The Norris Group Blog

California Real Estate Headline Roundup

Posts Tagged ‘mortgage’

By Bruce Norris .

Rick Sharga, Vice President of Carrington Holding Company, LLC, Joins Bruce Norris on the Real Estate Radio Show #328

Friday, May 3rd, 2013

Rick_Sharga

 

Rick Sharga

Vice President of Carrington Holding Company, LLC

(Full Bio)


streamitunesdownloadrss

Bruce Norris is joined again this week by Rick Sharga. Rick is the vice-president of Carrington Mortgage Holdings and one of the country’s most frequently quoted sources on foreclosure, mortgage, and real estate trends. Rick has appeared on every major network and news show in the country, and he has even briefed government organizations such as the Federal Reserve and Senate Banking committee on foreclosure trends. Prior to being with Carrington, Rick was senior vice president of Realty Trac, with is responsible for marketing and business development.

Bruce asked about what kind of experience it was to speak in front of the Federal Reserve and Senate Banking Committee. Rick said it was an eye-opener, particularly when you realize how broad a range of subject matter on which these people have to become instant experts. This was especially true in talking about some of the more arcane aspects of foreclosures, how the processes work, and how there are 51 different jurisdictions across the country that all operate a little differently. This gave Rick an appreciation for the magnitude of the job they try to do because there is so very much that they need to try to absorb.

Speaking in front of the Fed was a little humbling for Rick. He was talking to the chief micro economist and the chief macro economist, and they were asking for Rick’s opinions on the market. He said it should be the other way. It was very gratifying for him and humbling to have enough of a reputation within a certain subject matter to be able to share it with other people who can put it to use.

It is a daunting task for the committees when you think about all the subjects on which they have to get up to speed. They most likely invite experts in and tell them to get them up to speed. This explains why well-intended and seemingly logical legislation that gets passed goes so horribly wrong. There really isn’t the expertise that comes with the business aspect of being involved in the everyday aspects of the operations like a lot of people like Rick are. The other part is you have agendas that really step up to play, so you really have to consider if you are hearing facts or if you are hearing wishful agendas. Rick jokingly said he was shocked that Bruce thought there were agendas playing in Washington.

Bruce asked where Carrington Mortgage Holdings is located. Rick said their headquarters is in Orange County in Alisa Viejo. They have an investment group that is headquartered in Connecticut as well as servicing operations with facilities in Santa Ana, California and Fishers, Indiana. Bruce also asked how many people all together are employed by the company. They have a little over 2500 employees and are continuing to grow. They are seeing growth in a number of their businesses, including the servicing business, loan origination, and real estate brokerage. Rick said it has been an interesting transition coming over to Carrington and seeing all these various aspects of mortgage and real estate related businesses we never had.

Bruce asked if this was the very definition of vertically integrated. Rick said they stopped talking about vertical integration because nobody really understood it. Rick said the CEO does like to say that they do just about everything involved in residential real estate transactions outside of cutting down the trees. It is an integrated operation in the regard that they have business units that invest in pools of loans, that write loans, service loans, buy and sell properties for consumers or investors, write title insurance, do property preservation and construction. It is really does run across the board; and the flip side of that is, depending on the customer, they do not have to work with all those entities.

Bruce said it would sound like Rick and the employees have been in the business for fifty years, but that is really not the case. It is like an accidental success story that the company really started as an investment management business. They began in 2003 investing in pools of subprime loans and managing the credit risk on the loans. When the market went sideways, the company bought the loan servicing business from New Century when they filed bankruptcy. They did this primarily because the loans that had been purchased were sitting in that servicing platform, so it was a defensive move. Bruce Rose, their CEO, likes to say that he had visions of running a hedge fund in Connecticut and suddenly found himself with a 600 person servicing operation. All the other businesses really have grown since then to support some of the other businesses.

It’s funny how things work out sometimes. Rick said Bruce Rose never had a master plan to be involved in all the various aspects of mortgage and real estate operations, but he has certainly been flexible enough in that he had a vision once he got started to put together a good business model.

Rick’s company also has a new loan origination business. Bruce wondered if this was originating loans only for owner-occupants or for investors as well. Rick said it is primarily for owner-occupants. It is aimed at this market, and they do a lot of FHA loans. They also do refis and retail lending. They have branches in about 22 states, and they have a wholesale channel, so they are also working with mortgage brokers and helping them to get consumers funded.

One of the services Rick mentioned was he buys existing note pools. Bruce wondered if this is usually a national note pool. Rick said a lot of the pools are regional, although they are buying nationally. Very often the pools have some regional influence to them. What they are really buying mostly are pools of non-performing loans since their servicing group is very good at getting those loans to re-perform. This is a win-win since it is best for the borrower and ultimately best for the investor as well.

Bruce wondered who the seller typically is, whether they are FHA or Fannie. Rick said they have participated in both government agency pools as well as pools sold off by large lenders or other financial institutions. Typically they work these loans through their servicing group and ultimately wind up foreclosing on less than 20% of the loans they purchase. The guys are very good at finding a way to come up with alternative disposition strategies other than foreclosures. It is a big deal when 8 out of 10+ families get to stay there and retain ownership. Bruce wondered if this is typical, or if they turn to lease or sometimes renters. Rick said no but that this is an interesting phenomenon. They really expected to see more of an interest in people handing over the deed and taking a lease. What they found was that the people who want to stay in the homes really want to stay in as the borrower and just do a loan modification. Since they are buying the loans at a discount, they can usually pass on some of the savings in terms of lower payment prices on a mortgage.

A lot of the people don’t really want to stay anymore, so they become very good candidates for short sales or even sometimes deeds in lieu. In other cases, people are really just ready to move on and get on with the rest of their lives and are happy for the opportunity to do a short sale so they don’t have debt hanging over their head.

Bruce asked Rick if a high percentage of the time the occupant owner is cooperating with a short sale or if they are getting the loan recast and stay to make the payment. These two categories make up the 80% that he talked about with Bruce. A lot of it depends on the pool and what part of the country you are in, whether the Northeast or elsewhere. If you are in the northeast and in a state like New York where you have 1100 day foreclosure cycles, it is sometimes harder to get a borrower to agree to a short sale since they know they do not have to do anything for a couple years. It takes 1100 days for a foreclosure in New York and 1,000 in New Jersey. It will ultimately wind up having a negative effect on the real estate recovery since the distressed inventory will be around for so long.

Bruce asked if Rick thinks we will ever see a national foreclosure law. Rick said probably not, at least not in our lifetime. The CFPB recently put out national loan servicing standards, and those were mostly aimed at servicing of delinquent loans. After they issued their national standards, they issued an addendum saying that state laws trump these national laws. From the perspective of a company that does loan servicing in many states, it would be great to have one set of foreclosure rules and one set of servicing standards, but it really does get into the whole state rights versus federal rights issue. Right now foreclosure laws are all managed by the states.

Carrington is also buying properties, although very selectively. They think the market is very frothy right now. Rick and Bruce have talked about how well some of the business models hold up or don’t hold up as home prices appreciate very rapidly. Right now there are better opportunities in things like non-performing loans and mortgage servicing right now. They are just not willing to pay 125% list price for a property they are going to hold onto and try to get a rental return. At the same time, there seems to be a new player willing to do that almost every day. Everybody has a different business model. There was an announcement recently about one of the companies having an IPO. If you are overpaying a little bit but put some leverage into your purchase by getting other people’s money, sometimes the returns look better. Rick said he does not know what the implications are for the people that are doing the follow-up investing on properties that were intrinsically over-valued. There is a lot of money coming into the return rates, so it will be really interesting to see if they are able to deliver what their perspectives indicated they would.

Rick is probably a lot more familiar with the different business models that are out there. For Carrington’s purpose, Bruce wondered if whenever they bought a property it was always the intent for them to have it occupied by a renter for some period of time and then resell it for a profit. Rick said typically when they buy a property this is the model. It is almost always with the notion of having somebody rent the property out for a period of 3-5 years and then sell it as home prices appreciate. Their model was and is a hybrid model. There are rental returns built into it as well as home price appreciation. When a market overheats, it really makes both parts of the model difficult to achieve because the underlying collateral is potentially over-priced.

Bruce wondered what surprised Rick as he went through the buying effort. He wondered if there was something more difficult than he thought it would be originally. Rick said there were a couple things, and the two biggest really come down to inventory. The properties of REOS and lender-owned properties really dried up much more quickly than they or anybody had anticipated. As part of that, there had been speculation that they would see a lot of bulk sales and fairly large pools of properties sold. This has really not been the case as there has been a couple exceptions over the last few years, although really not that much. The other surprise was how much interest developed in the particular asset class so quickly. It seemed there was a new company announcing a new $100 million fund every day. It went from an interesting idea to the investment topic de jeur.

Bruce said when they are bidding at the trustee sale they can always tell that somebody has gotten their first $100 million since it is usually spent in a 3-day period. Along these lines, Rick heard an anecdotal piece from an auction in Atlanta where one of the institutional people ran out of checks. What is sad is that because they are doing so much business, the auctioneer actually waits for them to come back. From the auctioneer’s perspective, it makes sense to wait for the person who is coming back with the fresh set of checks.

Since people worry a lot about home price inflation rather than appreciation, the encouraging thing Rick has seen is that as the investors have come and gone from some of the markets, the prices have held. They may have accelerated the price appreciation and driven prices up a little faster than they would have gone on their own. However, once they have hit that new level they have generally held. This suggests that the value is still right for the properties that are being purchased. Rick brings up a really important point and something that is really a concern of people that are investors. Bruce does not think the homeowners really thought things out because this is a new experience. Bruce does not recall ever having this money invested in single-family homes. To Bruce, this is an unprecedented group of people. Collectively, all of these companies together have become market-makers.

Rick thinks the aforementioned is over-stated in the press right now. On a localized basis you could sometimes make an argument that they could become market makers. If you look at Phoenix last year and Atlanta, you see it happening. Collectively, there was $10 billion of funding announced last year, which was not all spent. $10 billion as a percentage of the overall housing market where there were about 5 million units sold is really a rounding error. Bruce has been studying foreign buying, which is about $800 billion. Rick does not think the institutional investors are really market makers in a broad sense. It has been interesting press conversation since it is not a new phenomenon. In terms of actual impact on the overall market, this affect has been overstated.

Bruce wondered if he also feels the same way about rent values. He wondered if they would not have so much inventory that they would sway. Rick said not yet since rental units are still occupied somewhere north of 95% across the country. What they have seen on a short-term basis is you take a neighborhood in Phoenix, and suddenly there are a lot of homes on the market for rent. You might have a temporary over supply because you cannot break their lease and move into something new. There could be some softening of rental rates, but he does not think it is because the entire inventory is hit at once.
FHA just announced that they were selling 40,000 notes this year, which is in a competitive bid situation. Bruce wondered if the FHA retains part ownership of this. Rick said he is not aware of any of those types of arrangements where the seller retains partial ownership. Rick believes they are all at right sales. The government pools, specifically FHA pools, tend to come with more specific requirements and language about what the buyer may or may not do with the pools. In the FHA pool that was sold earlier this year, there was some language that restricted buyers from being able to foreclose on properties for a certain period of time. It required a certain percentage of loan modifications. There were more restrictions and requirements with the government pools than with the private pools, and Rick believes they are all outright sales.

Bruce wondered if these are all auction type settings to where it is just the highest bidder who receives it. Rick said he is sure highest bid is one of the factors, but there are also performance and disposition considerations. He is not sure it is necessarily 100% based on the highest bid, but they do at least have to be competitive.

