The Norris Group Blog

California Real Estate Headline Roundup

Posts Tagged ‘Orange County’

By Bruce Norris .

Gary Thomas, President Elect of the National Association of Realtors, Joins Bruce Norris on the Real Estate Radio Show #295

Friday, September 14th, 2012

Sean O'Toole


Gary Thomas

President Elect, National Association of Realtors

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

On Friday, October 19, the Norris Group proudly presents its fifth annual award-winning event I Survived Real Estate. An incredible line-up of industry experts joins Bruce Norris to discuss perplexing industry trends, head-scratching legislation, and opportunities emerging for real estate professionals. Proceeds for the event benefit Make a Wish and St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital. This event would not be possible without the generous help of the following platinum partners: ForeclosureRadar and Sean O’Toole, the San Diego Creative Real Estate Investors Association and President Bill Tan, Investors Workshops and President Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest, Invest Club for Women and Iris Veneracion and Bobi Alexander, San Jose Real Estate Investors Association and Geraldine Berry, Frye Wiles, MVT Productions, and White House Catering. Learn more about the panel and how to attend at isurvivedrealestate.com.

Bruce Norris is joined this week by Gary Thomas. Gary Thomas is the broker/owner of Evergreen Realty in Villa Park, California. He has been in the business for more than 35 years and has served the real estate industry in countless roles. Gary is currently the 2012 president elect for the National Association of Realtors, which has been the voice of real estate professionals. It is the largest trade association with 1.1 million realtors involved in all aspects of residential and commercial real estate.

Bruce asked what some of the benefits would be for joining the National Association of Realtors if he had a broker’s license. Gary said one of the main benefits to being a part of the National Association of Realtors is the lobbying they do on behalf of not only realtors, but all homeowners in Washington D.C. and at the local and state levels. They do a lot of lobbying on homeowners’ property owner’s, and the industry’s behalves. They also have a lot of educational tools to utilize as well as a lot of discounts that you get with vendors when you are a member of the association.

Gary will become the president in the middle of November the day after the closing of their national convention held in Orlando, Florida this year. His duties will be to be the voice and the face of the National Association of Realtors and to lobby on their behalf when called upon to meet with different groups, including the banks and GSEs. Wherever he is needed, this is where he is going to be, including in front of Congress.

Bruce wondered if 2012 and 2013 are particularly important. Gary said absolutely since there are so many attacks on our industry, whether you are looking at the QM and QRM or what potentially could happen with the mortgage interest deduction. The fiscal cliff is also coming up, and there are so many things going on as well as the GSE reform. The industry is under a pact, and he does not mean just realtors. He is also talking about lenders, investors, banks, and builders. They are all in the same boat. It is really one of those years where you would find it almost hard to imagine that real estate will emerge with the status quo intact in all areas. In some way, you may even have to pick and choose some of the battles that are most important to win. Some others may not survive, and it will be interesting to see.

Regarding the fiscal cliff, Bruce said he read the document that suggested some of the things that real estate would give up if they had their way. Some of the things they talked about giving up are things we assumed would always be there, including the interest rate deductions. Bruce wondered if that is affected would their effort be to bring it down from where it is to about half of that. Gary said there are several things on the table they have talked about. One is naturally $1 million for a first and $100,000 for a second trust deed. In effect, it is $1 million ones combined. What they have talked about is either reducing that down and/or eliminating it completely. The other thing they have talked about is eliminating the second home deduction. These are the three things that are in play, none of which are particularly appealing. They said they will fight any of these three because if they bring it down, then what is to stop them a few years later from bringing it down a little more.

One of the things Bruce said he was surprised we ever got was the $500,000 nontaxable profit on a residence. When he heard this, he was surprised when this passed and even had to make a phone call to a gentleman who was a very smart man. He called him up to ask if he was reading the news right. He said if there is something that has to go, then is this not what would be sacrificed for the rest of it sticking around. Gary’s job is to keep all of it intact.

Since it is an election year, the question you have to ask is if the real estate industry as a whole better off in 2012 than 2008. Gary said we are doing better now from the sales standpoint inventory-wise. However, as an industry we are not better off today. Bruce just interviewed Sara Stephens a couple weeks ago; and he asked her if she went to sleep in 2008 and woke up in 2012, would she be happy as an appraiser since this was one of the areas that changed radically.

Bruce wondered what happened to the great pile of foreclosures that are supposed to inundate the market, aka the shadow inventory. Gary said some of the shadow inventory is still there, but if you ask the lenders they will tell you they do not have that much. If you ask the GSEs, they will say there is some out there. In Orange County, for example, there is very little inventory now. It is very low, and this is not just referring to REOs but anything. REOs are almost nonexistent right now. Anything that comes on the market as an REO is snatched up instantly. If there is a shadow inventory, it seems they would start releasing it. In some parts of the country where they had the robo-signing, this was a problem for them and they probably have held back releasing it. However, in California this really did not exist.

Bruce wondered what type of inventory levels we are talking about in Orange County since an average month’s supply of inventory would be six months. However, Gary said it would be one and a half months, which is ¼ of normal. Anything that is $500,000 or below is half a month. If you have 15 days of inventory and you have pretty good demand, Bruce wondered if you have multiple offers almost every time. Gary said this is true if it is a decent property, price right, and comes on the market in that affordable range. When there is an increase in prices, then that is a problem. It is always a problem whenever you are coming out of the bottom of one of these recessions. This time may be exacerbated by the infrastructure of the review process and all the regulations that are put on the appraisers and the lenders. They are afraid to make a loan.
Gary tells clients that you are really not going into a loan process, but rather you are going into an inquisition. You can’t be surprised what they are going to ask or get upset; this is just the way it is. You also have to be prepared for how many times they are going to ask for the same thing. It is a very frustrating process unless you are doing a loan mod. This has become a dichotomy of effort. Bruce just had the experience of somebody working for his company who was getting a loan modification. He was told the lender was going to call and he was going to verify employment for them. Bruce said he prepared carefully for this since he figured he would have to go back when they started and have a pretty good history of what they had made both last year and this year. The question from the lender was if that person worked for the company, to which Bruce said they did. He asked if they wanted to know what the person made, to which the lender said it was not necessary. There is nothing necessary for a loan mod anymore other than to basically be a human being who can fog a mirror, but that is not true if you are going to originate one. If you are going to originate one it does not matter.

Gary said he talked to one of his agent’s clients on Friday who was putting over 50% down and is having a hard time getting the loan approved. Gary told him it was not his fault, it is the system right now. They are afraid to make the loan and it is an inquisition you are going through, but you just have to know you are not being adversely selected as this is happening with everybody. You would think they would want to make the loan and hope you don’t pay since they would make money on that one. When a lender deals with being afraid to do a loan, usually the situation is if you took it back you would create a loss. In this market, with a down payment of almost 20% they would almost definitely be creating a profit center. It is still like they are biting their nails right to the bitter end as if it is going to be a foreclosure without any doubt. Because of what they have been doing, they probably have the safest pile of loans in the last two years than ever in history. Part of the reason is because of the unknown consequences of the impending regulations coming out on the QM and the QRM. They really don’t know yet whether they have a safe harbor or if they can have a loan called back at any time in the future, whether it is ten years from now. Gary can understand why they would be a little gun shy themselves.

In the Qualified Residential Mortgage part of the Dodd-Frank Act, we are talking about a mandatory down payment of about 20%. This is what they had originally proposed. However, Gary said he thinks they have them convinced this is way too high, so they will bring that down. If you have made a mistake in the file at all, even if it is just a minor error or something that really does not affect the quality of the mortgage, and the people default on it in ten years, they can come back and have you buy back the loan. There has to be some safe harbor after a certain period of time. There are a lot of things that could be done to protect themselves, but in all the bureaucrats are trying to come up with something that is really not going to work.

One of the confusing things is that we have a shortage of inventory for sale in the Inland Empire as well. If there is a shadow inventory issue, Bruce said he would have thought it would be on the people that they don’t foreclose on and who have allowed to have been two years late. In talking with REO agents, they have been told that this is not going to be the path that most of these properties are going to fall into and they will probably fall into almost every other category rather than be foreclosed on. You are really going to see the growth industry of a short sale, possibly a deed in lieu of foreclosure, an aggressive loan mod, or principal reduction. You will see all of this taking inventory that might have shown up for sale to the sidelines. Gary is probably dumbfounded by their new policy of selling Fannie Mae properties in bulk. There does not seem to be any justification in that. One has already been done in California where there were about 500 properties. One is about to be done in Florida that just closed today and the winner was announced. This one involved about 695 properties, the majority of which they say are already rented. They did show the percentage of what the bid was compared with their asking price or CMA. It was pretty close, so they did a good job there. However, Gary said they have been lobbying them heavily to not do any since the inventory is so tight. It certainly does not add to the local economy since there could be a group of realtors that just received 600 commission checks. If there is any strategy to an area that is better off with owner occupants, they have basically negated this and created permanent rentals.

Bruce wondered if there are some restrictions on when you participate in these bulk buys and if there is some type of statement that says you will not present the property for sale for a certain period of time. Gary said he can’t remember but it seems there was a restriction on them reselling them right away. What is interesting is that we are taking inventory that would not have naturally gone through the process of possibly being sold to an investor who would fix the property up and present it in great shape to a retail buyer. Now, you have negated all these things and the property is not emerging for sale but rather being set on the sidelines. It is a puzzling strategy. We also now have FHA selling loans in bulk that are delinquent. It just came about where they were selling thousands of those to people, and they also have restrictions where people cannot foreclose on them 50% of the time. It seems they are making a concerted effort to make this inventory not show up from the lender side. The problem is that it is not showing up from any side, and he is not sure where they expect it to come from.

None of this makes sense unless you drive the price up. Brue said he could see how some have not thought this through. If you drive the prices up, then you would probably save trillions of dollars in upside down debt. You would get people to be in a positive equity position much quicker. This is not an unreasonable goal, but Bruce said he is not sure if they have actually thought it through all the way. Another thing that is interesting is that we did aggressively foreclose in 2008 and 2009. For those numbers of people in, for example, San Bernardino, a typical sales number is 27,000. We foreclosed on 54,000 families in the years of 2008 and 2009, and after three years those people can get an FHA loan. On top of what normal demand would be in 2012, you now are stacking two years of potential former owners on top of that demand with nothing for sale. Orange County has a similar situation where they were aggressively foreclosing in 2008 and 2009 to a lesser percentage, but nevertheless you had a back supply of former owners that would probably want in at 4% interest or less. This would make perfect sense.

Bruce wondered what the attitude of the buyer in Orange County is. It would seem like there would be a frustrated wannabe, which Gary said this is exactly what it is. Unless you are coming in with all cash, a heavy down payment, or something of that nature it is pretty tough. At some point short sales may be the natural target, but you go into that not knowing that you are going to get a yes answer. Even though they have probably improved the timeframe of all that, there is still a fair amount of time involved in getting a yes answer in that process. The process is not fast and still takes a while.

Regarding the REO agents who Gary has access to, Bruce wondered if they make any comments about what they have been told regarding whether next year is supposed to be similar to 2012. He wondered if they have been told if there will be a decline in that year or if we will go back to foreclosing on a lot of property. Gary said he has two agents who do a fair amount of REO business, and they have actually not been told anything as of yet. They are receiving assignments, but they are still in the dark and are not sure what their assignments will be. Gary speculates a lot of hesitation is dependent upon the election.

