The Norris Group Blog

California Real Estate Headline Roundup

Posts Tagged ‘California Association of Realtors’

By Bruce Norris .

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 5/16/13

Thursday, May 16th, 2013


Today’s News Synopsis:

NAHB reported housing starts declined 16.5% after builders cut back on the number of multi-family homes constructed.  Mortgage rates increased to their highest level in six weeks with 30-year rates at 3.51% and 15-year rates at 2.69%.  Unemployment claims are now at 360,000, their highest in six weeks.

In The News:

NAHB - “Housing Starts Slip with Multifamily Correction in April” (5-16-13)

“A correction from an unsustainably high level of production on the volatile multifamily side was largely responsible for a 16.5 percent dip in nationwide housing starts to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 853,000 units in April, according to newly released figures from HUD and the U.S. Census Bureau.”

Housing Wire“California continues to gain steam” (5-16-13)

“The California housing market continued to gain steam in April, with both home sales and prices experiencing strong increases due to high demand and tight inventory.”

DS News - “Inventory Finally Shows Signs of Growth in April, Rises Monthly” (5-16-13)

“While low inventory continues to curb home sales, April may have seen the first signs that the supply situation is turning around, RE/MAX says in its latest National Housing Report.”

Bloomberg - “Mortgage Rates in U.S. Rise to Highest Level in Six Weeks” (5-16-13)

“U.S. mortgage rates rose, pushing borrowing costs for a 30-year loan to the highest in six weeks.  The average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage climbed to 3.51 percent in the week ended today, up from 3.42 percent and the highest since early April, McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac (FMCC) said in a statement.”

DS News - “First-Time Jobless Claims Hit Six-Week High” (5-16-13)

“First-time claims for unemployment insurance for the week ended May 11 rose 32,000 to 360,000, the highest level since the end of March, the Labor Department reported Thursday.”

NAHB - “Builder Confidence in the 55+ Housing Market Shows Strong Growth in First Quarter” (5-16-13)

“In the first quarter of 2013, the National Association of Home Builders’ (NAHB) 55+ single-family Housing Market Index (HMI) increased 19 points on a year over year basis to 46, which is the highest first-quarter number recorded since the inception of the index in 2008 and sixth consecutive quarter of year over year improvements.”

DS News“Report: Foreclosure Timelines Lengthen with Higher Loan Amounts” (5-16-13)

“Among California homeowners encountering foreclosure, those with higher loan amounts tended to hold on to their homes longer than those with lower loan amounts, according to this month’s report from ForeclosureRadar.”

Inman“NAR committee endorses public-facing MLS sites as ‘basic’ service” (5-16-13)

“Multiple listing services should be able to charge all members for the costs of establishing and promoting public-facing websites, a National Association of Realtors policy committee has ruled.”

Hard Money Loan Closed

Riverside, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $100,000 on a 2 bedroom, 1 bathroom home appraised for $148,000.

 

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group presented Poised to Pop: Quadrant Four Has Arrived with TIGAR TODAY.

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be presenting Poised to Pop: Quadrant Four Has Arrived with Chino Valley on Friday, May 17, 2013.

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be presenting How to Make a Million in the Next 24 Months in Orange on Saturday, June 1, 2013.

Looking Back:

Southern California saw a 3.6% increase in home prices, an increase not seen in 16 months.  This came with the decrease in distressed properties to their lowest level in four years.  The Mortgage Bankers Association reported a 9.2% increase in mortgage applications.  Star Wars creator George Lucas proposed a plan to build low-income housing on his ranch after having been denied to build a digital production studio there.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

Vice President and Chief Economist of CAR Leslie Appleton-Young Joins Bruce Norris on the Real Estate Radio Show #318

Friday, February 22nd, 2013


Vice President of C.A.R.


(Full Bio)


streamitunesdownloadrss

Bruce Norris is joined again this week by Leslie Appleton-Young. Leslie is vice-president and chief economist for the California Association of Realtors, a statewide trade organization with 155,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. Leslie directs the activities of the association’s member information group. She oversees the analysis of the housing market and brokerage industry trends.

Bruce and Leslie discussed financing and FHA, which was less of a factor in 2012. They were still a big factor and way above what they were in 2000-2006. However, they did less percentage of loans in 2012 than they did in 2011 and 2010. Leslie thinks this reflects the inventory situation. You have your FHA buyer at a disadvantage in this market, so inventory has fallen and competition has intensified. It is the all cash buyer and not the low down-payment buyer who will win in those multiple offer situations. You have at least half of the properties selling in California with multiple offers. There were situations where a property was 25% over list with forty offers on it. Leslie hears about these kinds of things all the time and knows how it is very competitive out there.

We got used to very easy financing in 2000-2006, however it is much harder to get a loan. However, one of the things that is a lot more generous is the loan amount for FHA. Right now we are at a 366 median price. Back in the 90s when prices were at this number, the loan amount for FHA maxed out at 160,000. FHA was just not a factor because most of the properties were priced above that limit. Bruce said he always liked when they raised the limit in Riverside since back then whenever the median price bumped up the prices ran to meet it. This was because the sale was most likely going to be an FHA buyer.

Right now, FHA’s loan limit in Riverside is 500, double what the median price is, and 700 in Orange County, double the median price of the state. This is very generous but not an announcement he would want to see. Leslie said it is a very attractive program but not effective in the marketplace we are facing right now because of the competition from all cash. The buy and hold investor is keeping most of the inventory. They would have sold to an FHA buyer left and right. However, right now it is more profitable to hold it. Another big part of it is we are buying less of the inventory. The Norris Group does a fair amount of loans, and half of their loans now are people who want to hold the same inventory that they would have sold. Some of the big companies who are their competitors and buying a lot more than them buying none of those. This has been a big change.

Bruce wondered what the agents are feeling out there. He wondered if they are feeling that there is an upswing coming and the buyers are excited, or if there is only frustration that they cannot get anything for their clients. Leslie said they are definitely in a much better state than they were a year or two ago. However, it is a challenging market to work because it is so competitive. It is really competitive to receive listings and appraisals tend to lag in any turn of the market. Because of this you will have appraisal issues coming up where there is financing involved, the appraisal is not coming in, and yet the buyer and seller have agreed on a significantly higher price. Leslie said there are a lot more short sales happening much faster at about 25% of the total market. While there is still some frustration, it is definitely better and the lenders in general are doing a much better job of moving things through quickly. It is not a perfect market, but it is a market that is moving.
One of people who is in the news a lot is Robert Schiller. He recently quoted, “If you think investing in housing is such a good idea, why not invest in cars? Buy a car, mothball it, and sell it in twenty years.” He really thinks housing is not a very smart investment, although Bruce said he would really love to challenge this one. Bruce wondered if there are people who buy into this. Leslie said she was just listening to an interview Robert did recently, and he was called upon to defend himself in terms of being so negative given how strong the data has been. He also really clarified that he is not negative, he is just being cautious and looking at long-term trends. He is wondering how long rates are going to stay this low as well as how long investors are going to be engaged in the market. He is just urging caution given the long-term perspective he has had over the last twenty years and what has happened in the market.

When Leslie was at the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, she was Robert’s research assistant for a while. Robert is someone you really have to pay attention to because he is thoughtful. You look back at his irrational exuberance quote, and you see how he was pretty much right on the money. The issue is not that the market is strong and very responsive right now. The question is as you look out over the next 2-4 years, what will happen to the properties that are owned by investors as well as what will happen to housing prices. Leslie is more optimistic and positive as she looks at California and the demographic trends, pent-up demand, the fact that housing starts are still relatively low in this state. She could point to all kinds of reasons, but the economy works in strange ways and we do have to pay attention to some of the new things in this cycle that we have never seen in prior years. One of the issues is the data is not very clean and aggregated in an easy way to be able to answer the questions of who owns what, for how much, and for how long.

When you talk about being cautious, for Bruce this means you have a chance to lock up a payment to reside somewhere at an all-time low, then do this for thirty years where it does not change. This would seem to be very cautious, and he said he does not care what happens in the short-term in that sense. One thing he can predict pretty well is rents will not stay stagnant for the next thirty years. This is why it seems that irregardless of price, if your payment is fixed then you will feel less of that weight over time. You will be able to have a better life having discretionary money far in excess of somebody renting at the current rate every year. It is very frustrating for people to do what he is describing and are not able.

Bruce wondered if people are receiving different lengths of loans than normal. You would think everything would be 30-year, but then you listen to the radio and it is a ten-year or a “yourtgage” (Create your own mortgage). Leslie said there is more of this because you have people refinancing who are looking at their retirement horizons, so you have more of the 10 and 15-year loans especially at these low rates. For a while some of this was at less than 2%, so if you have a lot more diversity in terms of timeframes than you did in the past. This makes a lot of sense for people who are trying to prepare for their future.

Bruce said we are not thinking about how fantastic this is going to play out twenty years from now when people have these low-interest rate mortgages and have been able to participate in more spending in the economy. They then end up with no house payment much sooner than they ever would have in prior years. It is a big country and markets are behaving differently depending on what areas you go to, so the concern would be the areas where you have a very high investor-owned percentage and do not have a strong economic base to prop it up. This is where Leslie sees the weak link. The question is when we are going to see this economy really kick in and start to create jobs for this next generation.

