The Norris Group Blog

California Real Estate Headline Roundup

Posts Tagged ‘boom’

The Norris Group Real Estate News Roundup 8/13/10

Friday, August 13th, 2010

Video Blog Sources:

ABC News – “Housing Summit May Yield Fannie and Freddie Clues” (8-12-10) To air on  Treasury website Tuesday.

Sacramento Bee –  “Californias’ Income Falls For First Time Since WWII” (8-11-10)

Los Angeles Times“Fed to resume buying Treasury bonds” (8-11-10)

Foreclosure Radar Report – www.foreclosureradar.com

Inman“FHA premium changes pushed to Oct. 4″ (8-12-10)

Today’s News Synopsis:

Equity from the boom has now disappeared and many homeowners are deciding not to pay what they owe. Builders are shrinking the size of new projects as fewer consumers want McMansions. Moody’s sees increasing weakness in the commercial market and the U.S. government appears not to be sure how to move forward to avoid the much talked about double dip recession.

In The News:

New York Times“Debts Rise, and Go Unpaid, as Bust Erodes Home Equity” (8-11-10)

“During the great housing boom, homeowners nationwide borrowed a trillion dollars from banks, using the soaring value of their houses as security. Now the money has been spent and struggling borrowers are unable or unwilling to pay it back.”

RisMedia“Builders Shrink Homes to Fit Buyers’ Newly Modest Tastes” (8-13-10)

“I do believe the younger generation isn’t looking to build mansions anymore,” Palazzolo said. “They are looking at simpler lives. They aren’t looking for the same houses that the baby boomers were.”

AP“Homes lost to foreclosure up 6 pct from last year” (8-12-10)

“The number of U.S. homes lost to foreclosure surged in July, another sign lenders are moving quicker to take back properties from homeowners behind in payments. Lenders repossessed 92,858 properties last month, up 9 percent from June and an increase of 6 percent from July 2009, foreclosure listing firm RealtyTrac Inc. said Thursday.”

Market Watch“Monetary policy in a time of deleveraging” (8-11-10)

“The U.S. economy is on the edge of the cliff, threatening to plunge back into ruinous recession, but the worst part is that Washington won’t do anything to stop it. ”

Bloomberg - “Related News:Opinion · Insurance · Retail .U.S. Is Bankrupt and We Don’t Even Know It: Laurence Kotlikoff” (8-10-10)

“Let’s get real. The U.S. is bankrupt. Neither spending more nor taxing less will help the country pay its bills.”

Housing Wire“Fifth Third Converts 70% of HAMP Trials to Permanent Status” (8-13-10)

“Fifth Third Mortgage Co., the mortgage unit of Fifth Third Bancorp, so far converted 70% of its trial Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) plans into permanent modifications.”

Housing Wire“Moody’s Sees CMBS Delinquency Poised to Rise 9%-11% in 12 Months” (8-13-10)

“Moody’s Investors Service expects the share of commercial mortgage-backed securities loans that are delinquent or in special servicing to continue to rise over the next year. Analysts expect delinquencies to increase by 9% to 11% during the next 12 months with loans in special servicing climbing to about 20%, which would be up from the current 11.3% and 5% a year ago.”

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

186-TNG Radio – Daniel Phelan 8-7-10

Friday, August 6th, 2010

Daniel-Phelan

Daniel Phelan

CEO of Pacific Southwest Realty Services


streamitunes

download

rss

September 17th, 2010, The Norris Group returns with its award winning event I Survived Real Estate 2010. The Norris Group has assembled an incredible line up of industry experts to discuss the state of REO from the inside. Topics will include regulatory intervention and aftermath, bulk buying, myths and facts, and opportunities emerging for real estate professionals. 100 percent of the proceeds support the Orange County affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure. This event would not be possible without generous help from the following platinum partners: Foreclosure Radar and Sean O’Toole, the San Diego Creative Real Estate InvestorsAssociation and Bill Tan, Investors Workshops and Shawn Watkins and Angel Bronsgeest, Invest Club for Women and Iris Veneracion and Bobby Alexander, San Jose Real Estate Investors Association and Geraldine Barry, Claudia Buys Houses, Frye Wiles, MVT Productions, and White House Catering.