Bruce wondered if Gary has the hedge fund buyers in Orange County like we do in the Inland Empire. Gary said he has not heard of any; but his guess is that some of them may be there, but the prices are much different in Orange County than the Inland Empire. The hedge funds have a better shot at making a good profit on picking up properties in the Inland Empire. At the same time, he said they do have individual investors who are buying. On top of what normal demand is when you have interest rates at this price point, we have approximately six hedge funds with upwards of $1 billion ready to write a check for anything that is moving. If you are just a regular buyer who is going to receive an FHA loan, it is one tough assignment to get a winning bid passed.

There are some rules that have been very beneficial for aiding short sales, and that is the way debt forgiveness has not been a taxable event. That is one of the things that is due to change at the end of the year. Bruce wondered if this has agreed to be extended or if is still up for grabs. Gary said the debt forgiveness is still up for grabs, but they do have it through the Senate Finance Committee, and they are hoping to get a vote out of both the Senate and House this month before they go campaign before the election. There is a very good chance that it will pass at that time, and there is little resistance to it.

Gary Thomas can be heard again on the panel for I Survived Real Estate 2012, which will take place Friday, October 19.

The Norris Group would like to thank its Gold Sponsors for supporting I Survived Real Estate: Adrenaline Athletics, Coldwell Banker Pioneer Real Estate, Elite Auctions, FIBI, Inland Empire Investors Forum, Inland Valley Association of Realtors, Investor Experts Incorporated, Keller Williams of Corona, Keystone CPA, Las Brisas Escrow, Mike Cantu, Northern California Real Estate Investors Association, Northern San Diego Real Estate Investors Association, Personal Real Estate Magazine, Realty 411 Magazine, Rick and LeAnne Rossiter, Southwest Riverside County Board of Realtors, Starz Photography, uDirect IRA, Wilson Investment Properties, Tony Alvarez, Westin South Coast Plaza. See isurvivedrealestate.com for more on the event and all of the I Survived Real Estate sponsors.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

274-TNG Radio – Jim Spioto 4-21-12

Friday, April 20th, 2012

James Spiotto

James Spiotto

Head of the Special Litigation, Bankruptcy and Workout Group

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined by James Spioto. James is a partner with Chapman & Cutler Law Firm in Chicago. He is an expert on the municipal bankruptcies, and he produced a document called A Primer on Municipal Debt Adjustments that Bruce recently read. Mr. Spioto is head of the Litigation, Bankruptcy and Workout Group. He has represented banks and bank groups, insurance companies, institutional investors, funds, indenture trustees and bondholders in litigation or workouts for more than 400 troubled debt financings in over 35 different states and ten foreign countries. He has testified in front of Congress a number of times.

Bruce first asked what James’s feeling was when he heard the word “entitlement” because up until the previous night Bruce had a different definition. He wondered if the word had a positive or negative connotation, both to himself and to people in general. James said the question that all of us really ask is what we are entitled to. Bruce said it bothers him that it usually seems like a negative term. James agreed and said in one sense we should not ask for more than what we justly deserve; and in another sense we look to the municipalities and the states to provided essential governmental services. This not only includes public safety, but health, welfare, and education. Whatever the right level of this is the government working with its citizens.

At some point it may come to the agreements being arranged where we will be taking away some of these things in a Chapter 9. However, if you are working for one of those municipalities and that is what you decided to do as a career choice, you probably made that decision based on the concept that you knew you were giving up something but were gaining quite a healthy retirement on the back end. Bruce never thought of this, but the way it was described in the CalPERS document was as earned income that you were just going to receive later. In some ways it changed Bruce’s opinion of how lightly we should view not giving people what they have already earned. In a question of fairness from the workers’ perspective, they believe this to be part of the benefit of their bargain.

If you go back in history and in time, 40 years ago pensions were viewed as a gratuity in the municipal context and treated as such. States then started to put into either their constitution or their statutes provisions that made them a contract enforceable.  Some even went so far as to put in Constitutional amendments that said you could not impede or diminish contractual obligations for pensions. That is a far change from a gratuity, which is an interesting development regarding municipals.

There are different vehicles for retirement, and the one that seems to be the dominant problem would be something called “defined benefit” as opposed to “defined contribution.” If we recall what happened with corporations years ago, we used to have defined benefit programs too. They found out, and we saw a series of bankruptcies and Chapter 11s. Those plans were either rejected before a 401k plan or a defined contribution plan came in and replaced them. What our corporations saw was in a defined contribution plan, you promised a fixed return to the employee overtime regardless of how you did investments and how the corporation may have done them. What we found out was they were not able to make the return or afford the promised benefits. What they determined was in a defined contribution plan, they could basically make the contribution since it would be fixed. They could put it into their forecasts, and it was far more economically feasible for them to meet those promises. In the defined benefit, it was impossible to predict what the real cost would be. In a defined contribution, you were going to receive that benefit.

If you looked at the scope of a CalPERS program where you have 500,000 people already retired and another 1.1 million involved that have not yet retired, Bruce wondered if most of those people were on defined benefit programs. James said unlike corporations today, which virtually all of them are defined contributions if they have a pension program at all, in government they have generally been a defined benefit. There is a trend going on right now to try to change this. A lot of it is based on a percentage of salary based upon years of service times a certain percentage of your highest pay. It would be interesting if you had an investment like in 2008 where CalPERS probably lost principal. With this, ultimately the designated back holder is still the employer. No matter how things work out, it always is supposed to work out where the defined benefit is a guaranteed future stream of payments, no matter what happens. It is basically a question of risk-shifting or risk-sharing.

In a defined benefit program, the employer, in this case the municipality takes the risk of the market and the risk of what benefits will be able to be paid because you are guaranteeing that the employee will get that benefit during their retirement years. This seems like such a wildcard that it has to probably have a negative end. If a city runs out of money, this is where Chapter 9 bankruptcy begins to be a tool. Yet, it seems the thing that is causing the biggest problem is the least defected area. For example, if you look at Chapter 9 bankruptcy, then you need to ask why a city would go that route and what the benefits are that might be accrued if they do that. James said it is hopeful to start with discussing how Chapter 9 first came about in the first place.

Chapter 9 came about during the depression when we had over 4,000 cities that were suffering lawsuits and a real demand on Congress to find a solution. They could not afford the lawsuits, let alone the ability to pay the debt that was being sued on. Congress came up with Chapter 9 after a couple starts to get it constitutionally correct. By 1936, we had Chapter 9 that was determined to be constitutional because you had a relationship between the state and the Federal Government where they were both co-sovereigns. Given the tenth amendment, the Federal Government cannot interfere with the Government affairs or revenues of the state and of its subdivisions. That becomes a very important item in developing it. It has been used practically very seldom if you look at its counterpart for corporations.

Since 1936 and 1937, there have only been 635 Chapter 9s. You have 80,000+ municipalities, but only 635 since 1937. Last year, you had over 11,000 Chapter 11s, so you can see how sparingly they are used. They are used generally for small, special tax districts or smaller municipalities. The reason for this is municipalities need to borrow money. They don’t have shareholders of equity to provide funding for them. No one can put their money in as a shareholder. To provide money other than collecting revenues on a regular annual basis for taxpayers, if they want to build a capital improvement, a road, school, sewer system, water treatment system, city hall, or court they need to borrow money.  The reason is because they cannot collect where it is not feasible to collect all in one year the tax revenues necessary to run the municipalities and build those capital improvements. Therefore, they spread it over 30 years by borrowing the money and paying it off over time.

Bruce wondered what types of debt a city has that causes problems usually. When you mention things like a sewer, this is probably revenue generating. They are probably programs that are municipal enterprises that create their own revenues, whether it is waste water, trash, electricity, or even toll facilities. If managed correctly and properly assessed, they generally charge rates more than sufficient to cover cost of the indebtedness and operation of the municipality. There are some services such as public service and education that come through general taxes, real estate, income, sales, or other revenue sources that are part of the governmental services that are provided.

You have different types of services provided, and some of them may or may not have revenue sources. The important thing is some issues such as pensions from employees, a lawsuit, or something where someone did something to where someone was hurt or harmed could lead to the other party receiving a judgment larger than they thought and not affordable.  The municipality would have to then deal with this. They can issue bonds to finance those unexpected liabilities. Adjustment bonds are provided most dates where they can issue ways of financing it, or they can consider ways of some form of debt resolution, which includes a Chapter 9. The problem is Chapter 9 is normally the last resource, because in order to borrow the money to build the infrastructures, you need credibility in the market. You only get credibility in the market if you pay your debts.

The cost for a municipality to avoid a problem, even if it is in millions of dollars, could be far greater to the municipality if it does not have access to make those capital improvements they need to make. However, they do not have access at a reasonable cost because even if you raise them1-3%, when you spread the 3% over the next 30 years you’re talking in simple terms 90% more paid by the taxpayers.

Bruce wondered if James sees the Chapter 9 tool being used more often in 2012 and beyond. He said there has been an interest in whether Chapter 9 will provide something more for municipalities than are under financial distress. Rhode Island has addressed this issue by giving their bondholders’ public debt a first lien on ad valorem taxes and on the general funds of the municipality in order to make sure they have access to the market. Then they have had towns such as Central Falls file for bankruptcy and fairly quickly resolve their issues since the bondholders and ability to borrow money in the municipal market was not in play. They were down to the debt obligations that needed to be adjusted that were the problem.

More often than not the real problem with Chapter 9 and some of the mechanisms is if it really allows one to effectively deal with it. Many times, with Chapter 9 for example, it does not provide any more revenue. It may tip over, i.e., effect relationships that are good deals for the municipalities, which you don’t want to happen. What you really want to do is selectively hit the targets that are your real problems, whether it may be pensions, a type of unprofitable business needing to be restructured, a judgment that needs to be negotiated, whether refinanced or solved in some way.

Bruce wondered if there is a natural priority debt structure for a city where if they declare Chapter 9 bankruptcy, there is still some debt that is more susceptible to discount or negotiation than others. James said there is and that there is debt that could be backed by a statutory lien. This is a state law that gives a lien to the holder of the debt and generally provides that the proceeds or value of it has to first go to the creditor and cannot be used for any other source. There is also what is called special revenues, which are generally revenues from different types of municipal enterprises that are pledged to the bondholders who provided the financing for that enterprise. They either have a gross or a net revenue pledge. The net means the net after paying operation and maintenance costs. Those special revenues will even pay us through bankruptcy and will be unaffected by bankruptcy. Likewise, a statutory lien cannot be taken away in bankruptcy; it has to be honored because it is a state law, and the Federal Bankruptcy Court cannot undo that state law granting that lien.

Bankruptcy occurred in Orange County back in the early 90s mostly because of a very specific investment strategy that went upside down. The people who were the bondholders were eventually paid back in full because they had a statutory lien, so there was really no choice. It was not only the right moral decision, but it was the right legal decision. Bruce got the impression that Orange County would prefer not to pay it back, but they really had no choice.

With Vallejo, it was a different story. Their bankruptcy, as with most bankruptcies, provided a precedent for a road map of what probably can be used by other cities in the future. There they had appropriation bonds, which are bonds that are paid by an annual appropriation because there is a building or facility that has been financed by that with a promise of appropriation to the degree that the municipality needs that facility or building. They appropriate money to pay the debt service, which is rent or some obligation to pay. That obligation would be appropriated because they don’t want to give up that valuable asset. If they fail to pay, there are generally provisions that prevent them from being able to at least use them if not lose that facility. It can then be re-lent to other parties for other purposes. Generally, those appropriation bonds, if there is a value there, should be received.

In Vallejo, they renegotiated the payments, and it was a settlement in compromise. There were water bonds that had special revenues that were paid throughout the bankruptcy and not impaired. There were general and secured creditors including the wages of the employees and their contract clients along with vendors and trade creditors, which were general and secured claims. They were paid the remaining percentage of their claim over time as part of the bankruptcy, which was only between 5-20% and was not a very big percentage.