One of the factors that has to happen in California is you have to have prices accelerate to where it pencils to construct something. Bruce thinks this is what 2013 is about and what we will likely see this year. It is hard to see past what you are feeling right now, and one of the things that is happening simultaneously with this is developers are developing 5% of the amount of lots in Riverside and San Bernardino than is normal. There is no way building will catch up until they create building lots. Unfortunately, building lot creation has not gotten easier, but rather more involved. They are 2-3 years away from a building lot; so when you look at Riverside normally creating 35,000 and see they are creating only 5% of these, that number is stunning. This is going to affect economic development if people cannot live close to take advantage of the jobs.

We have existing lots, and once we go through those they are going to be surprised at there being a gap. This is why Bruce feels like the prices of existing homes will accelerate since there will not be whatever percentage normally the new home market will be. It will be hamstrung because of no building lots being created for five years.

One of the charts that surprised Bruce was the one that showed the percentage of sellers losing money reached an all-time high in 2012. This is due to the emergence of the short sales. You also had an acceleration of the proportion of short sales out of the total amount, so this almost skewed this number. Leslie guessed we are going to see this start to go down as the appreciation that we saw last year continues to accelerate very dramatically. The assumption is that all the people who lost money on their home cannot be buyers. However, this is not true; and they are going to be back in the market or just stay where they are. We are seeing a lot more principal reduction loan modifications happening as wells as people deciding to stay put. When you are looking at over 2 million mortgages, there is a lot of room for a variety of responses. However, there is no doubt that the price appreciation that we are seeing is going to push some of them out as well as push some of them to stay in for the time.

Bruce asked if he decided to do a short sale but was current on his loan, would he be able to get an FHA loan right after the closing. Leslie said he absolutely can, and if we see the Boxer bill go through the you would be able to be current on your payments and take advantage of a refinance, even if it is not a Fannie/Freddie loan. If we see that go through, which was alluded to in the State of the Union address, that is going to help people as well. The stabilization of the housing market is indisputable at this point. It has been that way in California for the last two years, and looking at last year you can say that for the nation as a whole.

What is also important to the short sale business and getting it finally through the end of this crisis and on to a normal market is the fact that they extended the mortgage debt forgiveness. You have this extended through the end of 2013, so this was the one part of the fiscal cliff negotiations that were being pushed very hard. However, now that this is done we are going to start looking at tax reform. The next issue that will be back on the front burner will be the mortgage interest deduction. This brings up a broader topic of representation for our industry. The National Association of Realtors, the California Association of Realtors, and the Mortgage Bankers Association are all going to bat for a specific industry during a time where a lot of people are looking at real estate and saying they can take a lot of goodies from this segment. Bruce is looking at it and trying to say they maybe should not do this.

Leslie said the argument is really strong that the housing sector is back and leading the rest of the economy, so do not do anything to put on the brakes. This does not make any sense at all. With all this said, the political reality is when they go behind closed doors and look at tax reforms, everything is going to be on the table. Leslie said as they have gone to Washington and talked to the California Congressional Delegation, she sees that there is tremendous support for not touching it. However, you go in and, for anyone who remembers 1986, the last time we had this situation we were good until the final hours. All of a sudden, you had a $1 million cap. We have been mobilized, and we will be even more so as we go into this session. However, the imbalances between revenue and expenditures are significant and are going to require some creativity to get through it. Real estate does seem to have some of the goodies from which they can make revenue.

One of the rules Bruce has always been surprised has stayed in place is that you can make $250 and $500,000 on the sale of your residence every two years and tax-free. When you have tax increases for people that are making a lot of money, Bruce wondered if it has a chance to skew people by an expensive residence for the sole purpose of it being one of the few ways you can make a lot of money that cannot be taken. Leslie said it depends on how you are projecting price appreciation over the time period that you are going to own the home. It would not be a short-term strategy, but would rather take a long time to gain that much equity in a home bought today. Clearly what we saw at the end of last year was the December sales were inflated at the upper end as you had high net worth individuals pushing to close transactions before you had an increase in capital gains or the thought that it would happen. Financial decisions as big as homeownership are impacted by tax rates. Looking at the exclusion on capital gains is going to be a longer-term strategy.

In 2005, Bruce read a report that had to do with the reason people bought in 2005. At that time, it was to make a profit. In 2012, the reason is homeownership. Unless you were just surveying investors, then the reason would be yield and cash flow. The market is 30% cash buyers and is very high historically compared to what we have had in the past. It feels like there is more cash than you could ever imagine waiting on the sidelines to do something.

Bruce asked Leslie what she thinks of the future of Fannie and Freddie. Leslie said we do need some things, so whatever the GSEs do needs to be done very slowly. In 2012, 87% of the new originations were bought by Fannie or Freddie, so they are the mortgage market. Any transition away from the GSEs is going to be at significantly higher rates. There is probably no one who can say what this will look like, and there is not even a proposal on the table. There have been a couple white papers that have come out over the last couple years, one from the Treasury and one from the FHA. It is a big complicated issue, and Leslie does not think anything is going to happen in 2013. Going forward, it really is the issue of this era for the future of the housing market because if you do not get a mortgage, you really will not need the mortgage interest deductions. The availability of capital at a reasonable rate is currently insured by the construct with the GSES and is going to have to be dealt with very carefully. This is the biggest policy concern looking ahead for Leslie.

Bruce asked if we know what Dodd-Frank now entails completely. He wondered if it is all done and will be implemented. Leslie said she thinks they are still working through some things, although other things such as QM have already been released. However, there are other things that are still being defined. It is still a little bit of a work in progress, obviously very political and contentious.

Bruce wondered if we are solving yesterday’s problems sometimes with policies that are no longer necessary. Leslie said there are a lot of people who would agree with that. Dodd-Frank was negotiated and developed in good faith. However, everything you attempt to do to regulate and avoid what happened in the past creates new challenges for the future. It is something you have to think about very carefully since there were a lot of things that led to the crash, and maybe the biggest one is not an issue right now. This issue is that you need to be qualified today to receive a mortgage. This was easy back in 2003-2005, but this is certainly not the case today and could possibly make the biggest difference of all.

When they look back, they have probably written the safest book of loans in 2011 and 2012 without a down payment of 20%. You look at all the issues with FHA right now, and you see it is certainly not the book that they have for the last 2-3 years. It really is what came before; and what they have done recently looks fabulous. You just don’t have a market typically that goes down the way we did.

One thing that could impact California a lot is if we have some kind of immigration forgiveness like we had during the Reagan era. Bruce asked Leslie if she sees this impacting California as far as households that are all of a sudden capable. Leslie said yes and that the general economic analysis of immigration reform is that it is positive. You are going to have people investing in education, paying more taxes, and being more engaged in the community. They are here already, so the net outcome for immigration reform is going to be very positive for the future and the economic growth of the state.

To find out more information, you can visit CAR’s website at www.car.org. This site contains fantastic information to keep you updated on all of the current statistics on sales, price, and affordability.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

Vice President and Chief Economist of CAR Leslie Appleton-Young Joins Bruce Norris on the Real Estate Radio Show #317

Friday, February 15th, 2013


Vice President of C.A.R.


(Full Bio)


streamitunesdownloadrss

Bruce Norris is joined this week by Leslie Appleton-Young. Leslie is vice-president and chief economist for the California Association of Realtors, a statewide trade organization with 155,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. Leslie directs the activities of the association’s member information group. She oversees the analysis of the housing market and brokerage industry trends.

For someone like Leslie who really heads up a lot of the talks in front of realtors, it must be quite a relief for her to say some pleasant things about the market. Leslie said what is particularly interesting is to go back just twelve months and be right at the cusp of the acceleration that we saw in 2012, then look back and see how quickly things changed. Bruce said in the January 15th report that really covered the final numbers for the year, the median price was $366. This was a change of 27% year-over-year and an unbelievable price change. It begs the question if the inventory mix was different or if the prices have really moved that much. Leslie said it is really a combination of both. We have had a really significant shift in the last year in what is selling. If we go back to December of 2011, 27% of the closings in California were REO. A year later in December 2012, it was only 11%. In one year you went from over a quarter of a market to about 10-11% of the market.

Equity sales or traditional sales that were not distressed went in the same twelve month period from 48% to 64%. Short sales stayed about flat at 24% a year ago and 25% now. You can see that you had a big drop in the available supply and hence sale of REO property, which tended to be at the lower end of the price scale and a lot more sales at the upper end. It was the same in 2012, at least for California, which is leading the rest of the country in the housing recovery since we led the downturn. We have seen a very significant shift back towards a traditional non-distressed market.

Bruce said what is interesting about this is we are at 64% traditional sales. Bruce wondered if it was ever really this low during the 90s. 64% is an improvement from where we were, but Bruce does not know if we have ever had 64% traditional sales in our history. Leslie said she thinks he is right and this is a point that gets to the whole issue of negative equity. You go back to the 90s, and the percent of people who were underwater was less than the 29% that we have today in California. It is a whole different ballgame.