Carrington has a model where they are going to buy and sell a property. Bruce wondered if there are other models he is aware of that are going to have the single-family homes with a different disposition where they may be putting the homes into a scattered apartment type REIT. Bruce said they would not come back on the market; although Rick said they will at some point, and this is one of the differences between a traditional apartment REIT and a real estate investment trust. It would make sense to build flexibility into a REIT like this where you can move certain properties out and replenish with other properties as they come to market. Rick is not aware of anybody’s plans that call for a permanent hold of the rental properties. The big variances tend to be the length of the potential hold and how much of the return for your investors you are planning to get for rental rates as opposed to home price appreciation.

Rick talked to a group in Indiana, and they were looking at 18-20% annual yields on the rentals, but they were really ultra holds. They did not see prices appreciating in a suburb in Indianapolis any time soon. Rick said they saw another big investor get out of Northern California since they were buying three $400,000 homes. You cannot simply have rental yields since you cannot charge $3-$4,000 a month rent for too many tenants. What they saw was home prices appreciating more rapidly than they thought, so they got out and made their profit. The REITs would be long holds. What you are basically counting on is the cash flow from the rental units being what you are investing in. Those building units would stay in the REIT longer than a typical buy and short-term hold. There could be some transactions that move properties in and out of that REIT.

Bruce asked Rick what a long-term hold would be. Rick said it would probably be anywhere from 5-10 years, which is a long-term hold. The average for most people going in was they were looking at a 3-5 year old. If you are looking at a REIT, you are probably looking at something a little longer than that. Bruce said it would seem to him that most of the product they would have in the REIT would have to be bought in the next 6-12 months. One of the largest investment groups looking into this was Blackstone, and they really believed there was about a two-year buying window, and we are in the second year of this right now. As prices go up, it gets harder to get the returns you are trying to find.

Bruce wondered if they keep switching locations, or if they do them all simultaneously. Rick said you are actually seeing a movement right now away from some of the more popular states. Typically everyone started where the foreclosure numbers were the highest, so you go for states such as Arizona, California, Nevada, Florida. What we are seeing now is a movement into second tier states, or states that did not have as terrible a fall from peak to trough in terms of home prices. In this case, you can buy reasonably priced homes and get a reasonable rental yield for the next few years. It is really not a buy/flip business so much as it is something that already cash flows and you might as well keep it.

Bruce asked Rick if he thinks this model is going to be gone at some point and they will find something more traditional to do with their billions of dollars. Rick said as there are other opportunities to deliver good returns, you will see less interest in this. However, he thinks you will see a more permanent group of large investors in the single-family rental space when we come out of this cycle than when we started.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 9/4/12

Tuesday, September 4th, 2012

Today’s News Synopsis:

Home prices grew 3.8% in July,  the highest in six years.  Construction on new homes, however, decreased month-over-month in July after showing gains for six months straight.  Freddie Mac is helping people affected by Hurricane Isaac by offering relief policies to those affected in Louisiana and Mississippi.


In The News:

Housing Wire“July construction levels break months of gains: Commerce Department” (9-4-12)

“The construction of new residences fell from June to July as overall construction spending contracted after six months of gains, the Commerce Department said Tuesday.”

DS News“Freddie Mac Offers Disaster Relief for Borrowers Affected by Isaac” (9-4-12)

Freddie Mac announced it has relief policies for borrowers impacted by Hurricane Isaac.  The relief polices are specifically for Freddie Mac borrowers located in Louisiana and Mississippi jurisdictions declared by President Barack Obama as disaster areas”

Inman“Home prices post strongest growth in 6 years” (9-4-12)

“A home price index based on multiple listing service data showed national home prices were up 3.8 percent from a year ago in July, the biggest annual increase since August 2006.”

Housing Wire“Credit union mortgage lending doubles in California” (9-4-12)

“California credit unions took advantage of the Home Affordable Refinance Program and originated twice as many home loans in second quarter than the previous three months.”

Realty Trac“How Real Mortgage Fraud Causes Foreclosures” (9-4-12)

“Mortgage  fraud is on the rise and that’s a trend which should thrill no one.  According to Experian, “a total of 39 in every 10,000 mortgage applications were identified as  fraudulent between April and June 2012, up from 32 in during the same period in  2011.’”

DS News“Foreclosure-Focused Reality TV Show to Debut in October” (9-4-12)

Next 1 Interactive, Inc., a media company focused on travel and real estate, announced Tuesday that the pilot episode of a new home improvement reality show focused on foreclosure renovation saw some success in a test market in New York.”

CNN Money“Wal-Mart cuts layaway fee” (9-4-12)

“Wal-Mart Stores said Tuesday it is cutting the upfront fee it charges customers who use its layaway plan.”

DS News“Mortgage Industry Nets 1,335 Jobs: Mortgage Daily” (9-4-12)

“For the fourth consecutive quarter, the mortgage industry posted a net gain in jobs, according to Mortgage Daily’s Second Quarter 2012 Mortgage Employment Index.”

Hard Money Loan Closed

Lomita, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $248,000 on a 2 bedroom, 1 bathroom home appraised for $390,000.

 

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Real Estate Investment Expo in Santa Clara Saturday, September 8, 2012.

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Los Angeles Real Estate Investors Association on Tuesday, September 11, 2012.

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the InvestClub for Women in Los Angeles Tuesday, September 18, 2012.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

Rick Sharga, Vice President of Carrington Mortgage Holdings, Joins Bruce Norris on the Real Estate Radio Show #282

Friday, June 15th, 2012

Rick_Sharga

 

Rick Sharga

Vice President of Carrington Mortgage Holdings, LLC

(Full Bio)


streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined by Rick Sharga. Rick is the executive vice-president at Carrington Mortgage Holdings, LLC. He is one of the nation’s most frequently quoted sources on foreclosure, mortgage, and real estate trends. He has appeared on NBC Nightly News, CNN, CBS, NBC, and just about every possible outlook. Rick is also a member of the board of directors of REO Max and president of the Technology Counsel of Southern California.

Bruce said Rick has changed hats since he last spoke with him and has begun work with Carrington. As the vice president, Rick said there is plenty to do. It is a 2,000+ person company that in a lot of ways is still in growth mode. The oldest part of the company there that is still part of the family really was only founded in 2003. There is no shortage of things to do, but candidly he is doing a lot of similar work he used to do when he was over at Realty Trac. He tries to make the Carrington brand name a little better known in the various markets in which they serve. Bruce wondered what they do at Carrington and what they would be putting themselves in front of that would be different from Realty Trac. Rick said it is a very different company.

The company was started through a hedge fund back in 2003. It was started by Bruce Rose, a gentleman who came out of Saloman Smith Barney, who started investing in mortgage-backed securities. A lot of mortgage-backed securities at the company were built on sub-prime loans. When the market started to go sideways, Bruce decided they really needed to do something to be able to take over servicing of the loans that were in those pools in order to manage their disposition. They bought the mortgage servicing business from New Centuries’ bankruptcy in 2007, and since then they have started ancillary business units to support the investment and servicing operations. They created Carrington Property Services to manage the assets, and they created White Van Real Estate Services to do property preservation field services. They also have a real estate brokerage called Atlantic and Pacific Real Estate that manages the sales transactions of properties. They also created a mortgage lending business called Carrington Home Loans that actually originates mortgages as well as a title and escrow company. They are really involved in virtually every aspect of the single-family real estate business, ranging from investing in pools of loans all the way through writing title on an individual property.

In regards to purchasing loans in bulk, Bruce wondered if this is still a main stay. Rick said this is the case and that the market is finally starting to open up a little. Bruce knew there was a dry spell, but he did not know how extensive it was. Both Rick and Bruce anticipated they would see larger pools of loans being sold off earlier in this downturn than they actually have. Rick said they have purchased two pools of loans from large lenders, somewhere in the $150-$250 million range in the last few months. These are all nonperforming loans that they then tried to modify using their servicing organization. They had a pretty good track record of loan modifications, so it is an absolute important part of their business.

Bruce wondered what the concentration of the location would be for the loans, whether it would be the East Coast or the West Coast. Rick said they are still looking at the hardest hit states and will probably skew more towards the Southwest and the Southeast. Occasionally they will see some business in Texas or Illinois, but mostly it will be in the Southwest and Southeast.

Foreclosure laws are different everywhere, so Bruce wondered if this really makes a challenge trying to get ownership of the property. In California, the rules change almost every quarter, so Bruce wondered if this is going on everywhere. Rick said unfortunately yes. He was talking with someone in the servicing business earlier, and he did not realize there are 45 separate state programs that are only oriented towards working with distressed borrowers that as a servicer you have to be aware of and potentially plugged into in order to help the borrowers avail themselves of state funds to get out of trouble. Florida is still a huge mess; it is a judicial foreclosure state that takes over 750 days to do a foreclosure. New York still has the distinction of having the longest foreclosure cycle at 1100+ days from the time the borrower receives the notice of default through the date the short sale takes place. It does vary greatly for obvious reasons. If you are a company like Rick’s, you try to avoid states like Florida, New York, and New Jersey, which are just backlogged and very difficult to get through the process. The reality is they are trying to modify more loans than they foreclose on, but even doing that becomes problematic in those states. Forget about the law changes and the regulatory changes. Borrowers really don’t have a lot of motivation to modify their loans in those states because they have not paid anything in a while. They do get used to this, and it is probably easy to get used to.

Bruce wondered when they are buying pools, are they in a competitive bid situation or a relationship-oriented offer. Typically there are competitive bidders involved; and very often when they do not secure pools, it is because someone overvalued it and is overbidding for those assets. The number of bidders is typically fairly limited. One of the aspects that is relationship oriented is the more intelligent lenders will take a look at what will happen to their borrowers if they release the assets to an investor. To a certain extent they would much prefer to work with a company like Rick’s since they will take good care of their borrowers and come up with better resolutions.

There are other investors Rick categorizes as churn and burn guys who really are trying to rapidly move into foreclosure, evict the borrowers, and flip the properties for some short-term profit. This not only is not good for the borrowers, but it is not good for the local housing market either. It is because you are selling these properties at a pretty significant discount at a time when the market really does not need much more of that. Bruce said he wishes they were selling at a significant discount. There is a lot of new money that has shown up that seems bent on paying full price and still writing a check for it with all cash. Rick said they raised $450 million at the company with their partner, Oak Tree, to go out and buy vacant REO properties and convert them into rentals.

Rick said Bruce really sets the bar for how to handle things like this in a local market, so to a certain extent there is institutional money coming into the market to compete with individual investors like himself. The reality is we are walking away from most opportunities to purchase right now because the numbers have gotten silly. They see people coming in and paying full value or over value on a property just so they can get into this part of the market, and this is not a terribly intelligent strategy and focused more on short-term than on long term opportunities.

It seems to be they have had the same dream that the best avenue for wealth is to own real estate in Riverside. Rick laughingly said it is not just in Riverside, but they saw Bruce get rich so fast they figured that was the best place to go. Bruce said they think there is nothing else to do with their money, and he wondered if this will change and their attention will be withdrawn from residential real estate just as fast as it showed up. Rick said they are concerned about the nature of the investors getting involved for the reason Bruce is suggesting. They are also concerned that they are seeing some people getting in and already trying to use leverage to buy, which suggests they might be under-capitalized. As a landlord, you need some underlying capital to be able to support the infrastructure and properly maintain the property. They are a little concerned about under-capitalized companies coming in. They have actually heard investors say things like they will buy the properties now and figure out how to manage them later, which is scary.

The cities are really willing to find them on their way to education. This is a lesson that some of these folks are going to learn the hard way, but there is still significant interest in finding ways to invest in the residential real estate market. There are precious few ways to do that from an institutional perspective. There is an opportunity to participate this way in a way that also fills the market need since Rick believes we will see significantly more rental activity over the next few years. It can be a win-win if it is done properly, and Rick tends to believe there is enough inventory for everybody that institutional investment is only going to take up a certain percentage of the market, individual investors like Bruce, and homebuyers will still be able to find the inventory they are looking for once the spigots are opened up a little bit by the people holding the assets.