Bruce wondered if they solved the structural issues that caused the bankruptcy, or if the problem is still there and only kicked down the road a piece. James said you have to look at the various types of municipal problems and solutions. New York City had municipal problems in 1975. They considered going into a Chapter 9 proceeding but chose not to.  They obtained some assistance from the state where the state through the municipal assistance corporation provided a backup for their financing, helped refinance their debt, provided some additional revenues for them, and worked through their situation. The same was true in Cleveland in 1978 and Philadelphia in 1991. We have more examples of states coming in, helping provide some grants and loans, moving some services to other governmental agencies, and salvaging or restructuring a municipal situation without the use of Chapter 9 in the larger municipal context. The issue with Chapter 9, whether it has been Vallejo or Orange County, has always been what pain will be suffered by the municipality on their taxpayers. In Vallejo, one question that lingers is a question about the services they had before they went in versus the services they had after they came out. Some have contended that some of the services are far less than half of what they used to be. The goal and mission of a municipality, as we all know, is to provide the right level of services to the citizens so that everybody not only wants to stay there, pay their taxes, but also attract business to other citizens to come live there and help it to grow and prosper.

If a city like Vallejo ultimately cannot generate the revenue to pay the people who are retired or going to be retired, Bruce wondered if there is a designated bag holder after the city that is called the state. James said for one, the city may or may not choose to get involved. Since it is the state and the sovereign itself, it can choose what it will do and what it will not do. Second, we always have to be careful of not putting on Band-Aids when we need a permanent fix. One of the issues that will be the challenge in the Vallejos of the future will be if this is really a permanent fix where we solve the problem, or did we just kick the can down the road to come up again in the future. Bruce said he would agree with this, and it seems like we do have a habit of no matter what the debt is we are experts at kicking it down the road and not solving it. Bruce does not know if Vallejo has solved their issue. You have half your police force and firefighters for a city of the same size, and at some point you have to say that makes it a little bit more of a dangerous place to live. This would not be the goal of any city.This is the concern of a lot of people who are working for the cities, and it seems the trend is for everyone to think that this responsibility can go away by simply declaring bankruptcy, and it was interesting for Bruce to read that this is not the case and should not be the case. These are debts owed on money they have already earned.

Tune in next week as Bruce continues his discussion with James Spioto.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

268-TNGRadio – Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest 3-10-12

Friday, March 9th, 2012

Shawn Watkins

Investors Workshops

(Full Bio)

Angel Bronsgeest

Real Estate Investor

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined once again by Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest. Both own the Investors Workshops in Orange County, and they have supported I Survived Real Estate every year that it has been around as well as have around 200 doors in Ogden, Utah.

Shawn first decided to create his own club when he was going to Nick Manfredi’s club at the Inland Empire Investors Forum. He really enjoyed his club, but he lived in Orange County away from his club and had to keep commuting out to him. Anybody who knows the 91 freeway knows if you do not get on the freeway by 2:00, you are not getting where you need to go very quickly. After doing this for several months, he went up to Nick and told him he wanted to start a club in Orange County. He ended up modeling the Investors workshops off the style of the club that Nick had. He did not pay his speakers, but he did pick them. He started the Investors Workshops in 2003 in Orange County chiefly because he was tired of not coming home until midnight, and he wanted to do things more efficiently. It was a large commitment for a small meeting, and Bruce has felt the same way. You realize it was a one day commitment, a one and a half hour talk, but it took all day. Some of it you just do because you love it, and ultimately these are the people who have great clubs.

In 2003 and 2006-07, there was a lot of interest because there was nothing you could do that would mess up. You had to be quick with any real estate you could touch. You did not have to be too smart; get in, get out, hope that it fell out of escrow at least once, then have a price increase and net more at the end. There was a lot of backslapping and congratulations. It seemed everybody had money, and nobody was afraid to flash it. In that mindset, you are casual about the decision process because you are blinded by the risk. Bruce and a lot of people he knew made some decisions they later regretted. Bruce said he should have read the book that he read once a year for money, and it was just one more lesson he had learned. Sometimes you have too many big chunks, and you realize there are some things you just cannot do.

When you owned a club in 2008 and 2009, there was a very different group sitting there. There was most likely a lot of damage and absence of people. Attendance was flagged, and Shawn began getting several voicemails of people asking if he knew anyone who did a short sale. The last time these words were uttered was in the late 90s. It is like the vocabulary does not exist for a generation, and we had quite a run. From 1998 until about 2007, there were people who did not even know what the REO department was. Short sales were even more remote. You had investors basically trying to figure out how to cut bait. There were multiple properties in multiple cities in multiple states.

Mike Cantu and Shawn Watkins told several stories about being loaded up with sub-divisions and properties, looking at them, and having to make a very hard decision. The stories were so overwhelming. When somebody comes up to you and says they have 30 houses in five different states, and none of them are worth even close to what is owed, then Shawn sees this makes people sick both physically and mentally. It is hard because you do not want to be the person who says it’s over and they need to let it go. Nobody else is wiling to tell them this, and the ones with the real estate clubs must be the only ones who know how to do it right. It is a very valuable experience to sit in this seat once in your life because it gives you perspective that you would not have sitting across from someone else who is there. It is not a permanent position; you will get a chance to own again, but it will not happen again within the next six months. You need to make a decision that takes you off of the pressurized seat you are on because it is not fun receiving certified mail; and you just need to give yourself a break. You were a renter before, and you can be a renter for a while. You just need to give people permission to go back and have that moment where they don’t have to have that stamp showing they owe something, which is kind of a badge of importance.

In order to have face-to-face conversation with someone one-on-one, then you sometimes have to be willing to have an uncomfortable conversation with them. They are going be more apt to tell you the things that are really going on since it is not going to be solely about the houses they own in twenty different states. There are other things going on, and they are more than willing to tell you this. Once you approach this and offer them solutions and conclusions to where you can help them stay afloat, then you create this trust. The people who go to their club who are members are people who know they can trust Shawn and Angel. This is very apparent by the way they have stayed and continued attending their club.

When you have this experience personally, you will sometimes sit across from someone who owns a house who is about to make a wrong decision since they do not want to sell it too low or on terms. The other choices here are leaving your family where they are and going somewhere else such as North Dakota. This way you have some legitimate ammunition and can tell someone if they need to reconsider a deal. You really can get stronger than you ever would because you realize you are really trying to help this person to not compound. We have a tendency to double-up. For instance, when penny stocks were doing badly, Bruce’s first reaction was instead of selling everything to buy more so his cost was less. This is called leveraging down. Leveraging down is lowering your cost on the worst decision you have made in the past. Bruce wondered if it would be smarter to make a new intelligent decision on the best investment in the future. However, you are still stuck with the evidence that you owe a specific stock at too high a price. You then say, “Let’s own twice as much at a lower price.” Sometimes this is what people do in real estate. They really feel they messed up in one area, so they need to fix it in another.

Bruce knows one person who sells bulk homes in Detroit, Michigan twenty at a time for $100 grand. He has mostly California investors buy them, and it has really worked out for him. However, his disclosure is rather hilarious. First, the home may no longer exist, so you are buying them in a pile. There is this spectrum of damage that is going to happen a certain percentage of the time. Second, if it does exist it may have tax liens on it exceeding its value. Nobody goes to see the houses because they are trying to make up for the damage in one area by a super deal that is obviously going to work out at $5 grand a pop. This is when they reconsider their decision. Shawn has seen this over the last few years. He watches people’s business model and looks at what they were buying a little over four years ago. He watched and listened, and for the ones who were gracious enough to ask him why his margin had shrunk so much, their honest answer was there was nothing much else they could do.

Shawn said if he wants a specific deal, he is going to keep buying since the margins are lower. Eventually they will get better again; but the question is what makes people think this is even the case that they will get better. If you buy more now and pay more for it so you can be in the game later, then you should ask yourself if you would consider doing something in real estate a little different. This way, you do not have so much exposure. Bruce does not completely discount the fact that you stay in the game since his company is evidence of one that had to pay higher prices than they thought they would have to originally. However, he also understands that when the shifts happen you sometimes have to control the numbers. He also understands the decisions mentioned prior do not have to be made in a negative fashion.

Shawn will use The Norris Group as an example when he talks to the people at the clubs and will ask them if they think they can outlast The Norris Group. Unless they are better funded and better trained than them, they are not going to outlast them. It is a legitimate statement to say they are a bit player in the game and they cannot withstand a shift down. There are not a lot of groups on par with The Norris Group or who are not as willing to share. Bruce is willing to say when we are willing to take a hit on margin and give their properties away. We will become property managers for a while and go 8 or 10 years in the future. They are comparing their ability to last, and they don’t have it. One little blip, and they’re done.

In the buy/sell business, you can have both alternatives be perfectly acceptable. The scary part was someone would call Craig and say they had a really good deal with a $750 grand house, which is not possible. There is no way you are going to get out of this and no way to cash flow if you don’t. The scariest thing would be if they went to The Norris Group or any other group who had the same standards, Bruce would be intellectually honest enough to tell them his money is not going to follow their deal. What happens is they use their own money, whether it is family money or money from people close to them. They’re standing on a pressure mine; and in their mind if they step off they blow up or take longer to blow up if they stay on it. They can’t move off it, can’t buy anything else, and cannot exit it. In their mind, that’s it.

The alternative is the rental business is not as appealing with $150 houses. Difference is these were not bought with any plan B. Plan A is Plan A. If they step off that Plan A, they lose a limb. Sometimes the answer is to lose one limb rather than lose everything. From 2004-2006, there was almost none of this possible in California. It was just an escalation game, and it was valid to play because everything you touched was going to make $50-$100 grand. It’s when you did not catch the turn that there could be issues.

Bruce once met with a guy who was one of the big speakers and was telling everybody to buy all over the world. He had an 8×11 sheet of his 62 properties, and it was his business card. You would look at it and be in awe, except for the fact that you would look at the cash flow that was -$15 grand a month. He had $4 million of worth, $12 million of debt, and $4 million of net worth. These included all the properties in Florida and California. He came to Bruce telling him things were going to change and go down, and it scared him. He was not exposed to this conversation. He looked at his list during lunch and told him he really scared him that night since in Bruce’s opinion the man had 6 months to turn everything he had into what was going to cost him $2 million to sell. He had $2 million in net worth on which he was going to have to pay taxes, and he was going to walk away being a millionaire. If he waited six months, things would go down to 0. If he waited a year, it would be -$4 million. It is very hard to make these decisions, but preventing this damage going forward now is possible because you can choose an area and a type where both the decision to sell or to buy and hold can come in the same property at the same moment. If one thing does not work, you can just keep the other.

Nowadays, The Norris Group does not usually buy a property with the thought of keeping it. If they make a mistake buying and selling, they are just going to eat the mistake. Usually this has to do with the size of the volume. You will have a stinker, which could be one out of every twenty properties, and it would not matter too much. However, if you’re only buying four, then you care a lot more. This happens because things are not always in your control. Sometimes you have some very strange things happen with the appraisal.

In the area where Shawn and Angel are buying, it cash flows mostly because the ownership group that would occupy it is not that excited about owning, so they don’t care about paying more to rent. They like that flexibility. Aaron Norris mentioned the Y generation and how this is how the buyers are built. They do not necessarily need roots of owning a home; they want the flexibility of going to the next job market. Bruce said he really has to look into this as a big shift. The way we used to do real estate was we would camp out on an ownership of a property and stay there. This is where you would usually start. When you get married and go to college, the whole idea is you are going to set aside money and buy a house. However, what if this is new and not going to be replicated? This is where it becomes interesting.

