin, and Shanghai, China.Bruce Norris is joined this week upcoming 2011 President of the National Appraisal Institute, Joseph Magdziarz.

Bruce starts by asking what the MAI designation means. MAI used to stand of “Member of the Appraisal Institute” but now means a members holds the highest professional designation for appraisers. The SRA designation is for residential appraisals and once again gives you the highest designation for that profession. These designations are given by mandated educations and experience.

In 1989, the FIRREA Act was passed. The FIRREA Act was put in place to create barriers to entry for those seeking to become professional appraisers and also to standardize the appraisal process. While it didn’t clean up the appraisal institute completely, it did put in place important systems. In 2008, the Appraisal Foundation brought education and review to a new level. This is still a work in process.

Joseph says on-the-job training is probably the most important aspect of a trainee becoming competent in the world of appraisals. Bruce asks what the stimulus was behind the FIRREA Act. Joseph tells him that at the time there was huge losses going on and lenders were able to hire whoever they wanted and they sometimes had no experience. This lack of experience was seen as a huge part of the problem during the S&L crisis.

Bruce talks about the current markets and asks if appraisers are taking some of the heat for the foreclosure problems. Joseph mentions the Appraisal Institute just got back from a Washington D.C. meeting with Congress and other groups in related industries. The Congressional Research Services gave them a copy of a report that was done on all the causes of the current crises. Out of 26 key areas that are listed as the cause of the real estate and mortgage backed securities issues, the appraiser world is not listed. Joseph says it’s good but it doesn’t mean the organization is perfect yet.

Bruce asks if Joseph sees legislative changes coming regardless of who is at fault for the current real estate crisis. Joseph says the Appraisal Institute’s president, Jim Amorin, is testifying before the Congressional Housing and Finance Committee speaking on the Housing Valuation Code of Conduct.

Bruce says in California foreclosures are a huge percentage of the for sale inventory. Often the process starts with a BPO. He asks is appraisers are part of that process. With BPOs, Joseph says there is not accountability and the requirements are different. Joseph says there are different motivations and that appraisers are required to remain unbiased.

Bruce asks how Realtors and appraisers get along and if they typically agree on important issues. Joseph says the two groups differ greatly on the BPO issue and appraisers think Realtors and brokers should be held to the same standards when making real estate evaluations and appraisals. Many states have their own rules and regulations so the National Association of Realtors doesn’t have much control of this issue on a state level. There are 23 states that currently prohibit BPOs for lending purposes. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were unaware of this and called their management companies immediately and halted the practice in those states.

Bruce says a few years ago he was at a Five Star Conference and a lender was on the stage when a broker asked why she had never gotten a listing from the numerous BPO submittals she had put forward. The lender admitted to giving the listing to the highest BPO they received. Joseph says that doesn’t surprise him.

Bruce asks how much of a problem coercion is for appraisers. Joseph says it’s been a real problem lately and especially in states like California. There was recently a lawsuit about an appraiser getting blacklisted because he didn’t give a lender a certain price. The Home Valuation Code of Conduct should address this as a new hotline will be created so appraisals can report this when issues like coercion arise. Joseph says there could be a penalty if an appraiser was caught adjusting numbers or was influenced. The other side is not currently help accountable and that should change.

Bruce says he had read that appraisers may soon have to be bonded and asks how that would change the appraiser business. Joseph says it would be devastating to the business. This would raise an appraiser’s overhead $16,000 and that would be passed on to the customers. The lenders should be the one with the bond since they approve the loan.

Bruce talks about the cramdown in which a current appraisal is necessary. Joseph says it’s excellent for appraisers but it hasn’t passed it yet. Too many people did home valuation models and BPOs and not professionals appraisals. It would have helped. There is a downside to cramdowns so he’s waiting to see what happens.

Bruce asks about valuations models. Joseph says sometimes they are very good and sometimes they are really bad. Areas like San Diego where there are a huge amount of dissimilar properties in a neighborhood make these models less effective. AVM is a type of regression analysis reliant on historical data so it’s not always current. Sometimes these models aren’t updated for sometimes months. Bruce asks if this is the issue with review appraisers. Joseph says this is more of an opinion and not a real estimate. AVM stands for automation evaluation model.