With all the infrastructure of REO agents all over the place, Bruce wonders why a lender would choose to sell in bulk if they could just list them with people who used to have 500 listings and now have 50. Bruce wondered why they would choose the bulk route, to which Rick said this is a question the realtors raised regularly. If we were really dealing with limited inventory, and if all of the inventory saleable that way, then they would probably not be having a conversation about it. There are a couple macro trends that suggest this is an interesting way to go. Rick believes we are going to see homeownership rates continue to plummet for the next two or three years. We would not be surprised if they drop as low as 60% nationally. Bruce said it is a mathematical certainty since you have 8% of the people not making their payments for a long time. If that is the case, and in some cases the projections are even lower, you are going to have more inventory than you have buyers.

There is also a situation where 96% of rental units nationally are occupied, so rental rates are escalating and there is simply not a lot of available places for people to live. Extensive research suggests that most people still prefer to live indoors. That suggests that renting out some of these properties would seem to make a lot of sense. There is also a backlog of seriously delinquent properties that have not yet gone through foreclosure and have been delayed by things such as the robo-signing schedule, the attorney generals settlement, which ironically has now slowed things down yet again. However, when all that inventory hits and the regulators start pushing the banks to get some of that inventory off their books, they are going to have to do something with the inventory. With the most conservative number he has seen recently, there are still about 600 REO assets out there that simply are off the market and not being marketed. If they were all off the market, they would have a terrible effect on home prices. This is maintaining inventory levels and supply and demand control as well as trying to maximize value. Most investors Rick has talked to are willing to pay between $.80-$.90 on the BPO for these assets because they are looking at the return on the rental income over a certain period of time. They really don’t need to buy these things at typical bulk sale prices.

Bruce wondered if there is a mandatory date or date in mind when tenants have to exit the properties. Rick said that unlike the regulations that the lender has, like for example they have to typically get rid of a property within three years after taking it back; in his case they are instead looking at a minimum hold time of about 3 years to as long as 7 years depending on the given market. However, it does have some flexibility since investors have to have not only a long-term view, but also flexibility. If the programs works like it should, Rick said they are considering creating a REIT that makes it an ongoing investment opportunity. Here, you would basically buy and sell properties out of the REIT as market conditions dictate. If Rick’s prediction is correct that ownership declines for the next three years, then there is no way you are going to have price increases in any of those years. In some markets, this is going to be a recovery that is extraordinarily localized. We are seeing evidence of this even today. The reality is we are probably looking at a bumpy ride along the bottom of the market for the next several years on a national basis until we work through this lot of distressed inventory and until we get unemployment rates down to where people can start buying.

One of the things Rick has noticed is most of relationships or data points that would have causality or correlation have fallen apart over the last couple of years. Rick asked when we ever saw a period of time when prices, interest rates, and sales volume fell. The answer is never. Interestingly enough, the one that has not broken is the relationship between employment rates and home sales. Historically, there seems to be an inflection point somewhere in the neighborhood of 6-6 ½% unemployment where home sales either spike up or spike down depending on which way the unemployment is going. The most optimistic projection he has seen is we will not get below 7% unemployment for another 2-3 years. What is interesting about that is, for example, in Riverside we have about 45% of people upside down. This means the current owners are incapable of buying anything because of debt levels, and 60% of sales in Riverside are either short sales or REOs. This means 60% of the people who have un-owned their real estate are incapable of buying as well. You start putting together the numbers of unemployment, and you ask yourself who is expected to buy all of this inventory. It is not going to be the owner occupant in the next two or three years because they are going to be credit incapable.

Rick said they are flying in a credit ensemble from Switzerland; and they are coming in with Swiss francs and will buy Riverside entirely. This is one of the reasons a lot of the inventory is going to be purchased by investors, whether they individual investors, small groups, or institutions. There really is not a choice, and in the short run it is not necessarily a bad thing since it is better than having them be vacant. Rick said he has used this argument quite regularly when people started talking about how bad renters are in the neighborhood. Rick said he tends to think renters are a much better option than a vacant house that becomes a crack lab. It is an unfair thing to say about a renter who happens to be renting instead of buying in general, but a much better solution in a market that doesn’t need any more vacant homes.

Bruce thinks the finger pointing is to the investor. They are probably looking at the investor as unwilling to maintain the property at a level that is acceptable, even if the renter might want it to be. Bruce is in a group in Riverside where they are pretty well liked by the city, so they go to meetings and have made some headway in how they view investor participation in owning something. However, not all investors are created equally, so they are pretty cautious about thinking that another 10% of Riverside is going the rental route. Historically, you cannot blame them for this. There have been a lot of abuses over the years, and Rick thinks there is so much scrutiny on what is going on in the real estate market right now, and there is so much local enforcement of new regulations that some of it is going to be clipped out. However, the other point Rick said he would make is to not discount motivated self-interest. If we are an investor coming in to buy a property, rent it out for a number of years, and then try to sell it at a profit, you would think they would try to maintain the property at a level where we would be able to maximize the profit and keep somebody decent at the end of the process. This is one of the concerns Rick said he has about seeing people using leverage or looking for financing to buy these properties since they are not sure they are going to have the capital it takes to maintain these things adequately, which could be a problem.

When someone buys a bulk package of loans, it is interesting how the rules must have changed during the process of one owning several thousands of these loans at a time when MERS came into existence when we did not know what those four letters meant, then all of a sudden everyone in the country new within 90 days what it meant. This must have had a pretty profound effect on the cost level when dealing with a bulk of loans that you now have to look at and see if there are problems. Rick said they have either been extraordinarily lucky or extraordinarily good at their diligence. They made some decisions several years ago to not be a MERS shop at the time when everyone was running that way. They have applied this principal to loan purchasing as well. They have been known over the years as a difficult investor because they rejected a lot of loans that other investors were willing to buy for any number of reasons. He cannot say the portfolios they have purchased have been error-free and pristine, but they are probably better than what has been out there on average, and they have been able to avoid a lot of those problems.

Bruce said if he was an occupant owner and found out that Rick was the one who bought his loan, he would probably have a smile on his face because he would have more options than the original lender would have and would therefore have a lower cost basis. Rick said there are two separate initiatives being discussed. When they buy a pool of performing loans, it is not with the intent of creating rental properties from that pool. What they are looking for there are REO properties that are already vacant since they think that has the best impact on the market and the highest long-term return opportunity for their investors. When they purchase a pool of non-performing loans, typically those loans are priced at more of a bulk rate, which means the discount could be anywhere from 40-60% of the unpaid principal balance. This would make it market value in Riverside, although what you are shooting for is slightly better than market value. What you do then is try to work with the individual borrowers to modify their loans. It is a lot easier for somebody who has purchased a loan at a discount to pass along a discount to that borrower.

Bruce wondered what the most common outcome is for the owner occupant who is going to receive a loan mod with terms either changed, principal reduction, or opportunity to do a short sale. Rick said you almost always get the opportunity to modify your loan with. They have modified over 60% of the loans they have had in their portfolio, and typically the monthly payment has dropped by over 20%. In some cases, if they see a loan that has a good opportunity to continue to perform, they will consider principal reduction as well. Short sales are always their preference prior to a foreclosure since they think it is better for everyone involved. The ironic part of today’s market is sometimes the hardest person to convince to do a short sale is the borrower.

To find out more about Rick Sharga’s company, Carrington Mortgage Holdings, LLC, you can visit their website at www.carringtonhc.com.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

272-TNG Radio – Sean O’Toole 4-7-12

Friday, April 6th, 2012

Sean O'Toole


Sean O’Toole

Founder, ForeclosureRadar

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined by Sean O’Toole, founder and CEO of ForeclosureRadar.com. Prior to launching ForeclosureRadar, Sean successfully purchased and flipped more than 150 residential and commercial foreclosures. He leveraged 15 years in the software industry. Sean used technology as a key competitive advantage to build his successful real estate investment track record. Now he has brought all these skills to ForeclosureRadar.

Bruce talked about how Aaron has a favorite word for websites, robust. If you say this about a person, it is not a compliment. However, if you say it about a website it is a good thing. This is how you can describe Sean O’Toole’s website. There is a lot to real estate and the real estate business, and Sean tried to make a tool that would work for all kinds of different things. They try to find new ways to use the site, go after new types of business, or have customers tell them something they had never thought of. The goal was to create something that would allow people to find a way to use it that works for them. Sean has a short sale section on his site now where the people that are actually trying to get them accomplished are able to communicate with each other and lenders who are easier to use. There was even a recording recently done that was shared with others, and this is a useful forum to which someone can have access. In their learning center they call it the short sale report; and it is free and right off their own website. They try to post information about each bank and links where you get the packages and letters as well as have a comment section where users can share information about each of those lenders, how they are to work with, and tips and tricks.

One of the general things about the internet is the nature of it is so inexpensive to access such a ridiculous amount of information. A lot of what is at the website is free of charge. When people pay for websites, they probably do not have an understanding of how much easier Sean has made the business. Bruce wondered if Sean even gets comments from people in the business or who have been in the business for a long time. Sean said he usually gets a double-edged compliment, especially from the ones who had been in the business before Sean’s existed. Half the time people are thinking they were saved a lot of time and allowed them to expand. Last year they may have brought 50 properties a month and made millions of dollars, and it is an awesome compliment that they used Sean’s primary system. However, it is also followed by people telling him he reels in the market and brings in a lot of other people. He gets both ends of it.

Bruce was never really a full-time trustee sale buyers until Greg figured a lot of it out along with a lot of the tools that were provided him. You go to a sale, and you see the same three or four people there every day. Now you go, and there are probably 50-75 people, and they change a lot. People can get up to speed a lot quicker than they used to, but they do not really have any appreciation of how much work has gone into getting them there. Sean said a lot of it was an issue of the times. People shift to where the market and the opportunities are. We went from a market where foreclosures did not matter to one at the peak where they make up the majority of the market in quite a few areas. Sean said he was looking at some stats he ran where in San Bernardino you went from 90% of the market being traditional market sales with 6% being flips and investor-run deals with 2% short sales to 46% REOs and 31% regular market sales in 2009. A lot of it was most likely out of necessity since we had a lot of builders who were pushed out of the building business and went into the foreclosure business. A lot of commercial brokers whose business was dried up also went into the foreclosure business. A lot of it was just natural, and Sean said they were fortunate to be in the right place at the right time.

Being an investor, Bruce looks at Sean’s website for these reasons, but he wondered what the government would use ForeclosureRadar for if Sean had them in his customer base. The first thing Sean said he saw them use ForeclosureRadar for was mosquito abatement. By finding properties that were not necessarily being maintained in the pools, the government was using their website to search for swimming pools in foreclosure properties so they would know to go treat them for mosquitos. Later on, a lot of cities get active to try to keep light down with code enforcements and the extension of the foreclosure process that we have seen over the last couple of years. Once somebody stopped making their payment, a lot of times they stopped making repairs too. In some ways it is great that they slowed down the foreclosure process as it has kept inventory off the market and kept people in their homes longer. However, at the same time their homes are not getting repaired, so code enforcement officers are using ForeclosureRadar to go look for these issues and try to be proactive about it.

Whether the code enforcement comes into play after the trustee sale or in the middle of the process usually depends on the county and the budget. He has seen some start off at the NOD stage. They will maybe take photos of the property at that point and continue to monitor it. If it goes downhill at any stage during the foreclosure process, they will start enforcement actions.