Bruce, Angel, and Shawn went on to discuss the education side of their business. What was really neat was they were taking on subject matter that no one else had. This has been a very big help as they have very experienced people who have had an impact on others learning the field. Angel said this is something that is hard to do even within the education space because working out deals is usually one of the last things investors learn. They begin using their own cash or their family’s cash, all their credit, and eventually they cannot build a career on the extent of what they can do. They have to learn how to buy in a creative way and buy in a way where the seller is participating in a transaction one way or another. This could include a Subject 2 or strictly a seller financed free and clear home. They have to learn how to have those kinds of conversations because they will not grow an empire. They won’t be able to quit their day job on only the extent of what they have. Most people don’t even have a lot to begin with, especially during a time when nobody wants to finance for investors.

One report Bruce recently read by the New York Federal reserve Board showed a chart that meandered its way up from 6-15%, which is the percentage of properties that when the people filled out the loan application they said they were not going to live in it after all. There was another chart that meandered its way up to 50%, which is the percentage of foreclosures caused by people where 50% of them were multiple grant deed owners. What happened was the other 35% did not say they were going to be non-owner occupants on their loan application. Now, they figured out that in California half of all the foreclosures were caused by multiple property owners. The chances of getting financing after this report would be slim. You would not be able to go to Congress and tell them which people were not really responsible for a lot of the damage. This was a speculator doing this, not an investor.

However, it is going to lend a lot of credence to the things Shawn and Angel talked about because it’s going to be about how to own a lot of properties. Unless you are just richer than Midas, you are not going to get financing, no matter who you are. Even with the ten loans that are available to people, you have to have so much backing. The people Angel knows who are getting these are people with high incomes who continue to stake in their jobs to get these ten loans, then have all this financial backing sitting behind every single house.

When Bruce went back to Washington D.C., they met with Fannie Mae and asked them what was not making sense because there was a $15 million portfolio of loans that was perfectly current. It was a 9.9%, and they were worried about a group they were going to loan to at 5%. They came up and said nobody wanted the current model because the loan application almost had to be figured like a commercial loan, which is not part of the factory process. The factory only wants to produce single-family loans that are owner-occupied, while everyone else doesn’t care. If you can’t place the loan, then why originate it? This is what really becomes the problem and the overlay of other lenders where you say Fannie Mae will do one thing, then the lender starts piling on other things. Fortunately, we are in a time where 75% of the mortgages in America are 5% or less interest for the first time in history.

In California, you have a lot of negative equities that are going to keep making their payments and emerge at the break-even point for a long time in the future. This niche of “Can I take this off your hands” is smart for both people. It’s like the hard money loan business right now where you have an investor who buys a house that cash flows, and you have an investor that wants 9% on the trust deed. Smart decisions are on both sides of this table. If you owe $120 grand at 5% and were just transferred to Texas on a job, your choices are to write a $12 grand check to accomplish a closing and make payments while it’s listed. The other option is somebody could come along and say they will take it and enjoy a cash flow, and the lender is a beneficiary of a non-threatening transaction as they are much less likely to have a foreclosure. However, this is somehow not supposed to be allowed.

Educating people on these things is mostly difficult because everything we are talking about is based in 100 years of law. It has happened before people had large banks when they dealt with one another. You might give somebody $10 in valuable consideration in at that time chickens or a horse. We used to do meets and bounds when we used to do legal descriptions. You go back and see that one person may be a geek for title like another may be for stats. That person’s boundary may be the old oak tree and the big rock, which do not exist anymore. You have had to evolve.

When we are talking about educating people on what a trust deed actually is and what a note actually is as well as legal descriptions and how these things work, they think you’re doing some type of voodoo when you’re not. What you are saying is, “Did you actually give money to the seller?” No, you traded documents; which if proper and in order, there is no reason why you cannot do that right now. It is not what the factory puts out. You are fighting this headwind, and we just keep doing it and trying to teach from a base of practical knowledge. We are doing about 7 or 8 a week; and these things are just constantly coming and coming when you are doing this kind of volume. It is not hard to stack a list of examples and say, “Clearly you can do this. We get title insurance, go through all the hoops, and we’re not trying to hide anything.” It might go against the lender policy, but the policy is going to ensure they have more damage than necessary.

Bruce said he had just spoken with a realtor who told him during the 90s, a niche that nobody else wanted was wraps and contract sales. He was so busy because he was the only realtor who fought this one out. He had a legal background and said it was worth the risk.

Bruce wondered how Shawn and Angel were finding their deals or how the deals were finding them. Shawn said what they have did was put the word out to local realtors on the MLS because they looked at stagnant inventory. They would also do mailers to owners of free and clear houses. They bought the list off of Data Trace; and this all took place in California and in Utah. The call rate was phenomenal, and it really all came back to personal referrals. Shawn said the number one source right now is he is getting calls from people, particularly a builder recently who had great prices and offered to lease the house that an owner currently owned if they bought a new one. As soon as he saw this he inserted himself and wondered why someone would do this when it could be sold to them on contract. The builder’s lender, who they own, sat down with them, looked at the documents, gave them the blessing, and now there is a constant stream of people who are trying to build a new one. The sales agent is pointing out different ones for them to buy; so when Shawn shows up to close a deal, it goes fast and he is the buyer’s new best friend. Shawn has been able to turn his deals into multi-transaction deals. Part of the key to being successful is not having to do deals one at a time.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

267-TNGRadio – Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest 3-3-12

Friday, March 2nd, 2012

Shawn Watkins

Investors Workshops

(Full Bio)

Angel Bronsgeest

Real Estate Investor

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined once again by Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest. Both own the Investors Workshops in Orange County, and they have supported I Survived Real Estate every year that it has been around. They are investors and do a lot of their investing out of state.

Prior to real estate, Shawn Watkins was a deputy sheriff in Orange County, which he did for about ten years. During this time he got to see a lot of changes and went through bankruptcy himself at the time when Bob Citron was in charge and getting an I.O.U. What is interesting is when you look at the debt levels in certain cities, you can see this being replicated in the future. Orange County seems to have survived a bankruptcy fairly well as this was not 40 years ago, but rather 1993. At that time it seemed like all was forgiven pretty fast. Shawn said it was one of the biggest magic tricks as we had two months of I.O.U.s, then it was business as usual. The only difference was Shawn didn’t own anything. Maybe Valeo has it right and we should forget paying everybody and start over again.

Another interesting thing is the skill set. You have people who are into teaching and brand new to it, but they are not brand new to life. Bruce wondered what Shawn did to gain the tools necessary to do his job now. Shawn said what he did was real integral to what he does now. He was a training officer where you are taught to come into a situation; and in ten seconds or less you have to control the situation, make a decision, and deal with the consequences for the rest of your life. With real estate, it moves much more slowly than that. However, because he had been trained to look quickly, he has a tendency to see more of the situation than other people do and be willing to mentally go farther than other people. It is almost like he can slow down the situation and see things deeper. Bruce said it’s like when he spars the guy who he spars with who is a tenth degree black belt, there is not anything he could do that could surprise him. Shawn does not claim to be this good; but when you are especially dealing with emotional issues, the core of his business is dealing directly with the homeowner.

As every situation is a little different, a lot of the same things are duplicated to where there is like a tape playing when you feel you have heard the exact same scenario. You then see the path you know you are on. Others don’t even know they are on it yet, but we are going to end up there eventually through a process. There might be some off ramps for one individual, but we’ll still be on the ramp on the other side when we’re done. In a way, this is our job as real estate investors. If you are really educated in this business, this is very important. You could be sitting in front of somebody who needs the direction of someone who has seen it a few hundred times to know it is solvable. They can then give them a couple suggestions. This is very important for somebody on the other side.

Bruce remembered his training in foreclosures where they would actually go out and knock on doors. The scariest thing you could do to somebody was tell them they were going to leave a problem up to them. Part of the issue here is their insecurity that they have anything good or of value to offer. When somebody is really an expert, they realize they need to talk with others. There is some baggage that comes, but this is part of the branding.

Angel has been up in Ogden for a while, so Bruce wondered if the business has been branded as being a reputable business. Angel said this was the case as they have a very good reputation in the area and are the go-to people. There is nobody else who even competes; and it is interesting because Utahns there do not see the value that her company sees. When Bruce was in Grand Junction Colorado, the same thing occurred. No one would buy anything; and we’re talking about $10,000 per door of 3-year old condos. You wonder how this could get messed up. It was hard to see through their eyes, and it was impossible for them to see through his. He had just come out of state and was looking at them thinking, “You were buying at four times this level before with both hands. Now you won’t touch it.”

As far as price damage from the peak to now in Ogden, it is not a volatile market like California, so the damage is less. You get very hyper-local when you are talking about A city in A county in A state. Ogden was the place where everybody went to buy cheap things. If you were a rehabber, this was where you went. For them, they made huge swings. They were able to get things that were at the time $.40 on the dollar; so where the fall came for them was not that the price did not go up as much but that the market simply fell out for buyers. If you bought a $100,000 house for $40,000, ended a very light $2800 rehab, and sold it for market at $100, you were seriously making some home runs in that market. Only 18 months later, no one was touching it. Now, for everyone who got into these things, even though they got in what they thought was the right price, it no longer was because it was invaded by non-owner occupant people who had no intention of living there. It was completely turned on its head, and this created the opportunity for Shawn and Angel.

There was not a lot of new building; which was interesting as most of the markets actually had too much inventory for a while when there was a lot of building in areas such as Phoenix and Riverside. However, Shawn and Angel were not dealing with this. They instead had an existing base shifting around. Angel described this base as a 3×5 mile radius shifting around with 80,000 people in it. There is no land to build anything on, so we are talking about a very impacted city. This was a railroad town that boomed for several years, and the cattle train was real important there, bringing in cattle to auction. Then, in the early 80s, everybody abandoned the downtown hub and went north to build north and south. The main part of the city was just choked out by blight crime, gangs, and prostitution. It was like south central Utah.

The city started to turn itself around with the new mayor who was elected in 2006. They dumped in millions of dollars, hoping to make it as far north as Park City. As a result, you had redevelopment, rezoning, and redistricting. Coming from law enforcement, Shawn began to see the changes they were making and seeing beat cops walking the street making it a place where they made it feel like the war in Afghanistan. The locals just could not shake the image that it had in the 80s, which lead to a complete undesirable reputation. The conclusion was still the old one. Shawn went to Ogden because he was told to by Bruce. He said Utah had a higher median sales price in ’97 than California. Shawn was the out-of-state person who told the civilians they clearly didn’t know who he knew. They didn’t understand what they were paying for in the town.

Before going into real estate investing, Angel was a paralegal. She first worked for a medical op practice defense firm about 9 years, half of her career. The other 18 years she worked for a sole practitioner and worked with personal injuries. She left this practice in 2007 after the boom, so all of her real estate experience is really not the kind that generates $100,000 profits by magic. Before she became a real estate investor as a layman, she learned the lessons she needed to learn. She and her husband bought their first condo in 1989 at the top, and they sold it 8 years later at the bottom. It felt like they put a $30,000 deposit on an apartment because they walked away from $30,000. In turn, the attorney she worked for allowed them to purchase a home again in a market at the time when no one wanted any real estate.

They looked at five abandoned houses in Tustin California that had already gone to auction and been denied. The next step for the bank was fix them up and put them up for sale. They picked the one they wanted and put a bid on it, but she knows now she could have bought it for cheaper and bought it for $.65 on the dollar. They put enough in it to live in it, and it was a much bigger house than they needed. Nine years later they sold it at the top. As a layman, she learned the lessons she needed to learn with two houses, and she did not cash in on it. When they sold, their house went up four times what they had sold it for at the top of the market. When you have a movement in Tustin, it is a serious movement. Bruce hopes in the next report they can make a color map that shows the price move by turning green and seeing where it goes first.