One of Leslie’s quotes from this cycle that we have just been through, as painful as it was, was the quote, “If you do not have equity in your home, you’re not a homeowner.” This is relevant on so many levels. If you look at the 90s and see how people behaved in a market where prices went down but they still had equity in their home, they hung in there. This time around, prices came down, people went into foreclosure, and they walked away because there was nothing left to save. This has likely been what has made this cycle so painful and drawn out.

Bruce said we went down in the 90s very gradually over a period of 5-6 years. It seemed like it was a repetitive 5% a year, whereas this time we dropped off a cliff and sometimes it seems like we are going down 3-4% a month in some counties. There was no way to catch that falling knife. It solves very quickly when there is nothing left to save. On top of that, we had a hard macro picture in terms of job losses and job opportunities, which exacerbated the declining price situation for many people.
Leslie mentioned the REOs becoming a smaller percentage. In one of her presentations, she took a look at the REO sales as a per dollars per square foot. For example, if you have it down as $116 a square foot and you have equity sales at $243 a foot, that is definitely not the same inventory. As an investor, there is virtually no discount in the marketplace for an REO, so it is a significantly different house. It is almost apples and oranges except when you are reporting on state as a whole with aggregate data. Then everything gets put in the same pot. Slicing and dicing this data in a meaningful way is the only way you can figure out what is going on. As Bruce noted earlier, the median home price in California increased 27% in December. It was buffeted around as an example by such a change in the composition of what was selling.

What is interesting is that the composition could be changing for two reasons. One would be if the jumbo loan market improved. However, we also could just have more houses turning to be expensive because of price appreciation. This is something that is being seen in Corona. Right now we see almost a 4% price movement per month. You are seeing this in areas where prices sell dramatically and were extremely attractive to first-time buyers and particularly investors. This was the canary in the coal mine investor that was looking to buy as early as 2008. Bruce said they did not have a lot of company when they were doing this, and a lot of people were talking about the pending shadow inventory and the extra price decline it would bring. At this point Bruce thinks most people would have to either believe they were mistaken or things are not going to happen because of policy changes.

Leslie said it is often hard for people to look ahead because the reality of today is so real. The question is how many people in our industry thought we would be in this situation today where we have a market that is really the strongest individual sector in the entire economy. Bruce said when you try to make decisions based on current emotions, that is dangerous. Bruce is thankful he has charts he can look at and see what is inevitable. For instance, regarding the inventory decline we have, a report came out saying that at the beginning of 2012 there was 4.3 months, and now there is about 2.6 months. It really does not feel like there is 2.6 months of available inventory somehow. It seems like half of it is pending because it seems like every time there is a house, it goes pending unless there is something radically wrong with it. This could be if it is so overpriced it’s ridiculous or it is missing a kitchen. Things are going into escrow very quickly.

The policies that were in place for 2012 that took inventory down by about half have not changed. You have all this demand that is still potential, only it is chasing half of the inventory. There are some data issues, and one of the things that seems to be propping up in a lot of discussions around the state is the off-market listings that are not counted in the MLS. You have to get the property in within the first 48-72 hours after having had a proliferation of private groups that are keeping it off. This may be a factor in under counting. Right now we are in the process of seeing how big that is, but it may be a little bit of a data issue.

Another thing that has been discovered is in past cycles investors tended to buy, fix the property up, and get it back on the market ASAP. This time, eight out of ten plus are fixing them up and renting them because the economics of renting is attractive in a market with low rates, rental appreciation, and price appreciation. This is keeping homes off the market as well, so there is a variety of reasons why you have inventory as low as it is. All of these things are probably going to continue to be so in the future. You have a great demand for the product, and you have a good chance that you are going to balance two months of inventory for the entire year. The big question mark in terms of forecasting sales for 2013 is on the supply side, not the demand side. So the question is how much inventory are we going to have.

What you have to then look at is the CoreLogic data that has 20% of the mortgages in the state being underwater. This is a lot of people, over 2 million properties, that are not really doing anything yet. Some of them are going to become whole as price appreciation increases, or they may do a refi and stay, and they may list. Whatever they do is going to happen slowly, so there is not really any magic bullet. Your forecast ahead is always gradual, but you look backwards and things turn on a dime occasionally. This may happen with inventory, but Leslie said she is trying to get her head around what that could be. She does not see it, and neither does Bruce.

When we said there was going to be 20% price appreciation in 2013, a good part of it was Bruce said he could see the demand side of it being real. However, he cannot see the supply side changing radically since they are not going to do REOs in quantity. FHA is selling their notes that are delinquent, so that is not going to be a big HUD list like we used to have. Only about 70% of your equity sellers are capable of putting these on the market without it being a short sale. Therefore, you are just naturally drawing from a diminished pool for the moment. What is nice about that you only need about a 20% price increase to solve half of that list. Once we get there, it is game over and the rest of them will be encouraged to keep hanging in there. Bruce thinks anyone who is current is going to stay.

Leslie said the big question mark is how soon the economy will reach the 6.5% unemployment target and start giving some higher rate messages to the market. When rates start going up, you are going to get movement in terms of some of the investors. They will see higher yields in other areas of the economy. This will most likely not happen this year since this economy is still struggling. You could also have California react very differently from the rest of the country, and this is one of the things that encourages Bruce about California. It is going to fare much better than the nation, so you will probably get a national policy that stays at this low rate that will be given to a California that doesn’t really need it anymore. We could probably survive just fine with a 4 ½% mortgage rate, but we are going to have it at 3 ½% or less.

It would be an adjustment and would have an impact. It is not that it will not create a reallocation of capital. The idea that these low rates are going to be with us forever is not going to be the case. David Stockman, Reagan’s CBO director, talked about another bubble. His argument was you have so many properties owned by investors that if and when rates go up significantly or even not significantly enough to make a difference, they are going to list and sell and move onto something else. It is an argument you have to think about because we have not really been in this situation before where you have such a large segment of the market being purchased by investors.

Bruce said an investor by definition is the cash flow type where a lot of the people would ultimately like to pay off the property and own it free and clear. In that case, the property is not going to re-emerge. One of the things that could be done for the glut of these properties not to re-emerge is to give them financing that they can go along with. The unfortunate fact of this is you cannot. You can get ten loans, and then you have to go to a loan like Bruce provides. He is giving a 9.9% interest rate, and it still makes sense that it will cash flow and they will buy it and hold it for appreciation. That person will sell that property because the real gain is in the appreciation. We could have a market that would be very different if we could give financing to investors.

You have the large Wall Street companies coming into the marketplace, so Leslie asked Bruce what his take is on Blackstone and the hedge funds. They may be responding a little bit differently than the individual investor who wants to pay it off and own it forever. Their game plan would be very different, and Bruce thinks sometimes they will form a REIT. In this case the properties may just stay permanently rentals. There are other companies such as Carrington who probably have a goal price, and then they will exit.

What is interesting is we are asking ourselves if these people are really market makers and if they are changing the prices and rents right now. Bruce thinks this is one of the things that is going to start to happen. Bruce does not know if they have calibrated, but the big group of people foreclosed on in 2008 and 2009 can now save money going from renter to owner, which is unprecedented in California. It would seem if they are buying 500 rentals in an area like the Inland Empire, and at the same time the people who were foreclosed on in droves are trying to go from renter to owner, they may not get the yield they were thinking. It may be that they exited them earlier. There are already a couple companies that have exited their game plan. They thought they were going to do it, and then they found out it was not that easy to manage 500 scattered homes.

The people who are buying in bulk have to hold for five years. Fannie Mae most likely has a share in the appreciation of it, and it is almost like they are partners. This is a totally different game, and Bruce does not know how many Southern California properties are involved in this. It would seem like it would be a lot, but both Bruce and Leslie do not think it is. The situation involves more the 5-10 units individual investor. Bruce has met with several companies, and the reason they wanted the meeting was they wanted him to gather a group of investors who would flip them properties. They were having a hard time finding properties since they were not available. They were sitting there with a big check book, and they are spending a lot less of their money than they thought they were going to be able to spend.

Leslie said it is a much better market, but it is a frustrating market when you look at multiple offers and over bids. Some of the data Leslie has seen, particularly coming out of the Silicon Valley, is really disturbing in terms of how quickly that market is moving and the proportion of all cash transactions still happening. A lot of money on the sidelines is coming back into the market even today with a vengeance. Bruce said he is pretty republican politically, but this is the one time he has looked at a market and said he really does not think Wall Street is serving a purpose for the public for it to be here driving up prices and making inventory non-existent.

Bruce said when he buys and sells homes, they usually have 130-150 sales a year, but they sell none of them to the people even though they receive offers from them. They sell it to owner occupants because that is why they are here. Bruce has been on the other side, and they deal with realtors who deal with 50 buyers that have no income or sales. They are trying to buy a property, and they get beat out left and right by something that is easier to close, such as a cash sale. You cannot blame anybody since all cash rules. It is unfortunate. NAR just came out with data on housing affordability, and you look at this data and see how it has never been this positive. Rates are so low, but if you have to finance it all then you are at a disadvantage in this market.