Bruce said something he had never seen on the website was a wholesale buyers list. One of the things Sean said he wanted to do from the beginning was they had a lot of incredible customers, the most knowledgeable foreclosure realtors and hottest investors, and they wanted to come up with a way to start connecting to those people. For all their customers, they allowed them to basically have a free advertisement out on their public website in something they called the marketplace. He wanted to connect folks and start allowing their customers to find each other and find services. They have investors who are willing to bid for others, so there is a bidding services section as well as people in property management, which some investors might be interested in. There are also a lot of realtors that are foreclosure experts and all get to advertise on this free foreclosure marketplace that is available to anyone. This section has not been updated as much since Sean said he tends to be more of a product-centric person than a market-centric person, which he said he is working on. He did say this feature has been around for a year.

Foreclosures have been a dominant player in the last five years, which is not typical California. Most typical California was the stretch from 2000 to 2006 where a trustee sale was rare. There were always a certain number of foreclosures, but Bruce wondered how radically this changes the business model that really concentrates on this. Sean said there is no question that foreclosures will play a less dominate role. It is already clear that REOs play a less dominant role now than they did even two years ago. There is no doubt that will even change and will continue to change. We went from 46% of the market being REOs in San Bernardino in 2009 to only 30% in 2011. That will most likely be lower this year. On the other hand, the motivators and players of who is in the foreclosure market changed in the timeframe from 2004-2006. You get some of the big consumer foreclosure sites, which he focuses on professionals rather than consumers. These sites had their best years in the years when there were the fewest foreclosures. They had less expense because they did not have to track as many foreclosures, and there were more people clamoring to invest in real estate and trying to find good deals. So there are really two sides to it.

Sean had mentioned how he thinks San Bernardino will have less of a percentage of REOs, and Bruce wondered if this is for natural causes or induced causes. Sean said he believes it is still largely from induced causes. You still have a lot of people underwater and lot of people in the foreclosure pipeline. However, it is becoming less and less politically correct to foreclose, so banks and looking for every other alternative possible. The latest thing is the REO to rental program. Banks all blame regulations for delaying these things and not pushing them through. At the end of the day it is all good for their bottom line to not foreclose and to delay the processes for as long as possible. We have seen this trend continue and grow. We are working through some of the problems as wells, so there are fewer people in foreclosure or underwater today than there were a few years ago. A lot of this is due to price increases.

One of the things Bruce has been studying about deleveraging debt is they are talking about the U.S. doing a really good job, but then in asterisks it said 86% of the debt reduction was just defaulting. It is improving, but it is not necessarily because we are having price increases. It is improving thanks to the strategic defaulters. Eliminating negative equity is a contrarian view.

Bruce wondered what the real estate debt was at the peak of the market. Sean said we have good numbers nationally, but not so well locally. According to the Fed funds, which the Federal Reserve publishes, we went from $4 ½ trillion in mortgage debt in 2000 to $10 ½ at the peak. We are now back down to about $9.8 trillion. This is a really good high-level gauge just to see where we are in the problem overall because if you think about debt as a percentage of income (in some cases the percentage of GDP), and you look at the number of new households and increase in household income from that time, the number should really be closer to $6 ½ trillion. This is where we should be back to if we want the same level of homeownership that we had in 2000. Unfortunately, we are a long way from being at that level, and Sean said he thinks this is the heart of the problem with the economy. Although, he realized that most economists would disagree and say it is jobs or something else. It is hard for him to see how you would have jobs when you have a consumer-driven economy where consumers are underwater in their homes. They have perhaps $3 ½ t o$4 trillion of too much debt.

What is interesting is that Bruce has talked to people who said banks have already written all this off. One of the interesting things about when banks write debt off is it does not write it off on the homeowner side. It is a one-sided write-off, so it does not improve the consumer position at all. Bruce has serious doubt that anybody has written off $1 trillion of anything, even if they put all their piles together. This is a lot of debt. The question is why you would want to model accounting that Congress put so much pressure on, specifically the Federal Accounting Standards Board. They say they have taken the write-downs, but it is the write-downs down to their fantasy values for these assets.

Bruce wondered when somebody wants to get into the business of trustee sales what are the typical rookie mistakes that he sees. Sean said the biggest mistake in terms of cost is to buy a second mortgage that you think is a first mortgage. The one thing Sean really encourages anybody entering this business to do is to really take the time to learn how to do title research. They regularly see their customers rely too heavily on their models. Sean said they guess what the positions are, and they give you that information. This helps with searching and the rest, but they do not intend for them to buy based on that information. They make things pretty clear with disclaimers and the rest, and nine times out of ten the models would probably work for the people. If your first deal is that 1 out of 10 where their guess is wrong or there is something strange about the title; that can be a very big loss. They will see other people who will call somebody, for example some junior customer service person, and they will ask them what they think is going on. They will usually tell them whether it looks like a first, but this is really not the way to do title research. If you cannot take the time to learn how to do it, you really should not be buying at auction. This is really not the place for somebody that is going to give it a shot and really not become good at it before they show up for the first day.

Bruce wondered what the likelihood is of somebody about to make a mistake having somebody there say not to bid on a second. With there being a lot more people down there, Sean said he sees helpful folks more often. Sean said early on in his foreclosure investing career he did this for a newbie and saved him about $150,000. He was still a relative newbie, having been down there 6 months, and the other regulars almost lynched him. They basically told him with more competition there is not really enough business to go around already, so by helping him out he saved him a lot of money. This means he was going to come back the next day. If he had lost the $150,000, they would never see him again.

Bruce said he prefers Sean’s route to the other people’s any day. Bruce actually did this intentionally one time to see if he had many friends and qualified intentionally for a second with his cashier’s check, and two other people qualified with him. However, when the opening bid came nothing was said. One of the regulars came over to Bruce and asked him what he had been doing, and Bruce said he just wanted to see if the person would tell him and see if he knew. In this way he made a really good point because you have to qualify to bid beforehand, and you will sometimes see the pros go qualify for things people might be confused about in order to try to suck them in. Sean has even seen pros knowingly bid to a point where they had a $50,000 loss against somebody trying to increase the other person’s loss because they realized the other person did not know what they were doing. Rather than letting them take the small loss, they actually took the risk of losing tens of thousands of dollars just to see that person’s loss be matured.
One of the things that has really changed is that before there was real equity, so when you are foreclosing in the ‘90s, people had older loans and there was equity. In this cycle, real equity is virtually non-existent, so you end up having something called a drop bid. If you asked somebody who attended trustee sales on a regular basis back in the 90s if they had checked out the drop bids, he would not have that vocabulary in his mind at all. Now, all of a sudden it is the entire business. Bruce wondered how somebody would find the drop bids before Sean’s site provided the service. Sean said it was largely by attending the sale or calling and checking ahead of time to find out. Pre-announcing opening bids is something that really started fairly recently. You would occasionally see it beforehand, but nobody even thought to enquire as what the opening bid was because up until 2008, the opening bid was the amount due. The years 2007 and 2008 were a terrible time to be in the auction business because everything had an opening bid that was above the market value. This was why the REOs were so overwhelming because they were taking back 95-99% of the inventory they could have sold to somebody with a cashier’s check. In the peak month, 97% went back to the bank.

One time in San Bernardino, Bruce happened to look in the MLS, and it was so ridiculous. There were 25 properties per $1,000 increment all owned by lenders. 101 had 25, 102 had 25. You had your way if you were buying through the MLS at that point. It was right at this time that we claimed the term shadow inventory and were talking about bank-owned properties. For all of those listed in the MLS, there were at least that many if not more that were not listed in the MLS. That bank-owned inventory was pretty short-lived because once the banks realized they needed the correct prices for what people could afford without the crazy financing, that shadow inventory disappeared. In a lot of places we went from 20 months of inventory to 4 months of inventory in a few month period.

Shadow inventory is still a very misunderstood term as the definition has shifted to talking about the REOs that were not being marketed to something else. Bruce was just in front of the mayor and city council in Riverside, somebody brought up shadow inventory, and his emphasis was the banks were holding onto a lot of properties. He was emphatic about it that they had not done what they were supposed to do as far as putting up for sale. It is a little hard to deal with somebody who is that emphatic with a chart, but he does make a point that there is something called shadow inventory that has changed definition.

If you want to check out Sean O’Toole’s website, visit www.foreclosureradar.com. He helps realtors, investors, and government agencies track foreclosures in California, Arizona, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. The cost is $49.95, and there is a discount for members of the California Association of Realtors.

Tune in next week as Bruce continues his interview with Sean O’Toole.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

264-TNG Radio – Mike Novak-Smith and Ted Boeker 2-11-12

Friday, February 10th, 2012

Mike Novak-Smith

Mike Novak-Smith

REO agent

RE/Max

(Full Bio)

Ted-Boeker

Ted Boeker

Owner and Broker

RE/Max

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce Norris is joined once again by Mike Novak-Smith and Ted Boeker. Mike Novak-Smith is not only one of the largest REO agents in the Inland Empire, but the nation. Mike is in the top 1% of all real estate agents nationwide and is experienced in REO, short sales, bankruptcies, asset management, and negotiating. Mike specializes in REOs in Riverside, Moreno Valley, San Bernardino, Perris, Rialto, Colton, and Corona. Ted Boeker is the owner of the company that Mike is at and has brokered for RE/Max Results in Moreno Valley. Having started the company in 1989, Ted has vast experience in real estate and has been able to train and lead 35 of Southern California’s highest producing real estate brokers and agents to close deals quickly and efficiently for a variety of clients in commercial, residential, multifamily, and office real estate. Nationwide Home Loans Inc. and RE/Max Results escrow division are associated companies. Before that, Ted practiced law.

With short sales gaining momentum, the process has become simpler and quicker. There is definitely an improvement as the banks have geared up because of either direction from the government or the realization that this is the only way they are going to survive the process. They have shifted a lot of people into the short sale divisions and have shortened the timeframes. There is still a lot of work to do, but there are still a few very good negotiators and asset managers. What is needed is probably ten times this many to be able to handle the number of short sales that are coming. Bruce wondered if Mike and Ted have looked at the losses when they compare a house going the REO route as opposed to the short sale route. Mike said often times a short sale can be more effective, but it depends on the timeframes. One thing with the REOs is the REO seller does control the process of using agents who are very effective and can speed them through the process. Mike has watched short sales where they closed the REO in two months, from start to finish, and fourteen months later they’re still on the market and still in escrow with the short sales. If it is done right, the short sale would be a quicker way to do it, but you have to have control of the process or it will run late. Ted agreed with the exception that the banks are improving their timeframes. In fairness to the banks today and the companies that they are shoving the properties off to are doing a good job of getting up to speed.

Bruce said it has to be pretty detrimental to the agent. For example, a first-time buyer could want to make an offer, but not confirm the offer for another five months. You have to think you are never going to do this a second time even if you hung in there for the five months. You will never make another offer for the second short sale because you have to make the decision to go live somewhere. This is a real issue. Bruce said, being a lender, that if someone asked him if he wanted to take a short sale, it would take about 30 seconds to do the math and say yes. So he wondered why it would take months and what is so involved that the problem cannot be solved more quickly. Ted said with his experience today with short sales, they are doing a lot for one particular company. They have found properties that have seconds that nobody knew about and second loans that have been sold in the secondary market, in some cases days prior. The person selling did not know there was a second, was getting ready to close, and found out about the second after they had already sold the property. Now they have to start all over with the company, and the deal falls through.
Ted said the best one they have so far is first holder made a first. The owner came in, took out a second, and somebody in the process forgot to subordinate the second to the first. There is now a $160,000 second that is now in front of a $150,000 first. The very likelihood is the owner of the home is going to end up with a $60,000 first on his house, and the second will be out with 0. Bruce said a situation like this is not very entertaining when you buy one of these in a trustee sale.