Bruce wondered how Angel’s legal background lends itself to what they do now. Angel said it helped a lot with contracting and putting contracts together. She is not an attorney, but it certainly helps with putting the contracts together. Mainly for her the job was primarily one of the liaisons from the client to the attorney. People get a little intimidated talking to attorneys, so it was her job to listen to them and hear what hey had to say and help them get their questions answered. Eventually they talked to the attorney and would still have to call her back and tell her what their attorney had told them. She found that she learned very quickly how to filter. She has to know what a person needs, what they are saying, and let them talk but be able to extrapolate information from them at the same time.

Shawn said with 99.99% of their deals they are talking directly to the owners. Between 1997 and 2005 the buying business was all of this, but now it is almost none of this in California. Shawn has a lot of financing that would probably work. He has been making offers in California and getting lots of positive response. The particular challenge in California right now is time. Shawn wants to make sure people know that running out of state and buying is not easier than buying in-state. They cannot just pick a state and buy there because you heard someone tell you to do it. His office is twelve minutes away from his house, and he knows that he can drive and touch every property that he owns. An important factor is Utah is his home state; so he knows if you take your eye off the ball for a fraction of a second, you are going to lose money.

You also have to start thinking through the locals’ eyes. At Grand Junction Bruce remembered thinking he was going to have to leave his California brain at home, which he did during the purchase but not the rent-out. He remembered thinking he did not know why they had a 50% vacancy factor. He did not think through the market that he was about to enter. He thought about how easy it was to rent something in California, and it was quite a rude awakening six months later to have 50% vacancy despite all of his efforts. Angel believes Grand Junction is a little bit different than Ogden in that it is a lower economic environment. The people who do rent, even if they could technically pay less if they bought it, will always be renters. This is a very different economic world.

Angel most likely looks at different numbers and sees how they don’t make sense as far as numbers go. It is this way in Texas. You could go to Texas, rent for $1400, and own for $900; but the other parties involved want nothing to do with it. Finally, you decide you want to interview a few people and find out why they came to a specific conclusion. In Texas you change jobs more often. If you can get extra overtime you can go to another company, and you are very rarely rewarded for owning a particular product in Texas called real estate. It does not escalate. Somebody could get a property, move, lose money, and they are a renter for the next 40 years. You have to be acclimated to the way they think instead of how California has rewarded ownership of real estate. Yet, Shawn and Angel are being rewarded for owning real estate in Ogden; so Bruce wondered what they are looking for that others overlook.

Shawn said the thing you have to remember is anybody can engineer a deal in California right now. There is money available to cash flow, but you have to spend a lot of time getting another person in front of you as it is clearly a time-intensive process. Shawn can literally do 20 to 1 deals from his home market to California. The reason why is because Utah is an energy state and very dependent on natural gas, oil, drilling, and drilling related services. They are in a boom right now, so it is a good time for them right now. What happens is you have people who have very short time frames for what they need to do. A lot of the owners they deal with are heirs and have inherited it from a descendent, have been given an estate, or are accidental landlords. They thought they were going to flip their way out, and now they are completely miserable on this slow road to wealth. Shawn finds a lot of these people are in-state owners, but he also finds a lot of county owners. Up in Utah, for example, 45 minutes is a lifetime. They want to own something closer to where they live when they really don’t live that far away to begin with.

Bruce knew a lot of the properties in Grand Junction would be filled fast because there was a college 3 ½ miles away. Mary Simpson was his manager, and he mentioned to her that he wondered if the students would really go 3 ½ miles to go to school, which was not the case in Grand Junction. Shawn said Weaver State University is right in the middle of his market, and he rents to zero students. He has found that because they are at a local school they will probably live with their parents. If they are going to try to play and have the fun college experience, they won’t pay their bills. They are the first people who won’t pay because they are too busy doing college kid things.

What has resonated with Shawn and his business is they are willing to do the management. They recognize really fast that the only way to ensure they were going to be able to keep their doors open was to manage the properties since they tried really hard to find a management company that was only management. They could not find it. You had realtors who did it on the side and a few management companies that dabbled in it. By and large, when you call them you only get voice mail. In that market, people may only have 72 hours to get their housing situation straight before they are gone for a month in the fields drilling. If you are not there answering the phone and taking their deposit money, then your business is not going to be very successful. You cannot be successful unless you are really ready to answer the phone. They will usually give them a $50 cash bonus if they give them someone who ends up renting from them. This really pulls people in, especially around Christmas.

Bruce wondered when they get someone who rents what size deposit he likes to get. Angel said they take no deposits, which would give them a competitive advantage because this is not normal. They thought it through to where it would not have risks and started morphing with the training she took with David Tilney. No deposit means that they can get in for less and don’t have to come up with a first, last, and a deposit. This means they can also charge more per month, and she never has to give this more-per-month back. Angel does not really like writing checks to tenants. The interesting part is psychologically people tend to treat their place better if there is not a deposit. Shawn said they usually give the people a list and tell them what things cost. If you break the ceiling fan, it is $100. If you break a window, the tenant is given a bill ahead of time and told to sign it and if they break anything they will be billed for it. There is something psychological about the tenant not wanting to break anything and be billed for it rather than moving out and taking out their last month’s rent.

Shawn and Angel mentioned David Tilney again and talked about how he had a system that may not work lock stock and has not been used completely, but he has terrific implementation. For Shawn and Angel, opening themselves to other people’s experiences is certainly a short circuit way to get where they need to go. In the same way, Mike Cantu, for example, was not a speaker at first, and you were pulling teeth to get him to speak. Now, he has a lot to offer; and whenever Bruce hears him speak he thinks that he has more information per minute as you hear a lot of condensed information from him. Shawn does not think a day goes by when he does not quote Mike. Shawn really likes his quote, “money is the lubricant that lets you go through life,” since he is saying it lets you slide through life with the least resistance.

In the mid ‘80s Bruce was the new kid on the block with Aidee Kessler, and the fact that he allowed him to write for his magazine and gave him an audience was an honor. When he heard Tony Alvarez speak for the first time, he knew he was going to knock it out of the park. It is fun to watch people really add value to other people’s lives, and this is what Shawn and Angel are really starting to do. When you are speaking for a long time, you can have some really strange experiences with clubs that have very bad intent. This is not their club; theirs has a very good feel to it. At the very beginning, Bruce had a bad experience with a club. He was asked to speak on someone’s television show he was invited to do, which he did not think was normal since they did not even know each other. He later spoke at his club, where the man was not even present. Five minutes after it was time to start, Bruce decided to go ahead and speak. The man came much later; but when he arrived the whole demeanor of the room changed, and they hated the guy. Bruce then talked to Kessler, who told him to ask before going to talk to somebody. When you are a speaker and have done it as much as Bruce has, when you get in front of a club you can get the sense if the audience has been abused or not. Shawn and Angel have an audience that has not been abused, and this is good. They work really hard to make sure this happens. What really helps one feel like they have done their job is when somebody comes to them and tells them they did not do it because they heard someone else do it, but rather because they did it themselves.

Tune in next week as Bruce continues his discussion with Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

256-TNGRadio – Carolina Reid 12-17-11

Friday, December 16th, 2011

Carolina Reid

Carolina Reid

Senior Researcher at the Center for Responsible Lending

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce is joined once again by Carolina Reid. Carolina joined the Center for Responsible Lending in August 2011 as a senior researcher working out of the Center’s California office. Before coming to CRL, Carolina served as the research manager for the Community Development Department for the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. At the Fed, she published a substantial number of journal articles, working papers, and policy reports on the Community Reinvestment Act, the Foreclosure Crisis, Access to Credit, the role of anti-predatory lending laws. She also helped build the capacity of local stakeholders, including banks, nonprofits, and local governments, to undertake community development activities, especially in the area of affordable housing.

In their last interview, Bruce and Carolina had just broached on the subject of the need for a down payment. Shelia Bair stated as she was leaving office, “If people put down 20%, it makes perfect sense that they are going to have a better payment history.” Based on that assumption, we’re going down the road of Dodd-Frank and making it mandatory for a 20% down payment before we’re able to receive the best rate loan. Bruce believes the timing of this is disastrous. Shelia agreed, and she also does not think that 20% down payment is necessary in order to ensure that borrowers stay in their homes and receive responsible loan products. Carolina said they have a history of providing no down payment or very low down payment loans with very high success rates. The questions are how you underwrite these loans, what kind of product features do these loans have, and if you have really considered the borrower’s ability to repay the loan over the long term. There is evidence from city programs and state affordable housing programs and other programs like the Community Advantage Program, which has run out of self-help and is affiliated with CRL and a CRA motivated lending program and has very low foreclosure rates. We have also seen the aforementioned in an FHA loan, although historically FHA foreclosure rates have been slightly higher than the market overall. Over this most recent time period, they have actually performed quite well compared to the Alt-A and the negative amortization as well as the other risky loan products that were originated during the subprime boom.

Bruce believed they were probably not a big participant in the years that Carolina covered. In California they would have been non-existent, but they are certainly going to have their fair share of 2009 foreclosures. The deal is not so much the down payment as much as the negative equity, which has not really been discussed. The majority of the country’s problems are really located in areas that had ridiculous prices rises and then ridiculous price declines. Bruce wondered if the negative equity was really the driving force to most of the foreclosures. Carolina was uncertain and said there is some debate among economists about what actually caused the foreclosure crisis. Once prices start to decline, it becomes really hard to come up with an alternative of exiting your home if you are having payment difficulties other than foreclosure, whether it is because you cannot resell or do not have enough equity. However, it is a big part of the problem now and is certainly hurting homeowners, particularly homeowners who have lost their jobs or otherwise financially struggling due to the recession. It is one thing to have a negative equity position; but if you’re attached to the real estate industry then the odds of you making the same money that you were making in 2006 is very unlikely. If you are in the lending business and are paid a point-to-loan, you are now making a loan at half of the price and a lot less transaction. Even if you are employed, you are not as fully employed as you once were. Carolina said she believes families are really struggling right now because the after effects of the recession have gone on so long and unemployment still remains so high that even people who had considerable savings have burned through that. This has made it increasingly difficult for them to make their mortgage payments. Bruce said there is also acceptability right now to not making your payment that is definitely taking hold.

When The Norris Group buys foreclosure property, they have seen that the average length of people have been in the property for two years or more and have therefore been making payments for a couple years. There is a study that says if your circle of people starts performing strategic foreclosures, then there is pressure. You may be sitting next to your cousin, who is on vacation on a cruise ship, and he may be thinking, “The only reason this is possible for me to take this vacation is I stopped making that payment.” You begin feeling the urge to join the party. Carolina is not sure of the extent to which this may be a real problem across the state. In the many interviews she has done she has found that borrowers are really committed to making their mortgage payments, and they feel a real obligation to that with a real sense of self-worth about being able to make that payment and that commitment. Carolina said she wishes we had a way to empirically tease out which of the stories is the strongest, but there are probably just as many borrowers who are actually desperately trying to make their payments. Bruce believes if it was a lot more, you would have a gigantic foreclosure percentage. Bruce said he is dealing with the most foreclosures ever, but we are still not talking 10%. There are a lot of people upside-down making payments on things they know is over encumbered because it is the way they have been taught to be built.