Bruce looks at investors, and he sees a lot of people have it in their mind that foreigners are buying up everything. Looking at a chart they have, you see that they represent 5% of the market. It is small if you look at the whole state, but it is much more significant if you look at specific areas. If you take 5% of 500,000 sales, all of a sudden you are looking at 25,000 homes statewide. This is not a market maker in the sense that you are going to change the dynamics of a whole state if every one of those people decided to put up a house for sale. You know they are not all going to do this. Bruce said he does not know if the hedge funds own more than what the rest of the world is buying, although they are having a hard time buying their share. Bruce does not know the impact, although it really depends on how high they let prices go at these low interest rates. This is something they are both concerned about as they do not want to see a $600 median price with a 3% mortgage rate. Leslie thinks we will see rates come up way before this. Bruce said it depends since California may have a much brighter picture than the rest of the country.

Leslie thinks the long-term sustainable improvement in the housing market is directly tied to jobs. In California, Silicon Valley and the Bay Area is the best economy in the state, and we certainly have come down in terms of the unemployment rate being better than it was three years ago. We are making progress. One of the things Leslie likes to talk about is pent-up demand. This is all of the households that would have been formed that were not formed because college and high school graduates could not get jobs and had to move back in with their parents. The actual number of households that are invisible right now is between 375,000 and 575,000 depending on what kind of a growth rate you would have extrapolated with. This means you have people who just aren’t going to be able to make a market until they get jobs. California is doing a little better than the nation as a whole, but we need to do a lot better in order to really have this not be a financial phenomenon but rather an economic growth issue that is shared throughout the state by the population. This is what is still missing.

It is very powerful to talk about a state that sells 500,000 homes, and you have almost a year’s supply of pent-up demand due to unusual circumstances such as the recession. When that changes, you are going to have another group wanting to get into a fixed housing cost as opposed to a variable called rent. This is going to create a lot of demand.

To find out more information, you can visit CAR’s website at www.car.org. This site contains fantastic information to keep you updated on all of the current statistics on sales, price, and affordability.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

Sean O’Toole, President of ForeclosureRadar, Joins Bruce Norris on the Real Estate Radio Show #313

Friday, January 18th, 2013

Sean O'Toole


Sean O’Toole

President of ForeclosureRadar

(Full Bio)

streamitunesdownloadrss

Bruce Norris is joined again this week by Sean O’Toole. Sean is the founder and president of ForeclosureRadar.com, one of the finest websites a real estate investor can get involved with on a regular basis. Sean has done an excellent job on the website and put his computer genius to work in the industry, saving a lot of people a lot of money. He has also created competition that did not exist prior to his website by making it easier for people to become very proficient.

What is interesting is that people do not even know how to appreciate it. Bruce remembers watching a blog discussion where somebody was surprised by the mention of $50. Bruce thought to himself, “You have no idea what this business was like prior to this site.” You can absorb $50 in a half hour of time and never even check out 1/100th of the trustee sales since you are on hold. Sean had a customer early on who said they are now in double the number of counties that they were before and laid off two people, saving him $4,000 a month. Sean did not know whether to feel good about saving the money or bad about folks who lost their jobs, creating unemployment in California. This is the dilemma.

Sean’s site is not just a foreclosure website, but it has grown into the short sale referral network also. This will be a big thing for the next couple years as far a lot of properties going this route, even for investors. Short sales continue to be very important as lenders are on board with them pretty much across the board. So finding those opportunities certainly has been a key part of their business to help realtors do this and be a partner with the California Association of Realtors with their business products division. To help realtors with this has definitely been an important part of the business.

Bruce asked if there was anything new on the horizon for the website. Sean said there is, and they have been hard at work for two years. Those who have been regular customers know they really have not released much new in quite a while since they have been hard at work with something big. It is coming now very soon and will be out to their existing customers. They will receive the first peak at it, and hopefully later this month they will start dribbling it out. By spring, everybody should be able to have access.

The California real estate market usually improves when it gets employment to improve. This comeback has been orchestrated by policies that really have not included anything significant in the improvement of unemployment. One of the things Bruce feels pretty comfortable with is when you start having price increases to the extent that you will end up with building starting to pencil again, this is the most important domino. Once this tips over, you actually have a legitimate reason to be optimistic because those dominoes are the traditional ones that cause the comeback. Even if we force feed it to go there, once it goes there it is a big piece of the puzzle for California’s budget problems and migration. There are a lot of good things that happen if we have to build something.

California’s budget problems are primarily driven by unions, but that is a whole different segment. Sean thinks it is possible that we will see some more building. It is like what happened after autos when they got so low and we received all this straight news that they were up 5-10%. However, they were up from nothing to nothing; which is still nothing. We really have nowhere to go but up. In Riverside there was the announcement that construction is up 17%. Bruce looked at the chart, and it actually meant 8 houses. If you have one month of inventory and you have price aggression that starts to pencil, Bruce said he does not know where else inventory will materialize if every other policy is sending it to the sidelines as a rental. Sean said he was really surprised by the 2010 Census because he really expected it was going to show that we had overbuilt throughout California. It really didn’t show that; but it really showed that housing units for most of the state were really on pace with population growth. Certainly in a downturn you get some negative household growth, whether it’s kids moving in with parents or parents moving in with kids, or families, brothers and sisters moving in together to save money. However, Sean thinks we do not have a fundamental overbuilding in California, Merced and a couple other spots being an exception. We are going to need more housing units, and we should absolutely have some construction crew.

One of the things that happens when you have a recession as bad as we have had is you have delayed household growth. You have the 29-year old with the Master’s degree still living in the Irvine third bedroom, making $120 grand a year and still paying off his college loans. Aaron Norris, Bruce’s son, graduated from Irvine with a Master’s degree and was in the group that was single and wanted to be mobile. Last year, 20% of them got married. All of a sudden, the maturity level for that group who had really been delaying all those things joined what was typical, only they did it seven years late. This is another factor in that you do have the echo boom generation wanting to be a household much later in life, but it is actually about to be now that they want to do it. The multi-generational housing is probably not what everybody wants, it’s just what everybody needed to do. You want to say that a lot of these will be reemerging as households, and they don’t have to move anywhere since they are already here.

Bruce looks at a lot of pieces of the puzzle. He knows job creation will kick off after construction, but because of a pent-up pile of buyers coming out of foreclosure and credit damage from three years ago. Bruce said he does not even know if we need an employment increase to have such demand for houses, especially when it is paired with a one to month supply of inventory. This is really the kicker. Bruce said if you gave him six months of inventory, then he would be pretty benign on price increases. You have six months of demand on top of a month’s supply.

Sean is really in the cat-bird seat for information since he is predominantly dealing with people in the buy/sell business. What ends up happening is you get a property when you finally get the eviction done; you start to fix it or put it into the MLS with the phrases that you will fix things, and you receive offers as is that exceed your asking price. A few months later, they exceed any possibility of an appraisal being equal to the offer as is. You then realize some dynamic is going on that hasn’t really existed. This is largely in markets where payments are well below rents. Sean is not really seeing this type of thing except in these very employable areas. It’s a little different in Silicon Valley, but Sean thinks in most other areas where you are seeing a hot demand is where ROIs are above where they should be and payments are below.

Sean also has a service where it extends to Phoenix. Bruce mentioned the hedge funds that showed up in droves, and he wondered if they left the building. Sean said they have, most of them last year. Sean started hearing a lot of people, some of them based in Phoenix, saying they were done there and it no longer fit their profile. One of the predictions Sean has for California in 2013 is we may see the hedge funds move on from certain markets like Sacramento and possibly San Bernardino and Riverside. This will depend on how quickly prices come up compared to rents. Sean thinks they will leave; and when they leave that will certainly dampen the demand. What is interesting about that is one of the things happening when you are a buyer with financing is you can’t get in. It’s not like your needs are being met and you’re done. Rather your needs are not being met and you wait. Sean does not think the players in the market are large enough to be market makers where they are all that matters. If they go away, it would not spell doom for the market.

Bruce asked what percentage of the market is made up of hedge funds since cash sales are about 30%. Bruce wondered if the big people are 3 or 4% and if they would be equivalent to the foreign investor buying things in California. Sean said this is something they have been trying to get a handle on and figure out if they can get a more accurate number. The only thing Sean has currently is anecdotal where you talk to some people who bought 1,000 homes last month, and you think there is ten of this. This is nationwide, so we are still talking single-digit percentages of the market. It sounds like a tremendous impact, and it is a comp. If they are willing to pay something more than everybody else, then it presents a comp that the appraisal world can pay attention to and raises the boat for the other purchasers. These people have also been a market maker for aggression in Phoenix, where they are also market maker’s in the level where the rents decided to stay.