On a side note, when you have 80% of sales going either REO or short sale, the assumption is all of those people become renters. However, Ted said he assumes that about half would become renters, while the rest would move in with someone else, rather their parents or move to Nevada where they can get into something free or inexpensive. So in reality, they become non-households. This is a very big impact when you are talking about potential buyers: they are credit incapable and don’t have the money to live with the extra burden of debt. Not only can they not get a new loan, but they can’t afford a household cost. Therefore, for the time being they are downsizing. This is not going to be okay for either party, both the person who owns the house and are living in the back room or the people in the back room. They would like to emerge some day and be able to leave to live in their own place. If you can pick the timeframe, then you will have excess demand. Theoretically, this should happen two to three years from now assuming credit repair happens in two or three years. Having visited Washington, Bruce said a lot of what is happening is very political rather than common sense. If they wanted common sense suggestions, they would probably find it pretty easy to get. Trying to mix it with political acceptance is a whole different story.

In the ‘90s, there was a niche that emerged that Ted and Mike became very familiar with and that investors did a lot of in the ‘80s. When Bruce became an investor, one of the niches was you would have a 7% mortgage existing on loans prior to 1975, and in 1981 or 1982 interest rates were 17%. If you could move that financing forward to another buyer, you could wrap it as it was allowed. There was something called a simple assumption, which cost Bruce $45, so he would his name and tell people to pick his name instead of the other people. Bruce had new liability, so it was like the loan could only be paid back by the residents, and that was its sole responsibility. They changed this being acceptable, but there were hybrids that emerged in the 90s, something of which Ted and Mike were very familiar. They used a specific vehicle to sell somebody a home who probably would not necessarily qualify for bank financing but to get them to be the owner of a home.

For Ted, he preferred a land sale contractor or land contract. He said many people favor an all-inclusive trust deed; but his whole point about favoring land contract was that it did not create a grant deed, which in those days would tip off a lender that a sale had occurred. The recorded document was a contract between the two parties which memorialized the fact that one party would pay the other party a certain amount of money in five years. In today’s world, Ted does not believe one is necessarily better over the other. A lot of times it is the mood of the lender because the only thing to be concerned about is a due on sale clause being aggressively pursued by a lender. Bruce cannot imagine someone’s desk who decides to foreclose on a current loan because there was a breech on a due on sale clause in 2012. He would be fired quickly.

Mike said he has had many lenders tell him they did an AITD or a land contract who did not care as long as they received their money. Bruce said he once sat across from FHA in a meeting, and he said it would be helpful if they could take over subject to the existing loans, and they said they did not care. With a contract of sale, people would most likely relate to it more if you used it like a car sale. A car sale usually has a lien holder who actually has title. They almost hold the pink slip until the deal is made, whatever the deal is. In a car sense, it is usually paid off; but in a land contract it could be a meeting of certain agreed upon prior demands. It could be a demand for someone to pay them for three years, make every payment on time, and then they receive a grant. Somebody is always in distress, whether it is the seller or the buyer who does not have the credit to get a new loan. In the hard money loan side, there are investors buying properties that cash flow, and they have investors who put money in 9.9% trust deed investments. Smart money is on both sides of this table, and in this particular timeframe you could have smart people on both sides of those decisions. It could even be in a property that is almost a break-even.

Bruce bought a house in Moreno Valley two years ago, so the price really had not damaged; but he just had a job shift. He owed $140 on a $135 house and is $5 grand upside down. If he listed with someone and went through the normal cost, he would have to write a $20 grand check to escape. He had someone on one side, who was renting the same house in Moreno Valley for $1300, and he could make a deal to where he puts up a certain amount of money for a security deposit or pay a commission, and he could walk into a payment that is probably $900 with a chance of owning it. This makes more sense to Bruce, and this is why he believes it has a future pretty quickly. Ted said in this case the interest rate in the loan is becoming more valuable. In the old days, the equity was more valuable; and now the loan is valuable.

When Bruce first got into the business in 1981, he refinanced his house at 17 ½% interest, so to have an interest rate sub 4% is completely ridiculous. Bruce said he could certainly envision an 8% mortgage rate five years from now. Bragging rights would be somebody asking you your interest rate, and you tell them a number that is worth money. Lenders will be very sensitive to this at some point, but he cannot imagine for the next few years this standing in the way of asking if the person wants to foreclose or if they should find a buyer who still makes it current. It also speeds up the healing process in that they want stability from going from owner to vacancy. There are already a lot of damaged people, so when you’re talking about 80% of your business being credit incapable of buying a new home, they are payment capable of owning one in this type of circumstance. Realtors can then make a living not having to count on a group of buyers that won’t emerge for three years. It can absorb the next two or three years of people who are still waiting. Financially, we have two underserved groups: the group that just lost their property and the group of investors that could buy and hold rentals. If we would think this out and think about how we did it in the past, we could solve the problem without a lot of damage. If you had a lot of REOs where it was earmarked for owner-occupants and eventually there is a little pile of them that go to investors, there is five or ten of them at a time, and the mandate is to not sell them for five years, then it would not make sense to give these people financing. This would be game over as you would have more business than you would know what to do.

Ted said investors will save the day eventually, even if they are not allowed to because they are creative. Bruce once sold a property to a lady on Polk Street in Riverside, and it was in a land trust with an AITD on top. She received the property, but then she talked to her team later, and the tax person said when she writes her check she will not be able to deduct the interest as it was not in her name. All of a sudden, the lady called Bruce saying she could not understand that she owned the house, and Bruce could not make her team understand that she owned the house. Finally, he asked her if he could just buy the house back from her, and she said yes. He then asked her if she knew how she was going to have to give him the house. She was going to have to grant deed it to him because she owed him.

Bruce wondered if it was a difficult concept for people to understand the difference between a grant deed and a land contract or even an AITD. He also wondered if it was necessary for an escrow to be experienced with it. Ted answered yes to both questions. People do have a difficulty understanding, and it is a little funny because if you lay it out correctly and simply for a person, they do understand it. It is no different than buying anything else and promising to pay an amount and receive a grant deed or pink slip in return five years from now when the person has made their payments on time. Many real estate offices, certainly in the past, have simply refused to do any creative financing. This could include seller-carried financing, AITDs, or land contracts. One of the things Ted has insisted on is he will not do one of those transactions unless he can control the escrow because he needs to know that the escrow people will know how to do it and can explain it to the people whenever they have questions. Having been an investor for 30 years, Bruce has had experience and said there are some escrows that are worth their weight in gold and others where he is simply stunned by the questions people ask.

Bruce wondered if Ted has talked to people who asked to speak to people experienced with escrow, as this is something that would be valuable. Ted said he has never heard this asked, but he said by the time they finish explaining it they are fairly comfortable with the idea. Bruce said if Ted had worked with land contracts in the early 90s, there was not equity progression for quite some time. Ted said he did about 1300 land contracts, three of which actually went into distress and Ted and his employees were threatened with lawsuits. Out of about 1300, they had three that really did not get resolved and went bad. Ted’s feeling is it is a slam dunk, and the key to it is the people have to understand what they are doing upfront. Ted said he had a number of people who came in three or four years, and in those days the length of time was critical. Three years was too short a time; five years was really better. They had a number of people who came in five years and said they simply could not do it as they had either messed up their credit or had another type of distress. They would resolve the issue through either a reconveyance or a deed back. Everybody walked away relatively happy. As long as people understand what they are doing, they can solve a lot of problems creatively, which is what this market needs.

Bruce wondered if people are gun shy in buying right now, to which Mike said pretty much all the news on housing nowadays is negative. If you go to work and tell your coworkers you bought a house, you get chewed out for it, and then it becomes harder to follow through with it. There is not a lot of support for buying a house today other than the cheap interest rates. Mike said he does not really have the deals fall out once they are in escrow, but for many people today just going out into the market takes a lot of courage. Fear is the biggest factor they are dealing with, and this is why Bruce really spends time looking at his charts as these take him away from emotional decision-making, both on the high side and the ridiculously low side.

If you are in escrow for the first time in your life, you wonder if every situation is the same way. All of a sudden you are not tuning into news you probably heard but really did not hear. Now, all of a sudden, you are questioning every decision, even if you are locking in a 4% 30-year mortgage. Bruce cannot imagine this being replicated in our lifetime. Once we leave this cycle, we are going to see a chart that goes the other way for a considerable period of time. Young buyers today do not have any comparison, so they do not think something is a great deal and are not drawn by the 4%. Mike said there were people who walked when 4 ½% deals went up to 5%. He tried to tell them when he first bought a house it was at 13 ½%, and he was happy to get it. That payment emerges from a discounted price, and it is astonishing.

Bruce wondered what basic changes are going to come about because of this downturn in the future of financing for real estate and down payments. He wondered if there will be permanent changes or if we are only going through the emotions politically to make everybody happy. Mike said he believes there will be permanent changes. The problem today is it has become so hard if you are loaning money to buy a house to enforce your contract and get your collateral back if you make a mistake. If you compare it to car sales, they are way up from three years ago because they can enforce their contracts. If you do not pay for your car, they can come take it. With houses, it is almost impossible to enforce your contract now, so the financing is very tough. It will most likely get easier some day at some point, but it will most likely never again be what it once was. It should not be what it was from 2003 to 2008 because that was crazy, but there will probably be a little bit more of a push for a 5% minimum down payment versus 3% with a Fannie or Freddie type of purchase. As Bruce has pointed out very accurately, the VA program has a very low failure rate, and it is 0% down. There is a way to do it, but it is called underwriting and qualifying somebody. The hard money loan business just puts you in the seat of making common sense decisions. What it boils down to is are we likely to get paid monthly and get paid back? The VA is most likely in this same decision process where the whole world is driven by a FICA score, and yet they can make common sense decisions that look like they are going to be paid back and it makes successful loans.

Bruce wondered if interest rate deductions ever bite the dust, but Mike is not as convinced that this will make as big a difference. Most people’s perceptions of their interest rate deductions are much greater than the actual event. They think they are going to save a lot of taxes, but the truth is it is not really a big deal. At 4%, you have a bit of money to pass whatever the basic deduction is. They will probably have to owe $300 grand or more before it is even relevant, but this is not a real factor. There was another document drawn up where there was two sides of a panel where the Democrats and Republicans both had input about what to do about the budget. To Bruce, real estate seems like a piece of low-hanging fruit. We have had a lot of goodies for a while, and Bruce said if he was on the real estate side, like CAR or NAR, he would find a sacrificial lamb to take something back. One of them would be the $500 grand freebie, which occurs every two years. Bruce said he was surprised the people came up with this even though Bruce happened to own properties that would be affected. You have to wonder what percentage of people nationally could ever take advantage of that. If in fact they are going to take some of our things away, Proposition 13 should not be one of them. Ted said he does not know if he would be willing to give this up as it could be pretty damaging. This would allow taxes to go up 2 or 3 times and affect people who own things free and clear. Bruce said he interviewed a well-known economist who said this is why they have reverse loans.

For more information on their escrow company, American Independent Escrow, Inc., you can contact the company itself.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 1/25/12

Wednesday, January 25th, 2012

Today’s News Synopsis:

Bloomberg reported the sales of pending homes decreased 3.5% last month, and at the same time contracts for existing home sales are at the highest in 19 months.  In his latest State of the Union Address, President Barack Obama announced that he intends start a new refinance program allowing homeowners to refinance at low interest rates and therefore save almost $3,000.

In The News:

Bloomberg - “Contracts to Purchase Existing U.S. Homes Hold Near 19-Month High: Economy” (1-25-12)

“The number of Americans signing contracts to buy previously owned homes in December held near a 19-month high, showing the stabilization in the market that began in late 2011 will extend into the new year.”

DS News“Obama Announces New Refi Program in State of the Union Address” (1-25-12)

“Despite rumors earlier in the week that President Barack Obama would announce a settlement between the state attorneys general and the nation’s top servicers in his State of the Union address, the president made no such announcement Tuesday night.  However, he did announce his intention to save millions of homeowners approximately $3,000 annually on their mortgages by allowing them to refinance at today’s low interest rates”

Housing Wire“Wells Fargo launches pilot programs to clear LA, Atlanta housing inventory” (1-25-12)

“Wells Fargo (WFC: 30.32 -0.72%) will launch two multibillion-dollar programs this February to clear housing inventory in Los Angeles and Atlanta.”