One example of a group is there was an owner of a head shrunk fund in New York who owned a home in a real nice area in Orange County on a cul-de-sac. There were twelve houses, and he was the only one making his payment in the whole cul-de-sac. They actually had meetings every month with the eleven other people to discuss how it was going. This was considered a neighborhood strategic default, which Bruce had never heard of prior. Bruce also wondered about NSP funds. We have this foreclosure crisis, and the County of Riverside has their share of funds. The Norris Group met with the city and tried to figure out a way to work with them, but they could not really come up with something. Therefore, Bruce wondered how successful the NSP fund program has been and whether it was a wise expenditure of money. Carolina believed it was and that it was not a very big expenditure of money in terms of the housing market. We have to remember that it was a program that was developed in a period of crisis, so therefore there were a lot of mistakes made both in terms of initial program design and program implementation. Several municipalities and other areas that received NSP funds really struggled with the capacity to deploy those funds; but in other places they really have worked in the way they were intended and really helped to support non-profits and city governments in both purchasing distressed properties and returning them to productive use and affordable homeownership programs. Carolina believes there are a lot of examples of really innovating approaches to NSP implementation that maybe are not at the scale we would like them to be at but are certainly making a difference at the local level.

Bruce wondered why it is felt that the private investor would not be able to take on the inventory and provide a completely perfect house for these types of programs. It is not that the end buyer is getting a big discount, but he is getting a fixed-up home in a neighborhood area that has some challenges. In some places, they really are working to use NSP funds to turn them into permanently affordable homes through community land trusts. There is a very innovative program out of Boston Community Capital that tries to keep the distressed borrower in their home using NSP funds, but the best NSP funds usually go beyond this. There are a lot of investors out there who are not necessarily as responsible as others are. The idea behind NSP is trying to keep some of the wealth and some of the equity that exists in the home within community hands rather than in investor hands. Carolina does not see this as competition with other investors, but rather a very nice way to promote affordable housing within locally hard-hit areas. One of the challenges for NSP funds is they do have to compete with investors, and they did not end up with as many properties as they thought. This is one example of where you do not know when you are in the middle of a crisis, and people thought there would be plenty of properties that they would have been able to quickly acquire them. However, this turned out to not be true.

The delinquencies in California tripled in about a twelve month period, and foreclosures declined during the time period when delinquencies went from 3.4% to 11%, and foreclosures went from 1 ½% to .8%. Lenders stopped foreclosing. Carolina said they had problems with inventory even as early as 2009, but during that specific timeframe in 2008 they stopped. The reason they stopped in 2008 was when The Norris Group was buying REOs at the time, the lenders were receiving about $.18 on the dollar on their loan amount because there was so much inventory that the price was hammered to death. They stopped foreclosing on the inventory for a combination of reasons, such as they were capable of being fined by the city and prices were sinking because they had 16 months of inventory that was now down to 5 or 6. However, it is not churning in the background, and this is part of what Carolina’s report is saying that we are not finished with any of this.

One of the discrepancies that is a little scary is that we have already foreclosed on 2.3 million and have a little over 3 million to come, and in addition there was a wildcard statement that there was another report saying there was probably 10 million more to come. Bruce wondered where they obtained this figure, and Carolina said a lot of it was in the difference of measurement. The bigger figure, which was the 10 million, included the borrowers who were current but were significantly underwater. The estimate, therefore, was for borrowers who may still become delinquent, which CRL does not include. The estimate also included estimates of short sales, which CRL also does not assess in their reports. However, short sales are definitely gaining momentum in our world, so as far as the investor world they see that there is a shift. If you look at the California Association of Realtors’ figures, the short sales have already passed the number of REO sales in the counties of Orange and L.A. Riverside and San Bernardino are gaining momentum and you also have a fair amount of properties that will not necessarily go to the NSP stage because they are lowering the opening bids at the trustee sales to move the properties before they become an REO. Therefore, they are preventing as many REOs as they can, and there are also bulk deals where they are selling the notes in bulk to where people then have a chance to get a workout done because the new owner of the note owes a lot less than the face value of the note. In the $600,000 example Bruce used before, they might go buy the note for $350,000, and they would be in a great position to sit down with the owner to make a deal.

One thing that is a little aggravating is we never make a differentiation on the person that is upside down on how they got to that point. It’s the idea that one size fits all. So one person is upside down, but you had refinanced your way there and had pulled out $300,000. Or, in another example, someone’s application may have not been true. There is never a mention that when we are talking about a loan modification program we look at some of those categories and say we should not do it. Carolina agreed saying people got underwater under a multiple different ways, and the more careful studies do look at this. One of the things we are plagued by in this research is the lack of data that really helps us to combine all the different factors that went into both the loan origination decision and the outcome, particularly where borrowers are now given changes in house prices.

Bruce wondered what the next few years will be like for housing, and if when Carolina looks at the information if she is looking at it on a national basis or California specific. Carolina answered saying she is looking at national data, and she thinks the policy choices that we make now stand to make a real difference in what happens, how many people are affected, what neighborhoods are affected, and how long this downturn is really going to last. We do not need to throw up our hands at this point, but instead we need to continue thinking creatively about solutions. We also need to really understand that there are things we know we can fix, such as servicer behavior as well as aligning servicers and improving their servicing practices. We also need to get creative on the policy front in terms of reducing foreclosures and delinquencies as well as stabilizing housing markets.

Bruce wondered what ramifications happen, because it seems inevitable that we are going to have a decline of homeownership as we resolve this next pile of properties. He wondered what societal benefits has there really been having the biggest percentage of people ever owning their own home and what this has meant to cities and neighborhoods in the way of stability. Carolina answered that she has never been one who has been for getting the U.S. homeownership rate as high as possible, and she is not sure this is the goal for which we should be striving. Instead, we need to minimize homeownership gaps between different groups and making sure that where there are barriers to homeownership we should be able to overcome with prudent public policy. We should hope to overcome these because it remains true that owning a home is the best source of wealth for all families but particularly for low income and minority families. This is true partly because it is a savings mechanism and also because it is such a nicely leveraged asset. As Bruce said before, we know how to do this well. During the 1980s and 1990s, we really did help to increase homeownership rates among those groups of people and close the homeownership gap in a way that was responsible and actually promoted stability for both neighborhoods and families. Therefore, we should not lose sight of this goal.

Bruce believes homeownership is very important to our country. He was married at 17, so he was on the other side of the equation at that point. He remembered when he and Marsha bought their home after saving for two years, which at the time was only $750 a month; Bruce had the grant deed recorded in his name when he did not have a dime of equity. However, on the Saturday that followed he was able to mow his own grass, and he could tell you it felt like he was a man. It was then engrained in him that part of being an American is you are able to call the shots within your own yard. Bruce would really not like there to be policies that dictate big down payments and are so restrictive that you eliminate a lot of people from that privilege. It really does not make much sense. The pull of homeownership is strong among all different groups. People really do want to become homeowners to a large degree, and Carolina believes the evidence is very strong that when done responsibly it is good for wealth building, for communities, and families, particularly children in terms of later life outcomes. Therefore, when done right it really can be a very great way of expanding access to opportunity.

Bruce Norris and Sean O’Toole had the opportunity to go to Washington to talk to Fannie Mae and FHA about some of the solutions that they talked about at I Survived Real Estate at the Nixon Library. One of the things they talked about was the nothing down loan program and its ability to maybe move to another owner without formal qualification. That idea came from the early 80s when Bruce became an investor. To become a full-time investor, Bruce refinanced his house at 17 ½% fixed. He almost owned it free and clear. However, about 60% of real estate transactions in California between 1981 and 1983 were accomplished by not needing a new loan. They were allowed to take over the existing loans in a term called “Subject To.” You literally did not fill out paperwork from the lender and get approved. All you had to do was make sure the loan payment was current and you sent it one sheet of paper that says to take one person’s name off and put on another name.

If in the next two years we could have a program where you had nothing down, qualified people getting a VA loan and who could make the payment, and also made the loan transferrable to another owner someday; then that would be a very big benefit. The reason is because this low interest environment that we are enjoying right now will not always be there, but it is a huge savings. For the people who can get in now, especially the beginning group or the people who have not had a bigger share of ownership, to receive a 4% mortgage rate is bragging rights for 30 years. The housing cost would also be so low compared to their neighbor over time that they have a lot of spendable money. This would be a very big difference in their life, so hopefully we will not become so restrictive with our policies that we eliminate the chance to own homes for a good percentage of our people.

It is important to realize that owning a home is still an earned privilege. Sometimes we cross over to where it has become a right, and this is something that shows with people who are not making their payments. They have the mindset that they really deserve their house anyway, even if they cannot make the payments. These kinds of people are not in the communities that Carolina has been working in, but she can imagine if you ran into these people it would be frustrating. They do not realize that the bill is being passed onto others.

Carolina has been working for the Center for Responsible Lending for only a few months, but for the upcoming year they will be doing some more research on qualified residential mortgage, both working with definitions and trying to show that a 20% down payment is not necessarily in everybody’s best interest. They also hope to look a little bit at neighborhoods, neighborhood stabilization, and see what is happening in different places, particularly hard-hit areas in California.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 9/6/11

Tuesday, September 6th, 2011

Today’s News Synopsis:

The Federal Housing Finance Agency, who acts as regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is suing 17 banks in an attempt to recover billions of dollars worth of money lost due to mismanagement of the money by the bank.  However, in another story, FBR Capital Markets said the plan will not work and that it will only risk the banks losing more capital.  Bloomberg reported that retailers are planning to open more stores in response to the lower rents.

In The News:

Inman - “Government seeks redress for Fannie, Freddie subprime losses” (9-6-11)

“In a move that some analysts fear could lead to further tightening in residential mortgage lending, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s regulator has sued 17 banks to recover billions in losses on “private label” mortgage-backed securities the mortgage giant purchased during the housing boom.”

Housing Wire - “Big banks could tighten lending following FHFA lawsuit: FBR Capital” (9-6-11)

“The decision of the Federal Housing Finance Agency to sue major banks under representation and warranties clauses prompted Paul Miller with FBR Capital Markets to criticize the plan, saying it will likely further drain capital from the banking system.”

DS News“Mortgage Industry Layoffs May Reverse By Year-End” (9-6-11)

“After the mortgage industry lost more than 2,000 jobs in the first half of 2011, things may pick up throughout the end of the year, according to the recently released Second-Quarter 2011 Mortgage Employment Index by MortgageDaily.com.”

Bloomberg“Lower Rents Driving U.S. Retailers to Open More Stores, CB Richard Says” (9-6-11)

“More than half of U.S. retail chains plan to open more stores because of lower rents, a report by CB Richard Ellis Group Inc. (CBG) found.”

Realty Times - “Lenders are Looking More at the Condition of the Property” (9-6-11)

“It is pretty well known these days that mortgage applicants are liable to undergo scrutiny more thorough than just about anyone in the business can remember. I don’t know about the rest of the country, but in our neck of the woods (Orange County, California) we are also seeing the emergence of a parallel trend. Not only are borrowers getting a more thorough examination, but also the properties themselves are being scrutinized as never before.”

San Francisco Chronicle - “Mortgage rate drop produces refinancing wave” (9-6-11)

“Mortgage rates near historic lows have sparked a refinancing boom that has  lenders struggling to handle the surge.”

Los Angeles Times - “Study finds 41% of samll businesses plan to hire in next 6 months” (9-6-11)

“About 41% of small businesses plan to hire in the next six months, more than the 38% that don’t plan to add jobs, according to a study released Tuesday by Pepperdine University.”

O.C. Register - “Low-end sellers take biggest price cuts” (9-6-11)

“A slightly different view of the Orange County housing market from HousingTracker.net shows low-end sellers taking the larger local price cuts for the first time in two years.”

Housing Wire - “Regulatory reforms suspected of dragging down economic growth” (9-6-11)

“Regulatory reforms stemming from the 2008 financial crisis will add to the headwinds of an already weak global economy, according to the Institute of International Finance.”

