The Norris Group Blog

California Real Estate Headline Roundup

Posts Tagged ‘forecast’

169-TNG Radio – Harry Dent 4-10-10

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Harry-Dent

Harry Dent

Author and Economist

(Full Bio)

stream

itunes

download

rss

This week Bruce Norris is joined once again by Harry Dent. Harry is the president of the H.S. Dent Foundation, which publishes the H.S. Dent forecast. His mission is to help people understand change. He is the author of many books, which include The Great Boom Ahead 1992 and The Roaring 2000s and The Great Depression Ahead.

The title The Great Depression Ahead is gutsy. This book came out in 2009. Harry finished writing the book in the first half of 2008. However, we had some significant events occur at the end of 2008. The only thing that really surprised Harry was the stock market rally. He assumed that the economy would get worse, and as it got worse, the government would stimulate it. Harry predicted the stock market would bounce to 9800 and maybe even 11,800. We are right in the middle of that zone right now. Short term indicators predict that we might go even higher in the near future. However, he thought this stock bounce would begin and end earlier. Harry does not believe the recovery will last, because the baby boomers will go from spending to saving.

Harry defines a depression as an extended downturn in which you also see a deflation in prices. The reason why prices go down is because banks and loans are failing. This destroys credit and money. The deleveraging of credit causes deflation. In a depression, everything goes down. In an inflationary downturn like the 1970s, real estate goes up. Real estate does well during inflation. The failure of the banking system is the biggest shock an economic system can have. Harry believes that later this year and in 2011 we will go into a depression.

Alan Greenspan once said, “I watched my whole intellectual education fall apart in 2008”. That took a lot of guts to say, and it was astonishing to think that someone like Greenspan had studied economics for 50 years but still estimated incorrectly. Economists can look at a chart and come to two completely different conclusions.

Anyone who has studied business cycles throughout history knows that human greed takes over every time. Anytime you have low regulation, low interest rates, and bubbles building, people go nuts. People start thinking that the market will never go down, and the banks will lend to anyone. If bubbles go on for long enough, anyone will buy into a bubble. Its not a matter of intelligence, it’s a matter of understanding human nature, and that is where economists fall short. All economists look at is statistics.

There are no exceptions to the cycle of economics. The economy always goes from summer to fall, from inflation to disinflation. In the fall season is when you get bubbles, and when you get bubbles, the government always claims it can fix the problem, but they cannot and they have proven this over and over again. Bubbles have to deflate. We don’t want real estate to be so expensive that young people cannot afford it.

The bigger the boom the bigger the bust. Fortunately, we have a tool that tells you how long a boom will last approximately, and when it will wind down. Harry predicted how the economy would change by looking at the birth index. Booms always lead to excesses, and excessive lending and business expansion.

Japan had a real estate bubble similar to ours. They had excessive lending and unaffordable real estate prices. They had a demographic boom peak before the rest of the world, because they were the only major country who did not have a baby boom after WWII. Japan went through their downturn while the rest of the world was in the greatest boom of history. They didn’t have as much deflation as we will have, and their export industries can still be working at 120 percent. Japan also entered their crisis as a net creditor to the world. Almost all their debt was financed by their own citizens, so they had more capacity to stimulate and keep stimulating.

The U.S. is entering this downturn, and the whole country is going down with it. Baby boom demographics are down around the world. The world has also had a banking crisis and real estate bubble. We’re dragging people down with us, but they would have gone down anyways. The U.S. is the biggest net debtor in the world. We owe trillions of dollars to other countries. 50 percent of our debt is financed by foreign investors. This is contributing to the world downturn.

In 2011, Harry believes debt will overwhelm the banking system. This will cause the deficit to reach about $22 trillion. Harry thinks the debt will encourage our government to borrow even more, and we will pay for it. Japan tried to do this, and they will be sorry for it. Their debt to GDP ratio is 2.5 times what ours is. The only reason why they are surviving is because they are still paying interest rates on that debt at less than 2 percent. In the next decade, they will have to pay market rates like the rest of the world. Japan never truly deflated their bubble. They deflated their businesses, but they didn’t deflate their financial institutions. They have no way to easily get themselves out of this trouble.

Harry believes that Europe is going to start having debt trouble as well. When this happens, France and Germany will have to pick up the tab, but they won’t want to have any part in that. They will demand that the other countries cut their spending and raise taxes to cover their own debt.

In the United States, healthcare and social security expenses are already at costs above what we can afford, and we are now looking to expand that. Company and government pensions are unrealistically generous. Once we get to the point where we have to cut those pensions, people are going to go nuts. There may be riots. Bruce agrees with Harry on this issue. $46 trillion in unfunded medicare, Medicaid, and social security liabilities have already been promised to people. That is 4 times as much as the current government debt. We can’t afford the healthcare we have, and now they are trying to pass another healthcare bill.

The government will have to confess its inability to pay the baby boom generation its social benefits around 2012 or 2013 when the crisis will be at its worst. We will not get out of the mortgage and housing crisis until 2012. Harry believes that Obama will not be reelected, because he became president at a bad time.

We are going to have an enormous amount of debt in the next couple years, which is part of the reason why Harry does not support the new health reform bill. We will not be able to sustain the cost of this new program, and Bruce doubts that Congress has fully read through this health care bill.

When you have deflation, it exaggerates the current debt level. Harry believes that this will cause the government to scale back on age limits for social security and health care. Private debt will scale down substantially. All the debt ratios will get worse. Many businesses will go under or merge with other businesses. Banks will have to write off trillions in loans. Deflation works to restructure debt, rather than pay it off. If we had to pay all that debt off with deflated dollars, it would be much more difficult. At the end of this deflation period, we will be much stronger. Stronger companies will take over weak companies, costs get cut, and real estate goes down.

There are very few properties for sale in California right now, and it is easy to resale. The default rate has doubled in the last 12 months, but the foreclosure numbers have been cut in half. Banks are not foreclosing on people, because they do not know what to do with so many properties. Despite the 6 percent GDP, which Harry does not believe will last, defaults will continue to increase and foreclosures will continue to hit the market. This will suppress real estate prices. Banks will eventually have to write off a lot of those loans and foreclose. This is what will kill the recovery. Once the banks realize that real estate won’t recover, we will see the next banking crisis.