Fannie and Freddie say they test and update their systems often but to not give details. Every time new data gets in the model changes. But once a downward trend starts, it will predict lower and lower numbers much like it did when the market was booming. It works best when markets are flatter.

Bruce asks Joseph what changes he would like to say in the business. Joseph would like to see more education and higher standard of competence for all appraisers.

Listen in next week as the interview continues. To read more on the Appraisal Institute, see appraisalinstitute.org.

Joseph C. Magdziarz, MAI, SRA is the 2009 vice president of the Appraisal Institute. He will become the president elect in 2010 and president of the Appraisal Institute in 2011.

Magdziarz has been an active member of the Appraisal Institute for 38 years. He has served in a variety of capacities at all levels of the organization.

At the regional level, Magdziarz has served two terms as Regional Vice Chair and two terms as Region III Chair. He has also been a regional representative for many years. On the national level, Magdziarz served two terms on the Appraisal Institute’s National Board of Directors. He has served as Chair of the Education Committee for five years and has also chaired the National Audit Committee, Instructor and Faculty Committees, and Education and Publications Committees. In addition, he has served on a number of project teams. Presently, he is serving on the ADAPT (MAI demonstration report alternative) project team and the International Education and Designation project team.

Magdziarz has been President of Appraisal Research, Inc. in Rockford, Illinois for 38 years. He resides in Rockford, Illinois with his wife Sandra of 41 years and his bulldog Bella.

Magdziarz is an approved Appraisal Institute instructor for 26 courses in the Appraisal Institute’s QE, AE, CE, and USPAP curriculums. He has also had international assignments in Naples, Italy; Istanbul, Turkey; Seoul, South Korea; and Beijing, Tianjin, and Shanghai, China.

47-TNG Radio – Ward Hanigan 12-22-07

Friday, December 21st, 2007

Ward_Hanigan

Ward Hanigan

Foreclosure Specialist

stream

itunes

download

rss

Bruce Norris is joined once again by California foreclosure expert Ward Hanigan. Bruce and Ward in this session discuss new litigation which could mean big trouble for lenders, the bill being introduced that would allow “cram downs,” the lost art of assumptions, selling real estate today in San Diego, what Ward’s students are doing now, why the real estate industry at large was so unprepared for the downturn, percentage hit in price in San Diego so far, the rental market, predicted bottom of the market, Ward’s favorite title holding entity, the Land Trust, three different entities to hold properties, and subject to.

Ward Hanigan is a full-time foreclosure specialist and trainer in San Diego County. He brings you over 37 years of real estate experience, with a degree in Economics and a Doctorate in Law. He has worked in California’s foreclosure market exclusively since 1982, and as a consequence he has extensive experience finding cash, researching title, handling evictions, rehabbing, reselling, consulting, and is a “one-on-one” trainer and mentor to some of the most successful foreclosure practitioners in the Western United States.

46-TNG Radio – Ward Hanigan 12-15-07

Saturday, December 15th, 2007

Ward_Hanigan

Ward Hanigan

Foreclosure Specialist

stream

itunes

download

rss

Bruce Norris is joined by Southern California foreclosure expert and president of ForeclosureForum.com, Ward Hanigan. Bruce and Ward discuss how Ward got started in the forclosure business, investing in the 1980s, why Ward went for a law degree, Ward’s early mentors, California trustee sale market in the 1980s, what the trustee sale market is doing now, Ward’s Dingbat Retirement Program, how he has set up a reoccurring income stream, what properties he finds attractive, why tenants can make or break an investment, finding your customer and finding out what they want, Section 8, how San Diego has changed since late 2005, current conversion rates of trustee sales, deal breakers when looking at trustee sale properties, Ward’s take on the new subprime solutions, what lenders will be dealing with in 2008.

Ward Hanigan is a full-time foreclosure specialist and trainer in San Diego County. He brings you over 37 years of real estate experience, with a degree in Economics and a Doctorate in Law. He has worked in California’s foreclosure market exclusively since 1982, and as a consequence he has extensive experience finding cash, researching title, handling evictions, rehabbing, reselling, consulting, and is a “one-on-one” trainer and mentor to some of the most successful foreclosure practitioners in the Western United States.