This week Bruce is joined by Daniel Phelan. Daniel is the CEO of Pacific Southwest Realty Services. He is responsible for this company’s mortgage operations. Pacific Southwest Realty Services is an investment firm focused on commercial real estate. It represents and advises both real estate clients and institutional investors in debt. It is involved in equity placement, strategic planning, property sales and loan administration.

In 2006, Daniel’s company was heavily involved in the financing of commercial real estate. His company financed $1.5 billion of commercial real estate per year for every year of the boom.

Daniel does not think that investors perceived a high level of risk in the prices they were paying for real estate during the boom. Prices had been steadily increasing since July 1993. Commercial real estate had a continuous growth pattern all the way to 2007. If you had only been in the business for 15 years and had only seen positive growth, then you probably wouldn’t feel at risk.

The lending side was probably looking at the boom similarly. There was a lot of competition, because Wall Street entered the market. There was a tremendous amount of debt capital in the market, and it was extremely competitively priced. These prices made real estate investments that much more enticing. People saw the need to get their capital invested in some form, and commercial real estate was perceived to be a safe investment.

In 2006 to 2007, down payments were reduced because of the confidence of the market. Borrowers were getting into commercial properties with only 20 percent. Historically, you could probably get most properties financed with 25 to 30 percent down. However, 75 percent is considered to be a more appropriate and safe number.

There are two tiers of debt. Most banks is recourse, but most non-bank debt is nonrecourse. 99.9 percent of the debt for life insurance companies and pension funds is nonrecourse. Because Daniel’s company works with these kinds of firms, they could only look to the real estate for satisfaction of a debt following a default. From 2005 to 2007, many banks backed off their recourse loans and went nonrecourse.

The source of capital during the boom came from portfolio lenders, such as life insurance companies and banks, and nonportfolio lenders, such as securitized lenders and Wall Street lenders. If you were trying to accomplish high loan to value with lower rates, then you probably got involved in the commercial mortgage backed securities market. You would expect a rate of 110-120 over treasuries. Those loans would be pooled into $2 billion pools, and then sold on Wall Street.

Mortgages made near 2006 are not doing well right now. Underwriting standards were very loose at that time. The default rates for those issuances are above 5 percent, and sometimes above 10 percent.

Mezzanine financing can be compared to second trust deed. It is a debt placed behind a first trust deed. It is used for taking cash out of a property, cover tenant improvements, or buy out existing partners to recapitalize the partnership.

During the boom, mezzanine debt could be taken at a 7 to 8 percent rate on the low end. The mezzanine debt today is going for above 10 percent. It is not available for the same loan to value rate. In 2006, you could get 90 percent loan to value. Today, you would be lucky if you got mezzanine debt for 65 percent loan to value. You may not be able to get it at all.

If you intend to occupy a commercial building, you could get 90 percent financing from a bank loan. This is only available to owner occupants, and it is only available in a purchase situation, not a refinance situation. If you were buying a multi-tenant investment property, you probably would get financing from life insurance companies. Banks are beginning to come back to the commercial investment market. With these deals, banks are looking for a full relationship with bank accounts and operating accounts. During the second quarter, the commercial mortgage backed securities market starting coming back. However, this market is not coming back quickly. Daniel’s company funded its first two cmbs loans since 2007.

Daniel’s company always looks at the operating history and income of a property, and then he makes a reasonable expectation of how well that property will operate over time. The projection for those properties is typically not very good. In 2006-07 we had not been hit by unemployment. Most tenants were performing well, and occupancy rates were above 90 percent.

Many commercial loans are coming due in 2012. These loans were underwritten in 2002. These loans are going to cause a big problem. In 2002, underwriting standards were not that “out of wack”. Prices have come down a lot, but they are still greater than what they were in 2002. Daniel think there is plenty of capital to refinance the debt on those properties, and in many cases, lenders are willing to roll over those loans. The bigger problem comes in during 2014 to 2017. During these years, you will have loans on properties with significantly diminished values. At that time, you may start having tenant default issues.

Construction on commercial real estate is not going to perform well. Daniel does not know of any bank that did a commercial construction loan in 2008-09. However, there are some banks now that are willing to loan on a multifamily property now.