There is a psychology attached to exaggerated events like booms. When booms occur, people rationalize their decisions and the same thing happens in a down cycle. When things go down, people develop a pessimistic attitude towards the future. Baby boomers have not yet had a major downturn in both the real estate and stock market at the same time. This crash is going to cause retirements to disappear for baby boomers, and this loss will cause them to save even more. They will have to work longer but they may not be able to get jobs, because older people cost more in benefits. Harry is forecasting 15 percent unemployment.

Harry believes interest rates will increase this year. However, the bond market will eventually notice that the economy is slowing and then interest rates will decrease. This is what happened in 1931 when the crisis was building. We had a great boom market in bonds from 1932 to 1940 when interest rates were falling. In the next decade we will see deflation. If you want to buy long term bonds, Harry encourages people to wait until later this year or early next year. If you want to refinance, you may want to wait until interest rates come back down. This downturn in interest rates will happen between 2011 and 2013.

Bruce never thought he would see interest rates go down this low. Bruce began his real estate career in 1981 when he refinanced his house at 17.5 percent. Now we are at sub five percent rates, and we may see rates go even lower. Harry agrees and claims we may see rates go down to 3 to 4 percent.

168-TNG Radio – Harry Dent 4-3-10

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

 

Harry-Dent

Harry Dent

Author and Economist

(Full Bio)

streamitunes

download

rss

This week Bruce Norris is joined by Harry Dent. Harry is the president of the H.S. Dent Foundation, which publishes the H.S. Dent forecast. His mission is to help people understand change. He is the author of many books, which include The Great Boom Ahead 1992 and The Roaring 2000s and The Great Depression Ahead.

Before he wrote his books, Harry was working towards a degree in Economics, but then changed to Finance and Accounting. He felt that economics did not teach much, and that most economists were not able to predict anything. He eventually went to Harvard Business School and studied business strategy and marketing. This is probably why he comes to different conclusions than many economists.

Harry has been studying demographics in his consulting work. In 1998, he was sitting in front of the S&P 500 and the Birth Index for Baby Boomers. He looked at those 2 charts and he noticed that they looked a lot alike. Harry knew that the peak in spending was between 45 and 49 for the average economy, and this knowledge led him to conclude that he could predict the economy 50 years in advance with just one indicator. A boom typically starts when a generation is young, and ends when they begin hitting their 40s. Not too long after, he discovered that there were many correlations between different economic factors.

Harry’s business of predictions has been an ongoing learning process. He has extended his studies to real estate and different pieces of the economy. Recently, he had to revise his book The Great Depression, because he got new information about merging markets between countries like Europe and Australia. Emerging countries do not have the same kind of spending habits as that of developed countries. This is why he makes different predictive calculations for merging countries.

Attempting to accurately predict the future can be exhausting, because every time you think you’ve accounted for all the factors, you discover there is something missing. Harry has to account for political cycles, commodity cycles, urbanization and other factors which affect the merging of countries. Bruce feels that Harry’s non-arrogant mentality lends credibility to Harry’s work. The fact that Harry is open to new information, and to the idea of revising his own theories, is why Bruce pays attention to him.

Harry’s first book was named The Power to Predict. This book is about indicators like “the spending wave”, “the 46 year lag,” and “the inflation indicator.” This book also contained the “S-curve,” which describes the 4-stage business and economic cycle. Harry predicted that DOW would hit 10,000 by the early 2000s, and that the boom would end by about 2007. This book accounted for new technologies like the internet and new car models. When new technologies develop, they cause bubbles.

Japan was mentioned in this first book as well. Harry claimed that Japan was going to slow, and that the United States and Europe would improve. People thought he was crazy for making that claim, because at that time, Japan was booming with growth. In 1992, people thought the U.S. had seen its best days, but Harry claimed that there would be a boom around the year of 1998 to 2000, which would result in a government surplus. Harry also predicted at that time that inflation and interest rates would decrease around that time.

Bruce feels that the legitimacy of Harry’s predictions is confirmed by his ability to predict both bad times and good times. Also, Harry uses very specific terms when describing the future of economics. Harry doesn’t use moderate language in his predictions. He has noticed that economies tend to either be bullish or bearish. The good times don’t last forever, and he thinks that people who make predictions about never-ending prosperity are foolish. When markets go up, they tend to increase for 25 to 27 years. When markets go down, the downturn typically lasts 12 to 14 years. Harry currently believes that we will have a period of demographic weakness from 2008 to 2023.

Every 40 years we get a major downturn and the government tries to fix it, but they cannot do this because they cannot fight demographics. When you’re in a demographic boom, the government can stimulate because you have a generation that needs to spend and borrow a larger amount of money. Harry is claiming that the current government stimulus program will fail, because it is simply causing the younger generation to buy earlier when they would have bought a home in the future. Also, Harry does not believe the baby boom generation will be affected by the stimulus, because they are done with the home buying part of their lives.

Most people only study one theme of economics. This means that if they are bullish, then they will selectively read bullish material. These people have already come to a conclusion before studying the evidence.

In the early 70s, Bruce read a book from Howard Ruff named The Coming Bad Year. At that time, Bruce did not have much knowledge of economics, so he read this book as if it came from God. One of the suggestions that Howard made in this book was to buy 200 pounds of wheat. At that time, Bruce had two kids and he didn’t want to run out, so he bought 1000 pounds. This experience taught Bruce that you cannot believe everything you read from proclaimed experts.

Economists don’t have tools to project 50 years in advance, but Harry believes that demographics can do this. Harry predicts that the value of gold will decrease in value during the downturn, because this is a deflation season not an inflation season. This is contrary to the opinions of many people, but Bruce actually tends to lean in favor of Harry’s opinion on this matter.

The more popular you are as an economic writer, the more people respect your opinions, and the more likely they are to plan their lives according to your predictions. This is something that Harry thinks about frequently. Harry actually encourages people to read other authors who think contrary to his opinions, so they can have a fully educated opinion.

A long-term boom prediction is bound to have some down cycles mixed in. Bruce asks how one can know the difference between an anomaly downturn and a downturn which leads to a depression. If demographic trends are still up when downturns occur, then the market will eventually recover. Baby boomers are moving into their 50s and 60s. During this time, they will be saving more and spending less. This tells Harry that the government stimulus will not work.

It is easier to predict long trends than it is to predict precise downturn points. For example, during the past crash, our indicators led us to believe that the DOW wouldn’t go past 7200, but it actually went down to 6440.