Inman“MLS fees challenged as antitrust, RESPA violations” (9-6-11)

“Georgia’s  second-largest multiple listing service has been hit with a lawsuit alleging  that the unusual method it employs to collect dues from member brokers amounts  to an illegal kickback and price-fixing scheme.”

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor event calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 9/2/11

Friday, September 2nd, 2011

Sources:

Foreclosures Now Take 20 months

Mortgage rates hover around all-time lows

Home prices decline in 40 states

Employment Situation Summary

Working Together for Strong Communities

New GSE appraisal database to tighten scrutiny on mortgage lenders

Today’s News Synopsis:

In this week’s video, Aaron Norris gives the news of the week in the world of real estate and other big events. Realty Times reported again that mortgage rates are at their lowest on record.  Housing Wire reported that 17 banks that sold bad mortgage-backed securities to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are being sued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

In The News:

Housing WireU.S. sues 17 banks over MBS sold to Fannie, Freddie” (9-2-11)

“The Federal Housing Finance Agency sued 17 banks Friday, seeking damages from the sale of soured mortgage-backed securities to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.”

Inman - “10 metros with greatest 5-year gain in real estate values” (9-2-11)

“Online real estate valuation and search company Zillow has  calculated the 10 U.S.  metro areas that have experienced the largest gains in home values over the  past five years, based on the company’s home-value estimates and its Zillow Home Value Index, which is generated from those  value estimates.”

Bloomberg - “U.S. Employment Stagnated in August” (9-2-11)

“Employment in the U.S. unexpectedly stagnated in August, increasing pressure on Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and President Barack Obama to spur an economy that’s barely growing two years into the recovery.”

Realty Times - “Making Home Affordable Program” (9-2-11)

“It made headlines when it emerged on the market in early 2009, but here’s a refresher on President Obama’s Making Home Affordable Program.  This program was designed to help up to 9 million families restructure or refinance their mortgages in an attempt to stave off foreclosure.”

DS News - “HUD Awards $10M to Housing Counseling Agencies” (9-2-11)

“HUD announced Friday that it will distribute more than $10 million to housing counseling agencies throughout the country.”

Housing Wire - “Hurricane Irene could cause home refinancing, purchasing issues” (9-2-11)

“Damage from Hurricane Irene could make it difficult for homeowners in the Northeast to close on pending home refinancing and mortgage purchase applications.

Los Angeles Times - “Long-term interest rates plunge on hopes for new Fed stimulus” (9-2-11)

“Long-term Treasury bond yields tumbled Friday as investors bet that the grim employment picture will force the Federal Reserve to launch a new bond-buying economic stimulus program.”

Realty Times - “Mortgage Rates Remain at or Near Historic Lows” (9-2-11)

“Freddie Mac (OTC: FMCC) today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®), showing mortgage rates declining amid continued weak economic and housing data. While the 30-year fixed held steady, the 5-year ARM set a new all-time record low having fallen for the eighth consecutive week and now standing at 2.96 percent.”

O.C. Register - “Home prices up in 24 ZIPs! Yours?” (9-2-11)

“For the 22 business days ending August 16 – DataQuick’s freshest stats — the Orange County real estate market had homebuying patterns showing: 24 of O.C.’s 83 ZIP codes with gains in their respective median selling price. Overall, buyers’ prices were -2.8% vs. a year ago.”

Looking Back:

Servicers made over 120,000 proprietary loan modifications in July 2010, and 36,695 HAMP modifications. Pending home sales increased 5.2 percent in July 2010, according to the NAR. MBA reported 30+ day commercial delinquencies increased to 8.22 percent in the second quarter of 2010. Freddie Mac’s weekly survey showed mortgage rates dropped again to a rate of 4.32%.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 8/22/11

Monday, August 22nd, 2011

Today’s News Synopsis:

The mortgage Bankers Association reported an increase in delinquency rates for 1-4 unit homes, and also an decrease in foreclosures.  According to the latest Moody’s survey, the prices for commerical real estate properties rose .9% last June.  Also, Fannie Mae warned of another potential double-dip recession, according to Housing Wire.

In The News:

Housing Wire - FHA multifamily origination breaks record” (8-22-11)

“The Federal Housing Administration endorsed $10.5 billion in multifamily rental housing loans during its fiscal 2011, a new record with still another month and a half to go.

DS News - “Early Delinquencies Rise Amid Outlook for Continuing Deterioration” (8-22-11)

“The delinquency rate of first-lien residential mortgages increased to 8.44 percent of all loans outstanding as of the end of the second quarter of 2011, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) reported Monday.”

Mortgage Bankers Association - “Delinquencies Rise, Foreclosures Fall in Latest MBA Mortgage Delinquency Survey” (8-22-11)

“The delinquency rate for mortgage loans on one-to-four-unit residential properties increased to a seasonally adjusted rate of 8.44 percent of all loans outstanding as of the end of the second quarter of 2011, an increase of 12 basis points from the first quarter of 2011, and a decrease of 141 basis points from one year ago, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) National Delinquency Survey.”

Realty Times - “Real Estate Outlook: Interest Rates Low, But Still Declines” (8-22-11)

“As in weeks past, the real estate market’s latest figures remain tepid. This lukewarm environment has resulted in decreased builder confidence, as well as a decline in median existing-home prices. The National Association of Realtors reported earlier this month that the median home price in the second quarter was $171,900, down 2.8 percent from $176,800 in the second quarter of 2010.”

Bloomberg - “Commercial Real Estate Prices in U.S. Climbed 0.9% in June, Moody’s Says” (8-22-11)

“U.S. commercial property prices rose 0.9 percent in June, the second straight monthly gain, as buyers increased purchases in smaller cities in search of higher returns, according to Moody’s Investors Service.”

Los Angeles Times - “Delinquent loans on the rise again, a grim sign for housing” (8-22-11)

“It’s an ominous sign for housing. The percentage of homeowners who have missed at least one mortgage payment has risen for the second straight quarter, the Mortgage Bankers Assn. says.  Officials at the trade group expressed concern Monday that the sluggish  economy may be creating another group of distressed borrowers.”

Realtor Magazine - “Foreclosure Talks Snag on Bank Liability” (8-22-11)

“Observers say federal and state officials continue to work on a settlement with the nation’s biggest banks with regard to their foreclosure practices, but the process has been delayed as banks seek broad legal immunity for mortgage-related claims.”

Housing Wire - “Fannie Mae warns of nearing double-dip recession” (8-22-11)

“Fannie Mae stopped short of forecasting another double-dip recession for the U.S. economy Monday, but warned recent indicators show one could be nearing.”

Bloomberg - “Early Mortgage Delinquencies Rise to Highest in Year as U.S. Economy Slows” (8-22-11)

“The percentage of U.S. mortgages overdue by one month rose to the highest level in a year in the second quarter as homeowners who lost jobs were unable to make their payments.”

O.C. Register - “Home sales dollars fall to July low” (8-22-11)

“The local multiple listing service reported that Orange County real estate brokers and agents had their slowest July in at least seven years.  The combined value of all homes sold in Orange County last month’s fell to the smallest amount for a July since 2005 due to lower sales and prices, new the Southern California Multiple Listing Service reported.”

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 8/19/11

Friday, August 19th, 2011

Sources:
July sales and price report
Mortgage Rates in U.S. Tumble to Lowest in More than 50 Years
Jobless claims up to 408,000 last week
Realtor.com, Yahoo Real Estate trading places in Web rankings
Mortgage servicers bypass foreclosure delays with more short sales
Case against MERS reaches Supreme Court
Fed to Keep Interest Rates Low until 2013
NAHB Study Finds Loan Limit Declines a Discouraging Prospect for Recovering Housing Market

Today’s News Synopsis:

In this week’s video, Aaron Norris gives the news of the week in the world of real estate and other big events. Despite home sales dropping, it was reported they are actually in better shape this year as sales are up from a year ago.  Two Multiple Listing Services in California, CRMLS and SoCalMLS, will be merging to form the largest firm in the United States.

In The News:

Housing WireDelinquencies on commercial real estate loans fall again in July” (8-19-11)

“Delinquencies for securities backed by commercial real estate loans fell in July for the third consecutive month, according to Fitch Ratings.”

San Francisco Chronicle - “Inflation May Embolden Opponents of Fed’s Moves to Spur Growth” (8-19-11)

“Signs that consumer prices are rising even as the U.S. economy slows maydelay additional moves by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke to spur growth.”

DS News - “Zillow: Price-to-Income Ratios Still High in Some Markets” (8-19-11)

“While an August report from Capital Economics states that housing values overall are undervalued by 20 percent, Zillow reports that many metro price-to-income ratios are still above their historic averages.”

Rismedia - “Home Sales Down in July but Up Strongly from a Year Ago” (8-19-11)

“Existing-home sales declined in July from an upwardly revised June pace but are notably higher than a year ago, according to the National Association of REALTORS®. Monthly gains in the Northeast and Midwest were offset by declines in the West and South.”

Housing Wire - “Ocwen, Altisource extend ties to keep costs down” (8-19-11)

“Two years after the spin-off, Ocwen Financial Corp. (OCN: 12.57 -1.95%) will extend certain services to Altisource (ASPS: 32.30 -3.29%) for an additional 12 months to minimize costs, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.”

Mortgage Bankers Association - “MBA Increases Origination Forecast in 2011, Predicts Greater Drop in Origination Volume in 2012″ (8-19-11)

“The Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Economic and Mortgage Finance Forecasts released today project $1.1 trillion in residential mortgage origination volume in 2011, roughly $100 billion more than earlier forecasts, as low mortgage rates have brought in higher than expected refinance volume, while purchase volume has been less than anticipated.

Realtor Magazine - “Housing Affordability at Highest in 20 Years” (8-19-11)

“Housing affordability continued to be near record highs in the second quarter, hovering near its highest level in the 20-plus years it has been recorded, according to the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index.”

Inman - “2 California MLSs merge to become largest in nation” (8-19-11)

“Visions of a statewide multiple listing service in California are a stepcloser to reality today, with the California Regional Multiple Listing Service Inc. (CRMLS) announcing a merger that will double its size and make it the nation’s largest, with 68,000 participants and subscribers.”

Orange County Register - “August home sales show signs of improvement” (8-19-11)

“For the 22 business days ending August 5 – DataQuick’s latest homebuying report — Orange County saw 2,663 O.C. residences sold — up 4.3% from a year-ago! If the trend continues for the full month of August, this could break O.C.’s 13-month losing streak.”

RisMedia - “Builder Confidence Unchanged in August” (8-19-11)

“Builder confidence in the market for newly built, single-family homes held unchanged at a low level of 15 on the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) for August, released recently.”

Looking Back:

Energy efficiency loans hit the skids as many banks saw the risk outweighing the rewards. A White House-created commission looked at possibly increasing the age for retirement benefits with the backing of AARP. California rates were one of the country’s hottest real estate markets for price increases while a PMI Mortgage Insurance Co. report listed 7 California areas (both northern and southern) that would most likely witness price declines 2011 and 2012.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

239-TNG Radio – Rick Solis and Andrea Esplin 8-20-11

Friday, August 19th, 2011

Andrea-Esplin

Appraiser/Investor

(Full Bio)

Andrea-Esplin

Appraiser/Investor

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce is joined once again by Rick Solis and Andrea Esplin, both investors in Southern California.