Residential real estate is beginning to experience a large number of strategic defaults. Commercial loans are also beginning to default, but not as badly. Commercial property owners can make their payments so long as 70 percent of the tenants are making their payments. Commercial loans are made based on the ability of a property to make income. The commercial property owners that will experience difficulty are the ones that have let go of workers. They may have a large amount of space, but are only using a small portion of it. When their leases come due, these owners will probably move out to a smaller space. This will hurt larger commercial properties.

Most cap rates during the peak were around 6 to 7 percent. For multifamily properties and apartments, cap rates were around 5 percent. As of last year, most cap rates have moved up to 8 to 9 percent. The reason why we have not experienced a dramatic change in cap rates is because of Fannie and Freddy’s involvement.

Daniel believes we are going to see more problems in 2010 rather than improvement. Sales are going to start again, but they are going to have to pay 35 percent down rather than 25 percent.

For more information about The Norris Group’s California hard money loans or our California Trust Deed investments, visit the website or call our office at 951-780-5856 for more information. For upcoming California real estate investor training and events, visit The Norris Group website and our California investor calendar. You’ll also find our award-winning real estate radio show on KTIE 590am at 6pm on Saturdays or you can listen to over 170 podcasts in our free investor radio archive.

Thank you for being a Gold Sponsor for I Survived Real Estate 2010: Delmae Properties, Elite Auctions, Entrust California, Inland Empire Investors Forum, Keystone CPA, Las Brisas Escrow, Leivas Financial Services, Mike Cantu, North San Diego Real Estate Investors Association, Northern California Real Estate Investors Association, Personal Real Estate Investor Magazine, Realty 411 Magazine, San Jose Real Estate Investor Association, Tony Alvarez, and Westin South Coast Plaza.

169-TNG Radio – Harry Dent 4-10-10

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Harry-Dent

Harry Dent

Author and Economist

(Full Bio)

stream

itunes

download

rss

This week Bruce Norris is joined once again by Harry Dent. Harry is the president of the H.S. Dent Foundation, which publishes the H.S. Dent forecast. His mission is to help people understand change. He is the author of many books, which include The Great Boom Ahead 1992 and The Roaring 2000s and The Great Depression Ahead.

The title The Great Depression Ahead is gutsy. This book came out in 2009. Harry finished writing the book in the first half of 2008. However, we had some significant events occur at the end of 2008. The only thing that really surprised Harry was the stock market rally. He assumed that the economy would get worse, and as it got worse, the government would stimulate it. Harry predicted the stock market would bounce to 9800 and maybe even 11,800. We are right in the middle of that zone right now. Short term indicators predict that we might go even higher in the near future. However, he thought this stock bounce would begin and end earlier. Harry does not believe the recovery will last, because the baby boomers will go from spending to saving.

Harry defines a depression as an extended downturn in which you also see a deflation in prices. The reason why prices go down is because banks and loans are failing. This destroys credit and money. The deleveraging of credit causes deflation. In a depression, everything goes down. In an inflationary downturn like the 1970s, real estate goes up. Real estate does well during inflation. The failure of the banking system is the biggest shock an economic system can have. Harry believes that later this year and in 2011 we will go into a depression.

Alan Greenspan once said, “I watched my whole intellectual education fall apart in 2008”. That took a lot of guts to say, and it was astonishing to think that someone like Greenspan had studied economics for 50 years but still estimated incorrectly. Economists can look at a chart and come to two completely different conclusions.

Anyone who has studied business cycles throughout history knows that human greed takes over every time. Anytime you have low regulation, low interest rates, and bubbles building, people go nuts. People start thinking that the market will never go down, and the banks will lend to anyone. If bubbles go on for long enough, anyone will buy into a bubble. Its not a matter of intelligence, it’s a matter of understanding human nature, and that is where economists fall short. All economists look at is statistics.

There are no exceptions to the cycle of economics. The economy always goes from summer to fall, from inflation to disinflation. In the fall season is when you get bubbles, and when you get bubbles, the government always claims it can fix the problem, but they cannot and they have proven this over and over again. Bubbles have to deflate. We don’t want real estate to be so expensive that young people cannot afford it.

The bigger the boom the bigger the bust. Fortunately, we have a tool that tells you how long a boom will last approximately, and when it will wind down. Harry predicted how the economy would change by looking at the birth index. Booms always lead to excesses, and excessive lending and business expansion.