The question is what impact they will have on rents. Sean has heard a couple people say these people are really going to push rents down and be super aggressive. At the end of the day, their job is to push the yield up. They are pretty motivated to push rents up, not the other way. Sean does not think seeing these guys coming in and buying a lot of units means lower rental prices for sure, especially when the position the last market maker can take is exiting all at the same time. Some of these guys have different models. Where we run the biggest risk is that some have a longer term buy/hold than an exit model. They are going to sell back to individuals and single-family buyers. Others plan to package the properties up as a REIT and take public investment in them. As they go to float those REITs, as we should see fairly shortly, if there is not a market for them and they cannot finance them, then they need to exit. This could put a few homes back on the market very quickly in some specific areas they have been focused on. They will need to exit; they will not trickle them out over a long period of time.

A lot of these people are using leverage to acquire these properties to then float as a REIT. That leverage is short-term leverage since they are planning to exit through taking the portfolio public. Bruce was not really sure how long the commitments were that they had, so Bruce wondered how long Sean means by short-term, whether it’s a year or five years. Sean said it’s actually one to two, which is a pretty brief period, especially if anything significant changes to interest rates. In some of these markets, you could go in and buy houses at a ten percent yield. This means given your investment you get 10% of your money back a year. If rent is $2,000 a month and you have expenses of $4,000 a year, that is a $20,000 a year income stream. This is what they are buying; and at 10% you would value that asset at $200,000. If you are willing to take a 10% yield, the house is worth $200.

These people, these market-makers, are coming and saying in these markets where things are selling at a 10, they are only willing to pay a 7. This pushes prices to $285,000, which is pretty big increase. Sean said this is really what they have been seeing. People are coming into the market and have really pushed prices up quickly and are buying cash. Where they create comps, it pushes prices up. At least for some of the people who plan to take the portfolios public, they are hoping to do it more like a 5% return, which values that same asset, that house, at $400,000. When they do this and take this public, it will not actually create a comp in the market. Sean said this is where he thinks if you are buying into this REIT and paying $400,000 for a house that a year ago was worth $200,000 and only got pushed up to $285, it will be interesting to see if these REITS fly and what the repercussions will be.

Affordability is probably still close to all-time highs. In California we have come from $245 grand to $340. We have moved almost $95,000, close to 38%. Yet, the affordability number is the highest Bruce has ever charted. Even though we have had this pretty aggressive price movement, we still have to dole out monthly the least percentage compared to our income. Regarding payment sensitivity, you may feel like there is only so much room for the person to qualify. Bruce wondered where this line is for the lender. Sean said it looks like FHA is going back to a more conservative stance. Even though we are at an all-time affordability, Bruce wondered if the brakes will be applied by the lender on a monthly cost basis. Sean said he does not know, although he does know that Bernanke recently expressed dismay over the fact that they pledged to buy all these mortgage-backed securities, and it has not pushed interest rates further on housing.

Sean definitely thinks we are hitting the bottom end there and that folks realize these rates are probably not sustainable. You look at the $250 to $350 increase, and $250,000 was the median back in 2000 when interest rates were more like 7. Now they are half of this, and we are only at $350. If you were just to look at that in a vacuum, it would say we were underpriced as well as it is a ridiculously low rate. Sean thinks we are seeing now concern about rates in the future and that rates going up in the future are actually holding prices back. If we knew interest rates were going to stay at 3 ½ for thirty years, it might help prices. On the other hand, if we knew rates were going up, in the short term it might help prices since people who rush out get aggressive and purchase something.

Being the investor, Bruce is looking at a window of opportunity and saying that his bet would be we will relive 2004 and 2005 in the next several years. This is because the payment is so ridiculous and interest rates are half of what they were the last time we were at these prices. Bruce is completely concerned about the day that they stop having those interest rates if they do it too late. If we get to a $600 grand median price at a 3% interest rate, that is a problem. If you take a regular 30-year loan and look at $250,000 and 6%, that is a payment of $16.63. Today, if you can get 3.75, that is a payment of $1620 on $350,000. If you think about the payments being flat and incomes being up from 2000, it makes sense that affordability is low. However, it does not necessarily say that the housing market is still strong compared to 2000. Bruce thinks the lenders are going to say yes to people long enough to have a substantial price increase because it does not change the monthly payment to an unbearable number for either the lender or the borrower.

What Bruce is wondering is if someone will break loose with the new policies that always seem to follow price aggression. This was a subprime issue. They were making junk loans, but prices were accelerating and no one was defaulting. Everything looked like an A-paper loan, so when you start having good paper written it seems you will have policies that get somewhat lax and continue this thing. They say history repeats itself, but Sean hopes we are not that stupid to go play this out over again. The Fed seems intent on doing it, so if the Fed is any indication then we’re probably going to blow another big bubble and do this all over again. What is interesting about if we do it this time is we are going to have a $600 grand mortgage with a 6% interest rate. If they go to a 6% mortgage rate and your price goes to $400, you wonder if you will default on your $600 grand mortgage since your payment will be less at $600 than it will be at $400. You may have negative equity, but you have a positive payment.

The folks who want to stay put will probably stay put since there is probably also a low payment versus rent. You will probably stay put and make your payment until you have to move. The one thing that does not change is that life events happen. This could include divorce, job transfers, death. The people who go through these are going to have to move. If 5% of the population moves in a year for these reasons, but they are stuck underwater and with reasonable payments, this could be a problem. This is one of Sean’s problems with the whole loan modification where you leave all the principles outstanding and reduce the payment, the non-principle reduction loan mods. It flies into the face of reality, which is that people have to move. You are kicking the can down the road and spreading out the problem over years and years. However, it does not mean the problem is solved.

Sean thinks some of the policies right now around loan modifications and low interest rates are insuring that we are going to continue to have housing problems and issues, artificial government involvement, and an unhealthy overall market. Hopefully we can land on the right side of it and exit before it is a problem and make some money in the meantime.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 10/30/12

Tuesday, October 30th, 2012

Today’s News Synopsis:

According to the latest S&P/Case-Shiller Index, home prices increased in August for the fifth consecutive month.  At the same time, home vacancies decreased last quarter according to the Census Bureau.  Rented homes decreased to 8.6%, and owner-occupied homes decreased to 1.9%.  30 year mortgage rates increased again by 2 basis points to 3.76% last September.


In The News:

Inman- “August home prices continue steady rise” (10-30-12)

“The 10- and 20-city S&P/Case-Shiller home price indices posted monthly increases for the fifth month in a row in August, according to a report released today.”

Bloomberg“U.S. Housing Vacancies Fall and Ownership Flat as Rentals Rise” (10-30-12)

“U.S. residential vacancy rates fell in the third quarter as the growth in households outpaced construction, the Census Bureau reported.”

DS News- “LPS Settles with Colorado AG for $1.8M” (10-30-12)

“Lender Processing Services, Inc. (LPS) reached a settlement with Colorado Attorney General John Suthers for $1.8 million over former document execution practices by LPS subsidiaries, DocX, LLC and LPS Default Solutions.”

Realty Times“California REALTORS® Change The Rules For Short Sale Offers of Compensation” (10-30-12)

Directors of the California Association of Realtors® (CAR) recently voted to amend the state model MLS rules as they apply to short sales.”

Realty Trac- “RealtyTrac on The Willis Report: Why Most Housing Markets Worse Off Than 2008″ (10-30-12)

“A housing report issued last week by RealtyTrac found that housing markets in 65 percent of U.S. counties are worse off than it was four years ago.”

DS News“Disaster Relief Available for Homeowners with Freddie Mac Loans “ (10-30-12)

“Homeowners with mortgages guaranteed by Freddie Mac may be eligible for payment relief if they are located in an area that has been devastated by Hurricane Sandy.”

Housing Wire- “Wells Fargo mails checks to thousands with FHA-backed mortgages” (10-30-12)

“Wells Fargo ($33.97 -0.09%)recently surprised thousands of home loan customers by sending refund checks to a fraction of its Federal Housing Administration-backed borrowers.”

Bloomberg“Real Estate Recovery Challenged by Sandy: Mortgages” (10-30-12)

“The U.S. real estate recovery that’s gained strength this year faces a setback from flooding and property damage inflicted by Hurricane Sandy, the biggest tropical gale to hit the Atlantic seaboard.”

Housing Wire“FHFA: 30-year mortgage rate edges up” (10-30-12)

“The average interest rate recorded on a conventional 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage rose 2 basis points to 3.76% in September, the Federal Housing Finance Agency said Tuesday.”

Hard Money Loan Closed

Lancaster, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $58,000 on a 4 bedroom, 2 bathroom home appraised for $90,000.

 

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the OCRE Forum at the Chinese Cultural Center in Riverside on Wednesday, November 7, 2012.

The Norris Group will be holding their Distressed Property Boot Camp from January 29-31, 2012.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 10/23/12

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2012

Today’s News Synopsis:

Zillow reported home values increased 1.3% last quarter, marking the largest gain in home values since 2006.  Equity sales are also at a four-year high with the decrease in REO inventory.  With the state of the economy, more Americans are waiting until their 80s to retire.


In The News:

Housing Wire- “Great Recession creates 4.8 million renters” (10-23-12)

“The United States added 4.8 million renters in the past six years while losing 1.7 million owner households as the dynamics of the real estate space changed in the wake of the 2008 financial meltdown, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.”