Rick first noticed when things went from an up market to a flat market to a free dive in the summer of 2006. It was getting harder sell, there were less offers, and the excitement was beginning to fall off. He noticed the free dive in 2008 when things got really bad. Bruce said prices were dropping about 3-4% a month. You could buy things 30% below market value, and only 10 months later all your equity was gone. We were not in the buy and hold, but sometimes you almost got there because it was tough to sell, so it was a scary time. For business at the time, Rick and Andrea bought two rental houses in 2008. Although Andrea wanted to buy a lot, Rick was not buying as much because he saw what was coming, and in 2009 he sat out the whole year and didn’t want any part of the market. In 2009 Andrea was buying from all REO inventories, so it completely changed from where she was chasing the deal before with absentee mailers. Now she was building relationships with agents. She wants to build relationships to where she can have repeat business. She quit going to lunch with her investors and started going with realtors. This is the advantage of being around for a few cycles in that you realize the skill set you know how to do, in her case meeting with people, really does not play a part in the current cycle as much as it does building a relationship that is repetitive. It’s almost like having an account where you call on a store that you own where you have a product, and you would be able to only show up once in a while and take an order. This is what this cycle, this quadrant 2, is like. You are building relationships that have legs, which is very different from a one-call closing skill like in 2003 and 2004 that you would need. You want long-term relationships. For people who are in this business for the first time now, the assumption is that this is how it works.

The Norris Group just had a boot camp where two people were doing short sales. However, the word short sale was not even understood for a decade at a time in California. They have a business model that is working perfectly until it doesn’t work, and then it will be nonexistent for a long time. This is what is tricky about what The Norris Group does. You really have to have different skill sets for whatever phase you’re in at the time. Rick said it seems a lot of the investors are good at one thing and not the rest, so people like those in short sales are only in it for a few years. Either they have to change or find a new job because short sales are going away at some point. It’s like saying you’re really good at attending HUD auctions, but the last one they had was back in 1997. Even trustee sales are going to be very slim. In 5 or 6 years from now, there will not be as much trustee sale business. It will be interesting since the Norris Group does this now, the margins are very tight. The quantity of people interested in it is very big, but Bruce said they used to fund people, who were doing it before, and their margins were good but there were fewer people and fewer properties. Therefore, the ratio actually turned out to be fine. What has changed, especially in the REO business, is the accessed information is so much easier and quicker to come up with an intelligent decision that they have people walking in to a business that don’t know very much that become close to 80% capable inside of two months. This is hard to compete with. Even for the ones that leave, there is a whole new wave showing up that only needs two months of training and are then pros. It doesn’t mean they are coming to accurate conclusions, but they think they are. It wouldn’t be hard to do an appraisal if you think just pushing a button and getting an opinion off of a site like Zillow that’s accurate. Oddly enough, the flatter the market is, the more accurate Zillow is. Bruce just pulled ten recent sales because he wanted to see, and it was only 1 out of 10 properties that were wrong by 10%. Most of them were within 2%. In a flat market, even the assessed values are pretty tight. It gives somebody a false sense that they know what they’re doing, especially if this is all they have seen and they think Zillow is correct all the time, whereas a few years ago it was not even remotely correct.

The type of inventory that Rick and Andrea are buying and holding is different from the buy/sell inventory in that the buy/sell inventory can include much bigger houses, houses with pools, two story houses, or nicer areas. This is absolutely necessary because this is what the retail buyer really wants. Because of the interest rates, if he is going to buy he is going to be able to afford the inventory that he wants. If Rick and Andrea tried to sell inventory they have in Victorville they’re renting, even if the price per month would be nothing, they said it would be a challenge.

There is a huge difference between buyers with the two properties Andrea has in Anaheim and Rialto. The Anaheim property is a single-family house that Rick flipped to her. The house originally was a mess and needed a lot of money to fix, and this is what has changed as far as what they sell and one of the reasons The Norris Group shifted to the trustee sale inventory. 75% of what they have is newer than 2000 and bigger than 2000 square feet, and this is really the sweet spot for the retail buyer. This would not make a good rental. For most of their rentals, they have less than $100,000 tied up in the rehab and the purchase price. If you’re over $100,000 and you’re getting hard money financing, it’s hard to make that pencil out. You have to end up with the farther out and older things. You’re not going to get a lot of Ontario, Upland, or Rancho Cucamonga rental houses right now unless you’re putting a lot of money down or you can be one of the very few people in the United States that can get an investor loan from a bank. Bruce thinks a lot of this is going to change; and he got a sense of this when he was back in Washington. They’re trying to figure out how to make it palatable to whoever they have to make happy. However, it has probably dawned on them that they’re not going to fix anything by selling things one at a time to owner occupants. Rick said he is positioning himself to take advantage of that when the financing becomes available. In Victorville, for example, one of the charts Bruce has shows that 76% of the people are over encumbered from either 10% to over 100%, which means that they’re either stationary, going to be in REO, or they’re going to be short sale. If you go up and look at how many percentages of the transactions are REO or short sale, it’s probably 80%. This means that 80% or more of the time, a buyer does not emerge from the sale of that property. Those people are going to buy. You have an extra family looking for a rental or to move in with themselves, but they don’t produce a buyer. This means that at a ratio of 4 to 1 you have to have another occupant buyer move in to their Victorville property. This is not going to happen.

In their Victorville property, the aforementioned situation is perfect for rentals, and they are getting the best renters they can. The tenants are people who just lost their house, and they think very much like a homeowner, which means they are used to taking care of things themselves. A lot of the tenants they have come in contact with are solid, hard-working, blue collar families that don’t make a huge amount of money but make a good living and can get by. They also happen to end up in a first-time buyer situation where they’re paying $400,000 for a house that’s worth about $125,000. Everybody would walk from that situation. You’re paying three times your mortgage than for what you can rent the house next door. You can understand the rationale between to know when you can’t continue to doing it forever.

Both Andrea and Rick manage the properties, although Andrea does about 80% of the property management. Rick said he doesn’t really enjoy the 20% that he does, so he is really looking forward to buying rentals. Also, when you have the thought of creative financing, you never get rid of anybody. You’re buying with a wrap, you’re selling with a wrap, and everybody is still with you. One guy who worked out in the desert used to have a $100 spread on 100 houses. This was his $10 grand a month. This would be perfect if everybody pays. He was showing Bruce this, and Bruce was thinking that if 10% of the people would pay him, he’s gone. Bruce likes the spread and buying at a discount, but he also likes being by himself and having a great life. This he said is cleaner.

Andrea and Rick were more aggressive with their purchases in 2010, but not so much in 2011. Rick misread the market and thought that with the way things were taking off that demand was coming back because of the government stimulus. He really thought the government was going to keep rolling this out, so he thought they had bottomed, making the houses cheaper and there being plenty of inventories. At the time he wanted to load up on as many as he could at that point. Once he noticed that property values were dropping, inventory levels were shrinking, and every investor and their brother was entering the market, he started losing motivation. When he notices we are bottoming again and can get good financing, then he said he is in with both of his feet. But it’s not clear how long this is going to be.

Rick and Andrea usually draw the same conclusions and are on the same page with a lot of things. All the rentals they have gotten have been from forming relationships, although now most of their inventory would be down as well as far as the REO agent themselves. They have one in particular they know will call them on a weekly basis. They’re calling now with things that don’t make sense, but they’re desperate. When Rick is appraising, he usually gets a sense of areas that are either going up or declining in different price bands or different counties. If you’re selling something over $500,000, in almost every market where you have something like this the market just seems like it’s gone. Even the really good areas like Glendora, Upland, or Claremont seem to have so little demand for the product that it’s tough. Rick doesn’t really see any areas that are going up in value, although he is mostly in the Inland Empire. He doesn’t really know about areas like Orange County or West LA County. Rick said it seems like things are gradually declining in most areas. The listings are usually higher than the sold that closed a couple months ago, and it seems like they’re dropping on average about ½% a month. Sellers are also kicking in a lot of closing costs, which translates into another 3% you’re paying out that you weren’t a year ago. Andrea has not had any appraisal issues when she was selling the property, but she doesn’t really try to squeeze it for everything. She wants it to be well-priced from the get go. She put $100,000 into her Anaheim property for repairs alone, something she knew about going in as it was a big rehab. Right now it’s listed at $485 for its resale price.

Rick believes rents right now are pretty stable. You can usually get a good tenant within a month. There are a lot of landlords that are renting to lower quality tenants and getting higher rent, but overall they have a lot more evictions, vacancies and problems that it balances out to the landlords that are pricing them at market rents. Rents are only down about 5-10% over the last 3 years. Andrea and Rick usually put their rents a little lower than market, and they try to fix their rentals as best they can, even a lot better than some landlords do. Rick sees a lot of landlords that do terrible work from missing screens to broken appliances and heaters that don’t work. These are usually the landlords who end up with the problem tenants. Rick and Andrea try to fix everything so everything is working. They want to attract the best people they can attract. The Norris Group did the same with a lot of the rentals they had in Moreno Valley. This was an area that got hit like Victorville, so you would have a fair amount of people looking at it, but you would have only one house that had repairs The Norris Group did, so it was kind of easy to pick the best one. They have not had challenges of kicking people out or with people who have missed paying their rent. One of Bruce’s thoughts was when he resold the house, he would not have to do a major rehab again because things like the granite were still going to be there.

Similar to Mike Cantu, who was on the show a couple weeks ago, Andrea finds her reading time very important to her and something non-negotiable. In addition, she also works out on a regular basis. It not only keeps her in shape and a time for her to be alone, but it is also the time she comes up with good ideas. She can decompress and think clearly. Bruce does something similar. He will have his headset on during his workout because he uses this time to think. It’s a good diffuser for him. Andrea will keep a notebook with her during her workout because she will think of things that she knows will immediately go away. It’s amazing that the ideas don’t stick around, and these are usually the best ideas.

Rick doesn’t really have anything non-negotiable. He has to have 7 hours of sleep a night, which is really the only thing non-negotiable for him. Although, he said he has offered to sell this to people. If they need a rush appraisal and are willing to pay a couple thousand dollars, he will give up a night’s sleep. When he was younger and more motivated he did read a lot, so this was non-negotiable for him back in the day.

When asked about Rick’s best quality, Andrea said he is a really great guy and has good integrity. They have been through good times, and it is easy to go through good times because of his integrity. They started out with nothing, and they had a lot to overcome. It is during moments like this you really find out the kind of person with whom you’re working. He always had her back, and they would figure things out together. It is very important to know who you’re working with especially during the tough times. Bruce has often talked to people who assumed something was in place, and he would then ask them if they had been through tough times together. He and Mike were at lunch, and Mike told Bruce he had seen a lot of people’s character change in the last couple years. Bruce replied he didn’t see the change, he saw the change revealed. This is what shows up when bad times hit.

Andrea’s quality is she will never give up. She will fight to the end to get to the finish line. A lot of the time Rick will look for the quickest and easiest solution, but Andrea will look for the best solution. No matter how bad things are, she will get to the finish line, and it usually works out a lot better than the way Rick would have gone.

Rick read a book by Dan Kennedy called My Unfinished Business, which told the story of his life, all the business he had done and how he carried out the business. He told about his failures and how he would get back up again. Reading is something you get into the habit of doing, and it becomes hard not to do it. Andrea’s bed is full of books, while Bruce has about five he’s reading all right now. What is interesting is all of his books are wrapped together. There is not one real estate book amongst them, but they are all connected tissue. One of them is about how people get to be great, and you find out you don’t have to be the most gifted person in the room. You can be the person who finds out they can try harder, work harder, and end up with the best reputation. He enjoys reading these books because he can relate to them as most people can. Most people have average skills and often ask themselves how they can become excellent. Bruce has talked with someone who has been a karate master for 40 years, and he told him the people who were the best students were not the ones who came in already gifted in karate and could do 70% of what he was going to end up doing naturally. These people very rarely have the character to take it to the level of somebody who has to struggle with every piece of it and finally emerge. This is usually how it is with investing. Starting out not having much is probably the best favor in the world because then you’re not putting too much emphasis on the things.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.