Bloomberg“Fed: Benchmark Rate Will Stay Low Until Late 2014″ (1-25-12)

“Federal Reserve officials said their benchmark interest rate will stay low until at least late 2014 and anticipate that unemployment will remain high and inflation ‘subdued’.”

DS News - “ISGN Enters Into $20M Line of Credit from JPMorgan” (1-25-12)

“ISGN Corporation has obtained a $20 million secured line of credit from JPMorgan Chase., the company announced Wednesday.”

NAHB - “Builders Commend White House Focus on Helping Home Owners, Seek Additional Steps to Spur Housing” (1-25-12)

“The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) commends President Obama for offering proposals in last night’s State of the Union address to help families stay in their homes and stanch foreclosures, and is urging policymakers to take additional actions to mend the housing market and boost the economy.”

Housing Wire - “FHFA home prices fall 1.8% in November” (1-25-12)

“Home prices declined 1.8% in November from a year earlier in the latest Federal Housing Finance Agency price index.  The seasonally adjusted index rose 1% from October, when prices fell a revised 0.7% on a monthly basis.”

Inman - “10 metros with biggest 1-year rise in real estate list prices” (1-25-12)

“No metro areas west of El Paso, Texas, earned a spot among the top 10 U.S. hot spots with the highest year-over-year hikes in median list price during 2011. Another Texas metro, San Antonio, ranked fifth on the list, based on data provided by online real estate portal Realtor.com.”

Los Angeles Times - “Eric Schneiderman promises aggressive financial fraud probe” (1-25-12)

“New York Atty. Gen. Eric Schneiderman, who was tapped by President Obama to lead a new Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, promised Wednesday to move aggressively to coordinate state and local investigations into the causes of the subprime mortgage market meltdown.”

Housing Wire - “Fitch downgrades RMBS bond ratings on default risk” (1-25-12)

“The default risk on 489 bonds backed by residential mortgage-backed securities prompted Fitch Ratings to slash the bonds’ ratings this week.  The bonds are part of 291 different residential mortgage-securities deals.”

DS News“Pending Home Sales Decline Monthly, Rise Annually” (1-25-12)

“After reaching a 19-month high in November, pending home sales declined 3.5 percent in December, according to the National Association of Realtors’ (NAR) Pending Home Sales Index.”

Hard Money Loan Closed

Los Angeles, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $165,000 on a 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom home appraised for $244,000.

California Real Estate Investor Events:

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Investors Workshops and will be interviewing Shawn Watkins today.

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Advanced Investing Skills and Strategies 2.5 on February 4, 2012.

Looking Back:

69,799 Notices of Default were recorded during the 4th quarter of 2010, according to MDA DataQuick. The Case-Schiller Index showed home prices decreased 1% during November 2010 in the nation’s top 20 metropolitan areas. University of the Pacific estimated unemployment would remain above 10% in California for 3 more years. IEmergent expected mortgage loan origination to fall below $1 trillion in 2011.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

259-TNGRadio – Craig Hill 1-7-12

Friday, January 6th, 2012

Craig-Hill

Craig Hill

Hard Money Lender for The Norris Group


(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

This week Bruce is joined by Craig Hill of The Norris Group. Craig has worked with The Norris Group since the company opened in 1995. Craig has worked with the real estate investors, helping them access money for their deals and trust deed investors who want to get a very safe yield on their money. Prior to working with The Norris Group, Craig was in the hard money loan business for years prior to that; and the expertise he brought with him has proved him valuable to the success of the company.

Bruce said it never ceases to amaze him that their client base keeps on finding deals that keep giving them record years. Craig said it seems that regardless of what you hear out there about there not being any deals, The Norris Group is very fortunate because they have wide enough base of clients that they seem to find enough properties to keep The Norris Group hitting record levels every year. They have an expert base of clients that finds things when most people don’t. Bruce has a feeling next year might be a blockbuster year and that there will be inventory in excess of what they had this year. Craig said for most of his clients, the perception ranges from no deals to a blockbuster year. Their base of clients, both buyers and trust deed investors, will be ready for whichever one it is.

The mood has definitely shifted, but at least now there is a safety in what people think has happened to prices. Craig thinks there is definitely not a huge issue with a large price drop, especially in the inventory with which The Norris Group is dealing. They are dealing in the starter homes, whether it is L.A., Orange County, Riverside, or San Bernardino. It is the lower priced homes. But Craig said people definitely do not see a sharp drop in the prices. This would be hard to imagine because when they deal with one of the long-term loans, it is not uncommon that the rents are 2x the interest payment. This is a 9.9% interest payment, not 4%. You would have to think there would be an interested buyer at some level. It is almost like with the investment side and the trust deed side, it is hard to imagine a real worst case. Craig had talked to a gentleman earlier who talked about how the only real issue is it would go from passive to a little less passive if you ever had a situation you had to deal with, but not something where you have a major loss of funds or would not have 2 or 3 solutions.

Back in 2007 and 2008 was not normal, it was really a Great Depression for real estate. It was hard to not get damaged somewhat in that, but for the ten years prior there are so many solutions, including the client base that deals with the inventory. When The Norris Group has one client that might have an individual problem, it seems to be easily resolved by multiple sources. Since a lot of the buyers concentrate in the same areas, Craig cannot imagine that if somebody were to get a house back or if a borrower was to have a problem that he would have any trouble finding somebody who would either take over the mortgage or take a similar mortgage on a house where it cash flows by twice of what the payment is. The Norris Group has had very few problems, but when they have they have had cooperation from the borrower. It seems like most of the time they are interested in a solution that does not force them to take it into foreclosure. The cooperation The Norris Group has had has been very fantastic.

The easiest case here would be if somebody wants to do a deed in lieu of foreclosure, this makes the process very simple. There have been a couple cases where someone has allocated a sale to another investor that then put the trust deed investor back on track receiving payments. A lot of things really come with the base of the clients that they have. The Norris Group has really grown to become the company it is today, and there are not a lot of people who want to burn that bridge. It is a lot of fun when you are associated with a company that has that reputation. Both Bruce and Craig receive the calls where people tell them they have heard of The Norris Group from so many different directions and want to know what they do. This is a fun phone call for them. The calls are definitely warm if not red-hot depending on how many times they have heard of Bruce Norris and The Norris Group. It is an advantage to take those calls. What is nice is there is no other place you can go to where they are treated the same way.

The concept of loaning money out to someone seems fairly simple. You find someone with a unique situation where normal lenders would not loan on it, so you step in, put up money, and get a higher interest yield. It sounds simple except for when people try to do it themselves. This is when the failure rate is astronomical. This is why they do loans and not situations because the situations are the dangerous ones. Their focus has always been on investors buying properties, so they really focus on doing loans. The people who only lend to people who have a situation, such as someone in foreclosure, currently do not have the ability to pay, or they would be paying. Therefore, somebody steps in and thinks they are protected by the equity and if they give a certain amount, such as $30 grand, then everything will be okay. However, what happens is that $30 grand has a home probably 5 minutes after you give it to them. Now you are dealing with the only security you have, which is the property. You really cannot rely on the borrower to make you good because he really could not make payments before you met him, and now he has all the payments plus The Norris Group’s payment, and the $30 grand did not really solve the problem the way the customer thought it would. If you are protected by the property, then this is a situation where you can be tied up by the borrower with litigation; and this has never been something The Norris Group wanted to do.

The word Craig uses more than anything because it applies to how he feels as an investor is passive. Their group of investors really gets spoiled by the passive nature. When they first started, the investors at the beginning felt like the company was a big warehouse filled with loans. People were asking for loans that were, for example, $200,000 more than what they originally asked. For a long time this may have worked because they were growing as the money base was growing, but then when the market got a little more difficult, they really backed off on the number of loans they did. Unfortunately, this was when clients found out it was not a warehouse, but rather a process. The clients went elsewhere thinking the process would be the same and they were drawing the loans from the same warehouse, but unfortunately this was where a lot of people got hurt. They have had so many people who want to invest, and Craig has had to tell people they will never change their criteria, no matter how many people want to lend money through The Norris Group. It is better for them to be a little disappointed than for The Norris Group to change their process.

What people have to understand is The Norris Group spends no time on negative situations in relationship to a lot of other companies. A lot of companies have foreclosure divisions, and Bruce said he just cannot imagine the stress of this. Earlier in the year, they did have a house that went all the way through foreclosure that was 600-700 loans in the past. This is something Craig can deal with; but when you are dealing with loans from 2 or 3 years ago and you have only had one, then it makes things a little more difficult. As a business model it is very good because they are spending all of their energy on positive things, such as new programs and ways to service people better and fund deals more quickly. It really helps the Norris Group do a better job too because when everyone is making their payments on time, the base of investors who have trust deed investments feel safer to make more quick decisions saying that what they have is just like the one they had originally. Craig said he sometimes wishes he were like the Ghost of Christmas Present when dealing with the new investor and show them how a deal had worked out originally and what they could do this time. Unfortunately you can’t, so it is understandable for new people. Everybody is new at something at some point, but usually with the success and consistency of things, everybody wants to get in and they’re only frustrated by the fact that maybe The Norris Group does not have enough loans for everybody.

Sometimes we get into situations where there are multiple decision-makers, a lawyer, and there was even one incident they dealt with where it was trumped by somebody who had a bad sense about the investment, and the investment they put in has not worked out. You can go a year out and look back to see how you really liked the decision you made. This is one thing that is a hard decision for people because sometimes they just have the wrong perception because hard money for years has been tied to people lending to people in situations Craig had talked about earlier, and it is not real easy for them to separate that somebody may actually have a different process. On the surface, with interest rates are 4% and the Norris Group is loaning at 12.5%, the borrower has to be risky; and his is not. It almost does not make sense. Interestingly enough, you have two groups of people, some who think they can do better with their own money and can get a 15-20% yield, and others who are completely the opposite and are earning under a percent in a CD and when they look at a yield of 9% think the money is being taken to Vegas. Whenever somebody comes into the office, he always shows them a list of all the 9% loans they have. He shows them how they have not had to foreclose on any and only might occasionally have a couple that are 30 days late. It is real comforting to know that on any given day he can have somebody in the office he can show his computer to and not be embarrassed.

Bruce also discussed the time he had the opportunity to speak in front of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac about the safety of loaning to investors. At that time we had a pool of $15 million loans with absolutely no late payments, and he said you could see the look of shock on their faces that there could be a 9.9% interest rate and no late payments. It was so out of the box of their thinking because they were looking at the investor as the risky borrower as opposed to the owner-occupant, and The Norris Group has found just the opposite to be true. This is why they have always pushed the envelope on the yield vs. risk side. They have never been the highest in yield to an investor, but they have always been by far the less risky. Sometimes people ask Craig if he could lend a little less or try to custom-fit the program, and Craig always responds that what they have to realize is this is a very given and take situation because if we want to continue to have the absolute best clients, we have to be on the cutting edge. It has to make sense for both sides, but The Norris Group cannot make it to where it absolutely does not make sense because what happens is instead of getting the A quality borrowers that they are filled with, they have to start fighting for lower than this. They always have to keep the clients they have because this is what makes them successful.

The type of people who always want to chase the higher yield is interesting because Bruce has had the same conversation with them where you finally figure out that they are in fact getting a higher yield and are foreclosing on 50% of their properties while they have 20% of their money active. The active part is really the key because Craig has had conversations with people year by year, and they just cannot pull the trigger. One instance might be the 9% program because it is an 8 year program. They think they are going to be looking at a higher interest rate and more nervous about committing their money. They will call Craig a year later, and he will finally tell them that for two years they have not been getting any yield, so going forward it would really have to obtain a yield. You really can’t take riskier investments or wait for some kind of better yield, especially someone who has wealth already. Sometimes it may not be a good fit for somebody that has to create wealth.