Harry claims there is an 80-year new economic cycle. This 80-year cycle is described as the 4 seasons model. There are always 4 seasons that occur in economics just like summer, spring, winter, and fall. We had the spring boom during the 1940s to 1960s. From 68 to 82 we had the summer downturn in which we experienced inflation and low spending. From 1980 to we went through the fall boom in which the baby boom generation began to spend a lot. We are going from high inflation to low inflation, which causes lower interest rates. The stock market does well when interest rates are low and this causes a bubble. Now we are up against the winter season, in which all our bubbles will decrease and cause deflation.

This 80-year cycle occurs over two generation booms which last around 38 to 40 years each. This cycle is repetitive going backwards, but there is an exception. If you go back into the 1800s, we still had a similar cycle system, but the two generation cycles only lasted about 28 to 30 years. This is because we were more of a farming society at that time. We did not have so many powerful middle class consumers. Right now, the commodity cycle is less important to our countries cycle. Commodities only represent about 10 percent of our economy.

Bruce asks if Harry has a process to determine whether or not false predictions are based on something unforeseen. Harry assumes that when bad predictions are made, that something was missed. Most people assume that the markets just aren’t getting something, and those people will be vindicated. The automobile industry correlated with a technology bubble from 1912 to 1919, and then a big crash occurred in the 1920s. We assumed another bubble would happen in 2006, but we did not see this. Harry tried to find an explanation for this by searching through history. He found a commodity cycle and a geopolitical cycle. During the boom of 2006, we had oil prices dramatically increasing which affected our ability to accurately predict the effect of the boom. Also, we had war problems which affected Harry’s predictions.

Harry Dent’s website is www.hsdent.com

You can find his books there and other activities which his company is involved with.  Join us for part two with harry Dent next week.

162-TNG Radio – Christopher Thornberg 2-20-10

Friday, February 19th, 2010

christopher-thornberg

Christopher Thornberg

Principal at Beacon Economics

stream

itunes

download

rss

This week Bruce is joined by Dr. Christopher Thornberg. Dr. Thornberg is the founder of Beacon Economics, and he is one of California’s leading economic forecasters. He is one of the only economists who accurately predicted the crash and the recession that followed.

During the last show, Christopher discusses the proposal to allow a bankruptcy judge to determine what they should owe on their home. Bruce mentions that banks are not foreclosing on homes because if they did then  their losses would be incredible. Thornberg says the proposal for bankruptcy judges was being pushed for a while, but it came to an end because the right side of Congress was strongly against it. Thornberg thinks that most homeowners, whether they were in trouble with their home or not, would not have been supportive of that proposal. A large number of the people in financial trouble today are in trouble, not because they bought homes at the peak, but because they refinanced at the peak. People took money out of their home to buy toys, like cars and televisions. If you walked into a bankruptcy court, and showed the judge everything you’ve done with your finances, he would allow you to keep your home, but you would lose everything else. Also, a lot of people committed fraud on their mortgage applications, so they would certainly lose their home. Realistically, people should be happy that we still have non-recourse loans, because they can take your house but they can’t take everything else.

Christopher says there are no smart economists claiming that the U.S. has potential for deflation. The deflation in Japan is being caused because of their tight monetary policy. The potential for inflation is driven by the money supply. The government pursues a tight money policy, which means they don’t expand the money policy very much. Japan had problems with inflation in the 60s, and that scarred their national psyche. They have become so scared of inflation that they have allowed deflation to occur. If Japan wanted to get rid of deflation, all they need to do is start printing money.

Japan has huge national debt, but they don’t want to inflate because that would make their cost of borrowing increase dramatically. If the United States started to inflate, and that inflation coincided with a $20 trillion federal debt, we would be in trouble. However, our existing debt would become much cheaper, because the interest rates are fixed.

In 2009, banks changed the way they deal with distressed debt. They don’t need to be aggressive about how they value loans, even though many of their loans are under water. As long as the bank can keep the loan current, they don’t have to acknowledge the potential loss in that loan. If we forced a mark-to-market mentality on banks today, we would probably collapse the banking system. There would probably be at least 6,000 banks going out of business if we forced banks to comply with their actual Tier 1 capital needs. We do not have the man power or the money necessary to bail out all the depositors in those institutions.

This is similar to what Japan allowed to happen in their bank system, but it is not the same. Japan created what Christopher calls “zombie banks”, and they made it difficult for anyone to raise debt. Our banks do not have to worry about that problem as much.

One of the nice things about the American economy in comparison to Japan, is that we still have a competitive market. Christopher has some friends who have become employees of different companies due to bank buyouts. Eventually, they quit and decided to start their own bank. These people are becoming new entrepreneurs who pick up the slack for banks who will not lend. Christopher thinks that these kinds of people will be our saviors.

A little inflation goes a long way. The U.S. could easily inflate the economy, which would pick up the asset values, and that would take a tremendous amount of pressure off of our banking systems. The Federal Reserve has made the stance that they are anti-inflation. Christopher believes that Bernanke needs to think more realistically, because a little inflation would be a huge relief for our financial system.

When we have inflation, we usually have an increase in wages. However, wage increases do not usually occur quickly.

In 1982, Bruce refinanced his house to be an investor at 17.5%. That is the long run consequence of that kind of activity.

Bruce asks Thornberg if he foresees the United States having positive GDP growth over 1 percent. Thornberg feels very confident that this will happen. The U.S. economy still has a lot of problems to deal with. However, if the government backs off the stimulus and allows the economy to re-grow and if we have less consumer spending, and more exports, then we will have a great opportunity to grow as a country.

When we talk about GDP, we are talking about the fundamental ability for an economy to produce goods. Our ability to produce goods and services increases by about 3 percent per year, and we’ve been maintaining this growth for decades. The question is, “What are we losing that productive output for?” Thornberg thinks we’ve been using that output poorly. We have been using our output to supply consumer spending and to bring in imports. Also, we have lost our focus on exports and business spending.

We have had a demand shift from less consumer spending to more exports. It takes a while for supply mechanisms to restructure themselves to meet those new demands. It is incorrect to say that demand creates supply. The question is, “How is the supply being altered by the basis of demand?”

The U.S. GDP growth was supported by a lot of equity extraction. Now many people must to save for their retirement. Bruce wonders how much that hurts that which represents 70 percent of GDP engine. This is the point that Christopher has been trying to make. If we hadn’t had the big equity bubble, and if we hadn’t seen an extreme increase in consumer spending, then our ability to supply would have shifted to exporting and business spending.