Bloomberg“Mortgage Lenders See Tighter Credit Under New U.S. Rules” (10-23-12)

“Mortgage bankers and Realtors are warning that it could become even harder for borrowers to qualify for a home loan early next year as the industry faces a barrage of new rules.”

DS News- “Housing Takes Charge in 2012: Freddie Mac” (10-23-12)

“The authenticity of this year’s recovery may still be in question, but according to Freddie Mac’s Economic and Housing Market Outlook for October, the housing sector is showing strength unmatched in previous years.”

Realty Times“New California Law Will Expan Anti-Deficiency Protections” (10-23-12)

Recently the California legislature took action that will expand anti-deficiency protections for California mortgage borrowers. Another way to put this is to say that the legislation enlarges the class of non-recourse loans in California”

Los Angeles Times- “Los Angeles metro area home prices predicted to keep rising” (10-23-12)

“Home prices in the Los Angeles area are set to rise moderately over the next year, real estate website Zillow.com predicts.”

Bloomberg“DeMarco Shrinks Fannie-Freddie Without Help From Congress” (10-23-12)

“The man with power over more than half of U.S. mortgages lives in a 1961 brick split-level house. There’s a basketball hoop in the driveway and a green Subaru Outback in the carport. The homes on Edward J. DeMarco’s block are so close that neighbors see into each other’s windows.”

CNN Money- “More Americans delaying retirement until their 80s” (10-23-12)

“As they struggle to save for retirement, a growing number of middle-class Americans plan to postpone their golden years until they are in their 80′s.”

Bloomberg“U.S. Home Values Jump the Most Since 2006, Zillow Says” (10-23-12)

“U.S. home values jumped 1.3 percent in the third quarter, the biggest gain since 2006, in an uneven recovery across the country, Zillow Inc. (Z) said.”

DS News“As California REO Inventory Depletes, Equity Sales Reach 4-Year Peak “ (10-23-12)

“While distressed sales continue to languish in California, equity sales, or non-distressed sales, firmed up and reached a four-year high in September, according to a report from the California Association of Realtors (C.A.R).”

Hard Money Loan Closed

Compton, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $130,000 on a 3 bedroom, 1 bathroom home appraised for $225,000.

 

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the OC Investors Club in Tustin on Friday, October 26, 2012.

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Cutting-Edge Financial Tactics Brunch at the Mission Inn in Riverside on Saturday, October 27, 2012.

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the OCRE Forum at the Chinese Cultural Center in Riverside on Wednesday, November 7, 2012.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 10/16/12

Tuesday, October 16th, 2012

Today’s News Synopsis:

Builder confidence increased this month for the sixth month in a row and is now at 41.  Vikram Pandit has stepped down from his position as Citigroup’s CEO and is being replaced by Michael Corbat.  The California Association of Realtors reported the median home price in California is now at its highest in four years at $345,000 last month.


In The News:

NAHB- “Builder Confidence Edges Higher in October” (10-16-12)

“Builder confidence in the market for newly built, single-family homes edged slightly higher for a sixth consecutive month in October, according to the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI), released today. The latest, one-point gain brings the index to 41, its strongest level since June of 2006.”

Housing Wire“Citi CEO Vikram Pandit steps down” (10-16-12)

“Citigroup ($36.97 0.31%) announced Vikram Pandit is stepping down as CEO and board member, effective immediately.”

DS News“Fitch Forecasts Continued Improvements for Housing “ (10-16-12)

Fitch Ratings is predicting a continued recovery into 2012, according to a recent report titled U.S. Homebuilding and Construction: The Chalk Line.”

Bloomberg“Investors Abandon Home Loan REITs Under Fed Assault: Mortgages” (10-16-12)

“Wellington Denahan-Norris helped deliver returns of 99 percent to investors in Annaly Capital Management Inc. (NLY) over the past five years. Now, after becoming co-chief executive officer, she’s being forced to play defense. ”

Los Angeles Times“Most consumer default rates hit post-recession lows in September” (10-16-12)

“Consumers did a better job making on-time payments for mortgages and credit cards last month than at any point since the end of the Great Recession.”

DS News- “Kroll Factual Data Finds Possibility of Fraud in Applications Rising” (10-16-12)

“Kroll Factual Data, Inc. found risks in mortgage applications appears to be increasing.  The company recently revealed that the loans it processes had a 1.3 percent increase in the possibility of fraudulent activity in the second quarter compared to the previous quarter.”

Housing Wire“FHFA: HARP leaps forward, 99,000 refinancings in August” (10-16-12)

“Close to 99,000 homeowners refinanced their mortgages through the Home Affordable Refinance Program in August, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency.”

DS News“California’s Median Home Price at Four-Year High: C.A.R.” (10-16-12)

“The California Association of Realtors (C.A.R.) continued to report a shortage of inventory in September, which is limiting home sales but seems to be pushing up median home prices.”

Hard Money Loan Closed

Highland, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $143,000 on a 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom home appraised for $222,000.

 

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Apartment Owners Association in Los Angeles on Wednesday, October 17, 2012.

The Norris Group is holding its fifth annual I Survived Real Estate 2012 in Yorba Linda on Friday, October 19, 2012.

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the OC Investors Club in Tustin on Friday, October 26, 2012.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 10/9/12

Tuesday, October 9th, 2012

Today’s News Synopsis:

530 people have been charged in mortgage schemes that caused homeowners to lose over $1 billion.  Shadow inventory decreased 10.2% year-over-year in July, putting it at a now 6-month supply.  Optimism in the housing market greatly increased last month with both the increase in home prices and decreasing mortgage rates.


In The News:

Housing Wire- “Shadow Inventory falls to 6-month supply” (10-9-12)

“The nation’s shadow inventory – or supply of delinquent and distressed homes not yet on the market – fell 10.2% from year ago levels in July, real estate data firm CoreLogic said this week.”

Realty Times“Eminent Domain Could be Used to Seize Underwater Mortgages” (10-9-12)

“Last Saturday, October 6, directors of the California Association of Realtors® (CAR) voted by an overwhelming majority to support “legislation to prohibit the use of eminent domain to seize ‘underwater’ notes’.”

CNN Money“Stocks slip as investors await earnings” (10-9-12)

U.S. stocks fell slightly Tuesday as investors gear up for the unofficial start of the third-quarter earnings season. But the Dow and S&P 500 continue to hover near five-year highs.”

Housing Wire“FTC cracks down on three mortgage relief scams” (10-9-12)

“The Federal Trade Commission said thousands of distressed borrowers may be victims of false claims of mortgage relief help. Instead the homeowners found themselves deeper in debt and the FTC is looking to end it, at least at a handful of firms. ”

Bloomberg- “U.S. Charges 530 in Mortgage Probe With $1 Billion in Losses” (10-9-12)

“The U.S. brought charges against 530 people over mortgage schemes that cost homeowners more than $1 billion, Attorney General Eric Holder said today.”

Realty Trac“Is More Mortgage Regulation Really Bad for Lending?” (10-9-12)

Claim of “too much regulation” have emerged as a major election issue with leading candidates telling us we must have fewer government rules. It’s a great argument but what do the facts say?”

Housing Wire“Less expensive home sales benefit subprime bonds: Amherst” (10-9-12)

“Analysts at Amherst Securities Group say better sales of less expensive homes this winter will disproportionately benefit subprime mortgage-backed securities, which have a greater concentration of lower-priced homes.”

DS News“Officials Recap Year-Long Effort of Distressed Homeowner Initiative” (10-9-12)

“Federal officials jointly announced Tuesday the results of the Distressed Homeowner Initiative, which is the first nationwide effort focusing on fraud schemes that targets struggling homeowners.”

Inman“Study to gauge impact of ‘green’ features on home values” (10-9-12)

“Citing a need for data that could help appraisers value homes with green and energy-efficient features, an appraisal trade group is teaming up with the state of Colorado to assess the impact of energy efficiency and other “green” features on the value of existing homes.”

DS News“Consumers Firming Up Faith in Recovery: Survey” (10-9-12)

“Consumer optimism about the housing market and homeownership improved substantially in September, Fannie Mae reported.”

Hard Money Loan Closed

Riverside, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $83,000 on a 3 bedroom, 1 bathroom home appraised for $139,000.

 

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Apartment Owners Association in Los Angeles on Wednesday, October 17, 2012.

The Norris Group is holding its fifth annual I Survived Real Estate 2012 in Yorba Linda on Friday, October 19, 2012.