Japan had a real estate bubble similar to ours. They had excessive lending and unaffordable real estate prices. They had a demographic boom peak before the rest of the world, because they were the only major country who did not have a baby boom after WWII. Japan went through their downturn while the rest of the world was in the greatest boom of history. They didn’t have as much deflation as we will have, and their export industries can still be working at 120 percent. Japan also entered their crisis as a net creditor to the world. Almost all their debt was financed by their own citizens, so they had more capacity to stimulate and keep stimulating.

The U.S. is entering this downturn, and the whole country is going down with it. Baby boom demographics are down around the world. The world has also had a banking crisis and real estate bubble. We’re dragging people down with us, but they would have gone down anyways. The U.S. is the biggest net debtor in the world. We owe trillions of dollars to other countries. 50 percent of our debt is financed by foreign investors. This is contributing to the world downturn.

In 2011, Harry believes debt will overwhelm the banking system. This will cause the deficit to reach about $22 trillion. Harry thinks the debt will encourage our government to borrow even more, and we will pay for it. Japan tried to do this, and they will be sorry for it. Their debt to GDP ratio is 2.5 times what ours is. The only reason why they are surviving is because they are still paying interest rates on that debt at less than 2 percent. In the next decade, they will have to pay market rates like the rest of the world. Japan never truly deflated their bubble. They deflated their businesses, but they didn’t deflate their financial institutions. They have no way to easily get themselves out of this trouble.

Harry believes that Europe is going to start having debt trouble as well. When this happens, France and Germany will have to pick up the tab, but they won’t want to have any part in that. They will demand that the other countries cut their spending and raise taxes to cover their own debt.

In the United States, healthcare and social security expenses are already at costs above what we can afford, and we are now looking to expand that. Company and government pensions are unrealistically generous. Once we get to the point where we have to cut those pensions, people are going to go nuts. There may be riots. Bruce agrees with Harry on this issue. $46 trillion in unfunded medicare, Medicaid, and social security liabilities have already been promised to people. That is 4 times as much as the current government debt. We can’t afford the healthcare we have, and now they are trying to pass another healthcare bill.

The government will have to confess its inability to pay the baby boom generation its social benefits around 2012 or 2013 when the crisis will be at its worst. We will not get out of the mortgage and housing crisis until 2012. Harry believes that Obama will not be reelected, because he became president at a bad time.

We are going to have an enormous amount of debt in the next couple years, which is part of the reason why Harry does not support the new health reform bill. We will not be able to sustain the cost of this new program, and Bruce doubts that Congress has fully read through this health care bill.

When you have deflation, it exaggerates the current debt level. Harry believes that this will cause the government to scale back on age limits for social security and health care. Private debt will scale down substantially. All the debt ratios will get worse. Many businesses will go under or merge with other businesses. Banks will have to write off trillions in loans. Deflation works to restructure debt, rather than pay it off. If we had to pay all that debt off with deflated dollars, it would be much more difficult. At the end of this deflation period, we will be much stronger. Stronger companies will take over weak companies, costs get cut, and real estate goes down.

There are very few properties for sale in California right now, and it is easy to resale. The default rate has doubled in the last 12 months, but the foreclosure numbers have been cut in half. Banks are not foreclosing on people, because they do not know what to do with so many properties. Despite the 6 percent GDP, which Harry does not believe will last, defaults will continue to increase and foreclosures will continue to hit the market. This will suppress real estate prices. Banks will eventually have to write off a lot of those loans and foreclose. This is what will kill the recovery. Once the banks realize that real estate won’t recover, we will see the next banking crisis.

There is a psychology attached to exaggerated events like booms. When booms occur, people rationalize their decisions and the same thing happens in a down cycle. When things go down, people develop a pessimistic attitude towards the future. Baby boomers have not yet had a major downturn in both the real estate and stock market at the same time. This crash is going to cause retirements to disappear for baby boomers, and this loss will cause them to save even more. They will have to work longer but they may not be able to get jobs, because older people cost more in benefits. Harry is forecasting 15 percent unemployment.