California has a $1.9 trillion economy, and a $20 billion deficit. Our problems are political and not economic. Christopher thinks we simply need our leadership to make some basic decisions on how California will finance the ending of our debt problem. We don’t have a government that spends a lot of our money. The problem is that we spend it in the wrong places. At the same time, we are not a high tax state. We put high taxes on small bases, which makes us an unfriendly tax place for specific constituencies. Christopher thinks that we simply do not have the political will to get rid of our debt problem.

Christopher thinks that Prop 13 is a fiscal injustice. It amazes him that Prop 13 was even allowed to exist. Prop 13 under the fairness clause, which states that if you are receiving similar services then you should be paying similar dues. Prop 13 should have been rejected in the California Supreme Court. Thornberg thinks we need to get people to vote against this proposition, but we probably won’t make this happen.

Christopher does not currently know, for sure, if we have positive or negative migration in California. However, based on some of the recent reports he has read, California is seeing negative migration. This is largely due to the weak state of the labor markets. The good new is that once we get out of our mess, we will have a weak dollar and lower home prices. Christopher is optimistic that once we are done with this mess, California will show outstanding growth.

The United states has becomes the world’s largest debtor nation. The good news is that the dollar has to go down at some point in time. China, India, Russia and Brazil have made an explicit policy to keep the U.S. dollar strong. They do this by taxing their citizens in order to buy U.S. treasuries. This is a strategy that will someday end, and this will cause the U.S. dollar to fall. This means that they will buy a U.S. treasury, but they will probably lose at least 15 percent of the value in their investment, because of the decline of our value. They are taxing Chinese peasants to subsidize American consumption. They could stop investing like this if they wanted to, but that would immediately severely damage their currency. People keep saying that China is overcoming us, but that just isn’t true. If you owe the bank $10,000, the bank owns you. If you owe the bank $1,000,000, you own the bank. This is exactly what is going on with China. We own them, not the other way around.

Bruce asks what privileges we have as the world reserved currency status. Thornberg says that we get what is called “seniorage”. This means that we can print money, and other people will want to hang onto that money. As a result, we get a subsidy kick out of it. In reality, this is not that important of a status.

We’ve left our worries of private bank debt behind. The new worry in the financial markets is sovereign debt. A lot of nations have increased their spending to levels that aren’t sustainable. People are worried that we will see similar losses in sovereign debt as we saw in banking debt. As a result of this, more people are investing in the U.S. dollar, which is causing the U.S. dollar to improve. Unfortunately, Christopher does not believe this will help us recover.

161-TNG Radio – Christopher Thornberg 2-13-10

Friday, February 12th, 2010

christopher-thornberg

Christopher Thornberg

Principal at Beacon Economics

stream

itunes

download

rss

This week Bruce is joined by Christopher Thornberg. Christopher is an expert in the study of regional economies, real estate dynamics, and business forecasting. In 2006, he co-founded Beacon Economics which is an  economic research and consulting firm that specializes in real estate markets, local economic development, and public and private policy issues. Christopher has also been part of the Norris Group’s award-winning fundraising series, I Survived Real Estate.

Christopher and Bruce discuss the current state of the market and whether the market is truly experiencing a comeback or is it completely manufactured.  Christopher goes into detail about Bernanke and his current handling of the market.  Government actions has delayed the inevitable and Christopher and Bruce discuss what the different strategies have been and how effective they have been and how much longer we should expect to see these manipulations.

Bruce and Christopher talk about Fannie Mae and FHA and the growing issues with FHA’s portfolio. The Mortgage Bankers Association estimates 20% of the their loan portfolio is in trouble.

A complete transcription of the show coming soon.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 2/9/10

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Today’s News Synopsis:

Altera Real Estate foresees significant improvement in the Orange County real estate market. According to IAS, national home prices have returned to 2004 levels. Forecasters from iEmergent expect approximately $580 billion in mortgage refinancing during 2010.

In The News:

Orange County Register – “Housing market warming along south coast?” (2-9-10)

“Steven Thomas of Altera Real Estate claims in his latest biweekly report that this is the strongest demand has looked in Orange County’s real estate market since 2005.”

Housing Wire“Pulte Posts Loss Despite $917m Tax Refund” (2-9-10)

“Pulte Homes (PHM: 11.08 -0.45%) posted a net loss of $117m, $0.31 per share, in Q409, even though it will receive a $917m tax refund later this year. The Michigan-based homebuilder said $800m of the tax refund comes from the extension of the net operating loss (NOL) carryback allowance”

Housing Wire“New Program Rewards Current Mortgage Borrowers” (2-9-10)

“if a borrower has a $200,000 mortgage and the value dropped to $150,000, a bank using the RH Reward program could give a $25,000 incentive to the borrower if the borrower remains current. How that reward is monetized depends on the borrower.”

Housing Wire“December Drop Brings IAS Index Back to 2004 Levels” (2-9-10)

“The index is a county-level measure of median sales price of single-family residences in five US Census Bureau regions, nine Census divisions and 360 counties. After five months of declines, the index is now 5.3% below its 2008 level. In 2008, the index declined 11.7% from its 2007 level. The index is now at a level last seen in mid-2004, IAS said.”

Housing Wire“Mortgage Financing Poised to Drop in 2010: iEmergent” (2-9-10)

“Mortgage volumes in 2010 will not reach the same levels as 2009 as the slide toward the collapse-curve bottom continues, according to iEmergent, the market research and advisory firm for the financial services industry. The firm projects the purchase-to-refinancing ratio will reach a 49% to 51% split in 2010. Forecasters predict between $531bn and $643bn in refinancing volume in 2010. Refinance volumes will be less than half of 2009 levels, and lenders relying on those transactions in 2009 will be at a great risk in 2010, according to the report.”

Wall Street Journal“No Exit in Sight for U.S. As Fannie, Freddie Flail” (2-9-10)

“Nearly a year and a half after the outbreak of the global economic crisis, many of the problems that contributed to it haven’t yet been tamed. The U.S. has no system in place to tackle a failure of its largest financial institutions. Derivatives contracts of the kind that crippled American International Group Inc. still trade in the shadows. And investors remain heavily reliant on the same credit-ratings firms that gave AAA ratings to lousy mortgage securities.”

Looking Back:

One year ago, two thirds of Americans expressed support for the $15,000 first time home buyer program, which the senate was considering. The MBA expected $171 billion in mortgages to mature in 2009. A government official announced plans to buy troubled assets.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 12/11/09

Friday, December 11th, 2009

Today’s News Synopsis:

Mark Greene of FICO forecasts that credit-card and mortgage defaults will increase during the next six months. Former director of the FHFA James B. Lockhart III, claims that the housing downturn may not be finished. Statistics from both Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings show that the default rate for CMBS increased during November.