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the OC Investors Club in Tustin on Friday, October 26, 2012.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

Rick Sharga, Vice President of Carrington Holding Company, LLC, Joins Bruce Norris on the Real Estate Radio Show #297

Friday, September 28th, 2012

Rick_Sharga

 

Rick Sharga

Vice President of Carrington Holding Company, LLC

(Full Bio)


streamitunesdownloadrss

On Friday, October 19, the Norris Group proudly presents its fifth annual award-winning event I Survived Real Estate.  An incredible line-up of industry experts joins Bruce Norris to discuss perplexing industry trends, head-scratching legislation, and opportunities emerging for real estate professionals.  Proceeds for the event benefit Make a Wish and St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital.  This event would not be possible without the generous help of the following platinum partners: ForeclosureRadar and Sean O’Toole, the San Diego Creative Real Estate Investors Association and President Bill Tan, Investors Workshops and President Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest, Invest Club for Women and Iris Veneracion and Bobi Alexander, San Jose Real Estate Investors Association and Geraldine Berry, Frye Wiles, MVT Productions, and White House Catering.  Learn more about the panel and how to attend at isurvivedrealestate.com.

Bruce Norris is joined this week by Rick Sharga.  Rick is an executive vice president at Carrington Mortgage Holdings, LLC.  Rick is one of the most often quoted experts and has been on almost every television show about real estate records.  He has been seen on NBC Nightly News, CNN, CBS, NBC.  He is a trusted voice in what is going on in the real estate world.  Carrington Mortgage Holdings has a large platform in the real estate business at this point.  The only thing they really don’t do with single-family real estate is cut down the trees.  The company started as an investment firm back in 2003 investing in mortgages.  They got into the servicing business in 2007 buying the servicing platform of New Century out of its bankruptcy proceedings.  They did this largely to protect the investment in the loans that it had made since they were servicing the large majority of these loans when it went bankrupt.  From ancillary services, it has gradually built on to augment the servicing business to manage the assets themselves and doing rental management of the properties, property preservation, and even the real estate brokerage of Atlantic Pacific Real Estate.  It really touches just about every aspect of single-family residential businesses, including creating new loans and making loan mods.  They have a mortgage lending division that has both a retail presence with its own branches and wholesale operations through mortgage brokers across the country.

Bruce said he really looks forward to Rick being on the panel this year because of Carrington’s position in the marketplace as a big buyer.  There are other companies who are doing similar things, so there has definitely been a change in the marketplace.  It is almost like residential real estate has a market maker, collectively if not individually, which would be the first time this has happened.  Rick said he has not looked at it this way, but Bruce’s insight is spot on.  The fact of the matter is there is a lot of money on the sidelines and not a lot of terribly attractive investment opportunities for that money to go chase.  A lot of investors would like to participate in residential real estate, and there are really not a lot of financial products that let them do that.  They are seeing a lot of interest in this category, and the interest exceeds the available inventory.  This is a bit of a conundrum.

What is interesting is that Bruce got phone calls last week from two new groups that were interested in them since The Norris Group name came up almost invariably when the groups looked them up.  The Norris Group got to have a meeting with them, and what is interesting as far as the learning curve goes and how easy it is to buy 1,000 properties.  The companies’ assumption is that it is going to be a lot easier than it is really going to be.  The truth of the matter is if you don’t care what you spend, then you can actually get a lot of properties quickly.  Carrington Mortgage Holdings just decided that their approach is that they do not plan to over spend on properties.  You can do that to get the critical mass more quickly, and perhaps you can bank on rental yields or come up with a security product that will reduce your capital costs.  They are opting right now to pay what properties are really worth; and this will slow it down for a little bit but it is a better strategy long-term.

There are some companies who seem like they want to reach critical mass, and Bruce wondered why this is so critical.  Rick said there are companies who have already announced plans to create REITs or other types of securities.  In order to do that, you really have to get to critical mass fairly quickly.  You need a certain number of properties producing a certain amount of cash flow.  What appears to be happening is that some people might be willing to over pay for certain assets in order to get to that critical mass more quickly.  What is interesting is that the volume of demand is outstripping supply by a considerable amount to where what you bought yesterday for what seemed to be a reasonable price is in fact tomorrow’s price.  Rick said he has heard this done before, and it did not end really well.

We would like to hope that history will not repeat itself and we will not have another artificial boom followed by an explosive bust.  However, as prices stabilize and begin to go up, you will probably have some of those people off the sidelines who are waiting for the absolute market bottom before they came back to buy.  They have normal trends of people looking to buy properties and investor interest as well as individual investor interest.  You have limited availability of assets for three reasons.  One, the new homebuilding has screeched to a halt over the last few years.  Second, the banks are not processing the foreclosures as quickly as they anticipated because of regulatory and legislative issues.  Third, until home prices go up a little bit more, you have a lot of current owner who are unwilling to sell because they are either upside down and cannot sell or they like to hold off and make a little bit more money on the disposition of their own property.  You have three things holding back supply, and at the same time you have more active interests in the demand side.  It has really created an unusual imbalance.

One thing that is unusual is Bruce had just looked at some statistics, and he had not really thought about how many people we foreclosed on in 2008 and 2009 being as significant as they are now.  If you add up 2008 and 2009 in, for example, an area in San Bernardio County, it is 200% of a year’s worth of volume.  These are people who are trying to re-enter the buying market.  A report recently came out that said the average FICO score on a successful mortgage application today is 740.  Bruce said he has looked at the reports from Fannie and FHA.  There has been a pretty significant change in attitude regarding who they are lending.  In 2007, 47% of FHA’s borrowers had a 619 FICO score or less.  In 2011, it was only 3%.  Even those people who are theoretically able to come back into the market at this point after being foreclosed on a few years ago probably are not going to have FICO scores that will make it easier to receive a loan.

What is interesting about this is one of the gentlemen who Bruce interviewed recently, Philip Tirone, understands the credit system and tells people if they do specific things then you will have a road back to a specific FICO score.  He said he does not know what has changed in the system, but it used to take two years of solid effort to get you from wherever you were to 720.  Now it is happening in nine months.  Whoever is in charge of making the decisions apparently wants people to have a better FICO score so they can buy things.  Bruce said he does not understand what the difference would be.  Rick agreed, but there has been a lot of speculation that it would be easier this time around for people to either correct their FICO scores or get loans with lower FICO scores because so many people had their credit damaged by this unprecedented wave of foreclosure activity and the subsequent economic meltdown.  There were also companies that were looking at creating new loan products for people exactly like that who have had damaged credit for a variety of good reasons, not something they did to themselves.  What you should be able to do is make a down payment, have a good track record of work history, and provide full documentation.  That is a hugely underserved market right now, and somebody is going to come in and serve it before too long, including the subprime number.  We can officially say no one will ever market in the subprime again.

There are definitely creditworthy people who are getting told no in this marketplace.  The California Association of Realtors is going to do a lot of presentations, and one of the charts basically showed that if you buy in San Bernardino, you save $500 a month over if you rent in the median price home.  For that to be the driver, you may have a bad taste in your mouth about owning, but if it saves you $6 grand a year you are probably going to try and get one.  However, this would be if you had the down payment that you need to buy the house in the first place and if you can find something to buy.  It is interesting with the mortgage rates being what they are, home prices still being at the low end of the scale, and the affordability vs. rental rates, you would expect to see more buying activity than what we are seeing right now.  It really appears that with down payment issues being one of the gaiting factors, another is there are a lot of people who just don’t want the long-term commitment right now since they are not completely happy with their employment status and would like the ability to move and find a new job without having to get out from under a long-term mortgage.  We are in that cycle right now where psychologically a lot of consumers have decided not to be buyers, and it will probably take time for that cycle to adjust again.

Bruce said when they went to do some 1031 exchanges in Texas, they really had to interview people and try to understand why they were doing what they were doing.  Bruce said some people were buying a house that was an 1800 square foot house in a nice area for $100 grand that was running for $1300.  The PI payment would have been $800.  Bruce was wondering why they were renting and why this was better.  They would tell him that Texas real estate goes up so few times in their lifetime that owning it has cost them every time they had to get rid of it or get transferred.  In their way of mind, it was the smartest idea to pay more for rent than have to sell a house.  In California, we have not been taught this but rather to own things most of the time.  The recent damage probably has some residual caution attached to it more so than normal.  The snapback is probably worse in places such as California, Arizona, and Nevada.  Rick read a recent RealtyTrac report where they were analyzing some properties in Las Vegas, and the average foreclosure start had a property with an LTV of 324%.  When you look at that kind of thing, it does urge caution before you enter into a formal agreement.

Apparently real estate prices can go down occasionally, you just have to figure out when and sidestep it if you can.  Bruce said he has also noticed a change in attitude toward lenders, including with principal reductions.  Chase actually has a letter out that has two phases to it.  They are basically mailing people letters that say they could not get a hold of them, so here is your new loan mod, new payment, and new payment coupons.  The second part of the letter said to just sign the bottom of the agreement of the principal reduction and send the pre-stamped envelope back to them.  This would then accomplish their principal reduction.  This happened courtesy of the Attorney General’s Summit and the National Mortgage Settlement.  Bank of America sent out over 200,000 similar notices saying they thought they were going to qualify for principal balance reduction and to get in touch with them.  They ended up getting a woefully poor response.  Rick said he has heard from a number of the servicers doing exactly what they were told was okay.  If their clients are not going to contact them, then they just give them their new deal.  Write it down, sign on the line, send it back, and it will all be official.  Even at that, Rick Sharga said his understanding was the response rates were not what they had hoped for.