Harry believes interest rates will increase this year. However, the bond market will eventually notice that the economy is slowing and then interest rates will decrease. This is what happened in 1931 when the crisis was building. We had a great boom market in bonds from 1932 to 1940 when interest rates were falling. In the next decade we will see deflation. If you want to buy long term bonds, Harry encourages people to wait until later this year or early next year. If you want to refinance, you may want to wait until interest rates come back down. This downturn in interest rates will happen between 2011 and 2013.

Bruce never thought he would see interest rates go down this low. Bruce began his real estate career in 1981 when he refinanced his house at 17.5 percent. Now we are at sub five percent rates, and we may see rates go even lower. Harry agrees and claims we may see rates go down to 3 to 4 percent.

168-TNG Radio – Harry Dent 4-3-10

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

 

Harry-Dent

Harry Dent

Author and Economist

(Full Bio)

streamitunes

download

rss

This week Bruce Norris is joined by Harry Dent. Harry is the president of the H.S. Dent Foundation, which publishes the H.S. Dent forecast. His mission is to help people understand change. He is the author of many books, which include The Great Boom Ahead 1992 and The Roaring 2000s and The Great Depression Ahead.

Before he wrote his books, Harry was working towards a degree in Economics, but then changed to Finance and Accounting. He felt that economics did not teach much, and that most economists were not able to predict anything. He eventually went to Harvard Business School and studied business strategy and marketing. This is probably why he comes to different conclusions than many economists.

Harry has been studying demographics in his consulting work. In 1998, he was sitting in front of the S&P 500 and the Birth Index for Baby Boomers. He looked at those 2 charts and he noticed that they looked a lot alike. Harry knew that the peak in spending was between 45 and 49 for the average economy, and this knowledge led him to conclude that he could predict the economy 50 years in advance with just one indicator. A boom typically starts when a generation is young, and ends when they begin hitting their 40s. Not too long after, he discovered that there were many correlations between different economic factors.

Harry’s business of predictions has been an ongoing learning process. He has extended his studies to real estate and different pieces of the economy. Recently, he had to revise his book The Great Depression, because he got new information about merging markets between countries like Europe and Australia. Emerging countries do not have the same kind of spending habits as that of developed countries. This is why he makes different predictive calculations for merging countries.

Attempting to accurately predict the future can be exhausting, because every time you think you’ve accounted for all the factors, you discover there is something missing. Harry has to account for political cycles, commodity cycles, urbanization and other factors which affect the merging of countries. Bruce feels that Harry’s non-arrogant mentality lends credibility to Harry’s work. The fact that Harry is open to new information, and to the idea of revising his own theories, is why Bruce pays attention to him.

Harry’s first book was named The Power to Predict. This book is about indicators like “the spending wave”, “the 46 year lag,” and “the inflation indicator.” This book also contained the “S-curve,” which describes the 4-stage business and economic cycle. Harry predicted that DOW would hit 10,000 by the early 2000s, and that the boom would end by about 2007. This book accounted for new technologies like the internet and new car models. When new technologies develop, they cause bubbles.

Japan was mentioned in this first book as well. Harry claimed that Japan was going to slow, and that the United States and Europe would improve. People thought he was crazy for making that claim, because at that time, Japan was booming with growth. In 1992, people thought the U.S. had seen its best days, but Harry claimed that there would be a boom around the year of 1998 to 2000, which would result in a government surplus. Harry also predicted at that time that inflation and interest rates would decrease around that time.

Bruce feels that the legitimacy of Harry’s predictions is confirmed by his ability to predict both bad times and good times. Also, Harry uses very specific terms when describing the future of economics. Harry doesn’t use moderate language in his predictions. He has noticed that economies tend to either be bullish or bearish. The good times don’t last forever, and he thinks that people who make predictions about never-ending prosperity are foolish. When markets go up, they tend to increase for 25 to 27 years. When markets go down, the downturn typically lasts 12 to 14 years. Harry currently believes that we will have a period of demographic weakness from 2008 to 2023.

Every 40 years we get a major downturn and the government tries to fix it, but they cannot do this because they cannot fight demographics. When you’re in a demographic boom, the government can stimulate because you have a generation that needs to spend and borrow a larger amount of money. Harry is claiming that the current government stimulus program will fail, because it is simply causing the younger generation to buy earlier when they would have bought a home in the future. Also, Harry does not believe the baby boom generation will be affected by the stimulus, because they are done with the home buying part of their lives.