In The News:

Mortgage Bankers Association“MBA Comment on Passage of Regulatory Reform” (12-11-09)

“Regrettably, the House moved forward and passed a bill that could adversely impact borrowers and lenders alike. By not creating a uniform, national regulatory standard, the bill continues the conflicting and confusing patchwork of state and local laws that result in increased costs for borrowers.”

Bloomberg - “Mortgage ‘Cram-Down’ Amendment Fails in U.S. House” (12-11-09)

“The U.S. House rejected a mortgage ‘cram-down’ amendment that would have given federal judges the power to lengthen mortgage terms, cut interest rates and reduce loan balances for homeowners in bankruptcy court. Lawmakers voted 241-188 today against the amendment, which was to be part of broader legislation reining in excessive risk taking on Wall Street. All but four of the Republicans who voted opposed the amendment, pulling with them 71 Democrats to defeat the measure.”

Bloomberg - “Defaults to Rise as Credit Issues Remain, Greene Says” (12-11-09)

“The next six months will bring more credit-card and mortgage defaults, said Mark Greene, chief executive officer of FICO, maker of the credit-scoring formula most widely used by U.S. lenders.”

Bloomberg - “Lockhart Says Housing May Take ‘Another Leg Down’” (12-11-09)

“James B. Lockhart III, vice chairman of WL Ross & Co. and the former director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said the U.S. housing decline may not be over. Lockhart said at a conference in New York that he’s concerned there may be ‘another leg down’ because of the pace of foreclosures. Foreclosures will ‘spike’ unless the Obama administration’s programs to spur home loan modifications do more to reduce homeowners’ debts, he said.”

Housing Wire“CMBS Delinquency Jumps Most in November: Moody’s” (12-11-09)

“The delinquency rate among US commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) jumped in November, according to separate surveys by Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings. Moody’s saw a 46bps increase over last month’s delinquency rate — the largest monthly increase of the current downturn — bringing CMBS conduit and fusion loans to 4.47% delinquent.”

Inman - “Feds: BofA lagging in loan mods” (12-11-09)

“Bank of America — which has more mortgages eligible for the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) than any other participating loan servicer — continues to lag behind the industry average in modifying troubled borrowers’ loans, according to the latest report from the Treasury Department. Through the end of November, Bank of America had made trial or permanent modifications on only 14 percent of the estimated 1 million HAMP-eligible loans it’s servicing that were delinquent by 60 days or more, the Treasury Department said”

Realty Times“Short Sales May Rise Due to New Government Incentives” (12-11-09)

“‘The push right now is for servicers to avoid foreclosure and the push is coming not only from The Obama administration and the Treasury but also from the owners of the loans such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And the focus right now is on short sales. So, I think in 2010, you’re going to see a lot more short sales and hopefully reduced foreclosures,’ says Travis Hamel Olsen, chief operating officer of Loan Resolution Corporation.”

In The News:

One year ago, Bank of America announced plans to cut 30,000 to 35,000 jobs.  U.S. Regulator James Lockhart claimed that mortgage rates would fall below 4 percent. An estimated forecast from UCLA showed that home-price declines since 2006 had amounted to $4.5 trillion.

133-TNG Radio – Christopher Thornberg 8-1-09

Saturday, August 1st, 2009

christopher-thornberg

Christopher Thornberg

Principal at Beacon Economics

stream

itunes

download

rss

This week Bruce is joined by Christopher Thornberg. Christopher is an expert in the study of regional economies, real estate dynamics, and business forecasting. In 2006, he confounded Beacon Economics which is economic research and consulting firm that specializes in real estate markets, local economic development, and public and private policy issues.

Beacon Economics will be doing its first Los Angeles Forecast Conference in the last week of July. There will be a panel of CEOs representing health care and the financial industry who will be talking about the changes occurring in their industry. It will be their first annual event. They are partnering with the LA Chamber of Commerce and Pepperdine to make this event happen. Southern California is the economic center of gravity within this state, and the center of Southern California is Los Angeles.

Bruce asks if a company is looking to relocate would find California to be a leading option. There are some things you have to consider if you come to California. You have to worry about where your employees are going to live. Nowadays homes are much more reasonably price compared to a few years ago. Companies coming to California will be able to rent commercial property for a lower price per month as well. The prices have not come down as much as they should have though, because of the leasing situation, and because there are still some landlords who seem to be in denial about the shape of the economy. Residential and commercial property are two sides of the same coin, and yet they come at different stages of the business cycle. Residential leads the business cycle, and commercial lags it.

The commercial real estate market is about to feel the same hit that the residential market has taken, but it is taking more time to mature. Part of the reason the commercial market is taking longer to go down is because the banks are not pursuing bad debt. The banks have more incentive to be lenient towards people they have lent money to, because if you foreclose on a loan then you actually have to mark that loss down in your books, but if you do not foreclose then the FDIC will allow you to keep that on the books at face value. They call it extend and pretend.

In the residential market there are a lot of properties that have not begun foreclosure, and some people have not made payments for 18 months. There are some banks that are willing to delay the foreclosure process, and some banks just can’t catch up, and there is also a problem with moratoriums that are slowing this situation down. Christopher thinks that if you have a problem then you should be trying to work through it and move forward, but we seem to be fond of dragging this problem out. Some will tell you that you want this problem to be solved over time, because the economy is already so weak, but Christopher says that there is very little evidence that foreclosures significantly hurt the economy. Moratoriums on foreclosure make it a lot longer problem.

On Christopher’s website there is a quote saying, “It’s not what Wall Street troubles me to California, it’s what California troubles me to Wall Street.” When we had a big financial meltdown last year, many reporters called Chris saying “What does this mean for California?” Christopher laughed at this, because Wall Street has presented itself as the leader of all financial things, but that is nonsense. The stock market can change its direction in the afternoon if it gets afraid. California has been in a recession since 3rd or 4th quarter of 2007, yet Wall Street made many bad bets and it did not seem to affect the economy for close to a year. If you did have a true meltdown in the financial system then you would have massive deflation and things would be far worse than they are now. We had a depression expert in the Federal Reserve, and he wasn’t going to let that happen.