Craig was having dinner with a client recently who had been with them a long time, and she had somebody she knew who came up to Craig and asked him how they could make $1 million. He said he could not tell her how to do it, but if you try to do it you might lose $1 million. Sometimes not everybody is a fit for everybody, so they have really found a nice niche for people who have some wealth and want to consistently build it with very low risk. With the price points we are at right now, we are making loans based on 1990’s prices. Common sense tells all of us that that was before it even went up this last time. If we feel that 1995 was a realistic value, these loans are being made at 60-65% of 1995 prices. All that tells us is historically we would not know what would have to happen for this to make sense and it also does in a second way because the rents are already covering the payment by double. It is one of those situations where the smart money is actually on both sides of the table because the investor, or the person buying the property, is a skillful investor buying something below market by today’s value. However, if you look at the whole picture the investor is buying it with a starting point of half of what it was worth four years ago, and he is receiving a discount and a cash flow. He is making money monthly and buying something below replacement cost where the history says we will probably accelerate in the future. He cannot borrow money through standard lenders because they are not interested in that loan. On the other side, he has the choice of receiving a ten year t-bill that is at 1.9% today, the stock market that goes down or up 300 points every other day based on what happens in Greece, or a 9% trust deed. ]

The Norris Group has some very large commitments from people, who have money managers and overseers, and from talking to these people one year apart Bruce has seen that they are astonished that their yield had performed perfectly. They were warning their client that there is no way that the yield could be so riskless, and then it turned out to be so. The best and most satisfying thing about what The Norris Group does is what they see happen in the long-term. Before going to The Norris Group, Craig was working with a friend and was funding deals with hers and her father’s funds. She told him a story about how she went to her account year after year for 6-8 years in a row. Craig told her he did not know what her investment was but she needed to get out of it because it was too risky. Meanwhile, with her father’s insistence she has also diversified into some stocks, which had netted a 0 yield over the last 18 years. However, by the ninth or tenth year she was told to keep doing what she was doing. It was very rewarding. The Norris Group has a process in place that is second-to-none in picking clients that are worthy of borrowing money.

Bruce and Craig talked about the process and why it was different from other people. The main thing you have to do is rule out people to make sure they are qualified when you get a call from a borrower. The first thing you do is try to establish right away whether or not it is a situation. If it is a situation, then you have to rule that out. Secondly, you always try to find out if it is owner occupied. Most hard money companies will not do owner-occupied loans any longer, so you also look at this. You also have to get an idea and see if they have any experience. The Norris Group really relies heavily on liquid cash because one thing they have found in the business is you really need to have liquid cash because you cannot have a situation where a $10,000 or $20,000 problem throws your whole world upside down. This is probably the most frustrating thing when somebody calls in to borrow, they might have $800 credit but only $10,000 in the bank. You can usually tell by their credit report and what they state their income is to see that it would not take much to flip the whole thing over. This is compared with someone who is a business person who went through a situation 4-5 years ago where he had a bankruptcy and so his credit is not as good. However, he currently has about $200,000 in the bank to back him up. People with better credit don’t like to hear this, but in our world this is a safer bet.

When we make loans, we are actually using common sense and asking ourselves what are the odds that we are going to be paid monthly and get paid back. We are really not guided by any 1,2,3,4 rules. The bottom line is if it really makes sense and it is a good loan, then it can be done. Bruce said that Craig also has kind of a sixth sense in that there are times when he has come to Bruce showing him something that looked good on paper, but he knew there was something about it that he felt uncomfortable with, and he was right. This was probably one of the things that he has always appreciated from the very start, whether it was from a trust deed investor or a borrower. There will be times when he will come to Bruce, and he can just feel that there is something not right. Craig has learned that he if gets that feeling to try to catch somebody in a little bit of a situation where he can tell they are not being up front with him.

Tune in next week for the second part of Bruce’s interview with Craig Hill on The Norris Group Radio Show.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 11/23/11

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2011

Sources:

LPS “First Look” Mortgage Report: October Month-End Data Shows an Increase in Foreclosures
Bureau of Economic Analysis National Income and Product Accounts
FDIC’s list of problem banks shrinks
Mortgage Servicers Make Progress to Fix Flawed Foreclosures
Freddie Mac Bulletin
Obama signs extension for higher FHA loan limits
Realtors hike dues to play politics
California attorney general’s office subpoenas Fannie, Freddie

Today’s News Synopsis:

In this week’s video, Aaron Norris gives the news of the week in the world of real estate and other big events.  In the world of mortgages, mortgage rates and applications are both down according to the most recent Primary Mortgage Market Survey.  Mores stores are preparing for Black Friday by opening even earlier than usual and lowering more prices.

In The News:

Housing WireMortgage rates edge down, ARMs reach new lows” (11-23-11)

“Mortgage rates declined this past week, with adjustable-rate mortgages hitting new lows, according to Freddie Mac’s latest Primary Mortgage Market Survey.

Mortgage Bankers Association - “Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey” (11-23-11)

“Mortgage applications decreased 1.2 percent from one week earlier (which included the Veterans Day holiday), according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending November 18, 2011.”

Bloomberg - “Friday Deals Show Stores Bowing to Buyers” (11-23-11)

“Every Black Friday, there’s a staring contest between retailers and shoppers over price. This year, the stores may have blinked first.  Chains such as Toys “R” Us Inc. and Gap Inc. (GPS) are opening earlier and offering more markdowns than ever on the day after Thanksgiving, said Mary Delk, a director at Deloitte Consulting.”

DS News - “Investors Increase Market Share, Especially in Distressed Sector” (11-23-11)

“Investors are making up an increasing share of home purchase transactions, especially in the distressed sector, according to a HousingPulse Tracking Survey released Tuesday by Campbell Surveys and Inside Mortgage Finance.”

CNN Money - “First-time unemployment filings edge higher” (11-23-11)

“The number of Americans filing for first-time unemployment benefits crept back up last week, after easing to a 7-month low in the previous week, but remained below a key threshold for gauging the job market.”

Housing Wire“S&P: 45 months to clear shadow inventory” (11-23-11)

“Changing default and liquidation rates in various regions prompted Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services to reduce its projection of how many months it will take to clear the nation’s shadow inventory.”

DS News - “Mortgage Insurer PMI Files Bankruptcy” (11-23-11)

“The PMI Group, Inc. says it has filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.”

Housing Wire“Freddie Mac single-family delinquency rate edges up in October” (11-23-11)

“Government-sponsored enterprise Freddie Mac reported Wednesday that its single-family seriously delinquent rate edged up in October, hitting 3.54%, compared to 3.51% in September.”

Looking Back:

One year ago, the NAR reported that existing-home sales increased by 10.1 percent in October 2010. Statistics showed that California workers, who earned the national median income, could afford 59.1 percent of the new and existing homes during the 3rd quarter of 2009. Multifamily lenders provided $88 billion in new financing for apartment buildings with 5 or more units during 2008.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

252-TNG Radio – I Survived Real Estate 2011 part 5 11-19-11

Friday, November 18th, 2011

I Survived Real Estate 2011

I Survived Real Estate 2011


(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

On October 14, 2011, The Norris Group returned with its award-winning event I Survived Real Estate. An expert line-up of industry specialists joined Bruce Norris to discuss current industry regulation, head-scratching legislation, and the opportunities emerging for savvy real estate professionals. 100% of the proceeds support the Orange County Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure. This event would not have been possible without the generous help of the following platinum partners: ForeclosureRadar and Sean O’Toole, Housing Wire, the San Diego Creative Real Estate Investors Association and President Bill Tan, Investors Workshops with President Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest, Invest Club for Women and Iris Veneracion and Bobbie Alexander, San Jose Real Estate Investors Association and Geraldine Berry, Real Wealth Networks, Frye Wyles, MVT Productions, and White House Catering. The event video can be found on isurvived2011.com.

Bruce continued his discussion with the panel on an interesting appraisal they had. Someone with no experience in a very unusual area where you received a lot of money for a certain located lot had a $1.3 million comp for the model-match house. They had the right location, but The Norris Group did not. They had a home for sale for about $700,000 for 90 days, which is not worth $1.3 million. When they went pending, the home was appraised for $1.3 million because it was a model-match house; someone had come in from out of the area who did not have a clue that it mattered there. This did, however, help lock in the sale.

Bruce wondered what the intent is on the mortgage side. He asked what the function of the appraisal management company was and if they are really supposed to just make sure that appraisal independence is accomplished. Sara confirmed saying this is the main function, and it was intended to be the main function to begin with. Unfortunately, it has become a clearing house for fees lower. The management company is going to make the money, and Sara said what her company finds is that when many consumers close a loan are confronted with an amount for an appraisal that includes not only the appraiser’s fee but also the management company fee. Sometimes the management company fee is more than what the appraiser is actually making on the particular sale. Sara related to Bruce on a personal instance where she had a friend who called and asked her if about $300 the usual in customary fee for a residential appraisal. Sara said this sounded a little high an asked her to call the appraiser. When she called the appraiser, she found out that a good part of the fee that she was going to be paying for the appraisal was actually going to the management company and not to the appraiser.

To earn their cut, the management company usually engages the appraiser and is responsible for the documentation securing the appraisal, getting the appraisal back to the file, and getting it to the lender. They act as the middle man. Bruce jokingly said they basically take an email and forward it. They do not necessarily have to have expertise as appraisers, however. In a lot of states like Arkansas and most likely in California, they have certain requirements for AMCs. The Appraisal Institute has been very active in trying to monitor the appraisal management companies and try to obtain some kind of regulation process, some bonding or some kind of law that supports the appraiser in the event that there is some kind of argument with regard to fee and process. In some states they are not regulated at all, and in other states they are closely regulated. This actually brings up a confusing situation. Bruce wondered if the Appraisal Institute has national and state regulations that overlap or contradict, which Sara confirmed.

Debra Still began talking about how her company works in 29 states and files 29 states worth of appraisal regulations, fees, forms, disclosures, and predatory lending. The variation is pretty stunning. The Dodd-Frank Act had tried to solve the reasonable customary fee, and Bruce wondered if this has changed in practice where the appraiser is now getting paid what they used to. However, Sara said this is not the case as there is still a big issue in this area. When Sara testified before the Congressional Subcommittee in July, this was one of the things that she continued to talk about with the subcommittee. The idea of reasonable and customary and the intent of Dodd-Frank was never to include the AMC fee into the reasonable and customary estimation. The Appraisal Institute has done a lot of research, a lot of study, and they have looked at VA schedules and others to try to help these AMCs and try to help the Congressional Subcommittee to take a look at what a reasonable and customary fee might be to an appraiser. They would like to see the HUD-1 form simply separate the fees. The appraisal fee needs to be on one line and one transparent number, and the appraisal management fee should be on another. An appraiser needs to be paid for the time, the education, the professionalism that they have and that they bring to the experience. The AMC should also be compensated for the work that it is doing. There are pretty severe fines for not paying reasonable fees. In the Legislation, it gets into the millions, and it is uncertain if any of these fines have been levied.

One thing that existed at one time and it is good that it does not anymore is undue pressure. However, Bruce gets the feeling it actually does exist but on the back end. He feels like there are buyers who are willing to say about a house that it is the one they want at the price they want it, but somewhere along the line there is pressure to get it at a lower price. He doesn’t know if it is the review appraisal process, an automated system, or it is an underwriter who says it should be lowered. He really doesn’t know, but he does know that as a seller he is confused sometimes why it comes back less. It’s not reasonable. People look out for their own best interests. For example, a seller checks out the market and goes pending, to Bruce this is a comp. If it disagrees with all the other comps severely, then this might be a problem. When The Norris Group fixes up houses, they might spend $30,000, but they do not automatically think about if they will receive $50,000 back for it. There are, however, times where a buyer looks at this and says they would not be able to do it for $30,000, and a $20 grand price difference at 4% interest is so minimal per month that the answer is they will take the $30,000 over the $50,000, especially when you have 70% comps against REOs and short sales. This is a problem. The real question is how they are viewed. One does not show up and say a property is a comp but it does not have a kitchen. You can’t get the truth with the push of a button.