Bruce interviewed Lance Martin, who is was a big REO agent and has a growing short sale business.  Just before the radio interview they did with him, he door knocked ten homes in Moreno Valley that were scheduled for sale the next week, one week away from the trustee sale date.  Lenders are even actually paying people to cooperate with a short sale.  None of them were interested in the least, and the reason was if they agreed with a short sale, they were not afraid of the trustee sale date since that would have come and gone many times.  They were not interested in cooperating with the short sale because that meant some kind of payment for housing would emerge from that decision.  There are an awful lot of borrowers who have figured out how to play the system, and if you have been living rent-free for a year or two, it is probably easy to get used to that arrangement.  You become numb to the notion that at some point somebody is going to eventually foreclose on the property and you have to come up with another solution.

Rick said he has also heard the same thing from servicers who contact homeowners.  Rick said his company buys a lot of performing loans; and when you buy these loans you try to modify as many of them as you can.  It is not only better for the borrower, but it is actually the best financial return for the investor to have those loans performing.  You would be surprised how often a servicer will be working on one of those loans that was purchased at a discount and offers a principal balance reduction.  The borrowers are often very polite and say it was nice of them to make the offer, but that reduced payment would be the first payment they made in two years.  It is difficult in this kind of environment to be more successful than most servicers are at doing loan modifications.  You need an interested borrower in order to be successful.

Bruce thinks people have been drug through the ringer a few times, so it is possible the mailer is coming at a bad time where they were probably interested at one point, were denied, and went through a process they felt was pretty rough.  Now they may not be interested in opening any letter from B of A.  There is clearly an awful lot of borrower fatigue, and that is a big part of the issue.  If you were trying to do a loan modification through one of the larger servicers earlier in the cycle, you probably never want to speak with a financial institution again since it was not a pleasant experience.  The servicer operations were never really set up to handle a massive wave of delinquencies and problem loans.  You are dealing with an industry that has a success rate of over 99% of all loans that were issued.  They suddenly have a 400% increase in the volume of problem loans and loans that really did not have any easy solutions that you could pull off the shelf to fix.  The mechanisms simply broke down, and it was frustrating for everybody.

We have faced unprecedented times, and this is a Great Depression of an industry.  Bruce said as he looks at it now, he sees prices going up now.  The Norris Group is in the buy/sell business and had a good month last month.  A lot of it had to do with them getting more for the properties.  This is something that is definitely starting to occur in which we are starting to see prices go up.  As prices go up, some of that $10 trillion of debt that we have on a value of property that diminished starts to become even instead of over-encumbered.  With what is going on in the last two quarters with what is going on with principal increase in the median average home price, there have been over 1 million borrowers going from negative equity to equilibrium or positive equity.  This is a pretty significant number when you stop to think about it.  As home prices do appreciate, we will see a lot of that paper debt disappear and a lot of the loans get right-sized.  This will really help psychologically if nothing else.  You can at least make a case for continuing to make your payment.  You now see there is some hope at the end of the rainbow.

There was recently a big bulk sale that went down in Florida with 600+ homes.  Bruce wondered if this is a typical pile that in which Carrington would be a participant bidder.  Rick said this was actually part of the FHFA pilot program with the selling off of the 2500 Fannie Mae properties.  They secured winning bids for about 2,000 properties in which they were unable to move a bulk pool in the Atlanta region for a variety of reasons.  This was anything but a typical bulk sale since those properties sold at 96% of BPO.  This was almost like a trustee sale.  The winning bidder only put about 10% of the cash down, and the balance was financed by Fannie Mae through a joint venture.  It was not exactly a typical sale, and 80% of the properties were currently being rented out.  This was the pile of programs that got a lot of attention about a year ago when it was first announced.  It was also the first of the pools to actually close, although there will most likely be a few more announcements over the course of the rest of the quarter.

In California, there was another pile of properties that were sold, and the California Association of Realtors disagreed with the process.  There were 484 properties in Riverside and Los Angeles Counties that were part of the pool.  What CAR was concerned about was this could become the status quo with FHFA moving large pools rather than pushing things through the more traditional channel.  Realistically, it looks like it is a one-time deal, and at 484 properties it is a rounding error in a state where you typically see 5,000-7,000 REOs change hand every month.  It is very likely we are going to see a very similar arrangement.  95%+ of BPO is being financed through these JVs with Fannie.  It has been a little big controversial in California, and you really can’t make a mathematical argument that says Fannie Mae needs to move these things in large pools since there is so much interest in the properties.  Rick said his perspective is there are 65,000 REOs in California that have not been sold, and there are another 250,000 properties of foreclosures.  Anything we can do to move this inventory out more quickly just leads to a more rapid housing market recovery.

Rick Sharga can be heard again on the panel for I Survived Real Estate 2012, which will take place Friday, October 19.

The Norris Group would like to thank its Gold Sponsors for supporting I Survived Real Estate: Adrenaline Athletics, Coldwell Banker Pioneer Real Estate, Elite Auctions, FIBI, Inland Empire Investors Forum, Inland Valley Association of Realtors, Investor Experts Incorporated, Keller Williams of Corona, Keystone CPA, Las Brisas Escrow, Mike Cantu, Northern California Real Estate Investors Association, Northern San Diego Real Estate Investors Association, Personal Real Estate Magazine, Realty 411 Magazine, Rick and LeAnne Rossiter, Southwest Riverside County Board of Realtors, Starz Photography, uDirect IRA, Wilson Investment Properties, Tony Alvarez, Westin South Coast Plaza.  See isurvivedrealestate.com for more on the event and all of the I Survived Real Estate sponsors.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 9/26/12

Wednesday, September 26th, 2012

Today’s News Synopsis:

Pending home sales increased 2.7% month-over-month last month, but decreased 2.% year-over-year.  Mortgage applications increased 2.8% last week with mortgage rates at their lowest on record.  California Governor Jerry Brown signed the final parts of the California Homeowner Bill of Rights into law on yesterday according to an announcement by Kamala Harris.


In The News:

DS News“Pending Home Sales Down Yearly in California: C.A.R.” (9-26-12)

“A lack of properties, mainly REOs, is crimping pending home sales in California, according to a release from the California Association of Realtors (C.A.R.).”

Housing Wire“KBW: 2013 recession looms without fiscal cliff fix” (9-26-12)

“The U.S. economy could fall into recession in early 2013 if Congress fails to stop a looming fiscal cliff made up of automatic spending cuts and tax hikes.”

NAHB- “Pace of New-Home Sales Holds Steady in August “ (9-26-12)

Following a substantial gain in July, the pace of new-home sales held virtually unchanged at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 373,000 units in August, according to newly released figures from HUD and the U.S. Census Bureau.”

CNN Money- “Private equity could be your next landlord (Video)” (9-26-12)

“A number of firms, like GTIS Partners in New York, are buying thousands of single family homes to rent them out.”

Bloomberg“Commercial Property Sales Outlook for U.S. Cut by ULI” (9-26-12)

“The Urban Land Institute cut its forecast for U.S. commercial real estate sales by 12 percent to $748 billion through 2014 because projections for economic growth are “down considerably” from six months ago.”

DS News“Final California Homeowners’ Rights Bills Signed into Law” (9-26-12)

California attorney general Kamala Harris announced Tuesday that the final parts of the California Homeowner Bill of Rights were signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown.”

Housing Wire“MBA: Mortgage apps rise 2.8% on record low rates” (9-26-12)

“Mortgage rates hit new record lows last week, spurring growth in loan application filings.  The Mortgage Bankers Association says applications increased 2.8% for the week ending Sept. 21.”

Inman“Brokers bullish on housing, worried about recruiting” (9-26-12)

Real estate brokerage executives are increasingly confident about housing markets and the economy, but cite recruiting and training the next generation of agents as top concerns.”

Realty Times“Existing Home Sales Improve as Mortgage Rates Remain Low” (9-26-12)

“The housing market recovery continues its pace as shown in the latest report from the National Association of Realtors.”

DS News“Survey: Election Influences Timing for 25% of Potential Homebuyers” (9-26-12)

“After conducting an online survey including 2,570 U.S. adults, MortgageMarvel.com reported 25 percent of Americans said the upcoming presidential election would influence the timing of their decision to buy a home.”

Hard Money Loan Closed

Huntington Park, California hard money loan closed by The Norris Group private lending. Real estate investor received loan for $98,000 on a 3 bedroom, 2.5 bathroom home appraised for $154,000.

 

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Real Wealth Game Changers Expo in Costa Mesa Friday-Sunday, September 28-30, 2012.

Bruce Norris of The Norris Group will be at the Apartment Owners Association in Los Angeles on Wednesday, October 17, 2012.

The Norris Group is holding its fifth annual I Survived Real Estate 2012 in Yorba Linda on Friday, October 19, 2012.

Looking Back:

The sale of new homes dropped 2.3% in August 2011, according to NAHB.  For the second day in a row, U.S. Treasury bond yields increased.  The Federal Reserve hoped to work together with the White House to coordinate efforts to keep interest rates down by purchasing longer-term mortgage-backed securities and Treasuries.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.