Most people only study one theme of economics. This means that if they are bullish, then they will selectively read bullish material. These people have already come to a conclusion before studying the evidence.

In the early 70s, Bruce read a book from Howard Ruff named The Coming Bad Year. At that time, Bruce did not have much knowledge of economics, so he read this book as if it came from God. One of the suggestions that Howard made in this book was to buy 200 pounds of wheat. At that time, Bruce had two kids and he didn’t want to run out, so he bought 1000 pounds. This experience taught Bruce that you cannot believe everything you read from proclaimed experts.

Economists don’t have tools to project 50 years in advance, but Harry believes that demographics can do this. Harry predicts that the value of gold will decrease in value during the downturn, because this is a deflation season not an inflation season. This is contrary to the opinions of many people, but Bruce actually tends to lean in favor of Harry’s opinion on this matter.

The more popular you are as an economic writer, the more people respect your opinions, and the more likely they are to plan their lives according to your predictions. This is something that Harry thinks about frequently. Harry actually encourages people to read other authors who think contrary to his opinions, so they can have a fully educated opinion.

A long-term boom prediction is bound to have some down cycles mixed in. Bruce asks how one can know the difference between an anomaly downturn and a downturn which leads to a depression. If demographic trends are still up when downturns occur, then the market will eventually recover. Baby boomers are moving into their 50s and 60s. During this time, they will be saving more and spending less. This tells Harry that the government stimulus will not work.

It is easier to predict long trends than it is to predict precise downturn points. For example, during the past crash, our indicators led us to believe that the DOW wouldn’t go past 7200, but it actually went down to 6440.

Harry claims there is an 80-year new economic cycle. This 80-year cycle is described as the 4 seasons model. There are always 4 seasons that occur in economics just like summer, spring, winter, and fall. We had the spring boom during the 1940s to 1960s. From 68 to 82 we had the summer downturn in which we experienced inflation and low spending. From 1980 to we went through the fall boom in which the baby boom generation began to spend a lot. We are going from high inflation to low inflation, which causes lower interest rates. The stock market does well when interest rates are low and this causes a bubble. Now we are up against the winter season, in which all our bubbles will decrease and cause deflation.

This 80-year cycle occurs over two generation booms which last around 38 to 40 years each. This cycle is repetitive going backwards, but there is an exception. If you go back into the 1800s, we still had a similar cycle system, but the two generation cycles only lasted about 28 to 30 years. This is because we were more of a farming society at that time. We did not have so many powerful middle class consumers. Right now, the commodity cycle is less important to our countries cycle. Commodities only represent about 10 percent of our economy.

Bruce asks if Harry has a process to determine whether or not false predictions are based on something unforeseen. Harry assumes that when bad predictions are made, that something was missed. Most people assume that the markets just aren’t getting something, and those people will be vindicated. The automobile industry correlated with a technology bubble from 1912 to 1919, and then a big crash occurred in the 1920s. We assumed another bubble would happen in 2006, but we did not see this. Harry tried to find an explanation for this by searching through history. He found a commodity cycle and a geopolitical cycle. During the boom of 2006, we had oil prices dramatically increasing which affected our ability to accurately predict the effect of the boom. Also, we had war problems which affected Harry’s predictions.

Harry Dent’s website is www.hsdent.com

You can find his books there and other activities which his company is involved with.  Join us for part two with harry Dent next week.

97-TNG Radio – John Husing 11-22-08

Friday, November 21st, 2008

John-Husing

John Husing

Inland Empire Economist

stream

itunes

download

rss

Bruce Norris is joined once again by Inland Empire Economist and Specialist John Husing.

Bruce Norris mentions that The Norris Group is now ready to start purchasing properties with the intent to hold them as rentals. Bruce says we’re buying at 28% of what the lender was owed.

John takes Moreno Valley as an example of what happened in the last cycle with rentals. The injection of rentals in areas that were traditionally owner occupied caused problems. Rentals are generally not as well cared for as owner occupied properties in the area. Home values go down because of this. In areas dominated by rentals, calls for police soar. Soon turnover increases as renters look for the best deals and there’s soon a rent war. Side effects of too many rentals can cause many issues. John says Moreno Valley was destroyed by HUD in the last cycle because they didn’t even think about the effects to the communities.