Trillion has replaced billion as the cost of solving problems, but Christopher says inflation does not seem to be a likely outcome of the spending we are doing. This is because a large portion of the money we are spending is being done through treasury bonds. That does not have an inflationary effect. What does have an inflation effect is the expansion of the money supply. The Fed, through its program of quantitative easing, has expanded its monetary base by 100 percent over the last year. If that money was to get into the real world then it would have an inflationary effect, but it hasn’t. Most of the money that the Federal Reserve has made has ended up in bank reserves. If the banks started lending that money then we would have an inflation problem, but Christopher thinks that if that ever happened that the Federal Reserve would start to get rid of that excess liquidity.

Bruce asks Christopher what the ramifications will be for 12 to 13 percent in California. Christopher does not think that unemployment is going to be a big problem. Unemployment is a lagging indicator. However, it does increase the amount of stress being put on the financial system. People over their heads in debt and underwater in their home but beyond that he doesn’t see a direct effect on the economy.

Bruce asks if he thinks lower wages will be an issue. Will renegotiation for lower union rates will come up? Christopher thinks it will have a little impact. Hours are already being cut for government and education jobs.

If California is one of the leading states in unemployment then it will affect migration patterns in the short run. The number one reason people move is for job opportunity. The number two reason is relative home prices. This means people will not have as much motivation to move into California for a while, but some people may start moving back into California because of the low home prices.

Builders couldn’t possibly be interested in creating building lots right now, so Bruce is worried that there will be a housing shortage around 2012 or 2013. Christopher thinks that is possible but he does not see us having an issue with single family housing. There are lots of lots ready out there, and as soon as someone sees the opportunity they will build. Christopher does think there will be problems with rental houses. When people start moving back, there will not be enough housing for low income families. Christopher hopes the state will make policy changes to encourage multi family production.

Bruce thinks that it might be a solution to give investors financing so that they can hold properties for a reasonable price because then the market would dictate what the rent would be. Christopher thinks we got into this mess because of too much financing but now there is not as much financing as people would like. Christopher wonders if there is a true market failure occurring right now or are people simply suffering from credit withdrawals. There was never too much financing for investors who buy and hold properties and eventually pay them off. The financing problems occurred when speculators and owner occupants got involved. If your goal is to find reasonable rentals, they are all over the place in Moreno Valley and San Bernardino, but the financing is not available for investors to get these homes. What seems like a sure deal to investors does not seem like a sure deal to the banks.

Bruce thinks that the number of bank owned properties is going to dramatically increase in the next year. Bruce asks if Christopher sees more price damage coming to California because of that. Christopher does not think that these bank owned properties are not going to really decrease prices but they will help hold prices down. There is pent up demand for housing. If you go to an auction, you will see people who want to buy foreclosed units. Bruce thinks that this is true in the short run.

Bruce wonders how we can have pent up demand when we have the most generous financing programs in existence. It is surprising to Bruce that there is this much demand when there are so many people who have been artificially allowed to participate before they were ready.

In Riverside and San Bernardino, rent is more expensive than the PITI payment. That has never occurred in California. This is occurring because there are many people who cannot qualify for mortgages because they already have a bad mortgage on their payment. Unemployment and foreclosures are at a record, so Bruce does not understand who is actually going to borrow the money to buy these homes.

Christopher thinks there are more potential buyers who smartly sat on the sidelines and waited for these opportunities to come up. There may be other people who are being co-signed by their parents. If you talk to bankers they will tell you that there are people coming through their doors who have a recent foreclosure, and they will look the other way because they know that these people have made a mistake and there is no point in turning down a potentially good loan. Bruce agrees with Christopher here.

Most of the mortgage market is being dominated by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Unless Fannie and Freddie are willing to back mortgage product and buy them off of banks, there is going to be very little money available.

Current loan modifications in California do not change the principal balance. Christopher does not think these have any chance of working. You cannot expect to have a true recovery by simply modifying the payment. People are not fooled by these modifications. Even though we are modifying their payments, they are still in an incredible amount of debt. It will take many years for them to get rid of the debt they have taken on, and their credit score will heal faster than their equity position. In 2008, 7 out of 10 people who applied for a loan modification ended up in foreclosure eventually.

Bruce asks Christopher what he thinks will indicate that real estate is starting to get healthy. Christopher thinks that sales are important and mortgage delinquencies from the Mortgage Bankers Association. For California, about 9 percent of all mortgages are delinquent. That tells you that we are no where near the end of this problem.

We look forward to Christopher being on our panel for I Survived Real Estate 2009.

Christopher Thornberg is a founding partner of Beacon Economics. Dr. Thornberg is an expert in the study of regional economies, real estate dynamics, labor markets and business forecasting. He has been involved in a number of special studies measuring the impact of important events on the economy, including the NAFTA treaty, the California power crisis, port security, California water transfer programs and the September 11th terrorist attacks. Prior to launching Beacon he worked with the UCLA Anderson Forecast where he regularly authored the outlooks for California, Los Angeles and the East Bay as well as performing a number of specialized forecasts for regions and industries. Dr. Thornberg lectures on a regular basis at a variety of public and private events, has appeared on CNN, Fox News and CNBC and is widely quoted in the press. He received his Ph.D in Business Economics from The Anderson School and his B.S. in Business Administration from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He specializes in International and Labor Economics. Dr. Thornberg continues to teach in the MBA program at UCLA and previously held a faculty position in the economics department at Clemson University.

107-TNG Radio – Christopher Thornberg 1-31-09

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

christopher-thornberg

Christopher Thornberg

Principal at Beacon Economics

stream

itunes

download

rss

Bruce Norris is joined once again this week by Principal and Co-Founder of Beacon Economics, Christopher Thornberg.

Bruce and Christopher continue their conversation about paying the debt we are currently giving our children. Christopher talks about World War II and how quickly we paid the debt back. Christopher doesn’t have a problem with raising money but government has a problem sometimes paying it back.

Bruce brings up that the State of California can’t raise money so how do you fix the issue. Christopher says California’s problem is $40 billion of a $1.8 trillion in economy which is only 3.5%. It’s not that big of a number. California is 18th in the list of states as far as paying taxes. We’re a little above average. We just collect them in strange ways. Instead of taxes on a ton of small things, we have larger taxes for a smaller bunch of things. Christopher says we have the most regressive property tax. There’s a small group of people who pay a larger portion of the taxes. There’s other ways to make California more tax friendly and pay off debt.

Bruce brings up Prop 13. Christopher thinks Proposition 13 is ridiculous. Voters would have to overturn that proposition.