Sara said all this points out the need for local market expertise, for people who are trained professionals, people who are trained to go to the market and interview the buyer and seller, to investigate the comparables, and make sure they are comparables. Secondly, Sara believes that a lot of appraisers, as they begin to turn in their appraisal reports, face a lot of undue pressure, for example, added comparables, extra questions, and more scrutiny placed on their valuation and their judgment. Bruce wondered if for some reason the pressure is there or a review appraiser disagrees that they could lose business because they came in at a higher number than the review appraiser. Sara said this is something that might happen on some instances, but it really falls to the appraiser to defend himself over and over again. If the information is there and the valuation has been done to the best of the appraiser’s ability, then you need to just get to the point in time where you have to say, “This is it; this is all I can do.” Sara said often times when this situation confronts the people at the company, they will say, “Could we pick you up? Could we drive those comps and take a look at them?” A lot of times you are talking to somebody who is sitting at a desk who never looks at the property and never goes to the particular comparable. He never inspects the interior and doesn’t have any information. It is a communication problem sometimes because as an appraiser and as a person who is writing the report, the communication skill needs to be there to convey extraordinary measures you may or may not have taken to include the sale and why. It is a difficult environment, and it is very difficult sometimes to meet the requirements that are piled on, that are additional, and seem perfect in terms of the final valuation result.

Debra Still said you do have underwriting guidelines and some investor overlays that are now causing some of this challenge where you might have an investor that requires that two comps be outside the community. Outside the community possibly means a foreclosure. This is one of the homebuilders’ top 4 issues. As we see some of these sub-markets beginning to heal and prices starting to stabilize, we have to think about how do we move forward and recognize that in a declining area we might have a very stable sub-market. How do we recognize that some investors want four comps or six comps or justify the time valuation? It becomes very complex when you combine both the appraiser’s work and the underwriter’s work on top of it.

Bruce gave an example of something that really changed their business model. They bought a property in Moreno Valley for $52,000, without a kitchen and other necessities, and they fixed it for around $25,000. They put it up for sale and went pending for $123,000, and they had seven offers within two days. This is a pretty good statement of market value. The appraisal came in at $100,000, and the review came in at $80,000. Consequently, they kept it as a rental at $1100, and they rented it in one day. The statement basically by the appraisal said that given $100,000 at 5%, the rental payment was worth twice as much as the value when you consider what it was worth in mortgage payment. What it prevented was them fixing the next 50 properties in Moreno Valley because what it told them was due to the changes that HVCC brought in, the appraiser was incapable of coming to that decision because no one would allow him to do it. This is a challenge for the industry right now, especially in the areas that have the overwhelming vacant REO as the comp. One of the reasons they concentrate in a specific area is because they provide their own evidence that a decision has been made before, which is what you are in a way stuck with as an appraiser. You have evidence that somebody made a decision.

Sara said one of the other things the aforementioned points out is a relationship with the purchaser and with the person who is going to be working with the mortgage as well as conversation and dialogue on the front end certainly might help to solve some of the problems. The Appraisal Institute is beginning to look at how they can develop some relationships in sub-markets that would allow them to try to take a look at what they have in the market in which they are working. The technique, theory, and ideas going forward are pretty new, and therefore they may have a lot of risk in them for a lot of lenders. It goes back to educating both the lender, the appraiser purchaser, and the investor in what is going on in the market and how they can handle some of the consequences of the downturn that we have seen.

Debra Still said this is one of the things that is difficult with HVCC. The spirit of the HVCC was right on target, not doing anything to exert undue influence on an appraiser. On the other hand, it is now law; and having those good, constructive conversations are very delicate. You have to be very careful and very thoughtful, and there is a protocol to have an appropriate dialogue with an appraiser as you are trying to get to the right place. It is using coercion when it really just needs to have better information.

In order for a company to not require an appraisal management company to act as the middle man and go directly to the independent appraiser, they would have to be a reasonably large lender. Debra Still’s company has a national subdivision processing department, so everything that has to do with properties is done by a department that is outside of the origination, the processing, the underwriting, and the closing. As long as you can set up an arms length environment, you don’t have to use an AMC. Most companies, however, would use that as their way to ensure arms length and to stay within the law. Sara said this is a big factor with a lot of lenders right now as they do not want to cross the line.

There is definitely a sense that there is some rotation system that is necessary where no matter what the experience level or knowledge of an area, it is just a specific person’s turn to obtain an appraisal. Debra Still’s company does a 1 in 5 rotation in each sub-market and probably has about 300 appraisers nationally that they use. It is very important not to use one person solely for a community. There needs to be team partners. All of the appraiser’s business would be dependent upon the company giving, so they have to do at least a 1 in 5 rotation. This is how they have set up their due diligence. They will review the appraisals, review for error, review any quality control audits, and they would make sure they have qualified individuals on their appraiser panel. Sara believes in this type of environment you would have more control over the quality of the appraiser. This is one of the things she does not find happening with a lot of the AMCs. They will gravitate toward cheap and quick and possibly overlook the qualifications that the appraiser has such as market expertise, which Sara says is extremely important. What really matters is the person who is willing to travel, to finish the appraisal, and turn it in completed. A quick turn-around time might be a day to a day and a half. There is no way that if you are not familiar with the market you can simply march in, collect the comparables, talk with the buyers and the sellers, get a sense of what is going on in the market, make the inspection, get a feel for what the property contributes, what are its overall attributes in relationship to the others that are on the market or the other sales that have occurred, go back to make the appraisal, and then write and convey it in a quick amount of time. It just cannot be done. Bruce said it is hard to want to do this if you are getting paid half of the appraisal fee. It may not even be feasible to spend as much time because you just cannot possibly do it. You might as well just go to Multi-list and get a couple of comps and move on.

When asked about broker-price opinions, Sara said one of the things about this is in some instances it might be a good vehicle, but for mortgage-lending purposes and for decisions a lender has to make; by in large the opinions are unregulated. An appraisal that is put forth and signed by a state-certified appraiser, which is what the Appraisal Institute does, has some education. They are unbiased and a third party out there taking a look at the property. They really don’t have anything more in the game than just to report and analyze the market. Sara believes sometimes in the terms of broker-price opinion you have a disinterested person. They are an advocate for the property owner and for another entity. They are certainly not regulated like the appraiser is in terms of adherence to certain educational requirements. There are so many things that are missing. The broker-price opinion might have its place in some part of the real estate picture, but certainly not in terms of making a decision to buy or sell. It’s a different approach; it’s a different mindset, and it should be for a different use.

Bruce speculated that when there is an REO created, there is a series of things that happen including a couple of BPOs and an appraisal. It’s uncertain which is weighed heavier, but there is evidence that everybody is getting a turn in saying what the value is.

Bruce asked the panel if they see anything in Dodd-Frank or the changes in qualified mortgages that threaten a 30-year mortgage for some of the stratuses of loans. Debra said she does not really see anything in the QM or the QRM that would specifically attack the 30-year mortgage. For the most part this has been a product that housing in America has depended on for many years.

To find out more, tune in next week for I Survived Real Estate 2011, part 6. The Norris Group would like to thank their gold sponsors for the event: Adrenaline Athletics, Coldwell Banker Pioneer Real Estate, Conaway and Conaway, Delmae Properties, Elite Auctions, Inland Empire Investors Forum, Inland Valley Association of Realtors, Keller Williams of Corona, Keystone CPA, Kucan & Clark Partners, LLC, Las Brisas Escrow, Leivas Associates, Mike Cantu, Northern California Real Estate Investors Association, Northern San Diego Real Estate Investors Association, Pacific Sunrise Mortgage, Personal Real Estate Magazine, Raven Paul and Company, Realty 411 Magazine, Rick and LeaAnne Rossiter, Southwest Riverside County Board of Realtors, Starz Photography, uDirect IRA, Wilson Investment Properties, Tony Alvarez, Tri-Emerald Financial Group, and Westin South Coast Plaza. Visit isurvived2011.com for more

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 6/29/11

Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

Today’s News Synopsis:

Bloomberg reported an increase of 8.26% in pending sales for existing homes.  Bank of America and RMBS investors have reached a settlement in their recent suit regarding a loss of money for investors.  Mortgage applications saw a decrease of of 2.7%, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.  Ally Financial has been subpoenaed by Federal Regulators in hopes to obtain information connected to a current investigation by the Justice Department.

In The News:

Bloomberg - “Pending Sales for U.S. Existing Homes Rise 8.2%” (6-29-11)

“More Americans than forecast signed contracts in May to buy previously owned homes, signaling the residential real estate market may be rebounding from a slump earlier in the year.”

Housing Wire - “Bank of America settles with RMBS investors for $8.5 billion (6-29-11)

“Bank of America (BAC: 11.175 +3.28%) agreed to pay $8.5 billion to investors who lost money on soured residential mortgage-backed securities that were assumed by the banking giant after it acquired Countrywide Financial Corp.”

Realty Times - “Case-Shiller Index Indicates Home Value Boost” (6-29-11)

“According to the latest S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index, April experienced a seasonal boost in home prices. Both the 10- and 20-City Composites were up 0.8% and 0.7% month over month, the first rise in eight months.”

Mortgage Bankers Association - “Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey” (6-29-11)

“Mortgage applications decreased 2.7 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending June 24, 2011.”

Los Angeles Times - “KB Home posts second-quarter loss” (6-29-11)

“Los Angeles home builder KB Home widened its loss in its second quarter as the housing market stalled and the company continued to suffer the fallout from the bankruptcy of a Las Vegas development.”

RisMedia - “Brokerage Veteran Louis Farina Joins Jordan Baris, Inc. Rentals” (6-29-11)

“Louis Farina has taken the reins and is running Jordan Baris, Inc. Rentals. Farina has an extensive background as the former owner of Signature Homes and Estates in Morris County, an award winning manager running a large office for a franchise and as a top producing Realtor.”

Housing Wire - “Early-stage mortgage delinquencies drop to 3-year low” (6-29-11)

“The amount of mortgages in the earliest stage of delinquency at the end of March dropped to the lowest level since the first quarter of 2008, federal banking regulators said.”

Realtor Magazine - “Fannie to Fine Lenders for Foreclosure Delays” (6-29-11)

“Mortgage servicers who have delayed the foreclosure process for delinquent borrowers may now get fined. Fannie Mae announced it will retroactively fine mortgage servicers for failing to process severely aged loans in foreclosure, HousingWire reports.”

DQ News - “Las Vegas Metro Area May Home Sales” (6-29-11)

Las Vegas region home sales held at a five-year high last month, rising modestly from both April and a year earlier as sales of distressed properties continued to account for nearly 70 percent of the resale market.”

Housing Wire“Regulators subpoena Ally Financial in mortgage probe” (6-29-11)

“Federal regulators subpoenaed Ally Financial Inc. this month, asking the lender for documents tied to mortgage deals and information related to a Justice Department investigation.”

Looking Back:

One year ago, Standard & Poor claimed U.S. home prices rose 0.8 percent in April 2010. According to the MBA, independent mortgage bankers and subsidiaries made an average profit of $1,135 on each loan they originated in 2009. Congress debated over legislation that would eliminate the HVCC in 90 days if passed. The House voted 409-5 to extend the closing deadline for the tax credit to Sept. 30 2010.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.