In the stabilization act, money has been given to cities to help stop this issue. Cities can negotiate prices in bulk and then double escrow the homes at certain prices over to construction firms to bring them back to nice homes. They then sell these homes to qualified first time home buyers. San Bernardino did this in the last cycle. 90% of the people who purchased those homes were still in 10 years later.

Bruce mentions that homeownership levels got too high and that more rentals will be a natural conclusion. John thinks it’s more of a pricing question. If prices got down to a level that’s affordable, people will buy. He says California has never built enough homes for its population.

John says that demand for homes is accelerating greatly. Unfortunately, the supply of foreclosures is still coming in great quantity which continues to bring down prices. John feels the only real solution is to get the principal down.

Bruce says Riverside is one of the possible hot spots once this all turns around. John says the Inland region has more construction dirt available then other counties. Over the next 25 years, Southern California will add 6 million people. Orange County and San Diego are built out or zoned out of being able to build. LA is in a similar situation. Once we get through this downturn, the Inland region has tremendous growth opportunity.

Bruce says that people would rather be in California then many other states. For the next couple of years, people from other states will start to recognize the opportunity to move to California and be making the same payment or less and be able to live in a better climate. Bruce thinks we’ll see massive in migration. John says he too thinks people will be looking at California as a place to retire.

Bruce talks about how he got to Riverside and the massive growth that’s taken place. John explains the three stage growth process. By the late 70s, Riverside developers started developing in the area. People were putting up houses where people didn’t want to live. But affordability is important. Later, the entrepreneurial developers come out here because there was a market. Retail centers soon follow because of demand. Housing boom tends lead to population serving businesses coming into the area. Industrial developers follow after which creates blue collar jobs. The Inland area was in Stage 3 where we saw increasing upscale houses being built. The Inland Empire saw much younger people move into the area. This influx of young talent with higher education opens up the area for much different jobs and services. The Inland Empire economy will be back on John’s three stage development once we get through this cycle.

John says San Fernando and Orange County went through this same three stage growth cycle. Orange County went through stage three in the 70s. John tells the story of South Coast Plaza. Orange County is actually worried because it’s losing its young and educated workers to the Inland Empire.

In Riverside, all industries are having a difficult time. Residential construction brought in a large about of jobs. Warehousing and distribution have also been main drivers for jobs. Now that these have both slowed, unemployment has boomed.

Bruce asks John if the Feds will crank up infrastructure projects. John says that would be the way to help the economy. The influx of cash to consumers by the government in May didn’t work because they paid off debt or went to Walmart.

Bruce asks John about the difference in median incomes from the Orange County and Riverside. John says they are very different. However, if you take the median income and then subtract the cost of housing, it’s about dead even. As the economy approves, we’ll continue to pull more and more people from Orange County for this reason.

More on John Husing and his research at johnhusing.com

In August 2006, Dr. John Husing was listed by the L.A. Times Magazine as one of the 100 most powerful people shaping life in Southern California. He is a leading authority on the impact of the goods movement industry on the region, and in particular its role as a provider of upward economic mobility to blue collar workers. He has just completed major studies on the impact of the proposed Clean Truck Program at ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach and has recommended some changes in strategy.

In addition, Dr. Husing has spent decades studying the city & county economies of Southern California with a specialty on the Inland Empire. This research began when he began working on his doctoral thesis at Claremont Graduate University in 1964. For the past 43 years, Dr. Husing has conducted extensive research plus interviews with executives and entrepreneurs to understand the forces shaping Southern California. He has a deep understanding of our political process, having managed over 100 partisan and non-partisan campaigns. Today, he uses his extensive knowledge of the region and his political experience to explain the economy to business leaders and policy makers throughout the Southland.

Privately, John Husing enjoys life as an adventurer, taking treks into uncharted territories as well as traveling to 52 different countries. In recent years, he has twice entered the unexplored jungles of NW New Guinea to make first contact with previously undiscovered stone-aged tribes. His last trip was trekking over the Himalayas from Nepal into Tibet. Closer to home, Dr. Husing is an amateur genealogist with his American roots traced back 12 generations to Robert Fuller and his family on the Mayflower.