Bruce brings up Citibank and the concept of cramdownsn which they agreed to cooperate with in bankruptcy court. Bruce asks if that’s possible and Christopher said it is. There’s a new president and an administration that’s more left leaning. Certainly some would pursue bankruptcy as a way to do so but it does incur costs above and beyond just losing your home. Other assets will be at risk. Christopher asks if judges will really consider this alternative as some of these people lied on their loan applications. Bruce says we haven’t put much pressure on the people who exaggerated income. Christopher says the FBI came out early and said they would not be pursuing the consumer. He finds it hard to believe a judge would take the same stance if a consumer blatantly lied on their application and then were seeking a cramdown.

Christopher talks about the huge issue of people going in to default after the payments are adjusted through loan modification. Reports suggest 50% go back into default.

Bruce brings up TARP and the term crawl back which is when CEOs have to give back bonuses if the banks restate their earnings. Christopher says they should have to give it back. Christopher says the problems in the market stems from the problem with executives in the financial system because they were grossly compensated for short-term returns. Christopher talks about some of the ways these executives made millions. He brings up a Lehman executive who made $400 million in six years and how he did it. Executives need to have some skin in the game.

Christopher says mortgage backed securities were used to hide risk. Bruce brings up what they used to call these instruments in the 1900s and how they were made illegal. Christopher is not apposed to derivatives, they’re just extremely complex. We just need to understand them more and the motivation for why people use them.

Bruce asks what the next shoe to drop will be in California. Christopher says asset values are now returning to normal. Savings rates are ridiculously low and debt is way up. Americans thought they were rich. Wall Street tricked these people into believing they could retire early. America has to get spending under control. It’s healthy but painful in the short run. Our economy is too reliant on feeding consumers what they want. It’s not we are buying too few cars today; we bought too many the past few years.

Bruce brings up that the consumer spending was a lesser percentage of the GDP in the past as it was in recent history. Christopher expects that to get back in line. Huge trade deficit was also part of this equation. There was a trade deficit and a savings deficit. In two years, there will be more exports, less imports, and less consumer spending and then we’ll have a healthy economy ready for growth. Bruce brings up that China won’t appreciate it much.

Bruce talks about a report Christopher Thornberg wrote called “Waiting to Save” which is about the habits of the younger generation (24-34) and their saving habits. Bruce says this generation will be picking up some tabs that they didn’t even create. Christopher says this generation grew up in a market where you borrow to speculate. People have to learn to live within their means.

Bruce asks about defined benefit plans. Christopher says for the most part they have left the room and only reside in government. He’s afraid these benefits might never happen and we might figure that out in the coming years. Many of these programs have lost much of their value.

Join us next week for a chat with Mike Cantu before we release his Rental and Property management seminar February 21st.

Christopher Thornberg is a founding partner of Beacon Economics. Dr. Thornberg is an expert in the study of regional economies, real estate dynamics, labor markets and business forecasting. He has been involved in a number of special studies measuring the impact of important events on the economy, including the NAFTA treaty, the California power crisis, port security, California water transfer programs and the September 11th terrorist attacks. Prior to launching Beacon he worked with the UCLA Anderson Forecast where he regularly authored the outlooks for California, Los Angeles and the East Bay as well as performing a number of specialized forecasts for regions and industries. Dr. Thornberg lectures on a regular basis at a variety of public and private events, has appeared on CNN, Fox News and CNBC and is widely quoted in the press. He received his Ph.D in Business Economics from The Anderson School and his B.S. in Business Administration from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He specializes in International and Labor Economics. Dr. Thornberg continues to teach in the MBA program at UCLA and previously held a faculty position in the economics department at Clemson University.

106-TNG Radio – Christopher Thornberg 1-24-09

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

christopher-thornberg

Christopher Thornberg

Principal at Beacon Economics

stream

itunes

download

rss

Bruce Norris is joined this week by Founding Partner and Economist with Beacon Economics, Dr. Christopher Thornberg.

Bruce asks what Christopher thinks about the phrase, “Since the Great Depression.” Christopher says it’s a bit of an exaggeration and there are definitely sectors that have been hit hard but it’s not that bad. Some assets are still holding well.

Bruce asks about the benchmark numbers that clue us in on a depression. Christopher says that before World War II, every recession was a depression. The word “recession” was created so there could be talk about economic downturns without alluding to the Great Depression which might cause panic. He says you could categorize a really bad recession as a depression.

Bruce asks about employment and if they’re measuring differently as there are several categories including under employed. Christopher says employment numbers are measured the same and there have always been those other categories. We’re mainly talking about people who want to find employment but can’t.

Bruce asks if Christopher thought he would ever see these big financial corporations fall. He said he did about six months before it happened because they had really leveraged themselves and it was unsustainable. Debt to equity ratios were 80 to 1. It became apparent any turmoil would cause a failure. The thinking was the more leverage, the more return. During bad times, that same principle works the other way; it magnifies losses. Now the government is picking up the pieces.

Bruce talks about the rating systems that we thought were independent and we find out they were getting commissions. Christopher says people who listen to Moody’s and S&P need to understand the system a little more. Many of these assets they were rating were new and didn’t have much history. Their ratings came from modeling so there was not a complete knowledge of risk. Bruce says that’s an issue because people were looking to these companies and they thought they could trust them. Christopher says people have to do their own due diligence. People stopped looking at fundamentals and weren’t doing their homework. When the market was working, people got lax. Bruce and Christopher talk about Bernie Madoff and how he could possibly get away with that for years without getting caught.

Bruce asks why it seems that when our bubble popped it seemingly caused the rest of the world to collapse. Christopher says that the U.S. is definitely the financial guerilla in the world at 25% of the world economy. However, the U.S. was not the only place where abuses of the financial systems were going on. The kind of borrowing going on in Eastern Europe is a perfect example. Some countries are in much worse shape than we are currently.

Bruce asks Christopher if there are ramifications to the U.S. and its reputation because of the fall. Christopher says there won’t be. Our dollar is good by comparison. In the U.S., you know what you’re getting and we have a very diverse and large asset base. U.S. Government debt is considered the best. The talk that everyone was going to Euro was all talk. In 2005 there were some issues but the problem spread to other banks in other countries and the dollar got everything back that it lost in 2005.

Bruce talks about TARP and if Christopher thinks the first half was spent wisely. Christopher said yes. Congress is upset that there is not enough oversight. Christopher says TARP was not meant to force banks to lend money. It was meant to stabilize the banking system. The system is still in horrible shape. There was an enormous increase in asset value and not just in real estate. The delinquencies on all sorts of debt are way up. Banks will possibly lose trillions. The banking system needs to keep going and we have to step in and help the banks recover.

The initial TARP program Christopher did not like. They were going to go in and overpay for assets. They’ve been taking chunks of the money and give it to banks that are too big to fail (Citigroup, Bank of America) and small banks that are healthy that haven’t participated in the debt frenzy to allow them to expand. It allows these banks to pick up other banks as they fail.

Christopher says the TARP money is all borrowing and the government creating Treasury bonds. The government is also facing a huge fiscal deficit so they need t borrow.

Bruce talks about interest rates and its effect on inflation and trillions in deficits. Christopher sees about another two trillion to total 11.5 trillion. It will be 15% of GDP. It’s all relative and it’s not that bad. And they unfortunately have to pick up next week. More about Christopher and Beacon Economics at beaconeconomics.com.

Christopher Thornberg is a founding partner of Beacon Economics. Dr. Thornberg is an expert in the study of regional economies, real estate dynamics, labor markets and business forecasting. He has been involved in a number of special studies measuring the impact of important events on the economy, including the NAFTA treaty, the California power crisis, port security, California water transfer programs and the September 11th terrorist attacks. Prior to launching Beacon he worked with the UCLA Anderson Forecast where he regularly authored the outlooks for California, Los Angeles and the East Bay as well as performing a number of specialized forecasts for regions and industries. Dr. Thornberg lectures on a regular basis at a variety of public and private events, has appeared on CNN, Fox News and CNBC and is widely quoted in the press. He received his Ph.D in Business Economics from The Anderson School and his B.S. in Business Administration from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He specializes in International and Labor Economics. Dr. Thornberg continues to teach in the MBA program at UCLA and previously held a faculty position in the economics department at Clemson University.

98-TNG Radio – Mark Fleming 11-29-08

Friday, November 28th, 2008

Mark-Fleming

Mark Flemming

Chief Economist for First American Corelogic

stream

itunes

download

rss

Bruce Norris is joined this week by chief economist of First American Corelogic, Mark Fleming. First American CoreLogic, Inc. is the nation’s largest provider of advanced property and ownership information, analytics, and solutions.

Mark starts by explaining what Corelogic’s Core Risk Monitor is and what it evaluates. This evaluation tool is used to forecast mortgage default risk areas. The report makes use of house price dynamic trends, economic trends, foreclosure delinquency trends and collateral risk trends. Bruce asks of those trends which is the one that causes the others to follow. Mark says the economic and house price trends are the most important. Issues with price decreases and the ability for people to pay their mortgages continue to create problems.

Bruce asks if the downturn from 1991-1997 in California is following the same model we are seeing today. Mark says it’s slightly different. Mark says in the 90s it was more a function of unemployment. This time around, the house price downward trend is causing more of a problem. The economic downturn is following.

Bruce asks if the core factors are different for different states. Mark says yes but these two primary conditions are key. Mark talks about the Midwest and how their market has changed and reacted.

Bruce asks Mark about his take on affordability and if increasing affordability means less risk. Mark says that increasing affordability means more individuals will be able to enter the market on the demand side and means that inventory will be able to stop the price slides. There are a few steps along the way to get the market really going but affordability is important.

Bruce asks about Corelogic and how much emotions play part in the economy. Mark talks about the emotions to prices and houses and how individuals don’t like to lose. Bruce talks about people and the fear of people not wanting to buy for fear of losses. Mark says that some homes become such a good deal they get back in anyway.

In Corelogic’s report in the 3rd quarter of 2007, Bruce asks how Ohio and Michigan topped the highest risk market but aren’t in this year’s report. Mark says it wasn’t that they improved, other markets got worse. In Corelogic’s 3rd report of 2008, California has 8 of the top 10 riskiest markets and did not appear in their 2007 report. Mark says the price declines got these areas on the list.

Bruce talks about the historic nature of price declines in California and how it’s the worst he’s ever seen. Mark says even nationally it’s bad. What once were the top markets are doing so poorly it’s bringing down the national numbers. California and Florida are seeing large price declines and they are two of the largest markets. Historically, housing recessions are more localized.

Bruce asks about the percentage of houses that are upside down in California. Mark says 28% of loans in California are in the negative equity position. Corelogic only recently started these evaluations so has no idea what happened in the 90s. Corelogic uses market trends and valuation models to figure out home prices and ran data for September for their most recent report they released.

Bruce asks if there are states that are in worse shape compared to California. Mark says Nevada is in the lead with 48% of homeowners owing more on their property then it is worth. The 48% includes investors and anyone with a mortgage is counted. The mortgage stock in Nevada is much younger than California. They didn’t have the time to pay down the mortgage hence the reason they are so upside down. California has many more mature loans.

Bruce asks about unemployment and how it might cause further price declines. Mark says rising unemployment will lead to more foreclosures as more people can’t afford their payments. However, when individuals are in the negative equity position, studies shows mobility decreases and will tend to look locally instead of moving out of state for jobs. Bruce brings up that California is a nonrecourse state and people will find it easier to walk. Mark says it will be interesting to watch the behavior of people in this cycle.

Bruce asks if the bailout will help stem the foreclosure situation. Mark says the more loans that are modified the better we’ll do. Bruce and Mark discuss the moral hazard of re-writing some loans but not others. Mark says this is part of the challenge for those creating these mortgage modification programs.

Bruce says the actually foreclosure data says we’re actually down in foreclosures because of SB1137. Lenders have to go through more steps in the foreclosure process now and data is very misleading at this time. Corelogic says they are ignoring the seeming improvement in foreclosure numbers because of this bottleneck.

Bruce asks if in the model if the percentage of those over encumbered include those that refinanced to get money out of the house. Mark says the report includes all mortgages. For more information, see corelogic.com.

Mark Fleming is chief economist for First American CoreLogic, America’s largest provider of advanced property and ownership information, analytics, and services. Fleming leads the risk management economics and research team, responsible for developing collateral and credit risk models—the basis of the company’s risk management product suite—through monitoring the real estate market, identifying real estate and mortgage market trends, and analyzing the data in light of demographics and the economy.

Prior to First American CoreLogic, Fleming worked for Fannie Mae, developing property valuation models designed to drive collateral assessment applications used in mortgage origination, quality control, and loss mitigation. He has published research on spatial econometrics and presented at many international conferences.

Fleming graduated from Swarthmore College with a BA in economics and holds MS and PhD degrees in agricultural and resource economics from the University of Maryland.

Play Now

http://www.thenorrisgroup.com/